组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:66 题号:15954239

Some evidence that certain memory exercises make people smarter has stimulated the rise of online brain-training programs such as Lumosity. But at least one type of brain training may not work as advertised, a new study finds.

As expected, practicing improved volunteers’ performance on tests of memory and the ability to locate items quickly in busy scenes, say psychologist Thomas Redick of Indiana University Purdue University Columbus and his colleagues. That improvement did not, however, translate into higher scores on tests of intelligence and multitasking, the researchers report in the May Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

Redick’s investigation is part of a growing scientific debate about brain training, which is promoted by some companies as having a variety of mental benefits. Some researchers say that extensive instruction and training on memory tasks can indeed fortify reasoning and problem solving. Others are doubtful that active memory sessions may boost their working memory, the ability to keep in mind and compare several pieces of information.

Redick’s team studied 73 young adults, aged 18 to 30, divided into three groups. One group completed 20 training sessions over about six weeks on a task aimed at boosting working memory, the ability to keep in mind and compare several pieces of information.

A second group in the new study received 20 training sessions aimed at improving the ability to pick out novel shapes from large arrays (阵列) of similar-looking shapes. This group provided a comparison to see whether the effects of memory training differed from training on a different mental skill. A third group received no training.

In the two training groups, volunteers improved with practice on the task they were learning but showed no increases in tests of intelligence and of the total amount of information that could be held in mind.

Participants in the new study didn’t receive enough instruction and practice before memory sessions to benefit from the intervention (介入), Jaeggi says. Redick’s group also gave volunteers limited time to complete a series of shortened versions of standard intelligence tests, which probably limited any potential for scoring increases, she asserts.

But until larger studies with longer follow-ups are completed, Redick cautions against assuming that memory training smartens people up.

1. What can we learn about the study?
A.73 young adults received memory training.
B.The second group was aimed at testing memory skill.
C.Volunteers showed no improvements in tests of intelligence.
D.Further studies have been completed to support Redick’s findings.
2. What does the underlined word “fortify” mean?
A.increase.B.dominate.C.restore.D.boost.
3. Where is the text most likely from?
A.A personal diary.B.A biology textbook.C.A science magazine.D.A finance report.
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约260词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐1】About ten men in every hundred suffer from color blindness in some way. Women are luckier, only about one in two hundred is affected in this matter. Perhaps, after all, it is safer to be driven by a woman.

There are different forms of color blindness. In some cases a man may not be able to see deep red. He may think that red, orange and yellow are all shades of green. Sometimes a person can’t tell the differences between blue and green. In rare cases an unlucky man sees everything in shades of greena strange world in deed.

Color blindness in human beings is strange thing to explain. In a single eye there are millions very small things called “cones”. These help us see in a bright day and tell the differences between colors. There are also millions of “rods”, but these are used for seeing when it is nearly dark. They show us shapes but not color. Some insects have favorite colors. Mosquitoes like blue but do not like yellow. A red light will not attract insects but a blue lamp will. In similar way human being also have favorite colors by day and with the aid of the rods we can see shapes at night. One day we may even learn more about the invisible colors around us.

1. The passage is mainly about ________.
A.color and its surprising effects on driver
B.women being luckier than man that fewer of them are color blind
C.danger caused by color blindness
D.color blindness and how our eyes tell different colors and shapes
2. According to the passage, with the help of “cones” we can ________.
A.tell different colors
B.see in weak light
C.tell different shapes
D.tell orange from yellow
3. Why do some people say it is safer to be driven women?
A.Women are more careful.
B.There are fewer color blind women.
C.Women are fonder of driving than men.
D.Women are weaker but quicker in thinking.
4. Which of the following statements about color blind people is true?
A.Not all of them have the same problem in recognizing colors.
B.None of them can sec deep red but all can tell blue from green.
C.None of them can tell blue from green but all can see deep red.
D.All of them are lucky enough to see everything in shades of green.
2017-04-08更新 | 99次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约290词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章讲述了研究发现将孩子的娱乐屏幕时间限制在每天不到两个小时,以及足够的睡眠和身体活动,可以提高认知能力。

【推荐2】Limiting kids’ recreational (消遣的) screen time to less than two hours a day, along with enough sleep and physical activity, is associated with improved cognition (认知) , according to a study published in The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health.

The study included about 4 ,500 US children aged 8 to11 and measured their habits against the Canadian 24 – Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth. It found that 51% of the children got the recommended (建议的) 9 to 11 hours of uninterrupted sleep per night; 37% met the recreational screen time limit of two hours or less per day, while 18% met the physical activity recommendation of at least 60 minutes of accumulated physical activity a day. Only 5% of the children in the study met all three recommendations; 30% met none at all.

The researchers found that as each recommendation was met by a participant, there was a positive association with global cognition, which includes memory, attention, processing speed and language. Those who met all three had the most “superior” global cognition, followed by those meeting the sleep and screen time recommendation and finally the screen time recommendation alone, according to the study.

Other organizations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics – have guidelines in place to help with the management of children’s screen time. The organization suggests putting realistic rules or limits in place for how long your children are on their screens, knowing who they are talking to and what they are doing. The amount recommended screen time depends on the age of the child. Besides, parents should also make sure to encourage physical activity and have bedroom rules such as creating “ tech-free zones”.

1. Who are the target readers of this passage?
A.Researchers.B.Teachers.C.Parents.D.Children.
2. What is the main idea of this passage?
A.A study on children's screen time is published.
B.US children fail to meet movement guidelines.
C.Organizations are concerned about children's cognition
D.Limitation on children's screen time is linked to better cognition.
3. According to the passage, which of the following might contribute most to cognition?
A.Screen time limit.B.Sleep hours.
C.Physical activity time.D.Sleep hours and screen time limit.
4. Why does the American organization suggest creating" tech-free zones "?
A.To make sure children have enough physical playtime.
B.To make sure children have enough sleep time.
C.To make sure children have recreational time.
D.To protect children against radiation.
2022-03-10更新 | 132次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了在20世纪50年代,英国历史学家Northeaster Parkinson提出的帕金森琐碎定律。

【推荐3】In the 1950s, British historian Northeaster Parkinson came up with a concept which was later known as Parkinson’s Law of Triviality. It states that the amount of time spent discussing an issue in an organization is oppositely associated with its actual importance.

Parkinson’s Law of Triviality is also known as “bike-shedding (车棚)”, after the story Parkinson uses to illustrate it. He asks readers to imagine a financial committee meeting to discuss a three-point agenda. The points are as follows: A proposal for a10 million nuclear power plant; A proposal for a350 bike shed; A proposal for a21 annual coffee budget.

What happens? The committee ends up running through the nuclear power plant proposal in little time. It’s too advanced for anyone to really dig into the details. The discussion soon moves to the bike shed. Here, everyone’s an expert. In the end, the committee runs out of time and decides to meet again to complete their analysis.

Bike-shedding happens because the smaller a matter is, the more people will have an opinion on it, even when there is no genuine value to add. When something is outside of our circle of competence, like a nuclear power plant, we don’t even try to express an opinion. But when something is comprehensible, everyone wants to show that they know about the topic at hand.

How can we avoid bike-shedding? The main thing you can do is to have a clear purpose. Priya Parker, the author of The Art of Gathering: How We Meet and Why It Matters, says that any successful gathering needs to have a focused purpose. “Specificity,” she says, “is a crucial element.”

When it comes to choosing your list of invitees, Parker writes, “if the purpose of your meeting is to make a decision, you may want to consider having fewer cooks in the kitchen.” Getting the result you want - a thoughtful, educated discussion about that power plant - depends on having the right people in the room.

1. What is Parkinson’s purpose of presenting the imaginary meeting?
A.To state a fact.B.To clarify a concept.
C.To make a prediction.D.To make a comparison.
2. What can be inferred from Paragraph 4?
A.The more you know, the less you speak.
B.What is simple for you may be tough for others.
C.What requires more work may get less attention.
D.The more you put in, the better your result will be.
3. Which is the author’s suggestion for a successful meeting?
A.Planning before the meeting.
B.Getting the right people to the table.
C.Spending less time on the minor issues.
D.Taking different opinions into account.
4. What can be a suitable title for the text?
A.Purpose: The Key to an Effective Meeting
B.Talent: A Crucial Element in Organizations
C.The Bike Shed Effect: Avoiding Small Matters
D.Nuclear Power Plant: The Less-known Proposal
2023-11-30更新 | 163次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般