Glitter (小发光物) is everywhere on colorful holiday cards, on the handicrafts your child makes at school, and in the cosmetics (化妆品) you wear. However, glitter can be the bane of every parent and every primary school teacher. Beyond being hard to clean up, it’s also made of poisonous and unsustainable materials according to a press release from the University of Cambridge.
Now, a team of researchers from the university have found a new way to make glitter from cellulose (纤维素) found in plants, fruits and vegetables.Their findings were published in the journal Nature. The special feature of cellulose can bend light in such a way as to create bright colours through a process called “structural coloration”. The same phenomenon produces some of the brightest colours in nature, such as those of butterfly wings and peacock feathers, and results in colours which do not die away, even after a century.
“Traditional glitter is produced by using plastic, metal or even mineral, and the production process consumes a lot of energy,” said Silvia Vignolini, the paper’s senior author. “And the glitter can get into the soil and the ocean, which leads to an overall level of pollution. Consumers are starting to realise while glitter is fun, it also causes a lot of problems.”
In Europe, the cosmetics industry uses about 5, 500 tonnes of microplastics every year. For many years, Vignolini’s team has been getting cellulose from wood and transforming it into shiny, colourful materials to be used in cosmetics and other products. Actually, any type of plant material, even waste products like fruit peels, can be used. Using techniques which allow cellulose to produce coloured materials, the researchers of the team say that their materials could be used to replace the plastic glitter and the metal glitter that are widely used in cosmetics.
According to the researchers, the glitter alternative could be used in almost all the fields where regular glitter can be found. They even say that it can be added to food and drinks.
1. What does the underlined phrase “the bane of” in Paragraph 1 probably mean?A.The tool of. | B.The pride of. |
C.A headache for. | D.A favourite with. |
A.Its colour is lasting. | B.It can stand extreme heat. |
C.It can even be used for farming. | D.It is made from the wings or feathers of animals. |
A.still needs plastic to become shiny enough |
B.brings green materials to the cosmetics in-dustry |
C.fails to be well accepted in the European market |
D.is partly funded by the European cosmetics industry |
A.Glitter is more harmful than we think |
B.The cosmetics industry should use less glitter |
C.Revolutionary glitter may make a better world |
D.A new technology can make glitter more affordable |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】When you think of a robot, what do you see? A machine that looks a bit like you and me?
What a robot looks like depends on its purpose. Cleaning robots often look like little vacuums.
Whether they look like us or not, most robots have three essential parts that make them a robot: sensors, actuators and programs.
Together, these parts are what make a robot different from other gadgets you might have around your house, like your computer or your washing machine.
Second, a robot has actuators that allow it to move around.
Third, a robot needs a program that lets it act on its own based on what it is sensing.
A.Flying robots might have wings like birds. |
B.The past robots were not artificially intelligent. |
C.We might use our legs and feet to walk and run. |
D.This ability to act on one’s own is called autonomy. |
E.First, a robot has sensors that allow it to “see” the world. |
F.We would need some actuators so that the robot could move. |
G.The reality is that robots can have different shapes and sizes. |
【推荐2】The surface of Mars is etched(蚀刻) with ancient river valleys and lake basins. Some researchers think that liquid water once flowed on the Red Planet. Today, Mars is too cold for much, if any, liquid water to exist. And 3. 8 billion years ago, when the flowing water formed, the sun was fainter than it is today, making it even harder to imagine a warm Martian climate. That’s why many researchers think Mars may have gone in and out of deep freezes.
Some researchers have suggested that early Mars only melt when large asteroid(小行星) impacts or volcanic eruptions temporarily warmed the planet. But Kasting, a geologist at Pennsylvania State University, thinks warm windows from such dramatic events would have been too brief to carve the vast valleys that exist on Mars. Now, Kasting and his colleagues have come up with an alternative explanation: They think Mars may have experienced a series of climate cycles caused by changes in the strength of the greenhouse effect.
The idea goes like this: When Mars was cold and frozen, volcanoes continued to erupt the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and hydrogen into the atmosphere. There, the gas blanket trapped heat and warmed the planet up until liquid water began to flow, forming Mars’ rivers and lakes. However, warm temperatures and abundant water would also have sped up certain chemical reactions that consumed carbon dioxide, mitigating the greenhouse effect and cooling the planet back down again. Then the cycle would repeat.
Kasting shared his theory with other astronomers at the December meeting of the Ameri- can Geophysical Union in San Francisco, and in the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters. So far, Kasting’s team has only shown that such an explanation is possible. But the researchers say field trips could help test the idea by looking for evidence of multiple warm events, and their duration.
1. What made researchers believe that liquid water once existed on Mars?A.The color of the planet. | B.The geological features of Mars. |
C.The temperatures of the sun. | D.The natural climate of Mars. |
A.Large asteroids had no impact on Mars. |
B.Volcanic eruptions were very frequent on Mars. |
C.There were no carbon dioxide and hydrogen on Mars. |
D.The vast valleys on Mars couldn’t be formed in a short time. |
A.Reducing. | B.Imitating. | C.Predicting. | D.Enhancing. |
A.The publication of the journal. | B.The future Mars missions. |
C.The design of the climate model. | D.The cooperation with astronomers. |
It is the elephant’s great desire for food that makes it a disturber of the environment and an important builder of its habitat. In its continuous search for the 300 pounds of plants it must have every day, it kills small trees and under-bushes, and pulls branches off big trees. This results in numerous open spaces in both deep tropical forests and in the woodlands that cover part of the African savannas. In these open spaces are numerous plants in various stages of growth that attract a variety of other plant-eaters.
Take the rain forests for example. In their natural state, the spreading branches overhead shut out sunlight and prevent the growth of plants on the forest floor. By pulling down trees and eating plants, elephants make open spaces, allowing new plants to grow on the forest floor. In such situations, the forests become suitable for large hoofed plant-eaters to move around and for small plant-eaters to get their food as well.
What worries scientists now is that the African elephant has become an endangered species. If the elephant disappears, scientists say, many other animals will also disappear from vast areas of forest and savanna, greatly changing and worsening the whole ecosystem.
1. What does the underlined phrase “setting the terms” most probably mean?
A.Improving the quality. |
B.Worsening the state. |
C.Fixing the time. |
D.Deciding the conditions. |
A.showing the effect and then explaining the causes |
B.giving examples |
C.pointing out similarities and differences |
D.describing the changes in space order |
A.Forests and savannas as habitats for African elephants. |
B.The eating habit of African elephants. |
C.Disappearance of African elephants. |
D.The effect of African elephants’ search for food. |
A.They are home to many endangered animals. |
B.They result from the destruction of rain forests. |
C.They are attractive to plant-eating animals of different kinds. |
D.They provide food mainly for African elephants. |
【推荐1】Israeli Company Develops 3D Printed Beef
If there were an award for the funniest company name of 2022, then the 3D printed meat company “Steakholder” would win that award.
Israeli company Steakholder Foods Ltd. has introduced its new product, Omakase Beef Morsels, which are bioprinted with cultured meat. The bites are inspired by the world-famous Wagyu beef, famous for its fat marbling patterns (大理石花纹) in the meat, which is also very expensive.
The company was formed in 2019 and has an office in Israel and Belgium, and is now expanding its operations to the US.
Stakeholder uses stem cells from cattle for the production of its printed beef, and the muscle tissue and fat are printed from two separate bio-inks.
The process works by first selecting the animals to extract (提取) the stem cells from. The cells are selected from animals that will provide the best meat and yield. The next step is proliferation, in which the cells are placed into a nutrient rich reactor to multiply. When the cells reach appropriate numbers, the stem cells change into muscle cells and fat cells.
“This product marks a major step forward for us and for the cultured meat industry in general,” said Arik Kaufman, CEO of Steakholder Foods. “It is the result of a lot of hard work and our desire to achieve the highest level of meat possible through bioprinting and cell culture processes.”
So there you have it, guilt-free meat eating may be just around the corner.
A.The company has already achieved several milestones since it was founded. |
B.Its goal is to create sustainable meat products to replace meats such as beef, chicken and even fish. |
C.The layers of meat and fat can be regrouped in different proportions to create different flavor experiences. |
D.Additionally, producing meat without having to raise and kill cattle may work out better for ensuring animal welfare and overall health. |
E.The meat product is the first of its kind and was created using a specific 3D-bioprinting technology that was recently patented by the company. |
F.In the final steps, the muscle cells and fat cells are turned into meat, ready to be processed into the final product, whether it’s a burger, steak, or even a meatloaf. |
【推荐2】The first commercial airliner to cross the Atlantic on a purely high-fat, low-emissions fuel flew Tuesday from London to New York in a step toward achieving what supporters called “jet zero”.
The Virgin Atlantic Boeing 787 flight was powered without using fossil fuels, relying on so-called sustainable aviation (航空) fuel made up largely of tallow (动物油脂) and other waste fats and plant sugars. “The world will always assume something can’t be done, until you do it.” said Virgin founder Richard Branson, who was aboard the flight with government officials, engineers and journalists.
The UK Transport Department, which provided 1 million pounds to plan and operate the flight, called the test a “huge step towards j et zero” to make air travel more environmentally friendly, though large challenges remain in making the fuel widely available.
Sustainable aviation fuel, which reduces greenhouse gas emissions by about 70%, is the best near-term way for the international aviation industry to achieve its net zero target by 2050, the US Energy Department said.
Holly Boyd-Boland, president of corporate development at Virgin Atlantic, said the flight shows the fuel can power existing aircraft but said the challenge is enlarging production to get to enough volume so that they are using more sustainable aviation fuel every day.
While this is the first jetliner to make the trans-Atlantic journey using only the sustainable fuel, it is not a commercial flight and not the first jet to do so. Gulfstream Aerospace was the first to make the crossing earlier this month with a business jet powered only by the eco-fuel. Air France-KLM flew from Paris to Montreal two years ago using a mix of petroleum-based jet fuel and a synthetic (合成物) made from waste cooking oils.
“This flight somehow gets us closer to guilt-free flying. Sustainable aviation fuel represents around 0.1% of aviation fuel globally and will be very hard to expand sustainably, but the flight is a valuable try,” said policy director Cait Hewitt.
1. What can we infer from paragraph 2?A.The Boeing 787 has a special structure. |
B.Greener fuel has become a reality in a way. |
C.Airlines should put waste fats to good use. |
D.Fossil fuels will be replaced in the near future. |
A.It runs into technical difficulties. |
B.It is unsuitable for commercial flights. |
C.It is unable to gain the public recognition. |
D.It fails to power existing planes constantly. |
A.They follow in Virgin Atlantic’s footsteps. |
B.They take advantage of waste cooking oils. |
C.They develop sustainable fuel products actively. |
D.They are attempting to create eco-friendly aviation. |
A.Supportive. | B.Doubtful. | C.Indifferent. | D.Concerned. |
【推荐3】In a high-tech lab on John’s Hopkins University’s Homewood campus in Maryland, engineers have been building a robot that may be able to stitch (缝针) back together the broken tissues in your stomach and even your brain, no doctor needed.
The robot has a high-tech camera on one arm and a high-tech sewing machine on a second arm. The goal is to develop, in the next several years, a robot that makes the delicate work more consistent.
The robot, known as Smart Tissue Autonomous Robot, or STAR, which is run by a highly advanced computer program, will advance technology currently in wide use in operating rooms. The robot completes about a stitch a minute, slightly slower than a human surgeon. But the tests so far have shown more consistency than what the humans can achieve.
Long hours of traditional surgery can cause human hands to get tired and tremble, which may cause accidents during an operation. Robert Langer, an engineer, said the robotic arm could change the way surgeries are done. He has helped found dozens of biotech companies including Galen Robotics. The robotic arm being developed by Hopkins engineers is this company’s product.
Galen CEO Bruce Lichorowic compared the robotic arm to future for surgeons, saying it increases their stability, reduces tiredness and prevents cramps (抽搐) during long surgeries, all of which lead to safer surgeries.
Galen Robotics has its roots in research from Johns Hopkins University, but the company had been based in Silicon Valley until 2019. “The company currently employs about 40 people, about half of whom have advanced degrees from Johns Hopkins,” said Lichorowic, adding that the company plans to grow to 60 positions by the end of the year.
Galen’s robotic arm is not for sale yet, but Lichorowic said the company expects to submit an application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) later this year.
1. What can STAR do?A.Shorten operation time. | B.Replace human surgeons. |
C.Make operations smooth. | D.Advance medical studies. |
A.Flexible. | B.High-cost. | C.Promising. | D.Unpredictable. |
A.It is sponsored by John’s Hopkins University. | B.It still has its base in Silicon Valley now. |
C.Its robot arm will be released later this year. | D.It is scheduled to expand within this year. |
A.Mind & Brain. | B.Health & Technology. | C.Business & Investment. | D.Physics & Medicine. |
【推荐1】Human beings have a contradictory relationship with the sun. People love sunshine; however, if you stay out too long or haven’t taken enough precautions (预防措施), your skin will let you know the angry sunburn. First the heat, then the pain, then the remorse. Were people always this obsessed with sunscreens? The answer is “no”.
With only their feet to carry them, our distant ancestors didn’t move around much during their lives. Their skin adapted to subtle, seasonal changes in sunlight and UV conditions by producing more eumelanin (真黑素) and becoming darker in the summer and then losing some pigment (色素) in the fall and winter when the sun wasn’t so strong. This is not to say that the skin would have been undamaged by today’s standards. We can infer from the effects of sun exposure on modern people that the damage was similar.
As time goes by, people’s way of living changes as well. About 10, 000 years ago, human beings made their living by gathering foods, hunting and fishing. By around 6, 000 BC, many people were spending more time in walled settlements, and more time indoors. By at least 3, 000 BC, a whole industry of sun protection grew up to create equipment of all sorts — hats, tents and clothing — that would protect people from the discomfort and unavoidable darkening of the skin related to lengthy sun exposure. In some places, people even developed protective pastes — early versions of modern sunscreens — to protect their exposed skin.
As people have moved around more and faster over longer distances in recent centuries, and spend more time indoors, their skin hasn’t caught up with their locations and lifestyles. Your levels of eumelanin probably aren’t perfectly adapted to the sun conditions where you live, so they aren’t able to protect you the same way they might have protected your ancient ancestors.
People may love the sun, but we’re not our ancestors. Humanity’s relationship with the sun has changed, and this means changing your behavior to save your skin.
1. What is the relationship between human beings and the sun?A.It’s harmonious. | B.It’s irrelative. | C.It’s complex. | D.It’s conflicting. |
A.Ancestors’ skin had more eumelanin. |
B.Dark skin can protect against sunburn. |
C.The loss of pigment also means skin damage. |
D.Moving around is beneficial to increasing eumelanin. |
A.The level of eumelanin and temperature. |
B.Changes of the lifestyle and location. |
C.UV conditions and the amount of sunlight. |
D.Protection equipment and longer sun exposure. |
A.Some tips for protecting the skin. | B.Examples of how sunlight affects the skin. |
C.Risks of lasting exposure to the sun. | D.Benefits of adapting to the environment. |
【推荐2】Imagine that you are a superhero. Your superpowers are activated by a special suit. The suit communicates with your brain. It allows you to do amazing things with only a thought. By concentrating on strength, for example, you can kick a soccer ball across a field. By focusing on swift actions, you can jump to the top of a tree.
Such a connection between mind and machine may sound like a fantasy. To scientists, though, it is a very real goal. They are creating machines that let disabled monkeys walk. These machines may soon help disabled humans do the same. Unlike other bionic devices, these robotic “super suits” do not communicate with muscles and nerves. Instead, they have a direct line to the brain.
In 2005, doctors drilled a hole in the skull of Hutchinson, who had lost her right arm in an accident. Then they inserted a sensor onto her motor cortex (大脑皮层运动区). Wires connected the sensor to a receiver on her head. After she recovered, researchers plugged Hutchinson’s receiver into a cable that relayed signals from her brain to computers. Then they connected a robotic arm to the computers. The computers could interpret Hutchinson’s brain signals to move the arm.
Soon, Hutchinson, the computer, and the robotic arm became a team. Hutchinson was even able to lift her hand and drink from a cup. “She smiled when she put down that drink—that’s everything.” says Donoghue, a brain scientist.
Today other scientists are building on that success. One of those scientists is Dr. Miguel Nicolelis, who designed a whole-body bionic equipment. In 2014, a disabled former athlete kicked the first ball of the World Cup Games wearing one of Miguel’s full-body exoskeletons.
The exoskeleton was connected to brain signal sensors in the man’s cap. By thinking about kicking, he sent signals to a computer on his back. The computer then translated the signal into an exoskeleton-aided kick. Such designs may become common as scientists keep merging mind and machine.
1. Which can best describe the tone of paragraph 1?A.Narrative and serious. |
B.Persuasive and critical. |
C.Informative and objective. |
D.Descriptive and imaginative. |
A.Reason of the experiment. | B.Results of the experiment. |
C.Process of the experiment. | D.Significance of the experiment. |
A.It can be used on animals. |
B.It can move the whole body. |
C.It was supported by computers. |
D.It was connected directly to the brain. |
A.Robotic suits may be widely used to help disabled people. |
B.Exoskeleton is more common than Hutchinson’s bionic arm. |
C.Scientific experiments are commonly carried out in football fields. |
D.Disabled athletes can now play football again with the help of computer. |
【推荐3】Intelligence makes for better leaders —from undergraduates to managers to presidents — according to multiple studies. It certainly makes sense that handling a market shift or anything alike require intelligence. But new research on leadership suggests that, at a certain point, having a higher IQ stops helping and starts hurting.
Although previous research has shown that groups with smarter leaders perform better by objective measures, some studies have suggested that followers might subjectively view leaders with extremely high intellect as less effective. Decades ago, Dean Simonton, a psychologist from the University of California, Davis, proposed that brilliant leaders' words may simply go over people's heads, their solutions could be more complicated to carry out and followers might find it harder to relate to them. Now Simonton and two colleagues have finally tested that idea, publishing their results in the July 2017 issue of the Journal of Applied Psychology.
The researchers looked at 379 male and female business leaders in 30 countries across fields including banking, retail and technology. The managers took IQ tests and each was rated on leadership style and effectiveness by an average of eight co-workers. IQ positively correlated (和......正相关)with ratings of leader effectiveness, strategy formation, vision and several other characteristics—up to a point. The ratings peaked at an IQ of around 120, which is higher than roughly 80 percent of office workers. Beyond that, the ratings declined. The researchers suggest the "ideal" IQ could be higher or lower in various fields, to 140 or 100, depending on whether technical or social skills are more valued in a given work culture.
"It's an interesting and thoughtful paper,” says Paul Sackett, a management professor at University of Minnesota, who was not involved in the research. “To me, the right interpretation of the work would be that it highlights a need to understand what high-IQ leaders do that leads to lower understanding by followers,” he says. “The wrong interpretation would be, “Don’t hire high-IQ leaders.'"
The study’s lead author, John Antonakis, a psychologist at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland, suggests leaders should use their intelligence to use creative language that will persuade and inspire others—the way former U.S. President Barack Obama did. "I think the only way a smart person can signal their intelligence properly and still connect with the people,” Antonakis says, "is to speak in charming ways."
1. The reason why those with high IQs are viewed as worse leaders is probably that .A.followers think of their leaders to be less effective |
B.their IQ has a positive correlation with leader effectiveness |
C.they are hard to get their schemes across to followers |
D.their social skills can't be recognized in some work culture |
A. | B. |
C. | D. |
A.interpret the work they are involved in |
B.use inspiring and accessible language |
C.take a course in leader effectiveness |
D.communicate more with their followers |
A.A way to success for high-IQ leaders |
B.The latest research on intelligence |
C.Choose to be a leader of low intelligence |
D.Does a high IQ advance your leadership |