组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:126 题号:16883937

The study of psychology is facing a crisis. The Research Excellence Framework (the REF) has led to a research culture which is holding back attempts to stabilize psychology in particular, and science in general. The REF encourages universities to push for groundbreaking, innovative and exciting research in the form of 4* papers, but it does not reward the efforts of those who replicate(复制)studies.

The point of replicating a study is to test whether a statistically significant result will appear again if the experiments is repeated. Of course, a similar result may not appear - casting into questions the validity of the results from the first experiment.

Last year, the Open Science Collaboration attempted to replicate 100 studies from highly ranked psychological journalists. While 97% of the original studies had a statistically significant result, just 36% of the replications had the same outcome. Equally worrying: when an effect did appear, it was often much smaller than previously thought.

Recent data calls into question some widely influential findings in psychological science. These problems are not limited to psychology, however - many findings published in scientific literature may actually be false.

Science is supposed to be self-correcting and re-producibility is a cornerstone of the scientific method. Yet, we simply aren’t invested in replicating findings. We all want to be good researchers and understand more about how the world works. So why are we so reluctant to check our conclusions are valid?

Because no incentive(激励)is provided by the system we carry out our research in. In the UK, the REF rates the submitted research outputs in terms of their originality (how innovative is the research?), significance (does it have practical or commercial importance?), and rigour (is the research technically right?). Outputs are then awarded one to four stars. 4* papers are considered world-leading. The cumulative(累积的)total of 3* and 4* papers determines research funding allocation(分配)and has a knock-on effect on institutional position on the national ranking list and therefore attractiveness to students. Obviously, the more publications the better.

The focus on originality - publications exploring new areas of research using new models, and avoiding testing well-established theories - is the exact opposite of what science needs to be doing to solve doing to solve the troubling replication crisis. According to REF standards, replicating an already published piece of work is simply uninteresting.

Worryingly, many academics admit to engaging in at least one questionable research practice in order to achieve publication. Examples of this include: coming up with a theory after data is collected, stopping collecting data when an effect appears in case it disappears later, or only reporting the significant effects from collected data. Others simply fabricate data - Dutch psychologist Diederik Stapel shockingly falsified data from more than 50 studies. The REF completely harms our efforts to produce a reliable body of knowledge. Why?

With the next REF submission just four years away, many researchers are effectively faced with a choice: be a good scientist, or be a successful academic who gets funding and a promotion.

1. What crisis the study of psychology facing?
A.The REF has started a revolution in not only psychology but also science.
B.The REF presses the universities to conduct more groundbreaking research.
C.The REF tends to set up a different standard for replications of studies.
D.The REF’s indifference to replications of studies had led to disturbing effects.
2. The REF’s emphasis on originality has brought about _________.
A.a reliable body of knowledgeB.publications exploring new areas
C.tests of well-established theoriesD.uninteresting replications of studies
3. The underlined word “fabricate” in paragraph 8 closest in meaning to __________.
A.copyB.invent
C.transmitD.pretend
4. We can infer from the passage that the REF __________.
A.is a system for assessing the quality of research in UK universities
B.provides UK researchers with funding and job opportunities
C.recognizes researchers’ work and adds to their attractiveness to students
D.is planning to change its standard before the next REF submission

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。主要介绍了Otago大学针对截止日期和拖延症开展的一项研究调查及其发现。

【推荐1】They say procrastination (拖延) is the thief of time—actually deadlines are. New research from the University of Otago has found that if you want someone to help you out with something, it is best not to set a deadline at all. But if you do set a deadline, make it short.

Professor Stephen Knowles and his co-authors tested the effect of deadline length on task completion for their research published in Economic Inquiry. Participants were invited to complete an online survey concerning a charity donation. They were given either one week, one month, or no deadline to respond. Professor Knowles says although the topic of the survey was about charity, the results apply to any situation where someone asks another person for help.

The study found responses to the survey were lowest for the one-month deadline and highest when no deadline was specified. No deadline and the one-week deadline led to many early responses, while a long deadline appeared to give people permission to procrastinate, and then forget. Professor Knowles wasn’t surprised to find that specifying a shorter deadline increased the chances of receiving a response compared to a longer deadline. However, he did find it interesting that they received the most responses when no deadline was specified.

“We interpret this as evidence that specifying a longer deadline, as opposed to a short deadline or no deadline at all, removes the urgency to act,” he says. “People therefore put off undertaking the task, and since they are inattentive, postponing it results in lower response rates.”

He says it is possible that not specifying a deadline might still have led participants to assume that there is an unspoken deadline. Professor Knowles hopes his research can help reduce the amount of procrastinating people do. “Many people procrastinate. They have the best intentions of helping someone out, but just do not get around to doing it.”

1. Why did Professor Knowles do the research?
A.To study more about procrastination.B.To test the effects of deadlines.
C.To prove the existence of procrastination.D.To advocate charity donation.
2. Which situation is least likely to lead to procrastination?
A.A crowd-funding appeal with no deadline.B.A one-week post-disaster donation.
C.A one-month application for assistance.D.A charity donation due on a given date.
3. Why do people procrastinate when given a long deadline?
A.They are unwilling to act.B.They dislike the deadline.
C.They lack a sense of urgency.D.They are too busy to remember.
4. What does Professor Knowles talk about concerning the research in the last paragraph?
A.Its concern.B.Its limitation.C.Its background.D.Its significance.
2022-05-11更新 | 132次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约460词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐2】Store owners have been inventing new tricks to get consumers into their stores and purchasing their goods. Even as we find new strategies to resist, neuroscientists (神经科学家) are employed at marketing agencies across the country to best figure out what is going through a consumer’s brain at each point in the decision process.

We consumers overspend due to the fact that we have a fear of missing the really good deal or having to pay more for the same thing and lose money. Normally, the prefrontal cortex ( 前 额皮 层 ) controls our emotional reactions to things, and keeps us from acting unreasonably by calming down our fears. But an advertiser can disturb our prefrontal cortex just by displaying flashy deal signs, encouraging it to do math on how much money we might save now by buying more of something we don’t actually need yet.

Nostalgia, that regretful affection for past events, is another strong influencer during the holiday season, and it’s shaped by emotion. Emotion—whether good or bad—enhances the formation of memories, engaging more parts of the brain. So hearing a nephew singing a carol, for instance, might reawaken memories associated with that particular song in a much more powerful way than hearing that same nephew sing another song. These kinds of memories are brought back even more easily by sensory input. This might be why we are often greeted by a sensory reminder everywhere we go in a month.

Wherever you purchase gifts, there are social influences on what you buy as well. The holidays are a time when we are especially conditioned to pay more for the label because we’re buying gifts. Receiving a brand-name gift sends the message that “this person has spent more on me, so he or she must value me more.” And it makes sense. If two things seem pretty much the same, how do I know which to choose? Humans have survived as a social species, and we have to rely on each other. So when our brains are trying to make decisions, one of the shortcuts is to assume that if a lot of other people prefer something (and higher cost is often a predictor of that), then there must be a reason.

Much of our holiday spending is driven by unplanned purchases. Plan ahead, resist the urge to purchase in the moment, make notes for comparison shopping, and if the deal is actually good, then it will hold up to inspection and you’ll feel good about your purchases later. Before you blow your budget this season, remember that your brain might be fooling you into that next purchase.

1. From Paragraph 2, we learn that ______.
A.the prefrontal cortex is the calculation center
B.the common consumers always act unreasonably
C.the sight of flashy deal signs may fill consumers with fear
D.the advertisers make consumers pay more for the same thing
2. According to Paragraph 3, which of the following can work on consumers?
A.Creating a festival atmosphere.B.Following the current fashion.
C.Preparing more free samples.D.Offering a bigger discount.
3. Why do we buy brand-name gifts during the holiday?
A.They are more reliable.B.They are a sign of social status.
C.They make people feel valued.D.They are favored by most people.
4. To avoid overspending, the author suggests we ______.
A.buy in the momentB.reduce our budget
C.return unnecessary productsD.make a plan in advance
2020-04-07更新 | 443次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐3】New research about male guppies, a tropical fish found in most fresh and saltwater environments published in the journal Functional Ecology suggests that male guppies exposed to high predation (捕食行动) levels often develop larger brain sizes than those living in low-risk environments. Consequently, the development of larger brain sizes among the male guppy population allows for better chances of survival under high predation conditions.

The team began its research in the southern Caribbean. They concentrated their observations on populations located in two independent rivers. In each, they collected male guppies living above and below the waterfalls. A small amount of predators lived in the waters above the waterfall, therefore the local guppy population had evolved (进化) under predation-poor conditions into a predation-poor population.

On the other hand, below the waterfall, predators were found to be increasing, making environment dangerous. Scientists noticed that male guppies located above the waterfalls often displayed on average smaller brain sizes than males living under the waterfall.

The next step was to find out if male guppies from high-predation population only had larger brains as a result of long evolutionary processes or a direct response to exposure (暴露) to risk during development. This question took the team away from the tropics and back to the laboratory, taking a sample group of guppies originating from high predation group. These were divided into two test populations. The first group was exposed to the sight and smell of a predator living in a nearby aquarium for five minutes at a time, five times a week. The other guppies served as a control group and lived in non-predatory places. The results showed that males exposed to predators have 21 per cent heavier brains than those of the control group.

Male guppies are generally more colorful than females and thus more likely to be exposed to predation threats. The increase in intellect could offer males advantages such as the ability to detect and react to danger earlier, increasing their chances of survival.

1. We learn from the passage that ________.
A.smarter fish have better chances of survival
B.guppies can’t survive in high predator conditions
C.the size of guppies changes with the environment
D.larger brains only result from long evolutionary process
2. This new research was done mainly by ________.
A.listing factsB.analyzing data
C.making comparisonsD.explaining reasons
3. Male guppies are more easily attacked than females because of their ________.
A.appearanceB.behavior
C.life historyD.living environment
4. Which of the following proverbs reflects the findings of the research?
A.Pain past is pleasure.
B.Great hopes make great man.
C.While there is life, there is hope.
D.Storms make trees take deeper roots.
2019-04-02更新 | 84次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般