组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:181 题号:17343804

The space community is taking the orbital debris (碎片) threat increasingly seriously these days. Multiple satellite “mega-constellations (巨型星座)” are in the works, making space traffic management and space-junk removal more pressing issues than they’ve ever been.

For instance, SpaceX has already launched more than 1,700 satellites for its Starlink broadband constellation. The company ultimately wants to launch around 30,000Starlink satellites into orbit. One Web has launched more than half of the satellites for its planned 648-member constellation, which may also grow beyond that initial number as time goes on.

In addition, satellite construction costs continue to fall, allowing more and more people to get satellites up and operate them—including folks with very little experience in the field. This opening of the final frontier is generally a good thing, but it further highlights the need for responsible action when it comes to satellite operation. In 2019, for example, the Space Safety Coalition (SSC) laid out a set of proposed voluntary guidelines designed to control space junk over the coming years.

One recommendation is that all satellites operating above 250 miles be equipped with propulsion(推进) systems, allowing them to get away from possible collisions (碰撞). The SSC also recommends operators who control satellites in low Earth orbit should include in their launch contracts a requirement that rocket upper stages should be got rid of in the atmosphere shortly after liftoff.

More active debris-fighting strategies could also be part of the solution. Removing just a handful of rocket bodies or dead satellites every year could help us keep our space-junk problem under control, according to some studies. And researchers around the world are developing and testing ways to do just that, using nets, harpoons(鱼叉) and other methods.

The space-junk issue is a global one, so governments around the world should have conversations about how to deal with it. Let’s hope the talks, the decisions and the tech end up outpacing the problem.

1. What do the two examples in Paragraph 2 illustrate?
A.Orbital debris ensure satellite safety.
B.Constellations consist of many satellites.
C.Space is becoming increasingly crowded.
D.SpaceX has higher capacity to explore space.
2. Why can more people send satellites into orbit?
A.Experience in this area is rich.
B.Satellites are cheaper to make.
C.Satellite operations require little skills.
D.Space is accessible to common people.
3. What is an effective way to control space junk?
A.Remove dead satellites from orbit.
B.Cooperate in monitoring satellites.
C.Operate satellites at a fixed height.
D.Recycle a rocket shortly after liftoff.
4. Which of the following is a suitable title for the text?
A.Space junk cleanup
B.The risks of space junk
C.Space debris and satellites
D.Guidelines for space safety

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】Dengue is a very painful illness spread by mosquitoes. In severe cases, dengue can even be deadly. Dengue is a serious disease affecting people in around 120 countries. It can cause high fevers, headaches, and severe pain. It’s caused by a virus spread by bites from mosquitoes. Therefore, dengue is more common in warm areas. Every year, roughly 390 million people get dengue, and as many as 25,000 die from it.

Now scientists seem to have found a way to protect humans from dengue by first protecting mosquitoes. Dengue fever is caused by a virus. Though it may seem strange to think of it this way, the mosquitoes that spread the dengue virus are also infected with it. But the virus doesn’t seem to hurt the mosquitoes.

Wolbachia is a kind of bacteria commonly found in many insects. In some insects, Wolbachia can keep some viruses from duplicating themselves, which is how viruses grow inside a body. Wolbachia isn’t naturally found in mosquitoes. But by infecting these mosquitoes with Wolbachia, scientists can keep the mosquitoes from catching the dengue virus. Even better, the young mosquitoes coming from the eggs of the infected mosquitoes also carry Wolbachia.

Researchers working with the World Mosquito Program (WMP) ran a 27-month study in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. They split a 10-square-mile area up into 24 smaller areas. In half of the areas, the scientists did nothing. In the other half, they set out containers of eggs from mosquitoes that had Wolbachia. They did this every two weeks for just 4 to 6 months.

Ten months later, 80% of the mosquitoes in the treated areas carried Wolbachia. The researchers report the number of dengue cases in the treated areas was reduced by 77% and that the number of people needing hospital care for dengue dropped by 86%.

Because the results of the experiment were so good, the WHO has placed Wolbachia-infected mosquito eggs in all parts of Yogyakarta and surrounding areas. The WHO says that within a year, their efforts will protect 2.5 million people against dengue and that their efforts will be turned into a program that can be repeated worldwide.

1. What kind of disease is dengue?
A.It is likely to cause death.B.It causes no pain but fevers.
C.It happens less often in hot areas.D.It hurts both people and mosquitoes.
2. The underlined word “duplicating” in paragraph 3 most probably means “________”.
A.worsening the harm ofB.expanding the size of
C.increasing forces ofD.making copies of
3. What can be inferred about the method from the figures listed in paragraph 5?
A.Its wide use.B.Its effectiveness.C.Its complexity.D.Its easy operation.
4. What’s the WHO’s attitude towards the method?
A.Ambiguous.B.Positive.C.Tolerant.D.Skeptical.
2021-10-28更新 | 149次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】Over our long shared history, dogs have developed a range of skills for bonding with human beings. Their ability to make sense of human instructions like "lay down" is just one such skill. But whether dogs understand human intentions, or merely respond to outcomes, remains unclear. The ability to recognize others’ intentions is a basic part of Theory of Mind, long regarded as uniquely human. Can dogs also distinguish between something done on purpose and something done by accident?

To answer this question, a team of researchers in Germany conducted an experiment that examined how dogs reacted when food rewards were held back. They found that dogs responded differently depending on whether the actions of the experimenter were intentional or unintentional.

The experiment was conducted under three conditions. In each condition, the dog was separated from the human tester by a transparent (透明的) barrier. Then the experimenter fed the dog pieces of dog food through a gap in the barrier. In the "unwilling" condition, the experimenter suddenly withdrew the reward through the gap in the barrier. In the "unable-clumsy" condition, the experimenter brought the reward to the gap in the barrier and "tried" to pass it through the gap but then "accidentally" dropped it. In the "unable-blocked" condition, the experimenter again tried to give the dog a reward, but was unable to because the gap in the barrier was blocked. In all conditions, the reward remained on the tester's side of the barrier.

Not only did the dogs wait longer in the unwilling condition than in the unable conditions, they were also more likely to sit or lie down-actions often interpreted as being uninterested-and stop wagging their tails.

The team acknowledges that their findings may be met with challenges and that further study is needed to deal with alternative explanations, such as behavioral cues (暗示) on the part of experimenters or knowledge transfer from earlier dog training. "Nevertheless," the paper concludes, "the findings present important initial evidence that dogs may have at least one aspect of Theory of Mind: the capacity to recognize intention-in-action."

1. How was the experiment carried out?
A.By grouping the dogs and treating them differently.
B.By feeding the dogs with food for good behavior.
C.By observing the dogs in different conditions.
D.By training the dogs about reactions to food.
2. What surely happened in the "unable-clumsy" condition?
A.The tester collected the food back.B.The food dropped to the floor.
C.The gap in the barrier was blocked.D.The dog stopped wagging its tail.
3. What do the researchers think of their findings?
A.They partly prove Theory of Mind on dogs.
B.They have met more doubts than trust.
C.They are challenged by some experimenters.
D.They help solve dogs’ behavioral problems.
4. Which of the following is a suitable title for the text?
A.Experiment to Test Dog-human Bond.B.Dogs Have a Wide Range of Skills.
C.Experiment Guided by Theory of Mind.D.Dogs Can Understand Human Intentions.
2021-11-02更新 | 83次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章通过研究表明男孩和女孩在学习数学方面并没有优劣之分,男生和女生的大脑在运算过程中时一样运转。

【推荐3】Scientists found statistical equality between boys ‘and girls’ brains when it comes to learning math. Jessica Cantlon, author of the study and professor of developmental neuroscience(神经科学) at Carnegie Mellon University, told NPR that when it comes to learning math, boys and girls are “indistinguishable.”

Boys and girls experience learning math in the same way, the new study found, debunking the age-old thought that-males are superior to females in the subject.

The study published Friday in the journal Science of Learning discovered that young boys and girls use the same networks in the brain to solve math problems. “While some have thought that boys are biologically likely to be better in math, there was little evidence to support those claims, “researchers said in the study. Some earlier studies have shown gender differences, but “it is impossible to separate intrinsic(本质的), biological differences from sociocultural influences.”

For the study published Friday, researchers analyzed 104 kids between 3 and 10years old while they performed some tests connected with mental processes of understanding and watched videos of math lessons in an MRI scanner. In a first for such a study, scientists used neuroimaging(神经成像) to capture images of kids ‘brains to evaluate the differences between males and females.

Testing revealed that girls’ and boys’ brains function similarly during mathematical processing. “Additionally, there was no evidence of gender differences in neural responses to mathematics content, neural responses during educational video viewing, or rates of neural development for mathematical processing in early childhood.”

Furthermore, scientists “found statistical equality between boys and girls throughout the brain. “This led the researchers to conclude that “gender differences in the field of science in adults don’t develop from intrinsic differences in children’s brains but likely from a complex environmental origin.”

1. What does the underlined word “debunking “mean in paragraph 2?
A.spreading.B.exposing.
C.reflecting.D.confirming.
2. What can be inferred from the third paragraph?
A.The gender differences are likely influenced by socio-culture.
B.Boys and girls solve math problems in exactly the same way.
C.Evidence was found that boys are biologically better in math.
D.Earlier studies have enough evidence to prove the gender differences.
3. What’s the result of the tests among the 104 kids?
A.Girls’ and boys’ brains are different in Math.
B.The kids like watching videos of math lessons.
C.The MRI scanner is helpful to evaluate the differences.
D.There are no gender differences in learning Math.
4. Which is the most suitable title for the text?
A.Boys and Girls Are Equal in Getting Education
B.Boys and Girls Brains Are Equal in Math
C.Males Are Superior to Females in Math
D.Adults Are Superior to Kids in Math
2023-01-11更新 | 47次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般