Fire ants tunnels got dug efficiently by only a small percentage of the group doing most of the work. Freeloaders, they just sit around while their hard-working colleagues get things done. But might freeloaders actually be necessary for society to function efficiently? The answer could be yes — at least when it comes to fire ants and their efforts to dig nests underground.
Fire ants are highly social organisms. So, Goldman and his colleagues wanted to know how individual ants knew what to do without a central leader issuing orders.To find out, Goldman’s team labeled individual fire ants with paint and then watched them dig their tunnels — only wide enough for two workers. Turns out, just 30 percent of the ants did 70 percent of the labor. “I was surprised that we ended up with so few workers actually doing the work at any one time.”
A quarter of the ants never even entered the tunnel. Others went inside, but left without digging out a single grain of dirt. These behaviors ensured the tunnels did not get clogged with insect traffic, which would make the construction process stop.
And when the scientists removed the five hardest-working ants from the tunnel, others immediately jumped in to compensate (补偿) — with no reduction in the group’s productivity. Seems that it doesn’t matter which ants are working or freeloading at a given time, as long as there is some division of labor to keep the tunnels flowing smoothly. The findings are in the journal Science.
The study could provide suggestions for the robotic. Imagine groups of robots sent to search for survivors from the ruins. Or nanobots (纳米机器人) coursing through our bodies to diagnose illness and deliver targeted medical treatment. Such robots will need to avoid getting jammed up in tight spaces. It might be necessary to program them so some just sit back and watch their colleagues work.
1. How do fire ants get the work done when digging tunnels?A.They all work under the order of their leaders. |
B.Only the strong ants do the majority of the work. |
C.They all cooperate together and spare no effort to do the work. |
D.Some work efficiently while others just sit around and do nothing. |
A.Covered. | B.Crowded. | C.Destroyed. | D.Spotted. |
A.the rest of them didn’t know what to do |
B.the leaders had to do the work by themselves |
C.other ants took their place and continued to do the work |
D.other ants were in panic and escaped from the tunnels immediately |
A.robot technology | B.social communication |
C.underground construction | D.scientific observations |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Scott Edwards stopped his cross-country bike trip when he found a red-headed woodpecker (啄木鸟). “I got my first good look today,” he says. He was phoning from his tent in Illinois later that night. “I hadn’t seen the red head until today, so I was very excited.”
Edwards is a bird researcher at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass. Over this past summer, he rode across the United States. In some degree, he did it to see the country. But he also used the trip to do some serious bird-watching. That’s something he’s been doing for more than 40 years.
When he was growing up in the Riverdale neighborhood of the Bronx in New York City, there were lots of trees, he recalls (回想). When he was nine or ten, a neighbor took him bird-watching. Edwards has been doing it ever since. But finding those birds is getting more difficult. “The numbers of birds are dying down,” he says. And Edwards is hardly the only one to notice it. Scientists around the world have been finding the same thing.
A 2018 study by Bird Life International found that birds around the world are in trouble. There are about 11,000 species of birds. Four in every ten species of them are decreasing in number. That’s true for all kinds of birds living in all types of habitats (栖息地). Only a few members of these species remain in the wild. And even common birds are less common than they were just 50 years ago. What’s worse, that’s now true almost everywhere.
1. Why did Scott Edwards feel excited?A.He found a good way to set up his tent. | B.He took a bike trip alone successfully. |
C.He became good-looking during travel. | D.He saw a special bird for the first time. |
A.Doing bird-watching. | B.Studying at Harvard University. |
C.Biking around the world. | D.Looking for red-headed woodpeckers. |
A.Birds are decreasing in number. | B.Birds remain in the wild. |
C.Birds are easy to find. | D.Species of birds are increasing. |
A.Health. | B.Medicine. | C.Environment. | D.Travel. |
【推荐2】Passing biker Anuchit saw the dog twice on a highway in Roi-Et, northeastern Thailand, and last month. He stopped to check on the dog and was told by the locals that it had been sitting at the same place for its owner in the last four years.
Saowaluck , 45, said that she found the dog at that place in early 2016. Then he was so skinny and he had injuries, so Saowaluck took him to the vet, adopted him and named him Leo, but after a couple of days he was missing from her house and appeared at that spot again so she let him stay there and have been coming to feed him every day.
Anuchit decided to share the story of Leo and a video online, prompting the dog's owner to come forward. Video shows Leo sitting by the roadside and looking out as the cars drove past.
Owner Noi , 64, said her dog Bong Bong had gone missing after jumping down from her truck in 2015. “My husband and I drove around to find him but we failed." On seeing the video, she went back to the spot where she lost the dog on September 9, while Leo bounded over excitedly to Noi and let her rub his head. However, he refused to go home when she carried him to the truck. It appeared that Bong Bong needed time to adjust himself, so Noi promised to go back again the next day.
However, that night Saowaluck called Noi and said that she wanted to keep the dog because she had become attached to him. Noi responded that she was more than happy to let the dog stay with Saowalack. She said: "I have no intention to refuse her request. Due to her good care I believed she and the dog will be happy together and I would like her to keep the dog in her house.''
Saowaluck promised to take the dog home and would take good care of him while Noi suggested she was happy to take the dog back, if Saowaluck no longer wanted him.
1. Why had the dog been sitting at the same place for four years?A.He was fond of freedom. | B.He forgot where he was heading. |
C.He was waiting for his owner. | D.He was looking for a new family. |
A.Propose | B.Force |
C.Promote | D.Urge |
A.He refused to approach Noi. |
B.He stayed with Saowalack. |
C.He jumped over in excitement. |
D.He rubbed against Noi’s legs. |
A.She had an intention of being the dog’s new owner. |
B.She wanted to tell Noi what she had done for the dog. |
C.She planned to attach the dog to the truck of her own. |
D.She intended to return the dog to Noi. |
【推荐3】Poaching (偷猎) and habitat loss have threatened Africa’s two species of elephants, taking them closer toward the edge of extinction, according to a new report released by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Before this update, Africa’s elephants were grouped together and were evaluated as vulnerable (脆弱的) by the IUCN. This is the first time the two species have been classified separately. In the past, elephants were mostly considered as either Asian elephants or African elephants. Forest and savanna elephants were typically classified as subspecies of African elephants.
The African forest elephant is now listed as critically endangered and the African savanna elephant as endangered. The number of African forest elephants fell by more than 86% over a 31-year assessment period. The population of African savanna elephants dropped by at least 60% over the last 50 years, according to the IUCN, which tracks the assessment risk of the world’s animals. Africa currently has an estimated 415,000 elephants, counting the two species together.
Both elephant species experienced significant population decreases because of poaching. Although it peaked in 2011, illegal hunting still happens and continues to threaten elephant populations. African elephants also face continued habitat loss as their land is converted for agriculture or other uses.
There is some good conservation news, the IUCN points out. Anti-poaching measures, combined with better land use planning to support better human-wildlife relationships, have helped conservation efforts. Some forest elephant population figures have stabilized in well-managed area as in Gabon and the Republic of Congo and savanna population figures have remained stable or have been growing, particularly in the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area in southern Africa.
But with persistent demand for ivory and increasing human pressures on Africa’s wild lands, concern for Africa’s elephants is high, and the need to creatively conserve and wisely manage these animals and their habitats is severer than ever.
1. Which of the following can describe African forest elephants?A.Their situation is terrible. |
B.They are divided into two kinds. |
C.They’re under threat due to poaching only. |
D.Their population has grown in Gabon. |
A.Expanded. | B.Accumulated. |
C.Transformed. | D.Classified. |
A.Uninterested. | B.Worried. |
C.Uncertain. | D.Disappointed. |
A.Poaching should be stopped. |
B.Poaching and habitat loss will make elephants extinct. |
C.More and more African elephants are being illegally hunted. |
D.Africa’s elephant species are now endangered and should be protected. |
【推荐1】Would you rather watch a new movie or an old favorite? Would you rather try a dish, you have never had at a restaurant, or stick with something you know you will like? Researchers studying the “mere-exposure effect”(曝光效应) have found that we often prefer the familiar over the novel.
In 1968, social psychologist Robert Zajonc published a landmark paper on the mere-exposure effect. His hypothesis (假说) was that simply being exposed to an object on a repeated basis was enough to make people like that thing. To test this, Zajonc had participants read words in a foreign language out loud. He varied how often they read each word (up to 25 repetitions). Next, participants were asked to decide how positive or negative the meaning of each word was. Zajonc found that participants liked the words that they had said more often, and the words that had been read 25 times were rated the highest.
In the decades since Zajonc published his paper on the mere-exposure effect, researchers have also suggested several theories to explain why the effect happens. One of the leading theories is that mere exposure makes us feel less uncertain. According to this idea, we tend to be cautious around new things, since they could be dangerous to us. However, when we see the same thing over and over and nothing bad happens, we start to realize that there is nothing to be afraid of. Additionally, mere exposure increases what psychologists call “perceptual fluency” (知觉流畅性). It is based on the idea that, when we have seen something before, it is easier for us to understand and interpret it, which puts us in a positive mood.
While psychologists are still debating what causes the mere-exposure effect, it seems that having been previously exposed to something can change how we feel about it. And it may explain why, at least sometimes, we tend to prefer things that are already familiar to us.
1. What were the participants asked to do during the test?A.Read each word for 25 times. | B.Rate how much they like a word. |
C.Write in a foreign language. | D.Decide the meaning of each word. |
A.A person will choose a new movie instead of an old one. |
B.A person will try an old favorite rather than choose a new dish. |
C.A person will like a variety of things that they see for the first time. |
D.A person will be cautious about the advertisement repeated many times. |
A.We will rely more on something familiar. |
B.We will feel curious about something new. |
C.We will be careful about something dangerous. |
D.We will find it quite easy to be in a positive mood. |
A.To introduce a psychological phenomenon. |
B.To advise you to try something new bravely. |
C.To analyze the reason for mere-exposure effect. |
D.To stress the importance of mere-exposure effect. |
【推荐2】The idea that red means stop and green means go affects more than just traffic light colors. We have been taught from a young age that red means danger, while green means safety.
Before there were traffic lights for cars, there were traffic signals for trains. At first, railroad companies used red to mean stop, white to mean go and green to mean caution. But train conductors ran into a problem with the color white meaning go — bright white could easily be mistaken for stars at night.
Yellow has a shorter wavelength than red but a longer wavelength than green. This means that red is noticeable the furthest away, yellow in the middle and green the least distance away — a helpful advanced warning for needing to slow or stop.
However, believe it or not, yellow was once used to mean stop. Back in the 1900s, some stop signs were yellow because it was too hard to see a red sign in a poorly lit area.
A.Railway companies eventually moved to the color green for go. |
B.It could be a mix of all three! |
C.But why were those particular colors chosen for traffic lights? |
D.Employ these driving rules and know that traffic lights have certainly come a long way. |
E.Red is the color with the longest wavelength. |
F.When you’re impatiently waiting at a traffic light, don’t get mad. |
G.Eventually, highly reflective materials were developed, and red stop signs were born. |
【推荐3】Regularly practicing facial “yoga”, or exercises for your facial muscles, may actually make you look younger, early research suggests,
In a small, new study, researchers taught 27 middle-age women (ages 40 to 65) how to perform 32 facial exercises, which included simple actions such as smiling in the cheeks. After this training, the participants performed these exercises at home for 30 minutes a day, every day for eight weeks. On the ninth week of the study, the participants reduced the frequency of their 30-minute exercise routine to every other day (three to four days a week), and continued the exercise for 20 weeks.
The participants also had their photos taken at the beginning and end of the study, and several doctors rated these photos using a standard method for assessing the appearance of aging in the face and neck. The raters, who didn’t know which photos were taken before and which photos were taken after the exercises, also estimated the age of the person in the photo.
After 20 weeks, the participants had better ratings for the fullness of their cheeks, on average, compared with their ratings at the start of the study. In other words, their cheeks looked fuller after their 20-week facial exercise. This change in cheek fullness also made the participants look younger: Raters estimated that the participants looked nearly three years younger after the exercises, compared with before.
However, the findings are preliminary and should be confirmed with a larger study, the researchers said. And many questions remain about exactly which exercises are beneficial and who might benefit from them. “The study involved middle-age, mainly white women, who stayed in the study for 20 weeks, so it’s not known whether the effects seen in the study would apply to men, or to people of other ages or races. It’s also not clear how long people need to perform the exercises in order to see benefits,” lead study author Dr. Murad Alam said.
1. What did the researchers first do in the study?A.They trained the participants. |
B.They divided the participants into groups. |
C.They took photos of the participants. |
D.They checked the faces of the participants. |
A.They looked healthier. | B.They got fuller facial outline. |
C.They became interested in Yoga. | D.They got to smile more frequently. |
A.proved | B.questioned | C.challenged | D.affected |
A.More facial exercises will be performed. |
B.Middle-aged women will not be included. |
C.Men participants will appear in later studies. |
D.20 weeks is enough to test if an exercise works. |
【推荐1】Do you look down when you speak? Play with your hair? Lean to one side? Every last gesture tells a story. What you are saying to others is not only reflected in the words coming from your mouth, but also through the gestures and motions you make with your body. Kristin Appenbrink, Associate Editor for RealSimple. com, shows what your body language is saying about you.
Standing with your legs together is considered more of a conservative stance (站姿). It looks like a solider facing his officer. This way of standing usually indicates respect.
This way you move your body reflects your attitude. And shifting your weight from side to side or front to back indicates that you are anxious or disappointed. Basically, this is a physical representation of what is going on in your head: you are having so many unsettling thoughts that you can’t stop moving from one to the other.
Crossing your arms and legs is a defensive position. Take note of the surroundings. More often than not, this just means a person is cold. Many people also find this position to be comfortable.
Pointing toes (脚趾) in, big toe to big toe, indicates you are closing yourself off because you feel awkward or insecure. But, if you’re sitting up straight with your shoulders aligned (对齐的) and your head up — signs of an open body position — your feet may be betraying you.
Opening up your hands by spreading your hands means you are open to new ideas being offered. Facing your palms down or grasping your fists firmly shows you have a strong position — one that may not be so flexible.
1. Which of the following does Kristin Appenbrink probably agree with?A.Body language will replace spoken language. |
B.Standing with arms crossing indicates respect. |
C.Body language can express what we want to say. |
D.Our bodies’ motions are different from our gestures. |
A.Making comparisons. | B.Analysing causes. |
C.Raising questions. | D.Giving examples. |
A.Satisfying. | B.Upsetting. |
C.Doubtful. | D.Unconscious. |
A.He feels embarrassed and unsafe. |
B.He thinks someone has betrayed him. |
C.He feels like hiding something from others. |
D.He’s willing to accept new ideas from others. |
【推荐2】Have you ever had the same experience? While watching late-night TV, an advertisement comes on for something that looks very tasty. Maybe it’s a delicious pizza, an icy beer, or a juicy steak. We think “how I wish I could get my hands on that right now”
Our wish will come true soon. A Japanese professor has developed a lickable TV screen that can imitate food flavors you can experience with your own mouth. The invention is called Taste the TV (TTTV). Though it’s just a model right now, its inventor, Meiji University professor Homei Miyashita, believes it could be produced in large numbers in the near future.
“The goal is to make a platform where tastes from all over the world can be tasted by users even while staying at home. It’s the same as watching a movie or listening to a song that you like,” Miyashita adds. “I hope people can, in the future, download and enjoy the flavors of the food from the restaurants they like, regardless of where they are based.”
In a video demonstrating how TTTV works, tastes are sprayed(喷) onto a rolling sheet of plastic, which then goes over a video screen. To create the tastes, a series of 10 containers, each with a chemical substance inside it, work together much like the red, yellow, cyan, and black inks in a printer to make up all of the colors you can put onto a sheet of paper. And like the printer, the containers will need to be refilled sometimes. But the video screen doesn’t need to be the lickable ingredient. The same tastes can be sprayed onto any other single-use plastic. The video also shows other ways TTTV could be used.
Meiji University student Yuki Hou, 22, got a taste of it. She told the machine that she wanted to taste sweet chocolate, after which the flavor containers sprayed a sample onto the plastic sheet on the screen. “It’s kind of like milk chocolate,” Hou said with a big smile, after licking the screen. “It’s sweet like a chocolate sauce.”
1. What is the main purpose of the invention of TTTV?A.To satisfy people’s sense of taste. | B.To improve people’s living standards. |
C.To make dishes more delicious. | D.To train better cooks. |
A.TTTV is a single-use product. | B.TTTV works in a similar way to a printer. |
C.The chemical substance have different colors. | D.The tastes are directly sprayed onto the screen of TTTV. |
A.Critical. | B.Favorable. | C.Unclear. | D.Doubtful. |
A.Health. | B.Education. | C.Science. | D.Entertainment. |
【推荐3】It is practically inevitable: sometime around the age of 40 people start to need reading glasses. Try as they might, there’s no avoiding it. One mobile app creator claims that practicing with their technology can train your eyes to see better.though some eye doctors are not sure.
The reason why many people eventually need reading glasses is that the lens (晶状体) of the eye loses flexibility with age, and has trouble focusing on nearby objects. The condition is called presbyopia (老花眼), which is just a natural side effect of aging.
The first app claiming to work out the solution is called GlassesOff. First you take a test given by the app, and then follow its customized training course. Three days a week, for 12-15 minutes, you’ll go through a series of visual exercises, such as recognizing small gray letters on a gray screen. After two or three months, it claims that you can kiss your reading glasses goodbye.
“We wanted to develop an application that can help people improve their reading ability by improving the way that the brain processes information.” says GlassesOff CEO Nimrod Madar. Until recently it wasn’t possible because scientists did not understand how the image processing capability of the brain actually works. “GlassesOff comes up with the idea of neuroplasticity (神经可塑性). Studies have shown that through training new connections can be made in the brain So that it can continue adapting to the world around us. In terms of vision, this means that through training, the brain may be able to form new connections that allow it to clearly process text even when the text is blurred by aging eyes.
In a 30-person study published in Scientific Reports in February, some participants were able to read letters 1.6 times smaller after using the app. Adults aged 40 to 60 years old had the most success. The study also found that the users’ eye health improved by an average of 8.6 years.
Sounds too good to be true? Well, it probably is. “Human vision quality is determined by the physical eye and the way he brain reads the information that the eye captures,” says Rhee, a doctor from Harvard University. “To think that we can reverse (逆转) presbyopia only by neuroplasticity is just not accurate.” It might not make a huge difference in terms of fighting presbyopia, but brain training could make a difference for younger people whose eyes are still more flexible.
1. Which of the following is NOT true about presbyopia?A.It is actually a natural phenomenon of aging of human eyes. |
B.People tend to suffer form it when they reach the age of 40. |
C.It can be prevented by means of proper eye muscle exercising. |
D.It occurs when eyes fail to focus on nearby objects well. |
A.helping people stay away from presbyopia |
B.reducing the negative effects of aging on eyes |
C.making the text that people read larger than normal |
D.training the brain to process visual information better |
A.the principle on which GlassesOff works |
B.why researchers came up with Glassesoff |
C.how training makes new connections in our brain |
D.now our brain processes the information that our eyes take in |
A.Optimistic. | B.Negative. | C.Doubtful. | D.Unconcerned. |