组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.94 引用次数:166 题号:17732352

To combat the trap of putting a premium on being busy, Cal Newport, author of Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World, recommends building a habit of “deep work” — the ability to focus without distraction.

There are a number of approaches to mastering the art of deep work — be it lengthy retreats dedicated to a specific task, developing a daily ritual, or taking a “journalistic” approach to seizing moments of deep work when you can throughout the day. Whichever approach, it is critical to determine your duration of focus time and stick to it.

Another approach to getting more done in less time is to rethink how you prioritise your day — in particular how we craft our to-do lists. Tim Harford, author of Messy: The Power of Disorder to Transform Our Lives, points to a study in the early 1980s that divided undergraduates into two groups: some were advised to set out monthly goals and study activities; others were told to plan activities and goals in much more detail, day by day.

While the researchers assumed that the well-structured daily plans would be most effective when it came to the implementation of tasks, they were wrong: the detailed daily plans demotivated students. Harford argues that inevitable distractions often leave the daily to-do list ineffective, while leaving room for improvisation (即兴创作) in such a list can reap the best results.

In order to make the most of our focus and energy, we also need to embrace downtime, or as Newport suggests, “be lazy.” Srini Pillay, an assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, believes this counter-intuitive connection between downtime and productivity may be due to the way our brains operate. When our brains switch between being focused and unfocused on a task, they tend to be more efficient. “What people don’t realize is that in order to complete these tasks they need to use both the focus and unfocus circuits in their brain,” says Pillay.

1. What contributes most to mastering deep work?
A.Keeping to focus length.B.Seizing the working chance.
C.Carrying out specific plans.D.Ensuring the task procedures.
2. What can we learn from Harford’s research?
A.Distractions may contribute to efficiency.
B.Daily schedules are beneficial to studying.
C.Performances are barely driven by monthly goals.
D.Detailed plans might not be as fruitful as expected.
3. Pillay believes that our brains’ shift between being focused and unfocused _______.
A.is motivated by well-planned tasksB.can bring about greater productivity
C.is targeted at better working balanceD.will greatly affect the way brains work
4. What’s the main idea of the text?
A.The approach to easing distractions.B.The priority to embracing downtime.
C.Solutions to relieving the life tension.D.Keys to getting more done in less time.
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 容易 (0.94)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。主要讲述每年都会有数以百万计的园丁在晚秋移除落叶,但是威斯康星大学最近研究表明,落叶有助于将植物健康生长所需的营养物质返还给土壤,这会大大改善土壤的状况。年复一年地移除树叶打破了这种生态平衡。

【推荐1】It is late autumn—millions of gardeners across the northern hemisphere, pulled on their thickest sweaters, spent hours clearing large piles of leaves and packed them into plastic bags at the end of driveways.

In the US alone, nearly 10 million tonnes of garden waste go to landfill every year. That is a large amount of effort, not just from an environmental viewpoint but from that of our aching backs, too. So where does this advice come from? Well, it largely comes from the belief that thick fallen leaves can make plants under them unable to breathe, especially shorter grass. They shut down important photosynthesis (光合作用) and get in the way of the growth of the shorter grass. However, this received wisdom has recently been questioned by researchers at Wisconsin University.

The key finding of their new research was that although clearing fallen leaves is one of the most common gardening practices, it makes very little sense. In natural ecosystems, fallen leaves help return nutrients necessary for healthy plant growth to the soil, which greatly improves soil condition. Removing leaves year after year breaks this ecological (生态的) balance. Letting some leaves stick around to cover your garden is a great way to help your grass and the local ecosystem.

They further explained that if up to 50percent of your grass lawn (草坪) is covered by fallen leaves, you might as well go back indoors and put your feet up. The advantages of this light leaf coverage far outweigh the disadvantages—the leaves will quickly break down and help next year’s lawn grow far better than if you had cleared them. Only at over 50 percent coverage do the Wisconsin researchers recommend clearing.

So why not consider leaving the leaves? Save time, carbon and effort, and in exchange get a healthier lawn from this garden waste—that seems like a pretty good deal. And how many plastic bags could be saved by simply not binning fallen leaves every year? In the US alone, about 700 million.

1. What does the author describe in paragraph 1?
A.An amazing autumn game.B.A common sight in gardens.
C.A hot attraction in the north.D.An extreme weather event.
2. What is the received wisdom?
A.Fallen leaves need not be cleared.
B.Fallen leaves protect shorter grass.
C.Fallen leaves block photosynthesis.
D.Fallen leaves are hard to break down.
3. The new research finds clearing fallen leaves makes little sense, because ________.
A.it ruins city imageB.it breaks gardening rules
C.it affects local economyD.it causes ecological damage
4. What’s the author’s attitude to Wisconsin University’s study?
A.Doubtful.B.Positive.C.Unclear.D.Worried.
2024-02-05更新 | 194次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约270词) | 容易 (0.94)
名校

【推荐2】A new study suggests Earth could have lost up to 60 percent of its atmosphere in the collision of space objects that created the moon. Most scientists believe this event happened about 4 billion years ago when Earth was still developing. They think a massive object, possibly the size of the planet Mars, hit the Earth, sending vaporized particles (颗粒)into space. Gravity is believed to have brought these particles together to form the moon.

The study presents evidence that this collision might have caused Earth to lose between 10 to 60 percent of the atmosphere it had. A report on the study appeared in the publication Astrophysical Journal Letters. The researchers‘ impact assumption is one of three leading theories of how the moon was formed. The others suggest the moon was either created at the same time as Earth, or that it was captured by Earth's gravitational field as it traveled through space.

The researchers decided to explore how massive collisions of objects affected rocky planets with thin atmospheres. To do this, they carried out more than 300 “supercomputer simulations (模拟)The experiment considered the positions at which the objects hit the planet, the speed of the impacts, as well as the size and mass of the colliding objects. Earlier research suggested that impact collisions during the latter stages of the formation of a planet can affect its atmosphere. The computer models in this study expanded on this idea. They showed that a collision like the one that may have formed the moon likely took a large part of Earth's atmosphere.

1. What do most scientists believe?
A.Earth has lost its atmosphere in the collision.
B.The moon was created in the collision of space objects.
C.The planet Mars hit Earth about 4 billion years ago.
D.The collision of space objects caused the atmosphere to increase.
2. What can we infer from Paragraph 2?
A.The collision of Earth and the moon affected gravity.
B.The atmosphere on Earth is the cause of the collision.
C.Scientists hold different points on how the moon was formed.
D.An agreement on the formation of the moon has been reached.
3. What does the passage talk about?
A.The process of the moon's being formed.
B.The heated debate among different scientists.
C.The supercomputer experiment of planets’ collision.
D.The collision of space objects affected Earth's atmosphere.
4. What is the purpose of the passage?
A.To inform.B.To persuade.C.To debate.D.To warn.
2021-01-02更新 | 174次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 容易 (0.94)
名校
【推荐3】Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence developed by our environment and our experience? Strangely enough, the answer to these questions is yes. To some extent our intelligence is given to us at birth, and no amount of education can make a genius out of a child born with low intelligence. On the other hand, a child who lives in a boring environment will develop his intelligence less than one who lives in rich and varied surroundings. While the limits of a person’s intelligence are fixed at birth, whether or not he reaches those limits will depend on his environment. This view, now held by most experts, can be supported in a number of ways.
It is easy to show that intelligence is to some extent something we are born with. The closer the blood relationship between two people, the closer they are likely to be in intelligence. Thus if we take two unrelated people at random(随机地) from population, it is likely that their degrees of intelligence will be completely different. If, on the other hand, we take two identical twins, they will very likely be as intelligent as each other. Relations like brothers and sisters, parents and children, usually have similar intelligence, and this clearly suggests that intelligence depends on birth.
Imagine now that we take two identical twins and put them in different environments. We might send one, for example, to a university and the other to a factory where the work is boring. We would soon find differences in intelligence developing, and this indicates that environment as well as birth plays a part. This conclusion is also suggested by the fact that people who live in close contact with each other, but who are not related at all are likely to have similar degrees of intelligence.
1. Which best describes the writer’s point in Para.1?
A.Intelligence is given at birth.
B.Intelligence is developed by the environment.
C.Intelligence is fixed at birth, but is developed by the environment.
D.Some people are born clever and others born stupid.
2. It is suggested in this passage that __________.
A.close relations usually have similar intelligence
B.unrelated people are not likely to have similar intelligence
C.the closer the blood relationship between people, the more different they are likely to be in intelligence
D.people who live in close contact with each other are not likely to have similar degrees of intelligence
3. The example of the twins going to a university and to a factory separately shows_________.
A.the importance of their intelligence
B.the effect of environment on intelligence
C.the importance of their positions
D.the part that birth plays
4. The best title for this article would be “_____________”.
A.On Intelligence
B.What Intelligence Means
C.Born with Intelligence
D.Environment Decides Intelligence
2016-11-26更新 | 1176次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般