To combat the trap of putting a premium on being busy, Cal Newport, author of Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World, recommends building a habit of “deep work” — the ability to focus without distraction.
There are a number of approaches to mastering the art of deep work — be it lengthy retreats dedicated to a specific task, developing a daily ritual, or taking a “journalistic” approach to seizing moments of deep work when you can throughout the day. Whichever approach, it is critical to determine your duration of focus time and stick to it.
Another approach to getting more done in less time is to rethink how you prioritise your day — in particular how we craft our to-do lists. Tim Harford, author of Messy: The Power of Disorder to Transform Our Lives, points to a study in the early 1980s that divided undergraduates into two groups: some were advised to set out monthly goals and study activities; others were told to plan activities and goals in much more detail, day by day.
While the researchers assumed that the well-structured daily plans would be most effective when it came to the implementation of tasks, they were wrong: the detailed daily plans demotivated students. Harford argues that inevitable distractions often leave the daily to-do list ineffective, while leaving room for improvisation (即兴创作) in such a list can reap the best results.
In order to make the most of our focus and energy, we also need to embrace downtime, or as Newport suggests, “be lazy.” Srini Pillay, an assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, believes this counter-intuitive connection between downtime and productivity may be due to the way our brains operate. When our brains switch between being focused and unfocused on a task, they tend to be more efficient. “What people don’t realize is that in order to complete these tasks they need to use both the focus and unfocus circuits in their brain,” says Pillay.
1. What contributes most to mastering deep work?A.Keeping to focus length. | B.Seizing the working chance. |
C.Carrying out specific plans. | D.Ensuring the task procedures. |
A.Distractions may contribute to efficiency. |
B.Daily schedules are beneficial to studying. |
C.Performances are barely driven by monthly goals. |
D.Detailed plans might not be as fruitful as expected. |
A.is motivated by well-planned tasks | B.can bring about greater productivity |
C.is targeted at better working balance | D.will greatly affect the way brains work |
A.The approach to easing distractions. | B.The priority to embracing downtime. |
C.Solutions to relieving the life tension. | D.Keys to getting more done in less time. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】It is late autumn—millions of gardeners across the northern hemisphere, pulled on their thickest sweaters, spent hours clearing large piles of leaves and packed them into plastic bags at the end of driveways.
In the US alone, nearly 10 million tonnes of garden waste go to landfill every year. That is a large amount of effort, not just from an environmental viewpoint but from that of our aching backs, too. So where does this advice come from? Well, it largely comes from the belief that thick fallen leaves can make plants under them unable to breathe, especially shorter grass. They shut down important photosynthesis (光合作用) and get in the way of the growth of the shorter grass. However, this received wisdom has recently been questioned by researchers at Wisconsin University.
The key finding of their new research was that although clearing fallen leaves is one of the most common gardening practices, it makes very little sense. In natural ecosystems, fallen leaves help return nutrients necessary for healthy plant growth to the soil, which greatly improves soil condition. Removing leaves year after year breaks this ecological (生态的) balance. Letting some leaves stick around to cover your garden is a great way to help your grass and the local ecosystem.
They further explained that if up to 50percent of your grass lawn (草坪) is covered by fallen leaves, you might as well go back indoors and put your feet up. The advantages of this light leaf coverage far outweigh the disadvantages—the leaves will quickly break down and help next year’s lawn grow far better than if you had cleared them. Only at over 50 percent coverage do the Wisconsin researchers recommend clearing.
So why not consider leaving the leaves? Save time, carbon and effort, and in exchange get a healthier lawn from this garden waste—that seems like a pretty good deal. And how many plastic bags could be saved by simply not binning fallen leaves every year? In the US alone, about 700 million.
1. What does the author describe in paragraph 1?A.An amazing autumn game. | B.A common sight in gardens. |
C.A hot attraction in the north. | D.An extreme weather event. |
A.Fallen leaves need not be cleared. |
B.Fallen leaves protect shorter grass. |
C.Fallen leaves block photosynthesis. |
D.Fallen leaves are hard to break down. |
A.it ruins city image | B.it breaks gardening rules |
C.it affects local economy | D.it causes ecological damage |
A.Doubtful. | B.Positive. | C.Unclear. | D.Worried. |
【推荐2】A new study suggests Earth could have lost up to 60 percent of its atmosphere in the collision of space objects that created the moon. Most scientists believe this event happened about 4 billion years ago when Earth was still developing. They think a massive object, possibly the size of the planet Mars, hit the Earth, sending vaporized particles (颗粒)into space. Gravity is believed to have brought these particles together to form the moon.
The study presents evidence that this collision might have caused Earth to lose between 10 to 60 percent of the atmosphere it had. A report on the study appeared in the publication Astrophysical Journal Letters. The researchers‘ impact assumption is one of three leading theories of how the moon was formed. The others suggest the moon was either created at the same time as Earth, or that it was captured by Earth's gravitational field as it traveled through space.
The researchers decided to explore how massive collisions of objects affected rocky planets with thin atmospheres. To do this, they carried out more than 300 “supercomputer simulations (模拟)The experiment considered the positions at which the objects hit the planet, the speed of the impacts, as well as the size and mass of the colliding objects. Earlier research suggested that impact collisions during the latter stages of the formation of a planet can affect its atmosphere. The computer models in this study expanded on this idea. They showed that a collision like the one that may have formed the moon likely took a large part of Earth's atmosphere.
1. What do most scientists believe?A.Earth has lost its atmosphere in the collision. |
B.The moon was created in the collision of space objects. |
C.The planet Mars hit Earth about 4 billion years ago. |
D.The collision of space objects caused the atmosphere to increase. |
A.The collision of Earth and the moon affected gravity. |
B.The atmosphere on Earth is the cause of the collision. |
C.Scientists hold different points on how the moon was formed. |
D.An agreement on the formation of the moon has been reached. |
A.The process of the moon's being formed. |
B.The heated debate among different scientists. |
C.The supercomputer experiment of planets’ collision. |
D.The collision of space objects affected Earth's atmosphere. |
A.To inform. | B.To persuade. | C.To debate. | D.To warn. |
It is easy to show that intelligence is to some extent something we are born with. The closer the blood relationship between two people, the closer they are likely to be in intelligence. Thus if we take two unrelated people at random(随机地) from population, it is likely that their degrees of intelligence will be completely different. If, on the other hand, we take two identical twins, they will very likely be as intelligent as each other. Relations like brothers and sisters, parents and children, usually have similar intelligence, and this clearly suggests that intelligence depends on birth.
Imagine now that we take two identical twins and put them in different environments. We might send one, for example, to a university and the other to a factory where the work is boring. We would soon find differences in intelligence developing, and this indicates that environment as well as birth plays a part. This conclusion is also suggested by the fact that people who live in close contact with each other, but who are not related at all are likely to have similar degrees of intelligence.
1. Which best describes the writer’s point in Para.1?
A.Intelligence is given at birth. |
B.Intelligence is developed by the environment. |
C.Intelligence is fixed at birth, but is developed by the environment. |
D.Some people are born clever and others born stupid. |
A.close relations usually have similar intelligence |
B.unrelated people are not likely to have similar intelligence |
C.the closer the blood relationship between people, the more different they are likely to be in intelligence |
D.people who live in close contact with each other are not likely to have similar degrees of intelligence |
A.the importance of their intelligence |
B.the effect of environment on intelligence |
C.the importance of their positions |
D.the part that birth plays |
A.On Intelligence |
B.What Intelligence Means |
C.Born with Intelligence |
D.Environment Decides Intelligence |
![](https://img.xkw.com/dksih/QBM/2022/10/19/3091084608577536/3092527780593664/STEM/2e98ac8161f744109baab04fd12a95d1.png?resizew=174)
It is a great, big, wide-open sky over our heads, but when you are flying in a jet airliner at 600 miles an hour, the sky is not so big. That’s part of the reason why, in the first four months of this year, the government said only 72 percent of all flights arrived on time, the lowest number since the recent system of reporting began in 1995.
The runways are full, the planes are jammed, and air traffic controllers complain they’re stressed out. And the radar systems that keep things going are, in large part, technology of the 1960s. “It’s like driving down the road with a paper bag over your head, and you’re trying to stay out of the way of other cars,” says Captain Karen Lee, a 747 pilot who heads operations for UPS, the delivery service.
At its center in Louisville, UPS is experimenting with the next generation in air traffic control: planes guided by the satellites of the Global Positioning System, instead of radar.
Though it has advanced greatly over the years, radar is a technology that dates back to the second World War . It scans the sky, looking for signals from planes in the air. Typically, air traffic radar only updates a plane’s position once every 12 seconds or so—and in 12 seconds, a jet can move two miles or make a turn. What’s more, radar signals can be blocked by storms or mountains. But with GPS signals, pilots can see in real time exactly where they are, and where other planes are, too. A readout screen in the cockpit (驾驶舱) tells the pilots what’s around them.
“What we end up with is a very exact location for each aircraft in the system,” said Basil Barimo of the Air Transport Association, which represents airlines.
1. According to the passage, we know that__________.A.the sky over our heads is becoming smaller | B.the condition of air traffic is terrible now |
C.the service of air companies is quite bad | D.fewer and fewer planes are in the sky |
A.the number of planes is increasing too fast |
B.the control system hasn’t kept up with the development of air traffic |
C.there is not enough room for so many planes in the sky |
D.the weather has become worse these years |
A.The Global Positioning System. | B.A more advanced radar system. |
C.A new unusual satellite. | D.A readout screen in the cockpit. |
A.It can only update a plane’s position once every 12 minutes. |
B.Its signals may not be received because of certain reasons. |
C.The cost of radar is higher than the cost of the Global Positioning System. |
D.Nothing can be done to improve the air traffic condition |
【推荐2】Read this Medication Guide before you start using RYBELSUS® and each time you get are fill. There may be new information. This information does not take the place of talking to your health-care provider about your medical condition or your treatment.
What is RYBELSUS®?
RYBELSUS® is a medicine used along with diet and exercise to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes(糖尿病). RYBELSUS® is not recommended as the first choice of medicine for treating diabetes. RYBELSUS® is not for use in patients with type l diabetes. It is not known if RYBELSUS® is safe and effective for use in children under 18 years of age.
How should I take RYBELSUS®:
*Take RYBELSUS® exactly as your health-care provider tells you to.
*Take RYBELSUS® by mouth on an empty stomach when you first wake up.
*Do not split, crush or chew. Swallow RYBELSUS® whole.
RYBELSUS® works best if you eat 30 to 60 minutes after taking RYBELSUS®. If you miss a dose of RYBELSUS®, skip the missed dose and go back to your regular schedule.
What are the possible side effects of RYBELSUS®?
RYBELSUS® may cause serious side effects, including:
*changes in vision. Tell your health-care provider if you have changes in vision during treatment with RYBELSUS®.
*low blood sugar. Your risk for getting low blood sugar may be higher if you use RYBELSUS® with another medicine that can cause low blood sugar.
*serious allergic reactions. Stop using RYBELSUS® and get medical help right away, if you have any symptoms of a serious allergic reaction including itching rash, or difficulty breathing.
1. What do we know about RYBELSUS®?A.It can be used alone to improve blood sugar. |
B.It is ineffective for use in children under 18 years old. |
C.It is recommended as the first choice of medicine. |
D.It can be used for patients with type 2 diabetes. |
A.Take RYBELSUS® when you are getting low blood sugar. |
B.Split, chew or swallow RYBELSUS® whole as you like. |
C.Skip it and eat on your regular schedule if you forget one dose. |
D.Take RYBELSUS® by mouth after you have breakfast. |
A.Poor eyesight. | B.Improved blood sugar. |
C.Slight allergic reactions. | D.Changes in hearing. |
【推荐3】It doesn’t matter when and how much a person sleeps, but everyone needs some rest to stay alive. That’s what all doctors thought, until they heard about Herpin. Herpin, it was said, never slept. Could this be true? The doctors decided to see this strange man themselves.
Herpin was 90 years old when the doctors came to his home in New Jersey. They thought for sure that he got some sleep of some kind. So they stayed with him and watched every movement he made. But they were surprised. Though they watched him hour after hour and day after day, they never saw him sleeping. In fact, he did not even own a bed. He never needed one.
The only rest that Herpin sometimes got was sitting in a comfortable chair and reading newspapers. The doctors were puzzled by this strange continuous sleeplessness. They asked him many questions, hoping to find an answer. They found only one answer that might explain his condition. Herpin remembered some talk about his mother having been injured several days before he was born. But that was all. Was this the real reason? No one could be sure. Herpin died at the age of 94.
1. The main idea of this passage is that_____.A.large numbers of people do not need sleep. |
B.a person was found who actually didn’t need any sleep. |
C.everyone needs some sleep to stay alive. |
D.people can live longer by trying not to sleep. |
A.to cure him of his sleeplessness. |
B.to find that his sleeplessness was not really true. |
C.to find out why some old people did not need any sleep. |
D.to find a way to free people from the need of sleeping. |
A.needed some kind of sleep. |
B.was too old to need any sleep. |
C.needed no sleep at all. |
D.often sleeps in a chair. |
A.his mother’s injury before he was born. |
B.that he had gradually got rid of the sleeping habit. |
C.his good physical condition. |
D.that he hadn’t got a bed. |