On Wednesday, two things happened. In Syria, 80 people were killed by government airstrikes. Meanwhile, in Florida, Elon Musk’s SpaceX successfully launched and fired a sports car into space. Guess which story has dominated mainstream news sites?
The launch of Musk’s Falcon Heavy rocket, the most powerful ever launched by a private company, went off successfully. Musk sent his cherry-red Tesla roadster running toward Mars, launching “a new space age”. The event attracted phenomenal publicity and made the rocket launch a masterstroke of advertising for Tesla.
Meanwhile, in Syria, where hundreds of thousands of refugees(难民) may be forced to return to unsafe homes, a UN human rights coordinator for Syria said despondently(沮丧地) that he was no longer sure why he bothers to videotape the effects of bombing, since nobody ever pays attention. He wondered what level of violence it would take to make the world care.
There is, perhaps, no better way to appreciate the tragedy of 21st-century global inequality than by watching a billionaire spend $90m launching a $100,000 car into space.
Musk said he wanted to participate in a space race because “races are exciting” and that while strapping his car to a rocket may be “silly and fun … silly and fun things are important”. Thus, anyone who mentions the huge waste the project involves, or the various social uses to which these resources could be put, can be dismissed as a killjoy.
But one doesn’t have to hate fun to question the justification for pursuing a costly new space race at exactly this moment. If we examine the situation honestly, it becomes hard to defend a project like this.
A mission to Mars does indeed sound exciting, but it’s important to have our priorities straight. First, perhaps we could make it so that a child no longer dies of malaria every two minutes. Or we could try to address the level of poverty in Alabama which has become so extreme that the UN investigator did not believe it could occur in a first-world country. Perhaps when violence, poverty and disease are solved, then we can head for the stars.
Many might think that what Elon Musk chooses to do with his billions is Elon Musk’s business alone. If he wanted to spend all his money on medicine for children, that would be nice, but if he’d like to spend it making big explosions and sending his convertible on a million-mile space voyage, that’s his right.
But Musk is only rich enough to afford these money-consuming projects because we have allowed social inequalities to arise in the first place. If wealth were actually distributed fairly in this country, nobody would be in a position to fund his own private space program.
Elon Musk is right: silly and fun things are important. But some of them are an indefensible waste of resources. While there are still humanitarian crises such as that in Syria, nobody can justify vast spending on rocketry experiments.
1. Why does the writer mention the two pieces of news at the beginning of the passage?A.To illustrate the inequality of wealth distribution and the consequent inequality of attention distribution. |
B.To highlight the significance of SpaceX’s successful launch of a rocket and a car into space. |
C.To appeal to the government for more attention to the air strikes and refugee crisis in Syria. |
D.To find out which news dominated the mainstream news sites. |
A.Because nobody appreciated his work and all the efforts he made. |
B.Because the violence in Syria is not serious enough to make the world care. |
C.Because however hard he tried, nobody seemed to care about the situation in Syria. |
D.Because he had great difficulty videotaping the effects of bombing. |
A.The space project of SpaceX cost the government too much money. |
B.It kills the fun to question the justification of the pursuit of space programs. |
C.Space programs are a waste of money that cannot be justified. |
D.Addressing problems of violence, poverty and diseases should be our top priority. |
A.We should pay equal attention to space projects and solving social problems. |
B.No private companies should be allowed to spend money in rocketry experiments. |
C.The money and resources used in space projects could have been used to deal with various social problems. |
D.Elon Musk should be blamed for misleading the public. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Financial Education-Awareness Dilemma
When it comes to financial education, the majority of today's youth will regard it as a necessity for certain specific people who want to make their career in the financial world.
Suppose you have $100 in a saving account that pays simple interest at the rate of 2%per year. lf you leave the money in the account, how much will you have accumulated after 5 years: more than $102, exactly $102, or less than $102? The test might look simple, but only half of the people surveyed gave the correct answer.
On the contrary, people who have a lower degree of financial literacy tend to borrow more, accumulate less wealth, and pay more in fees related financial products. They are less likely to invest, more likely to experience difficulty with debt, and less likely to know the terms of their mortgages and other loans. Thus, the cost of this financial ignorance is very high.
What is the solution?
A.Financial education must start early. |
B.However, they miss an important point. |
C.Why does each of us have to face a financial challenge? |
D.Why does financial literacy matter so much in our society'? |
E.Rich people are generally better educated on financial management. |
F.Besides, these people have more than double the wealth of people who don’t. |
G.For example, they frequently make late credit card payments, overspend their credit limit, etc. |
【推荐2】Alida Monaco doesn’t spend her summers doing the usual teenage work, like working at the mall. Instead,she ‘ s studying.
It used to be that a summer job was considered a teenage thing. Today, Monaco ,who has never had a summer job, is part of growing trend (趋势)teenagers focusing on their studies, even during the summer. That’s down from 72% of Americans aged 16 to 19 who worked in July of 1978, according to the U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Fierce (激烈的)competition, older workers returning to the workforce and weak economic growth are all adding to the decrease of teenagers in the workforce. But as schoolwork grows increasingly heavy and homework eats up more time, data suggest the biggest reason why some teens won’t be working this summer is that they simply don’t1 have time.
For college - bound teens, some teachers even advise students not to waste time on a summer job. “ Some of my students only have about six weeks off in the summer,” said Shannon Reed, a lecturer at the University of Pittsburgh and a former high school English teacher.” I could never advise that they get jobs during that short break. ”
Young people who don’t work may miss out on valuable skills that they’11 need control and help people learn to deal with adult situations. But Monaco, who plans to attend Harvard, isn’t fazed by her lack(缺乏)of work experience. “Maybe I have missed out on a couple of life skills, “she said. “ But I don’t think it will harm me in way .”
1. What is the trend of American teenagers?A.They are becoming lazy. |
B.They are fond of doing holiday jobs. |
C.They are focusing more on studies than on jobs. |
D.They are becoming particular about (挑剔)holiday jobs |
A.The reasons for teenagers giving up work. |
B.The fierce competition teenagers face. |
C.The structure (结构)of America’s workforce. |
D.The effects of America9 s weak economy. |
A.uncaring. | B.favorable(支持的). | C.worried. | D.doubtful. |
A.supported. | B.helped. | C.upset. | D.confused. |
【推荐3】How would you feel if you were invited to the moon? If you found a gold coin, would you save it, give it to charity or use it for a holiday? Personality quizzes of this kind, known as “psychometrics”, have bothered many job seekers. Now, it is being applied to the oldest problem in finance: will a borrower repay?
In rich countries, lenders use credit scores to weigh risk. But just 7% of Africans and 13% of South Asians are covered by credit bureaus (征信机构). Bailey Klinger of the Entrepreneurial Finance Lab (EFL), which explores new kinds of credit data, argues that psychometrics could include many more people in the financial system. Everyone has a personality, after all.
Judging character is not new. Psychometrics attempts to make it a science. The model developed by EFL has undergone many tests and adapted to different cultures. Its collected data reflect something unnoticed. For instance, young optimists are risky, but old ones are a safe bet.
Clever design cuts cheating. There are no obvious right answers; responses are cross-checked for consistency. The model monitors mouse movements for signs of indecision or distraction. When borrowers lie to get a loan, they often do so in predictable ways. In an EFL test, people are shown pictures of five drinks and asked which one they would be. Choosing water over something with small bubbles may be a sign of cheating.
This sounds fanciful, but there is evidence that it works. In one Indonesian bank, combining psychometrics with existing customer data cut default (违约) rates for small businesses by 45%. A study by the World Bank found that EFL’s model increased lending to those without a credit history.
The technique needs further development. At present, turning to credit bureaus is still the best way to tell if somebody will repay a loan. But bureaus improve more slowly than technology. Lenders will find ever more ways to look into their customers’ souls.
1. What are the figures intended to show in the second paragraph?A.Racial discrimination from lenders. |
B.Uncertain property of poor people. |
C.Great risks brought by credit scores. |
D.Current weakness of credit bureaus. |
A.It has been greatly improved. |
B.Its data confirm some ideas. |
C.Its effects vary with cultures. |
D.It can’t tell character exactly. |
A.Borrowers’ responses. | B.Lenders’ answers. |
C.Pictures of five drinks. | D.Drinks with bubbles. |
A.It will replace credit bureaus. |
B.It will be mature in the future. |
C.It has won most lenders’ love. |
D.It is far from satisfactory. |
【推荐1】We’ve all heard it before: to be successful, get out of bed early. After all, Apple CEO Tim Cook gets up at 3:45 am, Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne at 3:30 am and Richard Branson at 5:45 am- - -and, as we know, “The early bird catches the worm.” Indeed, it may be true that those who get up early have a jump start on the day before others are even out of bed.
But just because some successful people wake up early, does that mean it’s a trait most of them share? And if the idea of having exercised, planned your day, eaten breakfast, visualized and done one task before 8 am. makes you want to roll over and hit snooze until next Saturday, are you really doomed to a less successful life?
For about half of us, this isn’t really an issue. It’s estimated that some 50% of the population isn’t really morning- oriented or evening oriented, but somewhere in the middle. Roughly one in four of us, though, tend more toward bright-eyed early risers, and another one in four are night owls. For them, the effect can go beyond falling asleep in front of the TV at10 pm or being regularly late for work.
Numerous studies have found that morning people are more self-directed and agreeable. And compared to night owls, they are less likely to be depressed, drink or smoke.
Although morning types may achieve more academically, night owls tend to perform better on measures of memory, processing speed and cognitive ability, even when they have to perform those tasks in the morning. Night-time people are also more open and more creative. And one study shows that night owls are as healthy and wise as morning types- and a little bit wealthier.
Still think the morning people sound more like CEO material? Don’t set your alarm for 5 am just, yet, as it turns out, overhauling (大修) your sleep times may not have much effect.
“If people are left to their naturally preferred times, they feel much better. They say that they are much more productive. The mental capacity they have is much broader,” says Oxford University biologist Katharina Wulf. On the other hand, she says, pushing people too far out of their natural preference can be harmful. When they wake early, for example, night owls are still producing melatonin (褪黑激素 ). “Then, you disrupt it and push the body to be in the daytime mode. That can have lots of negative, physiological consequences,” Wulff says like a different sensitivity to insulin and glucose (葡萄糖) which can cause weight gain.
1. What can we know from the 4th and 5th paragraphs?A.Neither night owls no morning persons perform better than the middle ones. |
B.To beat night-time people, ask them to do maths calculation in the morning. |
C.Night owls tend to sacrifice their health for their wealth. |
D.Morning types are more conservative but more optimistic. |
A.Don’t fall asleep in front of the TV. |
B.Better not overhaul your sleep times. |
C.Stop sting your alarm for 5 am. |
D.Avoid being-regularly late for work. |
A.raising the problem→analysing the problem→solving the problem. |
B.presenting author’s viewpoint → providing supporting proofs→making a conclusion. |
C.leading in the topic→challenging a viewpoint → discussing about the topic. |
D.introducing a viewpoint -raising the question→presenting author’s viewpoint. |
A.To argue against the view that the early bird catches the worm. |
B.To compare the differences between early risers and night owls. |
C.To advise people to get up neither too early nor too late. |
D.To explain why some people are more successful. |
【推荐2】Walmart will soon use 360 robot cleaners across a few hundred of its stores. Using maps input by human employees, the AI-powered cleaners will travel in the store with no difficulty, sweeping the floor--just as human employees used to do.
Perhaps the most striking thing about these robot workers is how not-striking they are. Sci-fi movies suggest a future full of human-like robots who appear with their horrible qualities. Now the future is coming into view, and it looks like a giant lie. It's easy to imagine walking past an Auto-C on a shopping trip without even noticing its presence.
AI has already started to become a part of our everyday life. In New Jersey this week, dozens of workers were hospitalized after a robot at an Amazon fulfillment centre accidentally broke a can and enveloped workers in eye-and-lung-damaging gas. Days earlier in California, an auto-piloted Tesla drove a drunk, sleeping driver down a highway, which no doubt did some potential risk to the other drivers on the road. Highway patrol officers figured out on the spot how to stop the AI car.
Of course, industrial accidents and drunk drivers existed well before AI. Tools with the power to release the burden of physical labor—horses, steam machines, self-driving cars—also come with the power to injure. And the presence of AI-powered machines just steps away from us is, for now, still a rare thing for most people.
But the nature of robots’ coming into our daily life lives will make it harder to recognize—or object to—the bigger changes they bring later. Walmart insists that the robot cleaners give employees more time for customer service and other tasks. Critics point out that they could just as easily become an excuse to reduce staff and wages.
1. What is the difference between sci-fi movies and the reality?A.Now the human-like robots is hard to recognize. |
B.Now people don’t go to see the sci-fi movies. |
C.Now the human-like robots can tell lies. |
D.Now it is easy to ignore the robots. |
A.They damaged the robot first. |
B.The robot caused an accident on purpose. |
C.The robot made a mistake by chance. |
D.The robot driving them on the highway had an accident. |
A.Supportive | B.Objective | C.Doubtful | D.Indifferent |
A.Artificial intelligence is bringing great effect to our daily life. |
B.Walmart will soon use 360 robot cleaners across its stores. |
C.We should say no to artificial intelligence. |
D.Artificial intelligence is dangerous to our life. |
【推荐3】Today’s amazing newspaper headline!
First family of four to walk to the South Pole wearing Mickey Mouse ears and clown’s shoes.
No, not really. It isn’t true. I invented it. But I wouldn’t be surprised to see it one day soon. It seems that every week someone becomes ”the first” or “the youngest” or “the oldest” or even “the first married couple” to do something that doesn’t seem to be very useful to the rest of humanity.
This year I’ve seen headlines saying “The youngest person to sail the Atlantic alone”, “The youngest Briton to climb Mount Everest”, and “The first people to fly around the world in a hot air balloon”. Why do they do it? Don’t they have better things to do with their time and money? And why should I be interested anyway?
Human beings have already climbed the highest mountains, sailed across the oceans and flown around the world. People have already reached the most remote parts of our planet. Many of these things were done a long, long time ago. There just isn’t anything left to explore nowadays. I suppose there’s still a lot of the universe left, and the bottom of the oceans is still a bit of a mystery, but you need a lot of technology to explore areas like that. So, those people who feel the need for adventure can only do things that have been done before. So they have to try and do it in a new way, or be “the fastest” or “the youngest” or “the oldest” to do something that isn’t really new at all.
What is so great about climbing Mount Everest these days anyway? It’s become a popular tourist trip. People pay thousands of dollars to be taken up the mountain by the local Sherpas, who lead the way and carry the bags. At any one time there are about a thousand people either climbing up or on their way back down. As a result, Everest is covered with rubbish and the Sherpas have to make special trips up the mountain to pick it up. The climbers are often inexperienced and when they get into trouble other people have to risk their lives to bring them down to safety. Helicopter crews have been killed trying to reach people who were stuck on the mountain.
In January 2003 a helicopter carrying two British men crashed into the sea near Antarctica. I’m not quite sure what they were trying to be “the first” or “the youngest” to do. The Chilean navy picked them up after a nine-hour rescue mission that cost tens of thousands of pounds, all paid for by the Chilean and British taxpayers.
Talking of taxpayers, many Australians are getting a bit fed up with record breakers. A lot of people trying to break sailing or rowing records get into trouble in the seas around Australia, so the Australian navy has to send ships to save them. There have been a lot of difficult, time-consuming rescue missions in recent years costing the Australian government millions of dollars. I suppose we can’t just leave them to drown, but personally, I think we should give the bill to the people who are rescued. Perhaps they would think twice about doing it if they had to pay for expensive insurance premiums (保费). Then I wouldn’t have to read about them in the newspapers either.
1. The writer invents the newspaper headline in paragraphs 1 & 2 to ________.A.persuade readers of a new trend | B.entertain readers with his humor |
C.get readers interested in the topic | D.remind readers of an important event |
A.Mount Everest is now covered with a lot of rubbish |
B.climbing Mount Everest has already lost its true meaning |
C.it’s impossible to climb up Mountain Everest without help |
D.people without experience may get in trouble or even danger |
A.They have to pay for the costs of rescuing the record breakers. |
B.The Australian navy was not something intended for rescue work. |
C.The record breakers should pay for their insurance premiums themselves. |
D.A great number of people try to break records in the seas around Australia. |
A.It’s All Been Done Before | B.Never Do Something New |
C.You Are the Next Record Breaker | D.Be Responsible for Your Adventures |