I’ve been wondering how kids themselves, especially young ones, define(定义) play. It turns out that there have been quite a few research studies in which young children are asked in various ways to distinguish between play and not play. In a review of 12 such studies, Natasha Goodhall and Cathy Atkinson (2019) concluded that even very young children have a rather clear idea of the difference between play and non-play. Most important for the present discussion, a key characteristic of play for children is that it is chosen and directed by the children themselves.
As one example of such a study, Justine Howard and her colleagues (2006) showed children pictures of other kids involved in various activities and asked them to judge each as “play” or “not play.” It turned out that the most reliable indicator for the children was the presence or absence of an adult. If an adult (generally seen to be a teacher) was present, the activity was most often judged as “not play,” even if the children looked happy and involved. Children were also more likely to judge an activity as play if there was more than one child involved than if a single child was doing something alone.
Howard and her colleagues (2006) also reviewed previous research on children’s understanding of play and concluded that, all in all, children consider an activity to be play if it (a) is controlled by the children, (b) is enjoyable, (c) has no preset goal, and (d) involves pretense. Yay! This list matches reasonably well with the list I generated based on the work of other play researchers and my own observations. I’m apparently not too far off the mark.
Unfortunately, many education specialists who have heard that play is good for children’s learning don’t understand what play is. They develop “play-based learning” programs that go against the first characteristic of play because they are chosen and set up by the teacher and are more-or-less forced upon the children rather than freely chosen by them. Once the first characteristic is destroyed, the others are also generally destroyed.
I think it is hard for teachers to provide much real play for children, because that means giving up control. Moreover, stepping back and letting the children do their own thing may look like laziness or negligence(疏忽) to adult observers.
1. Which of the following is more likely to be regarded as play by children?A.Activities filled with joys and sorrows. |
B.Activities directed by children themselves. |
C.Activities with the company of their parents. |
D.Activities set up and monitored by a teacher. |
A.I am opposed to the mark. | B.I am in the wrong direction. |
C.My finding is close to the truth. | D.My mark is beyond imagination. |
A.Children can not choose them freely. |
B.The benefits of the programs are ignored. |
C.Not all the children are involved in the activities. |
D.What children do goes against the rules of the games. |
A.How children define play. |
B.Why play matters for children. |
C.How specialists design play-based learning. |
D.Why play-based learning is important to children. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】It seems that we are one step closer to finding alien life and maybe a future home for humanity. Scientists from NASA have found a new solar system filled with planets that look like the Earth and could even support life.
The group of seven planets, which orbits a star called Trappist-1, is 39 light years away from the Earth in the constellation of Aquarius(水瓶座). And three of them are in the “habitable zone” - the area around a star where water is most likely to be found. This is important because water is necessary for life.
“This is an amazing planetary(行星的) system - not only because we have found so many planets, but because they are all surprisingly similar in size to the Earth”, astronomer Michael Gillon from the University of Liege in Belgium told The Independent.
Trappist-1 is a “dwarf star(矮星)” which is colder and shines dimmer than our sun. If a person were on one of the seven planets, everything would look a lot darker than usual. The amount of light heading toward our eyes would be about 200 times less than we get from the sun, according to The Independent.
Because of that, Trappist-1, together with many other dwarf stars, was never on the list of places where scientists looked for alien life. But Michael Gillon, lead researcher behind the discovery, decided to give dwarf stars a chance. He built a telescope in Chile to observe 60 of the closest dwarf stars, and it turned out that Trappist-1 was worthy of the effort.
The researchers hope that they can spend more time watching the newly found planets to learn more about them. Even though more research is needed before determining whether these planets could really support life, the discovery is still encouraging. It shows just how many Earth-size planets could be out there.
“[The discovery] gives us a hint that finding a second Earth is not just a matter of if, but when,” NASA scientist Thomas Zurbuchen told The Telegraph.
1. What can be learned about the new solar system from the text?A.It contains a sun and planets like the Earth. |
B.There are aliens on the planets. |
C.Water can be found on all of the planets. |
D.Seven planets move around Trappist-1. |
A.Trappist-1 and other dwarf stars don’t provide as much heat and light as our sun can |
B.Scientists did not find a good place to observe dwarf stars according to the passage. |
C.It is impossible to find alien life on the planets of Trappist-1 and other dwarf stars. |
D.Scientists have observed dwarf stars, but they failed to find the possibility of survival. |
A.Less bright. | B.More powerful. |
C.Stronger. | D.Less beautiful. |
A.Scientists have found a second Earth. |
B.A new solar system may become home for humans. |
C.Scientists are planning to explore another planet. |
D.People will move to another Earth soon. |
【推荐2】Whenever we watch a horror movie and something scary happens, we might close our eyes and scream.
According to a recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Pittsburgh in the US, watching horror movies can raise mood, unite people, and boost confidence.
In the study, 262 adults were asked to enter a haunted house (鬼屋) attraction. Inside, they were met with a series of intense scenarios (场景) over the course of 35 minutes, and were asked to record their feelings both before and after the experience. At the same time, the researchers also monitored their brain waves.
In addition, being scared in a safe place could be a good way to boost confidence. Being afraid in a safe place even with people around can serve as a confidence boost.
A.We develop friendship with those we are with when we’re in an excited state. |
B.It encourages them to believe in their strength to make it through a scary situation. |
C.However, chances are that we will continue to watch and enjoy the movie anyway. |
D.So it makes sense that human bodies have evolved to make sure they feel close to those they are with when afraid. |
E.According to the researchers, the participants were more likely to be happier and less anxious. |
F.That may explain the reason why thrillers are popular among audience. |
G.What’s more, taking advantage of the sensation of being scared may bring people together. |
【推荐3】When a leafy plant is under attack, it doesn't sit quietly. Back in 1983,two scientists,Jack Schultz and Ian Baldwin, reported that young maple trees (枫树) getting bitten by insects send out a particular smell that neighboring plants can get. These chemicals come from the injured parts of the plant and seem to be an alarm. What the plants send through the air is a mixture of chemicals known as volatile organic compounds,VOCs for short.
Scientists have found that all kinds of plants give out VOCs when being attacked. It's a plant's way of crying out. But is anyone listening? Obviously. Because we can watch the neighbors react.
Some plants give out smelly chemicals to keep insects away. But others do double duty. They give out smells designed to attract different insects who are natural enemies to the attackers. Once they arrive, the tables are turned. The attacker who was launching now becomes lunch.
In study after study, it appears that these chemical conversations help the neighbors. The damage is usually more serious on the first plant, but the neighbors, relatively speaking,stay safer because they heard the alarm and knew what to do.
Does this mean that plants talk-to-each-other? Scientists don't know. Maybe the first plant just made a cry of pain or was sending a message to its own branches, and so in effect,was talking to itself. Perhaps the neighbors just happened to "overhear” the cry. So information was exchanged,but it wasn’t a true, intentional back and forth.
Charles Darwin, over 150 years ago,imagined a world far busier, noisier and more intimate (亲密的) than the world we can see and hear. Our senses are weak. There's a whole lot going on.
1. What does a plant do when it is under attack?A.It makes noises. | B.It stands quietly. |
C.It gets help from other plants. | D.It sends out certain chemicals. |
A.The attackers will get attacked |
B.The insects will gather under the table. |
C.The plants will get ready to fight back. |
D.The attackers will give out smelly chemicals. |
A.talk to one another on purpose |
B.warn people of a coming danger |
C.protect themselves against insects |
D.help their neighbors who are under attack |
A.The world is changing faster than ever. |
B.People have stronger senses than before. |
C.We don't fully understand the world. |
D.People in Darwin's time were more imaginative |
【推荐1】Over half of Canadian youth and young adults who have consumed energy drinks have experienced negative health effects as a result, according to a study from the University of Waterloo.
In a nationwide survey of Canadian youth, over half of those who had ever consumed an energy drink had reported experiencing a negative health event. Currently, Canadian legislation is meant to prohibit energy drinks from being marketed to children and energy drinks are not recommended to be used by people participating in sporting activities.
"Most risk assessments to date have used coffee as a reference for estimating the health effects of energy drinks. However, it is clear that these products cause a greater health risk," said David Hammond, a Professor in the School of Public Health at the University of Waterloo. "The health effects from energy drinks could be due to the different ingredients than coffee, or the ways in which they consumed, including with alcohol or during physical activity. Regardless, the findings suggest a need to increase monitoring of health effects from these products."
In conducting the study, the researchers surveyed 2,055 young Canadians aged 12 to 24. Of those who had reported consuming energy drinks at some point in their lives, 55.4 percent reported experiencing a negative health event. Of those reporting negative health events, 24.7 percent reported experiencing a fast heartbeat, 24.1 percent reported difficulty sleeping and 18.3 percent reported experiencing headaches.
"The number of health effects observed in our study suggests that more should be done to restrict consumption among children and youth," said Hammond. "At the moment, there are no restrictions on children purchasing energy drinks, and they are marketed at the point-of-sale in grocery stores, as well as advertising that targets children."
1. Who are forbidden to take energy drinks in Canada?A.Children. | B.Athletes. |
C.Old people. | D.Healthy people. |
A.The different ingredients in them. | B.The coffee contained in them. |
C.The quantity consumed at a time. | D.The place where they are consumed. |
A.Comparing results. | B.Listing figures. |
C.Giving examples. | D.Raising questions. |
A.It is illegal for children to buy energy drinks. |
B.Energy drinks are sold only in grocery stores. |
C.Some child actors advertise energy drinks. |
D.It's a long way to ban children from energy drinks. |
【推荐2】Sometimes, when Mr. Ballmer and his 16-year-old daughter, Elizabeth, listen to rock music together and talk about pop culture, he remembers his more distant relationship with his parents when he was a teenager. “I would never have said to my mom, ‘Hey, the new Weezer album is really great. How do you like it?’ ” says Ballmer. “There was just a complete gap in taste.” Music was not the only gulf. From clothing and hairstyles to activities and expectations, earlier generations of parents and children often appeared to move in separate orbits (轨道).
Today, the generation gap has not disappeared, but it is getting narrow in many families. Conversations on subjects such as pop culture and sex would not have taken place a generation ago. Now they are comfortable and common. And parent-child activities, from shopping to sports, involve a feeling of trust and friendship that can continue into adulthood.
But family experts warn that the new equality can also result in less respect for parents. “There’s still a lot of strictness and authority on the part of parents out there, but there is a change happening,” says Kerrie, a psychology professor at Lebanon Valley College. “In the middle of that change, there is a lot of confusion among parents.”
Family researchers offer a variety of reasons for these evolving roles and attitudes. They see the 1960s as a turning point. Great cultural changes led to more open communication and at more democratic (民主的) process that encourages everyone to have a say. “It’s not something easily accomplished by parents these days, because life is more difficult to understand or deal with, but sharing interests does make it more fun to be a parent now,” explains Mr. Ballmer.
1. What doesn’t the underlined word “gulf” means in the first paragraph?A.difference. | B.argument. | C.balance. | D.achievement. |
A.There is less parent-child activities. |
B.There is more respect for parents from children. |
C.There is a new equality between parents and children. |
D.There is more strictness and authority on the part of parents. |
A.Interested. | B.Supportive. | C.Indifferent. | D.Concerned. |
A.To describe the difficulties today’s parents have met with. |
B.To discuss the development of the parent-child relationship. |
C.To suggest the ways to handle the parent-child relationship. |
D.To solve the problem of the parent-child relationship. |
【推荐3】The Transoceanic Highway has been celebrated as one of South America's greatest engineering achievements, and supporters say it will greatly improve people's lives. Until recently, travel between the cities of Cusco and Puerto Maldonado in Peru took days by bus or truck—as Mary Luz's story illustrates—and drivers had to use narrow, parually unpaved mountain roads. Now, thanks to the new highway, the trip only takes a few hours, and is much safer.
Despite the highway's many potential benefits, environmentalists are concerned. The Transoceanic passes directly through a large part of the Amazon rain forest, in the state of Madre de Dios in Peru. According to a Peruvian government study, the forested area in the western mountains of this state has the greatest biodiversity of any place on Earth, and until recently, large parts of the forest were in pristine (未开发的) condition. As more people are moving into the region, environmentalists are worrying about the impact this will have on the Amazon's plants and animals, many of which are found nowhere else.
Shortly after the highway opened, large numbers of people began coming into Puerto Maldonado from all over Peru—and the world—to mine gold. There's a lot of money to be made in mining, as well as in farming, says environmental photographer Gabby Salazar. “I think we're going to see a big increase in farming,” she says. “Right across the border in Brazil, you see soybean farms all over the place.” Studies show three-quarters of the deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon occurs within 50 kilometers (30 miles) of a highway, and environmentalist like Salazar are concerned that the same thing will happen in Peru. “It's having an impact on the environment,” she explains. “It's having an impact on the people as well.”
Faced with these risks, many Peruvians talk about the importance of being practical, “In rural Peru, a lot of people are living in poverty, so it's very difficult to say don't build the highway.” explains Roger Mustalish, president of the Amazon Center for Environmental Education and Research. “But every time you see a road like this going through, you soon see major changes.” Will these changes be mostly positive or negative? Many Peruvians are hopeful, but only time will tell.
1. What is the passage mainly about?A.A new development that is resulting in mining and farming jobs. |
B.How environmentalists are protecting the Amazon's diverse wildlife. |
C.The impact a highway will have on the environment and people of Peru. |
D.How the Brazilian government helped the people of Peru build a new highway. |
A.Increased mining will lead to soil erosion. |
B.Farming will lead to an increase in water pollution. |
C.The highway will have an impact on plants and animals. |
D.The cities along the highway will become overpopulated. |
A.A highway like this brings about major changes on the environment. |
B.Economic development and environment protection need to be well balanced. |
C.It's too soon to say whether the highway will bring more good than harm or not. |
D.People in rural Peru are willing to sacrifice their benefits for the good of the environment. |
A.Positive | B.Subjective | C.Negative | D.Objective |