Parenting styles and choices are known to influence the way that children develop and grow. Researchers are now discovering more about a similar relationship between owners and their pets. How you “parent” your dog has an impact on the kind of dog it grows up to be.
The researchers studied 48 dog owners and their dogs, asking them to complete a pet parenting style survey before joining in three behavioral tests in the lab, assessing attachments and interactions between the dog and their human owners. Then researchers put the dog owners into three categories: authoritative (high expectations, high responsiveness), authoritarian (high expectations, low responsiveness), and permissive (low expectations, high responsiveness). The three behavioral tests covered attachment (how the dog responded to its owner during close interactions), sociability (how the dog responded when a stranger and its owner changed places with one another in the testing room), and problem-solving.
Dogs with authoritative owners had the highest rate of secure attachment and were highly social and sensitive to social context, compared to dogs with authoritarian or permissive owners. What’s more, the only dogs to solve the problem best came from the authoritative group. So researchers came with the conclusion that an owner who’s highly responsive to a dog’s behavior and needs tends to lead to a more social, secure, and smart dog.
The study matches up in some ways with previous research into parents and kids, specifically that children with authoritative parents are more likely to show secure attachment. It is thought to be because of the reliable support they get. “This research shows that the pet dog-human caretaker bond may be functionally and emotionally similar to the bond between a human parent and their child,” says behavioral scientist Lauren Brubaker.
For now, though the study is enough to show that there is some kind of relationship between the approach we take as dog owners and the way that those dogs then behave, even with numerous other factors in play. “We still need to conduct more research in this area,” said the researchers in their published paper.
1. What can we know about the research?A.A pet parenting style survey was needed. |
B.The dogs were divided into 3 categories. |
C.Dog owners were tested for sociability. |
D.Interactions between the dog owners were assessed. |
A.The purpose of the research. |
B.The process of the research. |
C.The findings of the research. |
D.The participants of the research. |
A.parents | B.pet dogs | C.dog owners | D.children |
A.To introduce some different pet parenting styles. |
B.To inform readers of a research finding. |
C.To instruct parents how to parent their kids. |
D.To persuade dog owners to be authoritative. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】For months, their adventure through China’s south-western Yunnan province had gone almost unnoticed. But last week, when images of a group of 15 Asian elephants walking through a residential(居民的) area appeared on social media, it immediately seized the imagination of the nation, stirring up considerable media interest and questions as to what caused their unusual journey.
The movement was so unusual that authorities sent as many as 360 people with 76 cars and nine drones(无人机) to track it. State TV has spent days following their every footstep. Chinese wildlife authorities have been struggling to understand why the elephants left their natural habitat last year. According to Xinhua, a group of 16 wild elephants began the journey in March 2020 to the north. In November, they arrived in Pu’er in Yunnan, where a female elephant gave birth to a baby, and settled there for five months. They then continued the walk on 16 April. A week later, two left the group, leaving 15 to continue their odyssey.
The appearance of the animals has not been warmly received by residents in Yunnan. Along the way, they have caused much destruction, eating whole fields of corn and ruining farm buildings. State broadcaster CCTV has estimated the damage to be at least 6.8m yuan ($1.07m). Fortunately, no human death has been reported so far.
Chinese experts said there had been other reports of elephants wandering into villages and harming crops in recent years. “Large-scale human engineering developments have changed the ‘islanding’ of elephant habitats,” said Zhang Li, a professor from Beijing Normal University. “The traditional zones between humans and elephants are gradually disappearing, and the chances of elephants’ facing humans naturally increase greatly.”
The wild elephant population in Yunnan is about 300, up from 170 in 1980, but the habitat area has decreased from 2,084 square km in 1976 to less than 500 square km in recent years.
1. What happened to the group of wild elephants in Yunnan?A.They got trapped while approaching a residential area. |
B.They headed north after leaving their natural habitat. |
C.They had a newborn baby in March 2020. |
D.They split up and three male elephants left. |
A.Adventure. | B.Break. | C.Struggle. | D.Victory. |
A.Excited. | B.Confused. | C.Embarrassed. | D.Annoyed. |
A.Wild elephants got on well with humans in the past. |
B.An island will be reserved to protect wild elephants. |
C.The number of wild elephants will stay stable. |
D.There may be more human-elephant conflicts in the future. |
【推荐2】Bronx Zoo
Excited to explore this z00 already? Well, save your dates and plan your trip to the US with Travel Triangle right away and let the kids within your joy. The Bronx Zoo is definitely one of the best places to visit in the USA. We are sure that you would have the best time ever!
The Size
The Bronx Zoo is among the biggest zoos in the US, measuring 265 acres or over 100 hectares. It is literally so big that you may find it difficult to explore it all in just a day. Not only is it big in terms of size but it’s the largest zo0 in the US by number of animals as well. As of 2020, it had 4,000 animals of over 600 species. Some of them include fennec foxes, bald eagles, collared lemurs and Komodo dragons.
Location
The Bronx zo0 in the USA is located at 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460.
The Tickets Cost
Tickets to the z00 in the US cost $28 for children, $37 for adults (13 years and over). Entry for children aged two and under is free. You can also go on group tours led by trained expedition leaders. It costs $125 for a group of up to 5 people.
Open Time
Bronx Zoo is open from 10 am to 5 pm Monday—Friday and 10 am to 5.30 pm on weekends and holidays. All animal exhibits end half an hour before the park closes.
The Best Attractions
Names | Attractions | Open Time |
Butterfly Garden | A dozen butterfly species | March 30th to October 1st |
Children’s Zoo | See and interact (交流) with farm animals | May 30th to October 30th |
Congo Gorilla Forest | Exhibition of Congo Gorilla | April 1st to October 30th |
Jungle world | Golden langurs in”Asian jungle” | May 30th to October 1st |
1. How much will a couple with a 3-year-old boy pay to enter the zoo?
A.$74. | B.$93. | C.$102. | D.$125. |
A.At 10 am. | B.4:30 pm. | C.5 pm. | D.5:30 pm. |
A.Butterfly Garden. | B.Children’s Zoo. | C.Jungle world. | D.Congo Gorilla Forest. |
【推荐3】Now it seems that more and more animals are showing up in cities where we would not expect them to. But scientists have learned that some species do better in cities. Take peregrine falcons (游隼) for example. They use tall city buildings to make homes, man-made lighting to hunt at night, and warm air currents created when the sun beats down on city surfaces to fly with less effort.
Some animals adapt well to city life, and some do not. For example, squirrels (松鼠) do amazingly well living in cities, while wolves have never seemed to get the hang of it. Usually, animals that eat a lot of different things, called generalists, do much better in cities than specialists, which eat one specific kind of food. Smaller animals are also more likely to live in cities than bigger animals. Some people believe animals that do well in cities might be smarter than the ones that do not, but more research is needed on this.
Many animals have even learned cool tricks to live in cities, and these behaviors help them find more food or mates (伴侣), or avoid people. To learn about these behaviors, we use recording devices to spot animals, microphones to record their sounds, and tracking equipment to follow them. Scientists use many different tools to study what animals eat, how healthy they are, how they compete with each other, and more.
Humans are turning the planet into cities and farms, which does not leave many other places for most wildlife to live in. So, what can we do? At home, we can cover our garbage carefully because it is not good for wild animals. We can also plant some native plants that wildlife might like. Seeing animals in a city, we can give them space and watch them from far away. We could also try some creative things like green roofs where birds and insects can live in.
To do that, we need to know what kind of habitats different species need, and how to prevent human-wildlife conflicts. We still have a lot to learn.
1. How does the author develop paragraph 1?A.By providing statistical data. | B.By making a comparison. |
C.By giving an example. | D.By stating arguments. |
A.Those with close mates. | B.Those with long diet lists. |
C.Those with fast movement. | D.Those with high intelligence. |
A.Restrict urban and agricultural development. |
B.Make our cities wildlife-friendly. |
C.Plant new varieties of plants. |
D.Sort our garbage carefully. |
A.In a short story. | B.In a health journal. |
C.In a business report. | D.In a science magazine. |
【推荐1】Look at your modern TV, and you see nothing less than a technological miracle. Scientists began experimenting with the concept of television more than a century ago. But decades would pass before it was brought to the public at the 1939 World’s Fair. More time passed before TV sets were in stores—and even then, it took a while until most people had one.
During the 1950s, TVs were expensive, screens were small and the picture wasn’t always clear. Moreover, early programs were in black and white; color wasn’t in wide use until the mid-1960s. Viewers didn’t have a lot of choice, either. Instead of hundreds of channels to choose from, most cities offered only three or four.
Early TVs worked with the use of analog (模拟的) signals. Here’s how they worked: Using a giant transmission tower, the local television station sent those waves through the air. Antennas on the roofs of buildings and homes received those waves and transported the signal to the television sets inside. By 2009, TV stations replaced analog signals with digital signals, which is the standard used today.
Modern digital TV uses different information streams. For example, one stream is for the picture; another stream is for the audio. Pictures are created by basic units called pixels (像素). Your screen has tens of thousands of pixels. Basically, three colors—red, blue and green—form other colors in various combinations, and the picture is created from all the pixels together. Groups of bits are formed into larger units called bytes (字节), which are the link between the content you’re watching and your TV. Your digital smart TV has an interface that allows you to control all the functions. Basically, a smart TV is a computer, large monitor and receiver all in one package.
In the future, there will be more functions equipped in your cellphone and TV and thus offer you more choices. Whether the TV will be a screen for your cellphone is up to you.
1. Which of the following was a new characteristic of the TV sets in the mid-1960s?A.The screens were small. | B.The pictures were unclear. |
C.The pictures were colored. | D.Many channels were offered. |
A.The development of TVs. | B.The working process of TVs. |
C.The problems viewers meet. | D.The advantages of modern TVs. |
A.They are always used as computers by viewers. |
B.Their pictures are more colorful with higher pixels. |
C.Users can control some of the functions on their computers. |
D.Bytes are in charge of linking the program to the TVs. |
A.A science-tech magazine. | B.A news report. |
C.A travel brochure. | D.A storybook. |
【推荐2】A new study led by researchers at the Yale School of Public Health finds air pollution may negatively impact standardized test scores. Using data from the North Carolina Education Research Data Center, the researchers tracked 2.8 million public school students in North Carolina from 2001 to 2018 and measured their exposure to PM2.5 found in polluted air. While previous research has shown negative effects on academic performance, it has relied on relatively small or less representative samples. “The biggest strength of this study is that we tracked every student in North Carolina in those years, for the whole time period that they were in the public schools,” said Emma Zang, coauthor of the study.
The study also finds that test scores of ethnic minorities and girls are disproportionately (不成比例地) impacted by PM2.5 levels. “Females and ethnic minorities face sexism and racism,” said Zang. “There are a lot of policies that are not friendly towards them. So, when they’re exposed to the same level of air pollution, they don’t have the resources to lessen the negative influences.” More privileged populations, however, might have more resources that allow them to live in a better environment, such as in houses with air purifiers.
“The level of PM2.5 pollution in the US is relatively low, but students living in areas below the current air quality standard of annual PM2.5 concentration are still negatively impacted by air pollution when it comes to their test scores,” said Zang. “We should aim to strengthen the annual PM2.5 standard to better protect our children.”
Air pollution is known to contribute to disease and death, and it also negatively affects students’ academic performance even at low levels of pollution. The subsequent studies, the researchers said, would involve looking at whether the findings hold true in different areas, and also the reasons behind the ethnic and sexual differences.
1. What’s the greatest advantage of the study?A.Tracking each student for 18 years. | B.Collecting more comprehensive data. |
C.Measuring students’ PM2.5 exposure precisely. | D.Building links between air pollution and test scores. |
A.benefit from current policies on PM2.5 pollution |
B.have the lowest test scores due to their identities |
C.lack resources to reduce the impact of air pollution |
D.suffer from educational inequalities owing to their background |
A.Offering a suggestion. | B.Raising a doubt. |
C.Making a comparison. | D.Giving a prediction. |
A.Applicability of the findings to other regions. | B.Ways to address racial and sexual differences. |
C.Long-term impacts of air pollution on children. | D.Establishment of PM2.5 standard fit for children. |
【推荐3】Although ethics classes are common around the world, scientists are unsure if their lessons can actually change behavior, evidence either way is weak, relying on laboratory tests or sometimes self-reports. But a new study published in Cognition found that, in at least one real-world situation, a single ethics lesson may have had lasting effects.
The researchers investigated one class session’s impact on eating meat. They chose this particular behavior for three reasons, according to study co-author Eric Schwitzgebel, a philosopher at the University of California, Riverside: Students’ attitudes on the topic are variable and unstable, behavior is easily measurable, and ethics literature largely agrees that eating less meat is good because it reduces environmental harm and animal suffering. Half of the students in four large philosophy classes read an article on the ethics of factory-farmed meat optionally watched an 11-minute video on the topic and joined a 50-minute discussion. The other half focused on charitable giving instead. Then unknown to the students, the researchers studied their anonymous meal-card purchases for that semester-nearly 14,000 receipts for almost 500 students.
Schwitzgebel predicted the intervention would have no effect; he had previously found that ethics professors do not differ from other professors on a range of behaviors, including voting rates, blood donation and returning library books. But among student subjects who discussed meat ethics, meal purchases containing meat decreased from 52 to 45 percent-and this effect held steady for the study’s duration of several weeks. Purchases from other group remained at 52 percent.
“That’s actually a pretty large effect for a pretty small intervention,” Schwitzgebel says, Psychologist Nina Strohminger at the University of Pennsylvania, who was not involved in the study, says she wants the effect to be real but cannot rule out some unknown confusing variable.
Schwitzgebel suspects the greatest impact came from social influence—classmates or teaching assistants leading the discussions may have shared their own vegetarianism, showing it as achievable or more common. Second, the video may have had an emotional impact. Least sparkling, he thinks, is rational argument, although his co-authors say reason might also play a big role. Now the researchers are probing the specific effects of teaching style, teaching assistants’ eating habits and students’ video exposure. Meanwhile, Schwitzgebel, who had predicted no effect, will be eating his words.
1. Why is it difficult to determine the effects of ethics classes?A.Because the ethics classes don’t have lasting effects. |
B.Because the subjects in ethics classes are difficult to identify. |
C.Because the evidence gathered from the classes may be unreliable. |
D.Because the classes are usually poorly summarized and misinterpreted. |
A.It is a sought-after behavior among students. |
B.It is beneficial to students’ health. |
C.It is a behavior easy to measure. |
D.It is a hot topic among students in ethics classes. |
A.are not necessarily ethically better. |
B.are less open to new things than other professionals. |
C.are not sensitive to political issues. |
D.are less likely to criticize students. |
A.Students’ change in behavior can give a boost to their reasoning. |
B.Students’ change in behavior is a result of multiple factors. |
C.Students’ change in behavior is a result of self reflection and regulation. |
D.Students’ change in behavior can bring psychological benefits. |
【推荐1】Tower Bridge is a bascule bridge in London, over the River Thames. It is close to the Tower of London, which gives it its name. It is sometimes incorrectly referred to as London Bridge, which is the next bridge upstream(在上游). It is one of five London bridges now owned and maintained by the Bridge House Estates.
In the second half of the nineteenth century, increased commercial(贸易的) development in the East End of London led to a requirement for a new river crossing downstream of London Bridge. A Special Bridge or Subway Committee was formed in 1876 to find a solution to the river crossing problem. It opened the design of the crossing to public competition. Over 50 designs were received. The judgment of the designs was surrounded by argument, and it wasn’t until 1884 that a design sent by Horace Jones was sanctioned.
Construction of the bridge started in 1886 and took about 8 years’ hard work of 432 construction workers. Over 70,000 tons of concrete were sunk into the river bed to support the construction. Over 11,000 tons of steel provided the framework(框架) for the towers and walkways. Horace Jones died in 1887, and another engineer took over the project. The bridge was opened in 1894.
The bridge sits almost directly above the Tower Subway, the world’s first underground tube railway (1870), which, until the bridge was opened, was the shortest way to cross the River Thames. A computer system was installed(安装) in 2000 to control the raising and lowering of the bascule. However, this has proved less reliable than expected, resulting in the bridge being stuck in the open or closed position on a number of occasions.
1. What does Paragraph 1 say about Tower Bridge?A.It’s named after a famous person. |
B.It’s another name for London Bridge. |
C.It’s not far from the Tower of London. |
D.It’s the only bridge over the River Thames. |
A.Tried. | B.Received. |
C.Discovered. | D.Passed. |
A.The history of Tower Bridge. | B.The building of Tower Bridge. |
C.The influence of Tower Bridge. | D.The importance of Tower Bridge. |
A.Many breakdowns have happened to Tower Bridge. |
B.The computer system works better than expected. |
C.The underground tube railway has a history of less than 20 years. |
D.The Tower Subway is the shortest way to cross the River Thames. |
【推荐2】For the first time, scientists have grown plants in the moon soil (土壤) collected by NASA’s Apollo astronauts. The scientists had no idea if anything would grow in the moon soil. They wanted to see if it could be used to grow food by the next generation of moon explorers.
Robert Ferl of the University of Florida’s Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences was surprised with the results. He and other researchers planted small flowering plants in the moon soil returned from the Apollo missions. The good news was that all of the plants grew. The bad news was that after the first week, the moon soil stressed the plants so much that they grew slowly. Most of the moon plants were small or not fully developed.
The longer the soil was exposed (暴露) to solar wind on the moon, the worse the plants seemed to do. The soil collected by the Apollo 11 mission was the least helpful for growth. It was exposed a couple billion years longer to the elements, the scientists said.
Simon Gilroy of the University of Wisconsin-Madison wasn’t part of the study. He said, “This is a big step forward to know that you can grow plants.” Gilroy added, “The real next step is to go and do it on the surface of the moon.”
Moon soil is full of glass particles (微粒). They got in the Apollo lunar landers and wore down the moonwalkers’ spacesuits. One solution might be to use younger spots on the moon for digging up soil. The environment also could be changed by adding special nutrient (养分) mixtures or man-made lighting.
1. What happened to the plants after the first week?A.They grew better than before. | B.They died from lack of water. |
C.They failed to grow very well. | D.They were struck by diseases. |
A.Solar wind. | B.Glass particles. | C.Man-made lighting. | D.Nutrient mixtures. |
A.thinks highly of the research | B.took part in the study himself |
C.found a way to improve the soil | D.works at the University of Florida |
A.NASA collected soil from the moon. | B.Astronauts returned to Earth safely. |
C.Scientists grew plants in the lunar soil. | D.Explorers grew food on the moon. |
【推荐3】Vertical farming is a hugely promising farming method that aims to produce more food to feed the growing population on our planet with limited natural resources. It includes growing in vertical frames (垂直框架) or even in high-rise buildings while farms are moved into urban areas, and producing nutritious crops without topsoil.
The farmers plant crops in nutrient-rich water, so plants can be raised without soil. They also grow plants using water from fish tanks, or using nutrient water mist systems that reduce water use by huge amounts, which is a technique developed by NASA as a way for astronauts to live in space and feed themselves while preserving precious water supplies. All of these soilless growing techniques use less or no chemicals, and recycle water with less waste. Plants can be grown and harvested all year round, free from natural disasters such as drought or flooding.
“This is the farming of the future,” said Paul Myers, co-founder of the vertical farming enterprise Farm Urban, “chemical-free and moved from the traditional agriculture to a more sustainable approach.”
The global vertical farming market is expected to be bigger. This is fueled in part by increasing demand for organic, chemical-free foods, but also by countries looking to increase their food security and cut down on imports, the UK, for example. It uses around 25 percent of its land as cultivated land but imports much of its food.
As the vertical farming industry expands, it is worth noting that it has limitations-it only works for some crops, and urban locations can be expensive.
1. Where will vertical farming be popular in the future?A.In cities. | B.In plains. | C.In deserts. | D.In the countryside. |
A.Waste-free. | B.Nutrient-rich. | C.Soilless. | D.Water-proof. |
A.The trade routes are secure. | B.Organic food is increasingly popular. |
C.The economic benefit is substantial. | D.Imports are becoming more difficult. |
A.Vertical Farming: How to Save Soil and Water |
B.Vertical Farming: What to Plant in a New Way |
C.Vertical Farming: Lowering Environmental Impact |
D.Vertical Farming: Raising Agriculture's Potential |