If you’re in the market for a new food or water dish for your cat, you might want to check out Free the Ocean’s Bamboo Cat Bowls. These are made of bamboo fibers and rice husks (稻壳) and are more eco-friendly than traditional plastic.
The presence of bamboo-used as a renewable filler—is part of what makes the bowl greener. Bamboo, which is technically a grass, grows 30% faster than trees and as much as 1.5 inches per hour! Not surprisingly, it produces 30% more oxygen and absorbs 35% more carbon dioxide than trees, according to Mimi Ausland, founder of Free the Ocean. “It’s a cut-and-come-again plant, which means it can be cropped without disrupting the root ball, reducing carbon giving off when it’s harvested.”
Rice husk is a byproduct of rice production that is a challenge to farmers because it is hard to break down and of no great value. Its use as a filler provides a purpose for an otherwise useless material and, along with the bamboo.
Ausland said, “Plastic cat dishes harbor bacteria (细菌), which can put your cat’s health at risk. Even if pet owners clean them regularly, they cannot be fully sanitized. Plastic bowls are the main cause of cat diseases.”
However, the bamboo cat bowl will not leach (渗入) harmful chemicals into your pet’s water the way that traditional plastic can and it is naturally free of bacteria.
Cats will like the bowls, as they have low edges. With an easy-to-pick-up handle, they come in four colors.
One customer commented, “My cats prefer these cat food bowls just like me. The cats like the low lip that makes it easy to eat out of. And the fact that they’re made of bamboo and that buying them makes a difference to the environment is amazing! And it is easy to wash in the dishwasher.”
1. What is mainly talked about in paragraph 2?A.The importance of bamboo in nature. | B.The advantages of bamboo over grass. |
C.The benefits of using bamboo as material. | D.The role of bamboo in reducing pollution. |
A.Replaced. | B.Removed. | C.Found. | D.Used. |
A.To promote a new product. | B.To give pet owners some advice. |
C.To introduce the functions of bamboo. | D.To point out the link between material and health. |
A.Cats have low lips. | B.Cats are easy to satisfy. |
C.He is fond of the new bowl. | D.He doesn’t like doing housework. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Household chores might seem a drag, but researchers have suggested tasks like dusting, scrubbing floors and washing the windows might help adults to stay healthy into old age.
Writing in the journal BMJ Open, a Singapore-based team of researchers said regular physical activity “improves physical and mental health, mitigates the risks and effects of chronic diseases, and reduces falls, immobility, dependency and mortality (死亡率) among older adults”. The team randomly recruited (征召) adults from the town of Yishun in Singapore, and asked them to complete cognitive function tests as well as activities to assess their physical capabilities, such as standing up from a chair as quickly as they could. Participants were also quizzed on their levels of physical activity, including the amount of light housework (such as dusting) and heavy housework (such as floor-scrubbing) they did, and were assessed for their risk of having a fall based on measures such as knee extension strength.
The study involved 249 participants aged 21-64 and 240 participants aged 65-90. Most of those who reported doing high levels of heavy or light housework were women. After taking into account factors including age and sex, the team found cognitive scores and attention scores were 8% and 14% higher respectively for older adults doing high amounts of heavy housework—on average 131 minutes a week compared with low levels, which appeared to amount to none at all.
Sit-to-stand times were lower for older adults reporting high amounts of heavy housework compared with low amounts, while they were also assessed asbeing at lower risk of having a fall. The team also found cognitive scores were 5% higher for older adults who reported high levels of light housework — on average doing 902 minutes a week — and memory scores were also higher, comparedwiththoseundertakinglowlevelsofsuchtasks,averaging89minutesaweek.
Gill Livingston, professor of psychiatry of older people at University College London, who was not involved in the work, said the study was interesting but had little meaning as people who are not so well may be expected to do less housework. “I think the advice would be that housework can be good exercise, which is good for your heart and brain. We cannot draw any conclusions from this study that it is specifically protective,” she said.
Charlie Foster, professor of physical activity and public health at the University of Bristol, also urged caution, noting the study relied on self-reported levels of household chores, which may be inaccurate, and did not fully take into account other factors which may influence the results.
1. What is the purpose of the passage?A.To tell people the more housework the better. |
B.To stress the importance of health. |
C.To propose a way to reduce mortality among older people. |
D.To show us the benefits of doing housework for the old. |
A.Women are more diligent than men. |
B.Cognitive and attention scores were 8%and 14% higher for old adults doing more heavy housework. |
C.The study is reasonable to some extent. |
D.No other factors influence the result of the research. |
A.The study was carried out among old people. |
B.Olderadultsreportinghighamountsofheavyhouseworkareathigherriskofhavingafall. |
C.Housework is good exercise specifically protective for older adults. |
D.Levels of high housework have an influence on cognitive and memory scores. |
A.Indifferent. | B.Supportive. | C.Objective. | D.Favourable. |
【推荐2】An analysis in nearly 2.3 million Europeans has found harmful associations between cold weather and deaths from heart disease, particularly in poor neighborhoods. The late-breaking research is presented at ESC Congress 2022.
Climate change is leading to a rise in the average global temperature but also extreme cold in some regions. More than 70, 000 extra deaths occurred across Europe during the summer of 2003 due to vehement heatwaves. Cold weather also accounts for extra deaths and hospital admissions.
Previous studies on the cardiovascular (心血管的) effects of heat and cold mainly used collective data, such as daily deaths in a city. The analysis used individual data, enabling us to identify weak groups for protective measures, therefore increasing adaptation for future weather events.
The analysis found increased risks of death from cardiovascular disease overall. With an approximately 10℃ temperature drop, from 5℃ to-5℃, there was a 19% greater risk of death from cardiovascular disease. There was a 4% higher risk of heart disease associated with an approximately 11℃ temperature drop. from 2℃ to-9℃.
Study author Professor Stefan Agewall of the University of Oslo, Norway said, “The relationships between cold temperatures and deaths were more pronounced in men and people living in neighborhoods with a low social and economic status. The links between cold and heart disease were stronger among women and people older than 65 years.”
Professor Agewall added, “Doctors can use this information to provide tailored advice for those most at risk of bad health outcomes during hot and cold days. We can all check the news for extreme heat and cold alerts and follow safety tips from local authorities.”
1. Which may best replace the underlined word “vehement” in paragraph 2?A.comfortable |
B.impressive |
C.accessible |
D.intense |
A.To make sure individuals get ready for extreme weather. |
B.To determine the effect of extra deaths from extreme weather. |
C.To identify specific groups easily affected by extreme weather. |
D.To analyze the links between individuals and extreme weather. |
A.What tailored advice is made up of. |
B.How his findings may benefit people. |
C.What weather report can do for patients. |
D.Why bad health outcomes occur in extreme weather. |
A.Protective measures for extreme weather events |
B.The constantly increasing average global temperature |
C.The links between climate change and extreme weather |
D.Potential threat to heart health from extreme weather |
【推荐3】What color is a tennis ball? Ask your classmates, and they might give you some surprising answers.
US magazine The Atlantic recently asked 30,000 people this question. Among them, 52 percent said tennis balls are green, 42 percent said they are yellow, and 6 percent went with other colors. According to the International Tennis Federation, tennis balls are yellow.
Scientists call this color constancy (色彩恒常性). For example, we know that China's flag is red. When we see it during sunset or under purple light, we still know that it is red, even if it looks like a different color.
According to The Atlantic, when our brains try to figure out what color the ball is, some people ignore ''cool'' colors, such as green, blue and purple. So they see the ball as being yellow.
A.It is not just tennis balls that have such a confusing color. |
B.But others ignore ''warm'' colors, such as red, yellow and orange. |
C.However, the color of a tennis ball is not as pure as the flag. |
D.It is difficult for some people to distinguish yellow from green. |
E.So why did so many people say that they're green? |
F.Certain parts of our brain are in charge of recognizing colors. |
G.When we first see an object in natural light, our brains recognize its true color. |
【推荐1】With the weather getting hot, bites caused by mosquitoes not only annoy people, but can result in many infectious diseases. Even when people wear long clothes, mosquitoes' complex biting mechanism enables them to bite some of them through.
It would be great if clothing could be used to completely prevent people from getting bitten. Researchers tested graphene (石墨烯), a material that is incredibly thin but really strong, in order to find out if it can make clothing resistant to mosquitoes.
In the lab experiment, volunteers exposed a small patch of skin on their arm or hand to roughly 100 mosquitoes for five minutes at a time. Researchers tested three different situations: volunteers wearing no protection, wearing cheesecloth (薄纱棉布), or wearing cheesecloth plus a thin graphene layer under it.
A video camera was then used to record and quantify mosquitoes' behavior, including whether they landed on the skin, how long they stayed there, and whether they began to draw blood. The number of bites each volunteer got was also calculated based on how many swellings developed on their skin afterward. Finally, researchers dropped a little water or sweat on top of the graphene layer and studied the consequence, and they also tested a slightly different graphene layer called "reduced graphene".
As a result, the number of mosquito bites on naked skin was the highest, about 16 on average; skin only protected by cheesecloth got the second, approximately 10 per five minutes' exposure. The exciting finding was that there was no swelling developing on skin covered by the thin graphene layer under cheesecloth, which means the material is effective at preventing mosquito bites. The mosquitoes landed on skin totally uncovered or covered in cheesecloth about 23 times on average, and stayed for one to two minutes. Comparatively, the mosquitoes landed on skin covered in the graphene layer fewer than 10 times, and the length of their stay was much shorter. Besides, water or sweat can ruin the graphene layer, which allows mosquitoes to bite through it. But fortunately, the number of mosquito bites in either dry or wet conditions can be lowered as long as the graphene material is improved to a certain extent.
1. Why did researchers conduct the experiment?A.To record the behavior of mosquitoes. |
B.To find a substance to prevent mosquito bites. |
C.To find a solution to stop infectious diseases. |
D.To test graphene's effectiveness in preventing mosquito bites. |
A.bleed | B.lose | C.test | D.suck |
A.By analyzing the reasons. | B.By comparing the statistics. |
C.By classifying three situations. | D.By recording mosquitoes' behavior. |
A.Cause-effect. | B.Opinion-fact. |
C.Assumption-conclusion. | D.Phenomenon-evaluation. |
【推荐2】A living robot has been created out of frog skin cells. Xenobots, named after the frog species Xenopus laevis that the cells come from, were first described last year. Now the team behind the robots has improved their design and demonstrated new capabilities.
To create the xenobots, Michael Levin at Tufts University in Massachusetts and his colleagues obtained tissue from 24-hour-old frog embryos after very small physical operation. Where the previous version relied on the contraction of heart muscle cells to move them forward by pushing off surfaces, these new xenobots swim around faster. They also live between three and seven days longer than their previous generation, which only lasted about seven days, and have the ability to sense their surroundings to some extent, turning red when exposed to blue light.
“The fundamental finding here is that when you free skin cells from their normal context, and you give them a chance to build other things than what they normally build,” says Levin. “To me, one of the most exciting things here is that they are plastic. This idea that even normal cells, not genetically modified, are in fact capable of building something completely different.”
Because they are created from cells, the xenobots eventually break apart and are totally biodegradable, says team member Douglas Blackiston, also at Tufts University. He therefore hopes that they can be used for biomedical and environmental applications.
Previous attempts at creating living robots, such as a wirelessly controlled cockroach, have involved dealing with live animals, raising ethical concerns. Xenobots differ from these because they are made entirely of living cells. “The approach here is maybe ethically the least problematic because everything starts with cells. They have no neurons, so it's not an animal,” says Auke ljspeert at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology at Lausanne, who wasn't involved in the research. “It's really cells, so I find it maybe the cleanest way."
1. How were the new xenobots created?A.By making use of frog embryos. | B.By relying on heart muscle cells. |
C.By sensing similar surroundings. | D.By exposing them to blue light. |
A.Fragile. | B.Stable. | C.Flexible. | D.Active. |
A.The xenobots can't break down easily. | B.The xenobots need to be further perfected. |
C.The xenobots can be applied in other fields. | D.The xenobots have already been widely used. |
A.The new approach starts with some neurons. |
B.Xenobots have raised least ethical concerns. |
C.The wireless controlled cockroach is a failure. |
D.Previous living robots involve few living animals. |
【推荐3】Next time you’re in a public place, take a look around you, and count how many people are using their phones. I can tell you now that it is probably more than half, whether you’re on public transport, in a cafe or simply walking down the street.
I’m not saying that I am not an example of this, but it always amazes me how people can spend so much time on their phones without actually talking to anyone in particular.
For example, I recently visited London and travelled on the tube while I was there. Apart from the people asleep, almost everybody else was on their phones, and because of the nature of the tube, it is difficult not to see exactly what they are all doing. Of course, being underground it is difficult for you to get any signal, which rules out texting or using the Internet, but there is still plenty you can use your phones for. People were playing games, reading articles and listening to music, and I am sure that as soon as they emerged from the train station they would start texting or calling or checking their emails.
Recently, my smartphone broke and had to be sent off to the warehouse for repair for a week or so. In the meantime I had to use a really old, basic phone just to keep me in touch with my family and friends. All I could do on this phone was send text messages, make calls and play one game. And I loved it. I loved being free from the Internet, and I really didn’t mind not having constant updates about what my friends were doing or what the latest celebrity story was. It allowed me to spend more lime taking in my surroundings.
However, I knew that as soon as I got my smartphone hack I would be one of those people once again. Perhaps I should just go back to using the basic phone and forget my smartphone.
1. Why are you asked to look around in Paragraph 1?A.To ensure your safety. |
B.To communicate with people. |
C.To count the people around you. |
D.To count the number of people using the phones. |
A.Using mobile apps. |
B.Talking with each other. |
C.Reading printed books. |
D.Checking social network sites. |
A.He felt great actually. |
B.He found it very inconvenient. |
C.He couldn’t see much difference, |
D.He felt terrible at first but better later. |
A.People without mobiles. |
B.People using basic phones. |
C.People using smartphones reasonably. |
D.People spending a lot of time on mobiles. |
【推荐1】Each year on February 2nd, there is special festival called Groundhog Day (土拨鼠日) forecasting event in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania. When it comes, people from around the world, including 5,000 in the small town today, watch this tongue-twisting(发音饶舌的) small town for a sign from one groundhog that supposedly predicts when that years' spring will arrive.
If it's a cloudy day outside when the groundhog pops from its cave, then spring will arrive early that year. However, if it is sunny outside, the groundhog will supposedly be scared by its own shadow, hiding underground for six more weeks of cold weather.
Of course, Punxsutawney Phil's prediction is no more able to guarantee the extended forecast than your local weatherman. ABC News reports that an analysis by the National Climate Data Center found that Phil's predictions are more often wrong than right.
Philis is also found to have made some unpleasant predictions. Ever since 1887, he has predicted 99 extended winters and just 16 early springs .Nine of the years' predictions were unavailable, according to ABC.
The holiday began as a German tradition in 18th century and became even more of a cultural phenomenon after the 1993 film Groundhog Day starring Bill Murray.
Punxsutawney Phil has become a celebrity in his own right. Each year, the fatter animal with long teeth is watched by millions as he emerges from a cave in the town he is named after. Phil has become so beloved by the town that he actually lives in the local library with his “wife" Phyllis.
Taking inspiration from the hard state of Bill Murray’s character in the classic film, Yahoo contributor Owen Rust says Groundhog Day is a good time to reflect on one’s routines.
1. The underlined word “pops” means “ ”.A.escapes | B.appears | C.increases | D.hides |
A.some of the predictions were unavailable | B.Phil wants to do that for fun |
C.Phil likes to make unpleasant predictions | D.he has predicted more late springs |
A.By an accident. | B.From people's life improving. |
C.By his own attractive force | D.From much money raised by the town. |
A.The National Climate Data Center | B.A German tradition |
C.A tongue-twisting small town | D.Groundhog Day weather forecasting |
【推荐2】Instagram has launched (发布) a machine learning technology to its app that better identifies self-harm and suicide (自杀) content in the UK after tragic death of a 14-year-old schoolgirl Molly Russell, who viewed Instagram content connected to anxiety, depression, self-harm and suicide before ending her own life in November 2017.
Molly’s family later found she had been viewing content on social media, particularly pictures on Instagram, linked to anxiety, depression, self-harm and suicide, which her father, Ian Russell, believed to “help to kill her.” Ian has demanded that web companies should take more responsibility for filtering (过滤) harmful content from the Internet, which may possibly contribute to more young people’s deaths.
Concerns have been raised about self-harm and suicide content online, especially how platforms deal with such content and its impact on certain users, young people in particular. Social media platforms are now increasingly being pressured to develop technology to help remove harmful content as quickly as possible, rather than waiting for users to report it.
Now, the new tool from Instagram automatically searches for suicide-related images and words on the platform. It then makes the content less visible (可见的) in the app or, in some cases, removes it completely after 24 hours if the machine learning decides it breaks the app’s safety rules.
Instagram boss Adam Mosseri said, “Our technology finds posts that may include suicide or self-harm content and sends them to human reviewers to make the final decision and take the right action.” Between April and June this year, around 90 percent of such kind of harmful content on Instagram was found by its own technology before any real user reported it to the platform. “But our goal is to get that number as close as we possibly can to 100 percent,” Mosseri added. “And I hope this could in some way help avoid tragic deaths like Molly Russell’s.”
1. What does Molly’s father mean by saying “help to kill her”?A.Someone on Instagram helped her to kill herself. |
B.She was suffering from cyberbully on Instagram. |
C.Content on Instagram had negative effects on her. |
D.She didn’t get any help from social media. |
A.Social media platforms are all taking action to remove harmful content from the Internet. |
B.Users can report harmful content online to the platform if they see any. |
C.All images and words that the new technology finds will be completely removed. |
D.Instagram has already achieved their goal to find 100 percent of harmful content in its app. |
A.Negative. | B.Positive. |
C.Doubtful. | D.Worried. |
A.A new technology brought out by Instagram after a teenager’s death |
B.A schoolgirl’s tragic death after viewing harmful content online |
C.Ways to prevent young people from self-harm and suicide |
D.How to deal with depression, self-harm and suicide content online |
【推荐3】You’re looking through social media and notice that one of your really smart friends has once again shared a somewhat astonishing story that you know is wrong. The story has a good hook (吸引力) in its title, but it’s ultimately just misinformation. Why does your smart friend do that?
A new study explains why so many of us unthinkingly forward misinformation. This international team of researchers found that most people do actually value accuracy, and want to share truthful articles, but in the heat of the social media moment, they consider factors other than accuracy—like the number of likes it might receive.
In a series of experiments, Gordon Pennycook and his colleagues set out to explore the contrast between what we believe and what we share. First, they reported that participants in their U. S. based studies were quite good at identifying which headlines were accurate and which were not, regardless of whether the headlines matched their political viewpoints. Despite this proficiency, participants were about twice as likely to share a false article that represented their viewpoints as they were to rate it as accurate. Specifically, close to 20% of people rated false headlines that matched their viewpoints as accurate; yet close to 40% of people said they would share these same news stories.
It may seem hopeless, but these researchers identified some strategies that social media platforms might use so that people prioritize accuracy in their share. In one study, the researchers investigated more than 5,000 social media users who had shared articles from sites that regularly traffic in misinformation. The researchers sent private messages to these Twitter users and asked them to rate the accuracy of an apolitical headline.
After the intervention, the accuracy of these users’ posts increased by 5 to 10%— they had been primed to think more about accuracy.
So maybe we should judge a bit less and politely push back when a story seems false. Second, make it a habit to ask yourself how accurate each headline seems before you share.
1. What did the researchers find about the participants in the new research?A.They were more likely to share accurate articles. |
B.They emphasized accuracy rather than other factors. |
C.They were not good at distinguishing accurate headlines. |
D.They prioritized popularity other than accuracy in their share. |
A.By limiting the number of likes that false articles could receive. |
B.By promoting only apolitical headlines on social media platforms. |
C.By messaging users and requesting them to evaluate the news’ accuracy. |
D.By punishing users who shared articles from sites that traffic in misinformation. |
A.The appeal of their posts increased. |
B.The accuracy of their posts increased. |
C.The number of their followers decreased. |
D.The number of their posts decreased. |
A.Why People Share Misinformation? | B.What Can You Trust on the Internet? |
C.What Can Social Media Platforms Do? | D.Where Can People Find Genuine News? |