组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:228 题号:19395546

The Roman Colosseum was built almost two thousand years ago. Despite its age and a 14th century earthquake that knocked down the south side, most of the 150-some foot building is still standing. Scientists and engineers have long suspected a key to the building’s durability (使用年限) is the use of a specific Roman concrete. But exactly how this solid concrete has contributed to the architecture’s strength has been a mystery to researchers across the globe.

A team of researchers recently discovered a potential answer to why these ancient Roman buildings have been able to weather the test of time while many modern concrete structures seem to fall apart after a few decades. The answer is self-healing concrete.

The material has three components: limestone (石灰石), volcanic material and water. What the researchers found was that the self-healing feature might be simply caused by chemistry accidentally. The limestone in the concrete is likely the secret.

When the ancient Romans made mortar (灰浆), they heated up the lime to turn it into a substance called “quicklime”. And, because they introduced water to the quicklime during mixing, the heat it produced set up a chemical foundation that could strengthen the concrete later. When tiny cracks start to form later, the quicklime stops them from becoming bigger. When it rains, the lime reacts with the water to recombine as various forms of calcium carbonate (碳酸钙), quickly filling the crack or reacting with the volcanic ash to “heal” the material.

For materials scientist Ainissa Ramirez, this new understanding of ancient Roman concrete is a welcome discovery. “This is one way that the material can be more environmentally friendly,” says Ramirez. “It’s sort of like a message in a bottle. The Romans made the material. We had to kind of figure out how they did it so that we can make better materials — and then, you know, in turn, be better protectors of our environment.”

1. What can we learn from Paragraph 1?
A.The secret of Roman concrete has been revealed.
B.The Roman Colosseum was built in the 14th century.
C.The whole Roman Colosseum survived the earthquake.
D.Roman concrete is essential to the architecture’s strength.
2. What does the underlined word “weather” in Paragraph 2 mean?
A.Take.B.Stand.C.Avoid.D.Fail.
3. What do we know about the self-healing process?
A.The lime itself could fill the crack later.
B.The quicklime should be made on rainy days.
C.The chemical foundation could weaken the concrete.
D.Combining water and quicklime would produce heat.
4. What can be inferred from Ramirez’s words?
A.People can be inspired to make greener materials.
B.The secret of Roman concrete is hidden in a bottle.
C.Roman concrete has greatly improved the environment.
D.Roman concrete is popular in making modern architecture.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
【推荐1】Dr. Michael Prager, a leading Botox expert, said that a growing number of women are developging something called “computer face”. He also said that professionals who worked long hours in front of a screen were ending up with saggy jowls(颚骨),“turkey neck” and deep-set wrinkles on their forehead and around their eyes.
The Botox expert said that, of all his clients, office workers were most likely to show premature (过早的) signs(迹象) of aging. “If you are one of the unfortunate people who frown(皱眉)while you are concentrating on the screen then, over time, you will end up with frown lines.” Dr. Prager said. “What is perhaps more surprising is the number of women with saggy jowls because they are sitting in one position for so long. If you spend most of the time looking down then the neck muscles shorten and go saggy, eventually giving you a second neck.”
Dr. Prager, who has a practice near Harley Street in London, said he encourages his clients to put a mirror next to their computer so they can see if they are frowning at the screen. “When people are stressed or thinking hard about something, then they will often put on a ‘grumpy face’ without even knowing what they are doing. When my clients put a mirror next to their desk, they are often surprised by the angry, frowning face which stares back at them.”
He said, “The women I am seeing at the moment have only been using computers at work for the last decade or so. But women in their 20s have grown up with them and use them for every single task. I think the problem is going to become much, much worse. In another ten years, they could be looking quite awful.”
Dr. Prager said there were several simple steps which could avoid “computer face” such as regular screen breaks and stretching the neck muscles. And, of course, there was always Botox. He said that, after a couple of sessions of Botox, the habit of “grumpy face” could be broken.
1. According to the passage, what makes women develop a “computer face”?
A.Frowning every now and then.
B.Concentrating on computers frequently.
C.Working too long in front of a screen.
D.Sitting in the same place for a long time.
2. According to the passage, which of the following are signs of aging?
A.Saggy jowls and short necks.
B.Turkey neck and frown lines.
C.Deep-set wrinkles and angry faces.
D.Second neck and stressed muscles.
3. The underlined word “grumpy” in Paragraph 3 probably means?
A.happyB.surprisedC.angryD.relaxed
4. From the last 2 paragraphs, we can know that ________.
A.“computer face” is avoidable
B.we should give up using computers
C.we should break the habit of “grumpy face”
D.the younger generation is worse at computers
2016-12-13更新 | 144次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约600词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】Hacking our senses to boost learning power

Some schools are pumping music, noises and pleasant smells into the classroom to see if it improves exam results. Could it work? Why do songs stick in our heads? What does your school smell like? Is it noisy or peaceful?

It might not seem important, but a growing body of research suggests that smells and sounds can have an impact on learning, performance and creativity. Indeed, some head teachers have recently taken to broadcasting noises and pumping smells into their schools to see whether it can boost grades. Is there anything in it? And if so, what are the implications for the way we work and study?

There is certainly some well­established research to suggest that some noises can have a harmful effect on learning. Numerous studies over the past 15 years have found that children attending schools under the flight paths of large airports fall behind in their exam results. Bridget Shield, a professor of acoustics (声学) at London South Bank University, and Julie Dockrell, from the Institute of Education, have been conducting studies on the effects of all sorts of noises, such as traffic and sirens (汽笛), as well as noise generated by the children themselves. When they recreated those particular sounds in an experimental setting while children completed various learning tasks, they found a significant negative effect on exam scores.

“Everything points to a bad impact of the noise on children’s performance, in numeracy, in literacy, and in spelling,” says Shield. The noise seemed to have an especially harmful effect on children with special needs.

Whether background sounds are beneficial or not seems to depend on what kind of noise it is - and the volume. In a series of studies published last year, Ravi Mehta from the College of Business at Illinois and his colleagues tested people’s creativity while exposed to a soundtrack made up of background noises - such as coffee­shop chatter and construction­site drilling - at different volumes. They found that people were more creative when the background noises were played at a medium level than when volume was low. Loud background noise, however, damaged their creativity.

Many teachers all over the world already play music to students in class. Many are inspired by the belief that hearing music can boost IQ in later tasks, the so­called Mozart effect. While the evidence actually suggests it’s hard to say classical music boosts brainpower, researchers do think pleasant sounds before a task can sometimes lift your mood and help you perform well, says Perham, who has done his own studies on the phenomenon. The key appears to be that you enjoy what you’re hearing. “If you like the music or you like the sound - even listening to a Stephen King novel - then you do better. It doesn’t matter about the music,” he says.

So, it seems that schools that choose to prevent disturbing noises and create positive soundscapes could enhance the learning of their for students, so long as they make careful choices. Yet this isn’t the only sense being used to affect learning. Special educational needs for students at Sydenham high school in London are being encouraged to revise different subjects in the presence of different smells - grapefruit scents for maths, lavender for French and spearmint for history.

1. The four questions in the first paragraph are meant to ________.
A.create some sense of humour to please the readers.
B.provide the most frequently asked questions in schools nowadays.
C.hold the readers’ attention and arouse their curiosity to go on reading.
D.declare the purpose of the article: to try to offer key to those questions.
2. What does the conclusion of the studies of noise conducted by Bridget Shield and Julie Dockrell suggest?
A.Peaceful music plays an active role in students’ learning.
B.Not all noises have a negative impact on children’s performance.
C.We should create for school children a more peaceful environment.
D.Children with special needs might be exposed to some particular sounds.
3. Ravi Mehta’s experiment indicates that ________.
A.students’ creativity improves in a quiet environment.
B.we may play some Mozart music while students are learning.
C.a proper volume of background noises does improve creativity.
D.noise of coffee­shop chatter is better than that of construction­site drilling.
4. Towards the positive impact of appropriate background sound and smell on students’ learning and creativity, the author’s attitude is ________.
A.ambiguous.B.doubtful.C.negative.D.supportive.
2021-03-28更新 | 58次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】Do you see a bird right now? Can you hear one singing? If so, you might be getting a mental health boost. A recent study found that being in the presence of birds made people feel more positive.

Andrea Mechelli, a psychologist at King’s College London and one of the paper’s authors, admitted himself studying the natural world by accident. “I don’t have a particular agenda focused on nature myself. I wasn’t thinking we were going to demonstrate nature has a strong effect,” says Mechelli. Instead, he was searching for answers to why people who live in cities seem to be more likely to suffer from mental illness, particularly psychosis(精神病).

In 2015, he created the smartphone app Urban Mind to search for patterns in users’ environments. How crowded was their city? Did they feel safe in their neighborhood? Could they see trees? “Our first finding was that nature has a very powerful effect,” says Mechelli. He and his colleagues then wondered if some aspects of nature were more beneficial than others.

Their latest study included 1,292 participants, mainly in the United Kingdom and Europe, some of whom revealed a professional mental health diagnosis such as depression. For two weeks, study participants using Urban Mind were reminded to fill out a questionnaire three times a day. They were asked questions about their surrounding environment and their mental state. The data were recorded at the same time.

With the data collected, Mechelli performed a statistical analysis that found an obvious improvement in well-being when birds were present, even when removing other factors like the presence of trees or waterways. The mental health benefit was true both for people with diagnosed depression and those without any diagnosed mental health conditions.

Nature, Mechelli notes, isn’t a cure all. The presence of trees and birds, for example, didn’t result in a better sense of well-being if participants also noted their neighborhood felt unsafe.

1. Why does the author ask questions in the first paragraph?
A.To offer examples.B.To make comparisons.
C.To introduce the topic.D.To support the conclusion.
2. What is Paragraph 2 mainly about?
A.The process of the research.B.The purpose of the research.
C.The findings of the research.D.The influence of the research.
3. The following would be investigated by Urban Mind EXCEPT ______.
A.the sight of treesB.the crowdedness of a city
C.the pressure from their workD.the security of a neighborhood
4. What can we know about participants in the latest study?
A.They all came from the UK.
B.They were diagnosed with depression.
C.They recorded their feelings by themselves.
D.They were required to answer different questions.
2023-01-08更新 | 82次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般