组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:14 题号:19480632

Cowboy or spaceman? A dilemma for a children’s party, perhaps. But also a question for economists, argued Kenneth Boulding, a British economist, in an essay published in 1966. We have run our economies, as he warned, like cowboys on the open grassland: taking and using the world’s resources, confident that more lies over the horizon. But the Earth is less a grassland than a spaceship-a closed system, alone in space, carrying limited supplies. We need, according to Boulding, an economics that takes seriously the idea of environmental limits. In the half century since his essay, a new movement has responded to his challenge. “Ecological economists”, as they call themselves, want to revolutionize aims and assumptions of economics. What do they say—and will their ideas achieve lift-off?

To its advocators, ecological economics is neither ecology nor economics, but a mix of both. Their starting point is to recognize that the human economy is part of the natural world. Our environment, they note, is both a source of resources and a sink for wastes. But it is ignored in conventional textbooks, where neat diagrams trace the flows between firms, households and the government as though nature did not exist. That is a mistake, say ecological economists.

There are two ways our economies can grow, as ecological economists point out: through technological change, or through more intensive use of resources. Only the former, they say, is worth having. They are suspicious of GDP, a crude measure which does not take account of resource exhaustion, unpaid work, and countless other factors. In its place they advocate more holistic(全面的) approaches, such as the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), a composite index(复合指标) that includes things like the cost of pollution, deforestation and car accidents. While GDP has kept growing, global GPI per person peaked in 1978: by destroying our environment we are making ourselves poorer, not richer. The solution, according to Herman Daly, a former World Bank economist and eco-guru, is a “steady-state” economy, where the use of materials and energy is held constant.

Mainstream economists are unimpressed. The GPI, they point out, is a subjective measure. And talk of limits to growth has had a bad press since the days of Thomas Malthus, a gloomy18th-century cleric who predicted, wrongly, that overpopulation would lead to famine. Humanbeings find solutions to some of the most annoying problems. But ecological economists warn against self-satisfaction. In 2009 a paper in Nature, a scientific journal, argued that human activity is already overstepping safe planetary boundaries on issues such as biodiversity(生物多样性) and climate change. That suggests that ecological economists are at least putting forward some important Questions, even if their answers may turn out to be wrong.

1. Why does Boulding compare the way economy is run with cowboy and spaceship?
A.To advocate the importance of space programmes.
B.To applaud the appearance of ecological economists.
C.To arouse people’s interest in cowboys’ adventures on grassland.
D.To awaken people to the need of sustainable development of economy.
2. Ecological economists will disagree that ________ .
A.economies are worth growing through intensive use of resources
B.economics should attach importance to the idea of environmental limits
C.ecological economics is neither ecology nor economics
D.the human economy is part of the natural world
3. According to the passage, which of the following about GPI is true?
A.It keeps growing although the peak appeared in the year 1978.
B.Mainstream economists regard it as a holistic and objective approach.
C.Ecological economists believe it is a better indicator of economy than GDP.
D.It fails to take the factors such as deforestation and car accidents into consideration.
4. We can infer from the last paragraph that the mainstream economists’ attitude towards ecological economics is ________ .
A.doubtfulB.sensitiveC.optimisticD.over-concerned

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文,主要介绍了将音乐应用于帕金森等运动障碍类疾病的治疗项目。演奏和聆听音乐对身心健康有明显的益处,包括改善我们的免疫系统和降低压力水平。它还可以减轻病人的痛苦,有效地帮助病人与他人交流。

【推荐1】Rx4 Rhythm is one of the programs offered at the Johns Hopkins Centre for Music and Medicine in Baltimore. The program is the brainchild of Dr Alexander Pantelyat, a violin player. He is also a neurologist (神经科医生) who specializes in movement disorders like Parkinson’s. Applying music therapy (疗法) to movement disorders is relatively new; previously, it was mainly used in cancer treatment. He explains, “Just listening to music activates many regions of the brain at the same time.” Now, a growing body of scientific evidence shows that music can be medicine, too.

One study from the Centre for Music and Medicine followed a choir composed of Parkinson’s patients to learn how singing might impact the speaking voice of those patients. After 12 weeks, the singers’ speaking volumes which often fade as Parkinson’s progresses grew demonstrably stronger. The Rx4 Rhythm drumming circle, meanwhile, came out of a 2015 study that showed that Parkinson’s patients had improved their ability to walk after six weeks of drumming practice.

In a review of 400 research papers looking into the neurochemistry of music, Daniel Levitin, a neuroscientist at McGill University, found that playing and listening to music had clear mental and physical health benefits, including improving our immune systems and reducing stress levels. It can also reduce the pain patients are suffering.

Studies show that music can trigger memories and touch parts of the brain that other mediums cannot. Sometimes music can work like miracle. One day, the nursing team at Toronto’s Princess Margaret Cancer Centre asked Sarah, a music therapist, if she could reach out to a patient who was unwilling to engage with staff or be part of any activities. As she started to play one piece of his favorite music on her keyboard, a change came over him. He unfolded his arms, turned towards Black and started to cry. He said through tears. “It was as if the music went places that nothing else could recalls.” He shared afterwards that the music showed up at a moment when it felt like a hug.

1. What is the purpose of the program?
A.To treat cancer using music therapy.B.To help patients to appreciate music.
C.To treat Parkinson by activating the brain.D.To treat movement disorders with the help of music.
2. How has the program affected Parkinson’s patients?
A.They walk faster.B.They speak louder.C.They grow stronger.D.Their memories fade.
3. What do the underlined words “trigger” mean in paragraph 4?
A.bring backB.refreshC.loseD.put back
4. What can be learned about the program from the last paragraphs?
A.It can help patients to recall places.B.It can help patients to comfort others.
C.It can help patients to interact with others.D.It can help patients to improve their ability to walk.
2024-05-17更新 | 124次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇科普类说明文。主要阐述了新的研究表明绵羊能够从照片中识别人脸。

【推荐2】According to new research from the University of Cambridge in England, sheep are able to recognize human faces from photographs.

The farm animals, who are social and have large brains, were previously known to be able to recognize one another, as well as familiar humans. However, their ability to recognize human faces from photos alone is novel.

The recent study, the results of which were published in the journal Royal Society showed that the woolly creatures could be trained to recognize still images of human faces, including those of former President Barack Obama and actress Emma Watson.

Initially, the sheep were trained to approach certain images by being given food rewards. Later, they were able to recognize the image for which they had been rewarded. The sheep could even recognize images of faces shown at an angle, though their ability to do so declined by about 15 percent – the same rate at which a human’s ability to perform the same task declines.

“Anyone who has spent time working with sheep will know that they are intelligent, individual animals who are able to recognize their handlers,” said Professor Jenny Morton, who led the Cambridge study. “We’ve shown with our study that sheep have advanced face-recognition abilities, comparable with those of humans and monkeys.”

Recognizing faces is one of the most important social skills for human being, and some disorders of the brain, including Huntington’s disease, affect this ability.

“Sheep are long-lived and have brains that are similar in size and complexity to those of some monkeys. That means they can be useful models to help us understand disorders of the brain, such as Huntington’s disease, which develops over a long time and affects cognitive abilities. Our study gives us another way to monitor how these abilities change.” Morton said.

1. According to the new research, what’s unusual about sheep?
A.They have large brains.
B.They can recognize their owners.
C.They can recognize human faces from photograph.
D.They can tell animals from humans.
2. How did the researchers train the sheep?
A.By showing photos of famous people.
B.By showing photos of humans and monkeys by turns.
C.By guiding them to follow their handlers.
D.By giving food rewards.
3. What can be inferred from the passage?
A.Sheep have a higher face-recognition ability than monkeys.
B.The sheep’s face-recognition ability may prevent some disorders of the brain.
C.The new discovery is beneficial to the study of cognitive ability changes.
D.The sheep’s face-recognition ability says the same when shown photos at any angle.
4. What’s the best title of the passage?
A.A New discovery about sheep.B.How Sheep Recognize Each Other.
C.A Wonderful Scientist.D.The Life of Sheep.
2018-07-14更新 | 175次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇新闻报道。主要介绍了一个研究团队的发现(多跟孩子交流有助于孩子的大脑发育,尤其是语言方面)和其他专家就该研究发现发表的言论。

【推荐3】A relationship between the amount of adult speech children are exposed to and the concentration of myelin, a substance in the brain, has been found, researchers say.

“I think the take-home message is, absolutely talking to your kids. It’s literally shaping the structure of the brain,” says the lead author, Prof. John P. Spencer of the University of East Anglia.

The team find, for the 30-month-olds, larger amounts of adult speech are associated with higher quantities of myelin in language-related pathways in the brain; however, for the 6-month-olds, it goes the opposite way.

While the latter (后者) is unexpected, Spencer points out one possible factor: the brain’s stage of development.

“When babies are six months old, they experience massive growth of new nerve cells,” he says. “So the input comes in and may help extend the period of brain growth.” “While at 30 months, the brain starts to cut back some of the cell growth, and form specific connections. That’s where myelin comes in. So now the input starts to help structure the myelin,” he adds.

The researchers conclude adult speech is significant for both age groups and that the more adult speech children go through, the more sensitive they will be to language. The next step for them is to figure out whether the 6-month-old babies showing that negative connection will surely turn into 30-month-old kids who show positive relationship.

Dr. Saloni Krishnan, Reader in cognitive neuroscience (认知神经科学) at Royal Holloway, University of London, who is not involved in the work, however, notes individual differences in language ability are linked to genetics. “Children who are exposed to more language at home and have higher myelination will also have inherited genes (经遗传获得的基因) from parents who are more excellent in languages,” she said. “No final conclusion could be made before this potential genetic effect are tested. And yet there being currently no standard around the amount of input children should receive, caregivers should not necessarily feel pressure to talk more to their children.”

1. Which can replace the underlined words “take-home message” in paragraph 2?
A.Process.B.Reason.C.Point.D.Consequence.
2. What surprises the team?
A.The finding for the 30-month-olds.B.The finding for the 6-month-olds.
C.How the input help nerve cells grow.D.How the input help structure the myelin.
3. What does the researchers think of adult speech?
A.It is positively related to myelin.B.It cuts back some of the cell growth.
C.Its effect varies with the size of brains.D.It is helpful for both groups’ language ability.
4. What might Dr. Saloni Krishnan approve of?
A.The team should do more research.B.Inherited genes decide language ability.
C.Parents must talk more to their kids.D.The concentration of myelin makes no sense.
2023-07-19更新 | 336次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般