If a president, a philosopher, and one of the bestselling authors of all time credited the same secret for their success, would you try to follow it too? Here’s what Friedrich Nietzsche wrote: “It is only ideas gained from walking that have any worth.” Thomas Jefferson: “Walking is the best possible exercise. Habituate yourself to walk very far.” And Charles Dickens made his point: “If I could not walk far and fast, I think I should just explode and die.”
It’s not just these three great figures who thought walking could improve their creativity. A Stanford University study also discovered that participants were 81 percent more creative when walking as opposed to sitting. According to the study, walking outside produces the most novel and highest-quality ideas in participants who walked and then sat down to do creative work. Another famous-person example: As part of his daily writing routine, Kurt Vonnegut would take a midmorning break from his office to walk before eventually returning to work.
Our brains work harder to process in different environments, so walking outside helps develop our ability to collect new ideas, to take in new sights, sounds, smells, and flavors. Shinrin-yoku, or “forest bathing,” is a common form of relaxation and medicine in Japan. It was developed in 1982, and recent studies show that being in the forest and walking among the trees lowers your stress levels. But you don’t have to live near a forest to receive the psychological benefits. Research has shown that immersion in nature, and the corresponding disconnection from multimedia and technology, increased performance on a creative problem-solving task by a full 50 percent in a group of hikers.
So instead of setting a fitness goal, why not set a creativity goal that starts with walking? Turn off your phone and give yourself the chance to be present in the world, to hear conversation and natural sounds, to notice the way people move, the way the sun reflects in a puddle. Walk not just for exercise. Walk for wonder.
1. Which saying can be inferred from the three person’s’ words in Paragraph1?A.Great minds think alike. | B.A still tongue makes a wise head. |
C.Gentlemen have peace but disagree. | D.A wise man appears simple-minded. |
A.Walking with a dog or a friend helps creative thinking. |
B.Walking is a necessary element of Kurt’s creative process. |
C.Only a few participants are found to benefit from walking. |
D.There is no connection between walking and generating ideas. |
A.On the running machine. | B.Down a busy and crowded street. |
C.In the science museum. | D.Through a tree-filled neighborhood. |
A.Walk for Wonder | B.Set a Creativity Goal |
C.Start Forest Bathing | D.Walk out of the Comfort Zone |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】When you walk into your workplace in the morning, are you walking in as yourself or as a stranger? While the workplace is a place to wear your professional face, it’s also a place where you should feel comfortable and connected to your co-workers. There is a good reason for this: A new study finds that hiding your true self at work can harm your career and your sense of belonging in the workplace.
For the study, researchers at the University of Exeter focused on commonly stigmatized(受到蔑视)characteristics, like having mental or physical illness. They sought to see how hiding such conditions that make one feel ashamed could affect one’s ability to grow.
“When someone hide their true identity, their social life suffers. This has an influence not just on the individuals, but also on the organization they work for. More specifically, hiding such characteristics from co-workers reduces their self-respect, job satisfaction and job commitment”, says co-author Professor Manuela Barreto. “Our findings suggest openness about one’s identity is often beneficial for individuals, the group and their workplace.”
The findings were based on many studies they analyzed from the Netherlands and the US. In one of the experiments, they had 95 men and women describe a time when they either hid or exposed a characteristic about themselves. In another one, the researchers offered imaginary scenes to 303 people that involved, again, hiding or revealing.
In both experiments, people were then asked how they would feel after hiding the characteristic. The answers resulted in their conclusion stated above: a lower sense of belonging and job satisfaction and commitment.
So we need environments where people don’t need to hide. Encouraging complete openness can turn the office into a more comfortable place that allows employees to enjoy working.
1. What does the author intend to do in Paragraph 3?A.Explain the study findings. | B.Suggest enough self-respect. |
C.Give the reason for the study. | D.Show advantages of hiding oneself. |
A.Feeling tired of the job. | B.Being looked down upon. |
C.Failing to fit in the society. | D.Losing colleagues’ respect. |
A.They all experienced true situations. |
B.They were asked to describe the feelings. |
C.They were more than 400 people in total. |
D.They volunteered to take part in the study. |
A.Don’t hide Your True Self in the Workplace. |
B.Why Do We always Keep Away from Others? |
C.The Advantages of the Poor Sense of Belonging. |
D.How Can We Handle Stigmatized Characteristics properly? |
【推荐2】There is an old saying in English: "Laughter is the best medicine." Until recently, few people took the saying very seriously. Now, however, doctors have begun to investigate laughter and the effects it has on the human body. They have found evidence that laughter really can improve people's health.
Tests were carried out to study the effects of laughter on the body. People watched funny films, while doctors checked their heart rate, blood pressure, breathing and muscles. It was found that laughter has similar effects to physical exercise. It increases blood pressure, the heart rate and the rate of breathing; it also works several groups of muscles in the face, the stomach, and even the feet. If laughter exercises the body, it must be beneficial.
Other tests have shown that laughter appears to be capable of reducing the effect of pain on the body. In one experiment doctors produced pain in groups of students who listened to different radio programs. The group, which tolerated the pain for the longest time, was the group, which listened to a funny program. The reason why laughter can reduce pain seems to be that it helps to produce endorphins(内啡肽) in the brain. These are natural chemicals that diminish both stress and pain.
There is also some evidence to suggest that laughter helps the body's immune(免疫的) system, that is, the system which fights infection. In an experiment, one group of students watched a funny video while another group served as the control group—in other words, a group with which to compare the first group. Doctors checked the blood of the students in both groups and found that the people in the group that watched the video had an increase in the activity of their blood cells, that is, the cells which fight infection.
As a result of these discoveries, some doctors and psychiatrists(精神病学家) in the United States now hold laughter clinics, in which they try to improve their patients' conditions by encouraging them to laugh. They have found that even if their patients do not really feel like laughing, making them smile is enough to produce beneficial effects similar to those caused by laughter.
1. What can we learn from the first paragraph?A.Laughter is good for one's health. |
B.Laughter is related to some illness. |
C.Laughter has been investigated long since. |
D.Laughter has no effect on the body. |
A.keeps down blood pressure | B.has similar effects to physical exercise |
C.decreases the heart rate | D.increases stress |
A.It reduces pain. | B.It exercises the body. |
C.It improves the body's immune system. | D.It can cure cancer. |
A.They laugh at their patients. |
B.They encourage their patients to laugh. |
C.They smile when they don't feel like laughing. |
D.They never stop laughing. |
【推荐3】Spider monkeys know that the best way to find food is in a group. But when they divide to hunt for fruit, there’s no random(随意性) pairing off. Researchers have found that they use collective computation(群体计算) when they break up into teams.
Typically, the older females lead the rest of the younger monkeys, having the final say in group activities. But that’s not the case for wild spider monkeys living in a protected area near Punta Laguna, Mexico.
When they’re ready to search for food, the monkeys form teams without a single leader picking who goes into which group. Instead, each monkey decides which group to join and when to move to another group. The result, say researchers, is that the monkeys are collectively computing good team sizes given the availability(可获性) of food in the forest.
“The spider monkeys seem to be collecting information about resources by forming these small teams, so that as a group they know their environment better than anyone does on its own,” lead study author, Gabriel Ramos-Fernandez of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, said.
To study the animals’ behavior, researchers spent two years recording 47 different spider monkeys for five hours each day. For hunting for food, they usually formed groups of 2 to 17 monkeys. Researchers worked together with the scientists at the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico to find out how a spider monkey decided to stay with or leave a group. Their study found that the monkeys’ decisions were influenced by the decisions of the other monkeys on the team. They would feel out their teammates about the best size and then make their own decisions accordingly.
The results produced teams of many different sizes, which were helpful in finding fruit in the forest. The researchers said that collectively computed sizes were sometimes not a perfect match based on the food that was available. They suggest a similar study should be used to examine how other groups or systems work, such as flocks of birds or schools of fish.
1. How do spider monkeys living near Punta Laguna differ from the typical ones?A.They can live better even in bad weather conditions. |
B.The sizes of their teams are decided by each of them. |
C.The older monkeys play a leading role in a team. |
D.They usually take turns to look for food. |
A.Spreading the word. |
B.Winning all the games. |
C.Making the final decisions. |
D.Getting the most delicious food. |
A.Its teammates’ choices. |
B.The sudden danger that appears. |
C.The unfair treatment from teammates. |
D.Its disappointment with the amount of food. |
A.Spider monkeys can’t offer help to each other in a group. |
B.Spider monkeys’ collective computation is not always useful. |
C.The researchers will do a further study about spider monkeys. |
D.Birds also use collective computation when they form groups. |
【推荐1】On the side of a busy road leading into Dundee, on the east coast of Scotland, the blades (叶片) of a small wind turbine (涡轮机) move in the wind of passing cars and trucks. It is charging a battery that is below the ground. This is an invention by Sanwal Muneer, a young engineer from Pakistan.
Muneer was inspired to create the turbine as he stood on the side of a racetrack several years ago. “At first, the light wind from the cars was just a welcome relief from the heat,” he says. “Then I started to think about how we could use that energy.”
The turbine stands two-and-a-half metres tall. Made of recyclable carbon fibre, it weighs just nine kilogrammes, making it easy to transport and set up. The fully-charged battery can hold a kilowatt of electricity, enough to run two lamps and a fan for around 40 hours. The idea is that this could be a source of electricity for rural communities in developing countries, or could power traffic lights or road signs in urban areas.
Dundee City Council is the first local authority to allow Muneer’s company, Capture Mobility, to test the turbine beside its roads. “We want to help engineers create something inventive which is also beneficial to the city.” says Neil Gellatly, head of roads and transportation for Dundee City Council. Capture Mobility moved to Scotland from Pakistan in 2015. The Scottish government is investing (投资) in cleaner-energy technologies. Wind is also strong and plentiful all year round here. This made it a good location for Muneer’s company.
Production costs remain the company’s biggest challenge. The turbines must be affordable in developing countries, but achieving this will depend on commercial (商业的) scale (规模). Capture Mobility is now analysing data from the turbine. Later this year, the company plans to send the next stage of the design to the producers. “I am passionate about engineering,” Muneer says. “But engineering is only a success if it improves lives.”
1. How does the author introduce the topic of the text?A.By sharing opinions about turbines. | B.By offering the definition of turbines. |
C.By introducing the inventor’s experience. | D.By describing the scene of a turbine at work. |
A.It is fixed to the ground. | B.It turns traffic into energy. |
C.It has been used to power traffic lights. | D.It is inspired by a rechargeable fan. |
A.To make full use of its wind with the Scottish government’s permission. |
B.To work with its inventive engineers. |
C.To help solve its energy shortage. |
D.To answer its government’s invitation. |
A.Make the turbine out of recyclable materials. | B.Invest in cleaner-energy technologies. |
C.Test the turbine in Dundee. | D.Mass-produce the turbine. |
【推荐2】Recent findings have shown that our appetite and food intake are influenced by a large number of factors besides our biological need for energy, including our eating environment and our perception(感知) of the food in front of us. A new study suggested that our short-term memory may also play a role in appetite. Several hours after a meal, people’s hunger levels were predicted not by how much they’d eaten but rather by how much food they’d seen in front of them—in other words, how much they remembered eating.
This difference suggests the memory of our previous meal may have a bigger influence on our appetite than the actual size of the meal, says Jeffrey M. Brunstrom, a professor of experimental psychology at the University of Bristol.
“Hunger isn’t controlled merely by the physical characteristics of a recent meal. We have identified an independent role for memory for that meal.” Brunstrom says. “This shows that the relationship between hunger and food intake is more complex than we thought.”
These findings echo earlier research that suggests our perception of food can sometimes trick our body’s response to the food itself. In a 2016 study, for instance, people who drank the same 380 calorie milkshake on two separate occasions produced different levels of hunger-related hormones(荷尔蒙), depending on whether the shake’s label said it contained 620 or 140 calories. Moreover, the participants reported feeling more fill when they thought they’d consumed a higher-caloric shake.
1. What affects our appetite according to the new study?A.How much we remember eating. |
B.What time we eat our last meal. |
C.How much we eat our last meal. |
D.What ingredients the food contains. |
A.indicate | B.reflect |
C.are supported by | D.are improved by |
A.Good eating habits contribute to our health. |
B.Eating speed often affects our food digestion. |
C.Psychological factors influence our hunger levels. |
D.Our biological need for energy determines our food intake. |
【推荐3】If you love adventure(冒险), you may see the world differently. People who are open to new experiences can take in an unusual amount of visual information and combine it in unique ways.
Openness to experience is one of the “big five” features often used to describe personality. It is characterized by curiosity and an ability to do well at tests that ask people to come up with creative ideas, such as new uses for everyday objects like bricks.
There’s evidence that people who score highly in assessments of openness also have better visual awareness. For example, when focusing on letters moving on a screen, they are more likely to notice a grey square appearing elsewhere on the screen.
Now Anna Antinori at the University of Melbourne in Australia and her team have found that people who score higher for the openness feature “see” more possibilities.
The team gave 123 university students a test, in which they simultaneously(同时) saw a red image with one eye and a green image with the other eye for 2 minutes. Usually, the brain can only notice one image at a time, and most students reported seeing the image flip(快速翻动) between red and green. But some students saw the two images mix together.
The higher the students scored for openness on a personality test, the more they experienced this kind of mix. “Their brains are able to come up with less traditional solutions.” Antinori says. “We believe this proves that they have different visual experiences to the average individual.”
The findings also explain why extremely open people can suffer from delusions(幻想症), says NikoTillopoulos at the University of Sydney, “At those levels of openness, people may actually see reality differently,” he says.
1. In which way are adventurous people different?A.They have excellent eyesight. |
B.They are usually well-mannered. |
C.They are careful while taking tests. |
D.They have special powers of observation. |
A.To stress they could see beyond the letters. |
B.To show they could recognize all the letters. |
C.To prove they could tell the letters were moving. |
D.To explain how they are open to new experiences. |
A.Some students saw more than two colors. |
B.Most students saw only one color each time. |
C.Most students found it hard to hold their attention. |
D.Very few students could tell what color each image was. |
A.They are more optimistic. |
B.They tend to be more creative. |
C.They can’t see through reality. |
D.They don’t know what delusions are. |