组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:43 题号:19628113

Picture this: you’re between video meetings, and scrolling through your social media newsfeed. Headlines like “Death toll continues to rise”“COVID-19 may cause long-term health implications” and “Health-care systems overwhelmed” flash across your screen. Your mood takes a dive, but you can’t stop scrolling.

If this scenario rings true for you, you’re not alone. Research shows people have a tendency to seek out information during uncertain times—it’s a natural coping mechanism. But is persistent information-seeking on social media, sometimes called doomscrolling, helpful during a pandemic, or any time?

Research on the effects of bad news on mood suggests exposure to negative COVID news is likely to be detrimental to our emotional wellbeing. For instance, one study conducted in March 2020 involving more than 6,000 Americans found that the more time participants spent consuming COVID news in a day, the unhappier they felt. These findings are striking and suggest that spending as little as two to four minutes consuming negative news about COVID-19 can have a detrimental impact on our mood.

So what can we do to look after ourselves, and make our time on social media more pleasurable?

One option is to delete our social media accounts altogether. But how realistic is it to distance ourselves from platforms that connect nearly half of the world’s population, particularly when these platforms offer social interactions at a time when face-to-face interactions can be risky, or impossible? Given that avoidance might not be practical, here are some other ways to make your experience on social media more positive.

Be mindful of what you consume on social media. Focus on the personal news and photos shared instead of the latest headlines.

Seek out content that makes you happy to balance out your newsfeed. This may be images of cute kittens, beautiful landscapes, drool-worthy food videos or something else. You could even follow a social media account dedicated to sharing only happy and positive news.

Use social media to promote positivity and kindness. Sharing good things that are happening in your life can improve your mood, and your positive mood can spread to others. You may also like to compliment others on social media. While this might sound awkward, people will appreciate it more than you think.

As the pandemic continues to alter our lives and newsfeeds, the study highlight the importance of being aware of the emotional toll negative news takes on us. But there are steps we can take to mitigate this toll and make our social media a happier place.

1. The underlined word “doomscrolling” in Paragraph 2 refers to__________.
A.browsing through bad news insistentlyB.seeking information on social media occasionally
C.a natural coping mechanismD.checking helpful news during uncertain times
2. What is the main purpose of the study conducted in March 2020?
A.To find out if the death toll of COVID-19 continues to rise.
B.To find out the effects of information-seeking on mood.
C.To find out the impacts of negative news on mood.
D.To find out whether people feel happy when exposed to COVID-19.
3. Which of the following is NOT true about the realistic solutions to the exposure to social media according to the passage?
A.Deleting our social media accounts altogether.
B.Only focusing on personal information and ignoring social news.
C.Checking positive content like cute animals to make ourselves happy.
D.Sharing positive energy with others and praising others.
4. The author writes this passage to_________.
A.show the profound influence of the pandemic on our lives and social media newsfeed
B.demonstrate the significance of the measures we can take to eliminate the harmful effects of social media
C.reveal the relationship between the news-seeking behaviour and the mood of the surfers
D.arouse our awareness of the effects of negative information on feelings and offer feasible solutions beneficial to our emotional wellbeing

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】A large team of researchers cooperated with multiple institutions across Europe, has found evidence backing up work by Persi Diaconis in 2007 in which he suggested tossed (掷) coins are more likely to land on the same side they started on, rather than on the reverse. The team conducted experiments designed to test the randomness of coin tossing and posted their results on the Arxiv Preprint Server.

For many years, the coin toss has represented a fair way to choose between two options—which side of a team goes first, for example, who wins a tied election, or gets to eat the last cookie. Over the years, many people have tested the randomness of coin tossing and most have found it to be as fair as expected—provided a fair coin is used. But, Persi Diaconis noted, such tests have only tested the possibility that a fair coin, once tossed, has an equal chance of landing on heads or tails. They have not tested the likelihood of a fair coin landing with the same side up as that when it was. He suggested that a coin tossed into the air spends more time there with its initial side facing up making it more likely to end up that way, as well. He suggested that the difference would be slight, however — just 1%. In this new effort, the research team tested Diaconis’ ideas.

The experiment involved 48 people tossing coins made in 46 countries to prevent design bias (偏见) for a total of 350,757 coin tosses. Each time, the participants noted whether the coin landed with the same side up as when it was launched. The researchers found that Diaconis was right — there was a slight bias. They found the coin landed with the same side up as when it was launched 50.8% of the time. They also found there was some slight change in percentages between different individuals tossing coins.

The team concludes that while the bias they found is slight, it could be meaningful if multiple coin tosses are used to determine an outcome — for example, flipping a quarter 1,000 times and betting $1 each time (with winning of 0 or 2$ each round) should result in an average overall win of $19.

1. Why is the coin toss often used to make decisions?
A.It can help people win an election.
B.It gives each side an equal chance of winning.
C.It seems the quickest and easiest way to reach a decision.
D.It provides a sense of mystery and excitement for those involved.
2. What did the Diaconis’s research team find in their experiment?
A.The coin toss is a fair process.B.The coin toss is a biased process.
C.The coin toss is a random process.D.The coin toss is an unpredictable process.
3. How did the research team get the conclusion of the experiment?
A.By analyzing collected data.B.By comparing different factors.
C.By tracking experimental process.D.By monitoring different participants.
4. What can be inferred from the passage?
A.The research team did not use real coins in their experiment.
B.Coin tossing has been used for many years to settle disputes.
C.The research team found the coin toss is fairer than previously thought.
D.The author does not believe the coin toss is a fair way to make decisions.
2023-12-19更新 | 82次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】The year 2018 will mark the 100h anniversary of the deadliest influenza outbreak in history. It is estimated that the influenza pandemic (瘟疫) of 1918 killed more than 50 million people around the world. Other estimates go much higher. Because of a lack of medical record-keeping, we may never know the exact number.

The influenza was a fast killer. Some victims died within hours of their first symptoms. Others died after a few days. “Their lungs filled with liquid and they choked to death.” The 1918 flu pandemic was also different from other outbreaks. It struck many young. healthy people. Viruses usually affect sick or old people.

Although modern medicine effectively controls many diseases, influenza remains difficult to protect against. The World Health Organization estimates that every year influenza kills 250,000 to 500,000 people around the world. Each year, medical scientists develop flu vaccines (疫苗) which offer immunity (免疫) from some influenza viruses. But they can only guess which form of the virus will spread.

Health officials remain concerned about another flu pandemic. New forms of the flu virus appear regularly. One example was the “swine flu” or H1N1 outbreak in 2009. Anthony Faucal, Director of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases in the United States says that virus caused a true pandemic.

To stop the next pandemic, scientists are now researching how to create a universal influenza vaccine. In October 2017, Vanderbilt University Medical Center in the U. S. announced the Universal Influenza Vaccine Initiative. The university said researchers are leading an international effort to develop a universal influenza vaccine that will protect everyone against all forms of the flu anywhere in the world. The university added that researchers will begin tests in early 2018. The Human Vaccines Project, a public-private partnership, is funding the project. However, until a universal influenza vaccine is available, today’s seasonal flu vaccine remains important.

1. Why is influenza difficult to protect against?
A.It spreads too rapidly.
B.It is quite easy to catch.
C.No vaccine is available.
D.It's hard to judge the form of virus.
2. What does the author want to tell by mentioning H1N1 in 2009?
A.New forms of flu virus keeps appearing.
B.It was the most serious in recent years.
C.It was caused by the same flu virus of 1918.
D.The H1N1 virus was deadly as well.
3. What can we learn about the universal influenza vaccine?
A.The development is quite costly.
B.It will be used all over the world.
C.It can protect against all forms of flu.
D.It will soon come into use in 2019.
2020-06-07更新 | 96次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】Text messaging is a surprisingly good way to receive candid responses to sensitive questions, according to a new study to be presented this week at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. “The preliminary (初步的) results of our study suggest that people are more likely to disclose sensitive information via text messages than in voice interviews,” says Fred Conrad, a psychologist at the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.

“This is sort of surprising,” says Conrad, “since many people thought that texting would decrease the likelihood of disclosing sensitive information because it creates a persistent, visual record of questions and answers that others might see on your phone and in the cloud.”

With text, the researchers also found that people were less likely to engage in “satisficing”— a survey industry term referring to the common practice of giving good enough, easy answers. “We believe people give more precise answers via texting because there's just not the time pressure in a largely asynchronous (非同步的) mode like text that there is in phone interviews, ” says Conrad. “As a result, respondents are able to take longer to arrive at more accurate answers.”

Conrad conducted the study with Michael Schober, a professor of psychology at the New School for Social Research. “We're in the early stages of analyzing our findings,” says Schober. “But so far it seems that texting may reduce some respondents' tendency to shade the truth or to present themselves in the best possible light in an interview, even when they know it's a human interviewer they are communicating with via text. What we cannot yet be sure of is who is most likely to be disclosive in text. Is it different for frequent texters, or generational, for example? ”

For the study, the researchers recruited approximately 600 iPhone-users through Google Ads, offering them iTunes Store rewards to participate in the study. Their goals were to see whether responses to the same questions differed depending on several variables: whether the questions were asked via text or voice, whether a human or a computer asked the questions, and whether the environment, including the presence of other people and the likelihood of multitasking, affected the answers.

1. The underlined word “candid” in Para.1 probably means _________.
A.straightforwardB.appropriateC.ambiguousD.objective
2. We can learn from the passage that __________.
A.people fond of text messaging are more honest.
B.texting will give away less sensitive information.
C.different variables might affect the responses of messaging.
D.about 600 iPhone users have been awarded iTunes by researchers.
3. Compared with phone interviews, texting has the strength that people could _________.
A.present their best to the interviewersB.have more time to make a reply
C.pay less for sending a messageD.enjoy more freedom of speech
4. Which is the best title for the passage?
A.Texting Downs ResponsesB.Texting Exposes Identity
C.Texting Benefits IntervieweesD.Texting Ups Truthfulness
2021-04-01更新 | 269次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般