组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科学技术
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:76 题号:20783639

It’s easy for consumers to buy food and drinks like a bowl of hot rice and coke online or from neighborhood shops, but for astronauts such things were impossible in the past.

Members of China’s Shenzhou manned space flight last year, however, were able to enjoy such food, thanks to Joyoung, a Chinese firm. Joyoung created a mobile space kitchen for the astronauts. A drinking water machine, an air heater and a soybean milk maker were all accessible (可得到的;可进入的) in the kitchen through a smart app. Tang Hongbo, who was a member of the Shenzhou manned spacecraft, said in the news that during his three-month trip, he could eat hot food with just half-hour efforts, a contrast (对比) to the past when similar attempts required several hours. “If we had time, we would also use equipment to eat homemade yogurt. We could also control the equipment in the space kitchen through mobile phone apps,” he said.

In the past, most foods couldn’t be directly heated in a microwave oven in the space. Conduction equipment often caused uneven (不均匀的) heating. An astronaut had to spend as long as four hours to heat some vegetables in the space kitchen. To solve the problem, Joyoung has developed equipment that gives out hot air to heat vegetables in a 360-degree way. That enables astronauts to eat steaming-hot fish-flavored pork and Gongbao chicken, a spicy, stir-fried Chinese dish.

Besides Joyoung, a group of companies, including Xiaomi Corp and Huawei Technologies, have contributed their technologies to the development of the space station. A vacuum (真空) cleaner enabled haircuts on the spacecraft possible. NOLO VR, a Chinese virtual (虚拟的) reality manufacturer (制造商), has helped astronauts develop an experimental equipment through which laboratory technicians on the ground can see and experience what astronauts are doing in the space.

1. What do astronauts think of Joyoung’s mobile space kitchen?
A.Water-saving.B.Energy-wasting.
C.Time-saving.D.Money-wasting
2. How does the author show the convenience on Shenzhou manned spacecraft?
A.By comparing the past with the present.B.By analyzing results.
C.By providing pictures.D.By answering questions
3. What does the last paragraph want to show?
A.There is more tech for the spacecraft.
B.Joyoung needs to further improve its technology
C.Astronauts on board can do as they wish.
D.What astronauts are doing is significant.
4. What is the best title of the text?
A.Modern Technology Brings Convenience to Human Beings in Daily Life
B.Earth to Space, Firms Add Value by Creating Technology
C.The Hot Diet on the Space Station Needs to be Addressed
D.Manufacturers Make Big Money from Inventing Equipment

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约300词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。研究表明,机器人可以改善工作场所的心理健康,但这些对机器人外观或行为的看法可能会阻碍机器人在它们可以发挥作用的领域的应用。

【推荐1】Robots can improve mental well-being in the workplace, but only if they look right, research suggests. A study by the University of Cambridge found that people who interacted with robots that were more toy-like, felt a greater connection compared to human-like robots.

Over five weeks, 26 employees took part in the weekly robot-led well-being sessions. While the robots had identical voices, facial expressions and scripts for the sessions, their physical appearance affected how people interacted with them and how effective they thought of them to be.

The first, the QT, is a childlike humanoid robot and roughly 90 centimeters tall, while the second, Misty, is a 36 centimeters tall toy-like robot. According to the researchers, toy-like robots look simpler, meaning people may have had lower expectations and ended up finding the robot easier to talk to and connect with. Those who worked with the humanoid robot found their expectations did not match reality, since the robot was not capable of behaving or interacting like an actual human.

These perceptions of robots are typically guided by popular culture. Researchers added that in films, TV shows and books, robots can do anything that an individual’s imagination can think of. But when faced with a robot in the real world, people find that it often does not live up to expectations.

Co-author of the study, Minja Axelsson, said, “These perceptions of how robots should look or behave might be holding back the uptake of robotics in areas where they can be useful.” Professor Hatice Gunes, from Cambridge’s Department of Computer Science and Technology, said it is “incredibly difficult” to create robots that are capable of natural conversation.

1. How long did the sessions last?
A.For about one week.B.For over one month.
C.For about 26 days.D.For over 90 days.
2. What do toy-like robots mean to the employees?
A.More disappointment.B.Richer imagination.
C.Less communication.D.Closer relationship.
3. What can we infer from Minja Axelsson’s words?
A.It’s necessary to improve robots’ appearance.
B.It’s difficult for robots to interact with people.
C.Robots can be made to meet individual needs.
D.Personal preferences may affect the use of robots.
4. Which is the suitable title for the text?
A.Robots’ Appearance May Improve Mental Well-being
B.Popular Culture Decides Human’s Demand for Robots
C.Attitudes towards Robots Vary from Person to Person
D.Human-like Robots Improve Efficiency in Workplaces
2023-05-11更新 | 145次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 适中 (0.65)
【推荐2】Thirteen vehicles lined up last March to race across the Mojave Desert, seeking a million in prize money. To win, they had to finish the 142­mile race in less than 10 hours. Teams and watchers knew there might be no winner at all, because these vehicles were missing a key part — drivers.
DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, organized the race as part of a push to develop robotic vehicles for future battlefields. But the Grand Challenge, as it was called, just proved how difficult it is to get a car to speed across an unfamiliar desert without human guidance. One had its brake lock up in the starting area. Another began by throwing itself onto a wall. Another got tied up by bushes near the road after 1.9 miles.
One turned upside down. One took off in entirely the wrong direction and had to be disabled by remote   control. One went a little more than a mile and rushed into a fence; another managed to go for six miles but stuck on a rock. The “winner”, if there was any, reached 7.8 miles before it ran into a long narrow hole, and the front wheels caught on fire.
“You get a lot of respect for natural abilities of the living things,” says Reinhold Behringe, who helped design two of the car­size vehicles for a company called Sci­Autonics.“Even ants can do all these tasks effortlessly. It's very hard for us to put these abilities into our machines.”
The robotic vehicles, though with necessary modern equipment such as advanced computers and GPS guidance, had trouble figuring out fast enough the blocks ahead that a two­year­old human recognizes immediately. Sure, that very young child, who has just only learned to walk, may not think to wipe apple juice off her face, but she already knows that when there's a cookie in the kitchen she has to climb up the table, and that when she gets to the cookie it will taste good. She is more advanced, even months old, than any machine humans have designed.

1. Watchers doubted if any of the vehicles could finish the race because ________.
A.they did not have any human guidance
B.the road was not familiar to the drivers
C.the distance was too long for the vehicles
D.the prize money was unattractive to the drivers
2. From the passage we know “robotic vehicles” are a kind of machines that________.
A.can do effortlessly whatever tasks living things can
B.can take part in a race across 142­miles with a time limit
C.can show off their ability to turn themselves upside down
D.can move from place to place without being driven by human beings
3. In the last paragraph, the author implies that there is a long way to go ________.
A.for a robotic vehicle to finish a 142­mile race without any difficulties
B.for a little child who has just learned to walk to reach the cookie on the table
C.for a robotic vehicle to deal with a simple problem that a little child can solve
D.for a little child to understand the importance of wiping apple juice off his/her face
2016-12-12更新 | 47次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了经验表明,技术突破和平均生活水平的提高并不总是齐头并进的,介绍了人工智能的潜能以及存在的一些挑战。

【推荐3】The 2010s brought no shortage of miraculous technologies, from tablet computers to 4G mobile internet. But these had surprisingly little effect on the economy. During that decade productivity growth in the developed countries averaged a miserable (少得可怜的) 1% a year, holding down average wages. Innovative firms embraced new tech, but many less adventurous ones did not bother. The experience showed that technological breakthroughs and improvements in average living standards do not always go hand in hand.

Generative AI, its developers say, will be different. Not since the invention of the internet has a new technology so captured the public imagination. The technology is consumer-friendly: within days of its release to the public, Chat GPT, the most famous AI chat bot, had millions of users. It is easy to see how this innovation could improve all types of work at all types of firms, from increasing the accuracy of doctors’ diagnoses to helping programmers write software code more efficiently.

With that said, for AI to truly spread out in the economy, it needs to make its mark beyond the most innovative companies. And this will take time. Although the internet began to be used by some companies in the early 1990s, it was not until the late 2000s that two-thirds of American businesses had a website. About 70 world’s largest firms still show no interest in AI, according to our analysis. Some evidence even suggests that usage of Chat GPT and its competitors is falling — perhaps as people have tried it out, and then decided it is not for them.

Indeed, even the most powerful technologies take time to be adopted, because companies tend to use a mix of software and services, some of which may be years or even decades old. Replacing outdated systems can be costly and complicated. Moreover, in the many industries either run or heavily regulated by the government, such as healthcare, education and construction, bosses and trade unions often resist the application of new technology, worried that it will lead to job losses. In time AI could well transform how people live their lives and do their jobs. But the road to widespread usage, and any resulting productivity boom, will be a long one.

1. What is paragraph 1 mainly about?
A.How productivity affects average wages.
B.Why the 2010s is a productive decade.
C.Whether economic growth follows new technologies.
D.What innovative companies care for.
2. What does the author want to indicate by mentioning Chat GPT in paragraph 2?
A.AI’s public imagination.B.Consumers’ enthusiasm.
C.AI’s healthy profits.D.AI’s huge potential.
3. What can be inferred from paragraph 3?
A.Big firms are less motivated to adopt new tech.
B.More efforts are needed to advocate AI.
C.Chat GPT is falling behind its competitors.
D.Websites were uncommon in the early 2000s.
4. Which word best describes the author’s attitude towards the future of AI?
A.Hopeful.B.Worried.C.Cautious.D.Pessimistic.
2023-10-13更新 | 197次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般