We’re all familiar with the feeling―it usually starts with a little itch (痒) deep inside the nose. Next comes the awareness that it’s going to happen. Then, achoo! Air rushes out of our nose at a shocking 100 miles per hour, bursting out whatever was causing the itch. The high-pressure from a sneeze (喷嚏) has led some people to think that if we didn’t close our eyes, they could be pushed out.
For decades, countless people have tested the theory. When finding it almost impossible to keep their eyes open while sneezing, many have concluded that the theory must be true. If you try it yourself, the possibilities are that your eyes are still where they belong. That’s because they are held firmly by the muscles in the eyes. Furthermore, increased pressure from sneezing actually builds up in the blood vessels (血管), which may cause vessels to break but may not be possible to push the eyeballs out.
Why did this theory start, anyway? Some say that it all began in 1882, when the New York Times reported an incident of a woman who burst one of her eyeballs during a sudden sneeze. Others point at the fact that different high-pressure experiences, such as childbirth, can cause blood vessels in the eyes to break out. Still others say that closing our eyes when we sneeze shows the theory is true. Scientists, on the other hand, explain that we close our eyes for the same reason we sneeze ― to prevent unwanted things from entering our bodies. Either way, as far as we know, there are no actual recorded cases of anyone losing an eyeball because of a sneeze, so don’t lose any sleep over it!
1. What is mainly talked about in paragraph 1?A.The cause of a sneeze. | B.The danger of sneezing. |
C.The importance of a sneeze. | D.The experience of sneezing. |
A.Because they are fixed firmly in the eyes. |
B.Because high pressure builds up in the eyes. |
C.Because they are held strongly by blood vessels. |
D.Because increased pressure prevents them from bursting out. |
A.Sneezes usually cause an itchy nose. |
B.People sneeze to burst out unwanted things. |
C.The high pressure caused by a sneeze will become less through breathing. |
D.People close their eyes when sneezing to stop their eyeballs from popping out. |
A.A guidebook. | B.A magazine. |
C.A storybook. | D.A textbook. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Here’s a word you may not have heard before: dogfooding. Dogfooding is short for “eating your own dog food”. It’s a term that has been used for years among software developers. It means using the software you write for your customers yourself.
This has great advantages because you are able to see what the user experience is like for your customers. You are also more likely to fix a bug (故障) if it affects you in your daily work.
For a long time, the compiler (编译程序) for Microsoft’s C#programming language was written in C++. Then the C# team at Microsoft created a new compiler called Roslyn, which is written in C#. It is a lot faster than C++ and it has the advantage of now being cross-platform (it works on different types of computers). It is the result of dogfooding.
No one really knows where the term “dogfooding” or “eating your own dog food” comes from. In a 1980s advertisement on TV, actor Lorne Greene mentioned he fed Alpo dog food to his own dogs. And the CEO of Kal Kan Foods also supposedly ate the company’s dog food product at yearly company meetings.
However, the first mention of the term in relation to computer programming was in a 1988 email from Microsoft manager Paul Maritz, titled Eating our own Dogfood, encouraging another Microsoft manager to use their products as a way to understand and improve them.
Nowadays, the term has been used in other fields. For example, teachers can dogfood their lessons whenever possible. This means taking their own tests or doing their own homework. By doing this, they can find all kinds of problems that they’d never notice if they just created tasks and gave them straight to students.
1. Why do software developers dogfood?A.They can talk to their customers. | B.They can control their customers. |
C.They hope to improve their products. | D.They want to make their daily work easier. |
A.He loved dog food. | B.He ate Alpo dog food. |
C.He advertised dog food. | D.He worked for Kal Kan Foods. |
A.They can have a close relationship with students. |
B.They can set a good example for students. |
C.They can pay more attention to teaching. |
D.They can know their lessons better. |
A.By listing numbers. | B.By giving examples. |
C.By making comparisons. | D.By using research findings. |
Here is a way to kill mice without spending a lot of money. It is a simple but effective kind of mouse trap. The method is first used by some farmers in the west African country of Mali. An agricultural expert in Mali reported about the Mali mouse trap in a magazine. The expert reported that his gardener caught 150 mice in just one night. The gardener used four traps. The trap is easy to make. First, remove the top from a 20 liter metal or plastic container(容器). Put it in a hole in the ground. The top edge of the container should be the level with the surface of the ground. Fill the container with water to within eight centimeters of the top. Add tiny pieces of grain wastes. They should float on the water. Also put some wastes on the ground near the trap. During the night, mice will come out to eat the grain wastes. They will fall into the container and drown. Replace the food in the trap every night.
1. According to the passage,_____ used the mouse trap first.
A.an agricultural expert in the west Africa |
B.farmers in the United States |
C.all American gardener |
D.farmers in Mali |
A.A simple and effective method used by farmers to kill mice |
B.How to kill mice |
C.Methods used by farmers to kill mice |
D.Farmers have problems with mice |
A.A special grain storage building |
B.Chemical poisons |
C.A mouse trap |
D.A hole in the ground |
A.![]() | B.![]() |
C.![]() | D.![]() |
【推荐3】Scientists have been trying to figure out how to alter the genes of humans for many years, and it looks like they’ve finally cracked (破解) the code. But while this may seem like a great step forward in science, some also believe that it’s one step back when it comes to ethics (道德准则). In August, a group of scientists from the USA and South Korea worked together to successfully edit a human embryo (胚胎) and remove a genetic mutation (突变) that would have led to heart disease, reported The Guardian. This was done with the help of CRISPR, a gene-editing tool that allows scientists to “cut and paste” human DNA.
Although this was the first example of an embryo’s genes being changed successfully, the advantages of gene editing have already been tested in living patients. In 2015, a five-month-old girl from the UK was saved after doctors used edited cells to fight off her cancer. As of today, she’s alive and well. And in the USA last year, scientists managed to remove HIV cells from several patients by editing the genes inside their bodies.
Some people hope that in the future, diseases or birth defects could simply be "edited out”. However, others believe this could lead to so-called designer babies, giving parents the option to choose everything from eye color to intelligence. “You could find wealthy parents buying the latest “upgrades” for their children, leading to even greater inequality than we already live with,” Marcy Camovsky, director of the San Francisco Center for Genetics, told BBC News.
In spite of these ethical concerns, experts say it’s not possible to create the “perfect” human being. Despite the progress scientists have made, we don’t understand human genes enough to give all unborn children great brainpower or amazing singing abilities. “Right now, we know nothing about genetic enhancement,” Hank Greely, a director at Stanford University, USA, told The New York Times. “We’re never going to be able to say, honestly, this embryo looks like it would score high on the two-part SAT.”
So it looks like if we want good exam results, or to impress people with our piano skills, we’ll have to stick with the old fashioned method of plain hard work---at least for now.
1. The underlined word “alter” in Paragraph 1 probably means ________.A.record | B.change | C.remove | D.increase |
A.A genetic mutation related to heart disease was removed by scientists. |
B.A newborn baby with cancer was saved by edited cells. |
C.HIV cells were removed from patients9 bodies. |
D.Some birth defects were simply edited out. |
A.They don’t think it is an effective way to fight diseases. |
B.They are concerned that it could lead to genetic mutations. |
C.They think it could lead to designer babies and increased inequality. |
D.They worry that it could make parents abandon children with birth defects. |
A.Gene editing is regarded as the perfect way to treat birth defects. |
B.There is still a long way to go to fully understand human genes. |
C.Gene editing could help enhance human intelligence in the near future. |
D.Scientists are pessimistic (悲观的) about the future of gene editing. |
【推荐1】Scientists have made an amazing discovery: large quantities of species of frog and salamander (火蜥蜴) glow under certain types of light.
Jennifer Lamb and Matthew Davis, at St Cloud State University in Minnesota, in the US, studied 32 different species of amphibians (两栖动物), mostly frogs and salamanders. Lamb and Davis shone blue torchlight on a frog that they were studying and were surprised to see it glow green. They wondered how many others would do the same, so they went to an aquarium (水族馆) in Chicago, US, and shone lights on all the amphibians.
They found that most of the animals lit up green, an effect that showed more clearly when seen through a yellow filter (指示灯). The team say their results have surprised them and they don’t yet know why the amphibians glow like this, but plan to do more research. This glow-in-the-dark ability is known as biofluorescence (生物荧光), and many animals, such as chameleons (变色龙), jellyfish (水母), sharks and sea turtles, can do it. Scorpions (蝎子) glow a bright blue under ultraviolet light (a type of light that causes sunburn).
Biofluorescence is caused by substances (物质) in the body that can absorb one colour of light and then give it out as a different colour. Usually animals absorb blue light and give off green, red or orange light. The bright green might warn off predators (捕食性动物) or help animals like the amphibians signal to each other, or it might even identify individuals, a bit like a call or smell that others can recognise.
“There is still a lot out there that we don’t know, ” Lamb told The New York Times newspaper. “This opens up a whole window into the possibility that organisms can see fluorescence (荧光) — their world may look a lot different from ours.”
1. What do the underlined words “the same” in paragraph 2 refer to?A.Shining blue light on a salamander. | B.Studying the effect of green light. |
C.Observing different amphibians. | D.Absorbing blue light and glowing green. |
A.Special needs to signal to one another. | B.Certain matter in the animal’s body. |
C.Colors existing in the animal’s body. | D.The glow-in-the-dark ability. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Confused. | C.Positive. | D.Worried. |
A.Differences between Frog and Salamander |
B.Biofluorescence and its Functions |
C.Frogs Glow Green in Blue Light |
D.Nothing Is Impossible |
【推荐2】Many people enjoy biscuits at teatime. But people with diabetes have to be careful about eating sweet food.
Diabetes is a metabolic(代谢的)disease. If a patient's blood sugar is not well controlled, serious problems can occur. A patient may experience dizziness and fatigue, but also have kidney failure, blindness and heart disease, according to Medical News Today.
But a new research may make it possible to “treat diabetes by eating biscuits”. Researchers from Peking University and East China Normal University successfully developed a new cell using synthetic(合成的)biology technology. Their study was published in Nature Chemical Biology in November.
In their research, diabetic mice implanted with the cells can increase insulin(胰岛素)levels and lower blood sugar as long as they eat specific amino acid(氨基酸)biscuits. It only takes 90 minutes for the mice to reduce their blood sugar, which amounts to the time after an insulin injection, Liu Tao, one of the authors, told Science and Technology Daily.
This kind of biscuit does not directly lower blood sugar levels, but is a “key” to insulin. The special amino acids in the biscuits help to start the insulin translation process. The end result is controlled blood sugar, according to Ye Haifeng, one of the authors.
“This unnatural amino acid is similar to the ingredients added in many health drinks and is very friendly to the human body, ” Liu told Science and Technology Daily. Maybe one day, people will need to take artificial amino acids before meals, or eat foods containing artificial amino acids suitable for diabetics, so they can control their blood sugar.
Although scientists in synthetic biology have paved the way for possible future treatments, their findings won't be ready for patients anytime soon. “Synthetic biology is still an early-stage discipline compared to the traditional diabetes therapeutic development timeline, with most technologies currently in the preclinical stages in the lab, ” Ira Pastor, CEO of the life sciences company Bioquark, told US News.
1. What is paragraph 2 mainly about?A.Diseases that can affect blood sugar. |
B.Severe problems caused by diabetes. |
C.Blood sugar's effects on the metabolic system. |
D.A kind of metabolic disease that is called diabetes. |
A.Scientists gave them biscuits with less sugar. |
B.The amino acid biscuits they ate contained insulin. |
C.Scientists implanted cells that can directly lower blood sugar. |
D.The implanted cells and the specific amino acids increased insulin. |
A.Synthetic biology is developing quickly at present. |
B.There remains a long way for this therapy to enter hospitals. |
C.Synthetic biology proves the most effective solution to diabetes. |
D.Many traditional therapeutic diabetes technologies are still in the lab. |
A.science report | B.health column |
C.research paper | D.biology essay |
【推荐3】When you think of the Arctic, you imagine an icy land of pure white snow. Others imagine it as the last really clean place left on Earth. We have polluted the deepest oceans with plastic trash, and now, CNN says, “It’s theArctic’s turn. ”
German scientists have recently found microplastics in Arctic snow, the Associated Press reported. Microplastics are pieces of plastic smaller than 5 millimeters. Sadly, the scientists found 1,800 pieces of microplastic per liter of snow.
How is plastic pollution reaching the Arctic? According to scientists, “It’s readily apparent that the majority of the microplastic in the snow comes from the air. ” They fall off of plastic objects and are moved by the wind, just like dust. They mix with ice in the air and fall to the ground as snow. Finding these plastics in Arctic snow means that we may breathe them in. An even higher amount of microplastic was found in the snow around cities.
The high concentrations found in snow samples suggest microplastics, which contain rubber or chemicals used in synthetic fabrics, may cause significant air pollution.
Are they bad for us? Scientists cannot answer this question for now, according to the World Health Organization. We do know that our bodies cannot take in “large” pieces of microplastics. However, if the plastics are small enough, they can find ways into our bodies and stay there for a long time, which can be bad for our health. What’s more, earlier studies have shown that microplastics may contribute to lung cancer risk, heightening the need to further assess(评估)the risks of taking them in, the study said.
Microplastics have also been found in rivers and oceans around the world. Previous research has found that they flow over long distances and into our oceans, damaging ecosystems along the way. They start in our wastewater, when we wash clothes with plastic fibers. The wastewater then flows into rivers and out to sea, where they are eaten by sea animals. If people then eat these animals, it means that we’re eating the plastic as well.
1. What does the author mean by “It’s the Arctic’s turn.” in Paragraph 1?A.The Arctic is pictured as an icy land of pure white snow. |
B.The Arctic has also been polluted by plastics. |
C.The Arctic is the last really clean place on Earth. |
D.People still knew nothing about the Arctic. |
A.very tiny pieces of plastics. | B.like dust. |
C.larger than 5 millimeters. | D.mixed with snow. |
A.They can find ways into our bodies. | B.They can stay in our body for a long time |
C.They may lead to lung cancer. | D.They are small enough. |
A.Plastic snow falls from the sky. | B.Microplastics contain rubber or chemicals. |
C.The Arctic is an icy land of pure white snow. | D.Rivers and oceans are in danger. |