组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:57 题号:21161371

We’re all familiar with the feeling―it usually starts with a little itch (痒) deep inside the nose. Next comes the awareness that it’s going to happen. Then, achoo! Air rushes out of our nose at a shocking 100 miles per hour, bursting out whatever was causing the itch. The high-pressure from a sneeze (喷嚏) has led some people to think that if we didn’t close our eyes, they could be pushed out.

For decades, countless people have tested the theory. When finding it almost impossible to keep their eyes open while sneezing, many have concluded that the theory must be true. If you try it yourself, the possibilities are that your eyes are still where they belong. That’s because they are held firmly by the muscles in the eyes. Furthermore, increased pressure from sneezing actually builds up in the blood vessels (血管), which may cause vessels to break but may not be possible to push the eyeballs out.

Why did this theory start, anyway? Some say that it all began in 1882, when the New York Times reported an incident of a woman who burst one of her eyeballs during a sudden sneeze. Others point at the fact that different high-pressure experiences, such as childbirth, can cause blood vessels in the eyes to break out. Still others say that closing our eyes when we sneeze shows the theory is true. Scientists, on the other hand, explain that we close our eyes for the same reason we sneeze ― to prevent unwanted things from entering our bodies. Either way, as far as we know, there are no actual recorded cases of anyone losing an eyeball because of a sneeze, so don’t lose any sleep over it!

1. What is mainly talked about in paragraph 1?
A.The cause of a sneeze.B.The danger of sneezing.
C.The importance of a sneeze.D.The experience of sneezing.
2. Why won’t eyeballs be pushed out while people are sneezing?
A.Because they are fixed firmly in the eyes.
B.Because high pressure builds up in the eyes.
C.Because they are held strongly by blood vessels.
D.Because increased pressure prevents them from bursting out.
3. What can we infer from the text?
A.Sneezes usually cause an itchy nose.
B.People sneeze to burst out unwanted things.
C.The high pressure caused by a sneeze will become less through breathing.
D.People close their eyes when sneezing to stop their eyeballs from popping out.
4. Where is the text most likely from?
A.A guidebook.B.A magazine.
C.A storybook.D.A textbook.
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。主要介绍了dogfooding(自我试用)一词的相关情况。

【推荐1】Here’s a word you may not have heard before: dogfooding. Dogfooding is short for “eating your own dog food”. It’s a term that has been used for years among software developers. It means using the software you write for your customers yourself.

This has great advantages because you are able to see what the user experience is like for your customers. You are also more likely to fix a bug (故障) if it affects you in your daily work.

For a long time, the compiler (编译程序) for Microsoft’s C#programming language was written in C++. Then the C# team at Microsoft created a new compiler called Roslyn, which is written in C#. It is a lot faster than C++ and it has the advantage of now being cross-platform (it works on different types of computers). It is the result of dogfooding.

No one really knows where the term “dogfooding” or “eating your own dog food” comes from. In a 1980s advertisement on TV, actor Lorne Greene mentioned he fed Alpo dog food to his own dogs. And the CEO of Kal Kan Foods also supposedly ate the company’s dog food product at yearly company meetings.

However, the first mention of the term in relation to computer programming was in a 1988 email from Microsoft manager Paul Maritz, titled Eating our own Dogfood, encouraging another Microsoft manager to use their products as a way to understand and improve them.

Nowadays, the term has been used in other fields. For example, teachers can dogfood their lessons whenever possible. This means taking their own tests or doing their own homework. By doing this, they can find all kinds of problems that they’d never notice if they just created tasks and gave them straight to students.

1. Why do software developers dogfood?
A.They can talk to their customers.B.They can control their customers.
C.They hope to improve their products.D.They want to make their daily work easier.
2. How is dogfooding related to Lorne Greene?
A.He loved dog food.B.He ate Alpo dog food.
C.He advertised dog food.D.He worked for Kal Kan Foods.
3. What is the advantage of teacher’s dogfooding?
A.They can have a close relationship with students.
B.They can set a good example for students.
C.They can pay more attention to teaching.
D.They can know their lessons better.
4. How does the author show the power of dogfooding?
A.By listing numbers.B.By giving examples.
C.By making comparisons.D.By using research findings.
2022-05-07更新 | 41次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约280词) | 适中 (0.65)
【推荐2】At one time or another most farmers have problems with mice. This is especially true for grain farmers. Mice eat a lot of grain. They also carry diseases(疾病), which people can get from eating or touching grain the mice have made dirty. Farmers can use special grain storage buildings or they can kill the mice. However, both methods can be costly. Farmers must buy materials to build the special grain storage buildings or chemical poisons to kill the mice.
Here is a way to kill mice without spending a lot of money. It is a simple but effective kind of mouse trap. The method is first used by some farmers in the west African country of Mali. An agricultural expert in Mali reported about the Mali mouse trap in a magazine. The expert reported that his gardener caught 150 mice in just one night. The gardener used four traps. The trap is easy to make. First, remove the top from a 20 liter metal or plastic container(容器). Put it in a hole in the ground. The top edge of the container should be the level with the surface of the ground. Fill the container with water to within eight centimeters of the top. Add tiny pieces of grain wastes. They should float on the water. Also put some wastes on the ground near the trap. During the night, mice will come out to eat the grain wastes. They will fall into the container and drown. Replace the food in the trap every night.
1. According to the passage,_____ used the mouse trap first.
A.an agricultural expert in the west Africa
B.farmers in the United States
C.all American gardener
D.farmers in Mali
2. What does the passage mainly tell us?
A.A simple and effective method used by farmers to kill mice
B.How to kill mice
C.Methods used by farmers to kill mice
D.Farmers have problems with mice
3. Which of the following can’t protect grain from being eaten by mice?
A.A special grain storage building
B.Chemical poisons
C.A mouse trap
D.A hole in the ground
4. Which is probably the trap mentioned in the passage?
A.B.
C.D.
2016-11-26更新 | 388次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约410词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】Scientists have been trying to figure out how to alter the genes of humans for many years, and it looks like they’ve finally cracked (破解) the code. But while this may seem like a great step forward in science, some also believe that it’s one step back when it comes to ethics (道德准则). In August, a group of scientists from the USA and South Korea worked together to successfully edit a human embryo (胚胎) and remove a genetic mutation (突变) that would have led to heart disease, reported The Guardian. This was done with the help of CRISPR, a gene-editing tool that allows scientists to “cut and paste” human DNA.

Although this was the first example of an embryo’s genes being changed successfully, the advantages of gene editing have already been tested in living patients. In 2015, a five-month-old girl from the UK was saved after doctors used edited cells to fight off her cancer. As of today, she’s alive and well. And in the USA last year, scientists managed to remove HIV cells from several patients by editing the genes inside their bodies.

Some people hope that in the future, diseases or birth defects could simply be "edited out”. However, others believe this could lead to so-called designer babies, giving parents the option to choose everything from eye color to intelligence. “You could find wealthy parents buying the latest “upgrades” for their children, leading to even greater inequality than we already live with,” Marcy Camovsky, director of the San Francisco Center for Genetics, told BBC News.

In spite of these ethical concerns, experts say it’s not possible to create the “perfect” human being. Despite the progress scientists have made, we don’t understand human genes enough to give all unborn children great brainpower or amazing singing abilities. “Right now, we know nothing about genetic enhancement,” Hank Greely, a director at Stanford University, USA, told The New York Times. “We’re never going to be able to say, honestly, this embryo looks like it would score high on the two-part SAT.”

So it looks like if we want good exam results, or to impress people with our piano skills, we’ll have to stick with the old fashioned method of plain hard work---at least for now.

1. The underlined word “alter” in Paragraph 1 probably means ________.
A.recordB.changeC.removeD.increase
2. What was the first successful example of human embryo gene editing?
A.A genetic mutation related to heart disease was removed by scientists.
B.A newborn baby with cancer was saved by edited cells.
C.HIV cells were removed from patients9 bodies.
D.Some birth defects were simply edited out.
3. Why do some people consider human gene editing a step backwards?
A.They don’t think it is an effective way to fight diseases.
B.They are concerned that it could lead to genetic mutations.
C.They think it could lead to designer babies and increased inequality.
D.They worry that it could make parents abandon children with birth defects.
4. What can we conclude from the text?
A.Gene editing is regarded as the perfect way to treat birth defects.
B.There is still a long way to go to fully understand human genes.
C.Gene editing could help enhance human intelligence in the near future.
D.Scientists are pessimistic (悲观的) about the future of gene editing.
2021-05-12更新 | 282次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般