组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:280 题号:13001840

Scientists have been trying to figure out how to alter the genes of humans for many years, and it looks like they’ve finally cracked (破解) the code. But while this may seem like a great step forward in science, some also believe that it’s one step back when it comes to ethics (道德准则). In August, a group of scientists from the USA and South Korea worked together to successfully edit a human embryo (胚胎) and remove a genetic mutation (突变) that would have led to heart disease, reported The Guardian. This was done with the help of CRISPR, a gene-editing tool that allows scientists to “cut and paste” human DNA.

Although this was the first example of an embryo’s genes being changed successfully, the advantages of gene editing have already been tested in living patients. In 2015, a five-month-old girl from the UK was saved after doctors used edited cells to fight off her cancer. As of today, she’s alive and well. And in the USA last year, scientists managed to remove HIV cells from several patients by editing the genes inside their bodies.

Some people hope that in the future, diseases or birth defects could simply be "edited out”. However, others believe this could lead to so-called designer babies, giving parents the option to choose everything from eye color to intelligence. “You could find wealthy parents buying the latest “upgrades” for their children, leading to even greater inequality than we already live with,” Marcy Camovsky, director of the San Francisco Center for Genetics, told BBC News.

In spite of these ethical concerns, experts say it’s not possible to create the “perfect” human being. Despite the progress scientists have made, we don’t understand human genes enough to give all unborn children great brainpower or amazing singing abilities. “Right now, we know nothing about genetic enhancement,” Hank Greely, a director at Stanford University, USA, told The New York Times. “We’re never going to be able to say, honestly, this embryo looks like it would score high on the two-part SAT.”

So it looks like if we want good exam results, or to impress people with our piano skills, we’ll have to stick with the old fashioned method of plain hard work---at least for now.

1. The underlined word “alter” in Paragraph 1 probably means ________.
A.recordB.changeC.removeD.increase
2. What was the first successful example of human embryo gene editing?
A.A genetic mutation related to heart disease was removed by scientists.
B.A newborn baby with cancer was saved by edited cells.
C.HIV cells were removed from patients9 bodies.
D.Some birth defects were simply edited out.
3. Why do some people consider human gene editing a step backwards?
A.They don’t think it is an effective way to fight diseases.
B.They are concerned that it could lead to genetic mutations.
C.They think it could lead to designer babies and increased inequality.
D.They worry that it could make parents abandon children with birth defects.
4. What can we conclude from the text?
A.Gene editing is regarded as the perfect way to treat birth defects.
B.There is still a long way to go to fully understand human genes.
C.Gene editing could help enhance human intelligence in the near future.
D.Scientists are pessimistic (悲观的) about the future of gene editing.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐1】There are two species of crocodile in Australia—the saltwater crocodiles and the freshwater ones.

Saltwater crocodiles are among the world's largest crocodiles, with males often reaching five metres. But some can reach six to eight metres. Females grow up to 2.5 metres long.

Saltwater crocodiles live in rivers, and coastal waters in northern Australia and eat a wide variety of prey. The young ones stick to insects, small reptiles and fish. But adults hunt for bigger prey like snakes, monkeys and cattle. And they have been known to attack humans.

Freshwater crocodiles, however, aren't usually dangerous to people. They live in freshwater streams, rivers and large water holes in northern Australia. Freshwater crocodiles aren't as big as saltwater ones either, reaching a length of three metres at most.

Crocodiles first appeared 200 million years ago and lived originally on land. But they soon evolved into aquatic (水生的) animals.

These reptiles are excellent predators (肉食动物) and have few natural enemies. Crocodiles have about 30 or 40 teeth in each jaw. And it is the jaw that gives a unique feature to them.

A crocodile can close its jaws with such force that it can break the bones of some animals. Yet, once the jaws are shut, they're so weak that they can be held together by a person's hand.

To reproduce, crocodiles, like other reptiles, lay eggs. One female can produce between 20 and 90 eggs at a time. Once laid, female crocodiles bury their eggs in sand or mud, where they are left to hatch. Some females stay in the area to protect the nest and look after the young after they hatch, but often other predators eat the eggs.

1. The largest crocodiles in Australia can reash a length of ________.
A.three metresB.five metres
C.eight metresD.ten metres
2. The following features of saltwater crocodiles and freshwater crocodiles have been mentioned in the passage except ________.
A.their eating habits
B.the law to find a mate
C.the key to their strong power
D.threat against their reproduction
3. What do saltwater crocodiles and freshwater crocodiles have in common?
A.Theh have the same size.
B.They both live in freshwater streams.
C.They are usually both dangerous to people.
D.They both live in northern Australia.
4. We can infer from Paragraph 7 that ________.
A.crocodiles close their jaws very quickly
B.crocodiles' jaws are easy to control when they are open
C.crocodiles are not dangerous to people when their jaws are closed
D.crocodiles' jaws are very powerful when closing
5. What usually happens after crocodile eggs are laid?
A.The eggs will be kept under the ground.
B.The eggs will be hatched by their parents.
C.The male crocodiles will protect the eggs.
D.The female crocodiles will leave the nest.
2021-04-12更新 | 46次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约460词) | 适中 (0.65)
【推荐2】“Mobile phones killed our man.” screamed one headline last year. Also came statements that an unpublished study had found that mobile phones cause memory loss. And a British newspaper devoted its front page to a picture supposedly showing how mobile phones heat the brain. For anyone who uses a mobile phone, these are worring times. But speak to the scientists whose work is the focus of these scared and you will hear a different story.
What we do have, however, are some results suggesting that mobile phones’ emission(辐射) have a variety of strange effects on living tissue that can’t be explained by the general radiation biology. And it’s only when the questions raised by these experiments are answered that we’ll be able to say for sure what mobile phones might be doing to the brain.
One of the strange effects comes from the now famous “memory loss” study. Alan Preece and his colleagues at the University of Bristol placed a devic(装置) that copied the microwave emission of mobile phones to the left ear of volunteers. The volunteers were all good at recalling words and pictures they had been shown on a computer screen. Preece says he still can’t comment on the effects of using a mobile phone for years on end. But he rules out the suggesting that mobile phones have an immediate effect on our cognitive(感知的) abilities. “I’m pretty sure there is no short-term memory.” he says.
Another expert, Tatterasll, remarked that his latest findings have removed fears about memory loss. One result, for instance, suggests that nerve cell synapses(神经元突触) exposed to microwaves become more—rather than less—receptive to under-going changes linked to the memory formation.
It would be an even happier outcome if microwave turned out to be good for you. It sounds crazy, but a couple of years ago a team led by Willian Adey at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in California found that mice exposed to microwave for two hours a day were less likely to develop brain tumours(肿瘤) when given a cancer-causing chemical.
So should we forget about mobile phone radiation causing brain tumours and making us unable to think clearly or reasonably?
“If it doesn’t cause cancer in animals and cells, then it probably isn’t going to cause cancer in humans,” says William. And while there’s still no absolute evidence that mobile phone does damage your memories or give your cancer, the_____ is: Don’t panic.
1. What worries people who use mobile phones?
A.Mobile phones will kill them.
B.Mobile phones cause memory loss.
C.Mobile phones heat the brain.
D.All above is right.
2. What is the attitude of Prece on the suggestion that mobile phones have an immediate effect on our congnitive abilities?
A.Doubt.B.Disagree.C.Approve.D.Wait and see.
3. The underlined word “unanimity ”in the last paragraph most probably means “_______”.
A.consensusB.disagreementC.possibilityD.impossibility
4. From the fifth paragraph, we can infer that being exposed to microwaves for two hours _________.
A.can result in killing you
B.is likely develop brain tumours
C.is unlikely to develop brain tumours
D.will cause your loss of memory for ever
2016-11-26更新 | 70次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约300词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。一项研究发现,由于气候变化和集约农业,世界一些地区的昆虫数量迅速减少了一半。我们需要认识到昆虫对整个环境以及人类健康和福祉的重要性,以便在许多物种永远消失之前解决我们对它们构成的威胁。

【推荐3】Insect numbers have quickly declined by half in some parts of the world due to climate change and intensive agriculture, a study has found. The combined influences of global heating and farming are driving a “substantial decline” of insects across the globe, according to UK researchers.

Lead researcher, Dr Charlie Outhwaite of University College of London, said losing insect populations could be harmful not only to the natural environment, but to human health and food security, particularly with losses of pollinators (传粉者). “Our findings highlight the urgency of actions to preserve natural habitats, slow the expansion of high-intensity agriculture, and cut emissions to reduce climate change,” she added.

The rapid decrease of populations of insects around the world has caused widespread concern. However, scientific data gives a mixed picture, with some types of insects showing extreme and sudden declines, while others are staying steady.

In the latest study published in Nature, the researchers pulled together data on the range and number of nearly 20,000 insect species, including bees, ants, butterflies and dragonflies, at about 6,000 different areas. In areas with high-intensity agriculture and on-going warming, insect numbers have quickly declined by 49%, compared with relatively untouched places that have so far avoided the most severe impacts of climate change.

“Careful management of agricultural areas, such as preserving natural habitats near farmland, may help to ensure that vital insects can still thrive (茁壮成长),” said Dr Tim Newbold, another study researcher. “We need to acknowledge how important insects are for the environment as a whole, and for human health and well-being, in order to address the threats we pose to them before many species are lost forever.

1. Which of the following can cause the fall in insect numbers according to the text?
A.Global warming.B.Lack of food.
C.The change of seasons.D.Habitat management.
2. What may Dr Charlie Outhwaite suggest?
A.Taking action to ensure food security.B.Protecting natural habitats of insects.
C.Stopping developing agriculture.D.Keeping insects at home.
3. How did the researchers draw the conclusion in the latest study?
A.By carrying out surveys.B.By doing experiments.
C.By discussing questions.D.By analyzing data.
4. What does the text mainly talk about?
A.The loss of farmland.B.The future of agriculture.
C.The decline of insect numbers.D.The harm of climate change.
2023-04-08更新 | 78次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般