In the old days, when you had to drive to a movie theater or to a video store to get some entertainment, it was easy to see how your actions could have an impact on the environment. You were hopping into your car, driving across town, and using gas all the way.
But now that we’re used to staying at home and streaming movies, we might feel better about ourselves. After all, we’re just picking up our phones or maybe turning on the TV. You’re welcome, Mother Nature.
“Not so fast,” says a recent report from the French-based Shift Project. Watching a half-hour show would lead to 3.5 pounds of CO₂ emissions. That’s like driving 3.9 miles. According to “Climate Crisis: The Unsustainable Use of Online Video,” digital technologies are responsible for 4% of greenhouse gas emissions, and that energy use is increasing by 9% a year. Stored in data centers, videos are transferred to our terminals such as computers, smart phones, etc. via networks: all these processes require electricity whose production consumes resources and usually involves CO₂ emissions.
In the European Union, the Eureca project lead scientist, Rabih Bashroush, calculated that 5 billion downloads and streams of the song “Despacito” consumed as much electricity as the countries of Chad, Guinea-Bissau, Somalia, Sierra Leone and the Central African Republic used in a single year.
Streaming is only expected to increase as we become more attached to our devices. Online video use is expected to account for 80% of all internet traffic in five years according to CISCO. By then, about 60% of the world’s population will be online.
You’re probubly not going to give up your streaming services, but there are things you can do to help lessen the impact of your online use.
Here are some tips:
Disable autoplay for video on social media.
Stream over Wi-Fi, not mobile networks.
Watch on the smallest screen you can.
Don’t use high-definition (高清) video on devices.
1. It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 that people think ______.A.they should welcome Mother Nature |
B.streaming at home avoids possible emissions |
C.it is inconvenient to drive to a movie theater |
D.watching movies at home is more fun |
A.60% of the world’s population watch videos online |
B.digital technologies account for 4% of electricity use |
C.online video use makes up 80% of all internet traffic |
D.30 minutes of streaming video may produce 3.5 pounds of CO₂ |
A.To praise their energy-efficient practice. |
B.To prove the poverty of the five countries |
C.To stress the popularity of the song “Despacito” |
D.To show the high energy use of downloads and streams |
A.Use high-definition videos. | B.Turn off video autoplay |
C.Stream over mobile networks. | D.Watch movies on bigger screens. |
相似题推荐
Science on Sundays is a programme of free monthly science talks which always brings the latest discoveries in plant science, as well as research linked to the plant collection at the Botanic Garden, to the visitors in a 30-minute short period of time. The programme in April is about tulips(郁金香).
Introduction
Time: 2:30 pm on Sundays
Title: In Search of Wild Tulips
Objects: adults and children aged 12+
Speaker: Brett Wilson at University of Cambridge
Background Information
The planted tulips are a common sight in spring gardens around the world, but have you ever considered where wild tulips grow? The wild ancestors of our much-loved gardening varieties can mostly be found in the mountains and valleys of Central Asia, far from the Netherlands, where most tulips are grown and bred. At the Botanic Garden, we have a National Tulip Collection where we grow many wild species including plenty of species from Central Asia. Over the last four years, Brett Wilson has been using something learned from books and combining with fieldwork to understand the diversity of tulips, with a view of identifying which species are most at risk of extinction.
Come and listen to Brett speak about the research and the adventures that have occurred in our search to find and protect wild tulips in this remote corner of the world. These will be live face-to-face talks taking place in the Botanic Garden Classroom for those visitors with interest.
1. What do we know about Science on Sundays?A.It focuses on plants. |
B.It is a paid programme. |
C.It appeals only to children. |
D.It is a live broadcast on weekdays. |
A.By making assumptions. |
B.By picking and collecting tulips. |
C.By growing tulips in greenhouses. |
D.By combining theory and practice. |
A.To ask visitors to plant more tulips. |
B.To call on visitors to listen to the talks. |
C.To push visitors to take more botany classes. |
D.To advise visitors to take adventure in remote areas. |
【推荐2】Who would win in a competition to memorize numbers, a chimp or a teenager? The teenager? Think again. Scientists have proved that chimps perform better than human beings when it comes to this kind of problem.
Memory is our ability to learn something, save it and recall it when needed. Our memories are important to our sense of self, our personalities, and our ability to understand the world.
Imagination and association can be useful too. By imagination, scientists mean picturing a word in your mind, while association means relating the word to something you already know.
A.So why not try pictures with English words? |
B.Then how do chimps have better memories than us? |
C.Scientists say that there are different types of memory. |
D.We may have to rethink what we believe about human memory. |
E.Scientists have also found that people memorize things in different ways. |
F.For example, the time it takes to compare the prices of a few items in a store. |
G.Short-term and long-term memory differ in the amount of information they can store. |
After a year of musical training, children aged between 4 and 6 performed better at a standard memory test than did children who were not taught music.The findings suggest that music could be useful for building the learning capacity of your minds.
Earlier studies have shown that older children given music lessons become better at IQ tests than those who are musically untrained, but this is the first to show such a benefit in children so young.
Professor Laurek Trainor, of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, also found clear differences in the ways in which children's brains responded to sound after a year of musical training.'This is the first study to show that brain responses in young, musically trained and untrained children change differently over the course of a year," she said."These changes are likely to be related to the cognitive( 认知的 )benefit that is seen with musical training."
Professor Trainer's team looked at 12 children, 6 of whom had just started extra-curricular (课程外) music lessons and 6 of whom were not being taught any music except that included as a standard part of their school curriculum (课程标准) .
During the year all 12 children had their brains examined four times using magneto-encephalography (MEG), and each child was played two types of sound —white noise and a violin tone.The MEG measurements showed that all children responded more to violin sounds than to white noise, reflecting a preferable for meaningful tones, and their response times fell over the course of the year as their brains matured.
1. This passage is mainly about ____.
A.why music lessons are good for the memory |
B.the benefit from extra-curricular training for younger children |
C.a study on twelve young children's brains |
D.new technology to examine children's brains |
A.the study is the first one on the effect of musical training on children's brains |
B.scientists got no valuable results from the earlier studies on the topic |
C.children musically trained remember things better than those untrained |
D.older children get more benefit from musical training than younger ones |
A.None of them had been musically trained before. |
B.Only 6 of them had a knowledge of music before. |
C.Not all of them had been taught some music in school. |
D.All of them were required to learn some music in school. |
A.the older a child is, the more quickly he/she responds to sounds |
B.human brains prefer musical sounds to white noise |
C.children of different ages respond to sounds at the same speed |
D.all the twelve children like to learn to play the violin very much |
【推荐1】The national movement to get rid of plastic bags has been gaining steam — with over 240 cities and counties passing laws that ban (明令禁止) or tax them since 2007 in the US. But these bans may be hurting the environment more than helping it.
University of Sydney economist Rebecca Taylor and her colleagues compared cities with the bans with those without them about the use of bags. For six months, they spent weekends in grocery stores recording the types of bags people carried out.
Taylor found these bag bans did what they were supposed to: People in the cities with the bans used fewer plastic bags. But people who used to reuse their shopping bags for other purposes, like picking up dog waste, still needed bags. “What I found was that sales of garbage bags actually grew sharply after plastic grocery bags were banned,” she says.
Garbage bags are thick and use more plastic than typical shopping bags. “About 30 percent of the plastic that was reduced by the ban comes back in the form of thicker garbage bags,” Taylor says. On top of that, cities that banned plastic bags saw a surge in the use of paper bags, which she thinks resulted in about 80 million pounds of extra paper garbage per year.
A bunch of studies find that paper bags are actually worse for the environment. They require cutting down and processing trees, which needs lots of water, toxic chemicals and fuel. While paper is biodegradable and avoids some of the problems of plastic, Taylor says, the huge increase of paper means banning plastic shopping bags increases greenhouse gas emissions.
The Danish government recently did a study that took into consideration environmental impacts beyond simply greenhouse gas emissions, including the use of water, damage to ecosystems and air pollution. These factors make cloth bags even worse. They estimate you would have to use an organic cotton bag 20,000 times more than a plastic grocery bag to make using it better for the environment.
1. What is the result of banning plastic grocery bags?A.Plastic bags are no longer needed. |
B.People begin to reuse their plastic bags. |
C.The amount of garbage is even greater. |
D.Most of the reduced plastic returns in the form of garbage bags. |
A.Sharp increase. | B.Slow development. | C.Tight control. | D.Sharp decrease. |
A.They are much thicker than plastic bags. |
B.They are not as biodegradable as plastic bags. |
C.They can’t be reused as many times as plastic bags. |
D.They need more natural resources and hurt the environment more than plastic bags. |
A.Banning plastic may do more harm than good. |
B.Banning plastic has great influence on people’s life. |
C.Banning plastic increases the use of paper and cloth bags. |
D.Banning plastic bags is gaining popularity worldwide. |
【推荐2】The world itself is becoming much smaller by using modern traffic and modern communication means. Life today is much easier than it was hundreds of years ago, but it has brought new problems.
Man has been polluting the earth.
The earth is our home. We must take care of it.
A.One of the biggest is pollution. |
B.The more people, the more pollution. |
C.Air pollution is still the most serious. |
D.That means keeping the land, water and air clean. |
E.Many countries are making rules to fight pollution. |
F.I hope scientists can find ways to solve the serious problem. |
G.Strange diseases have appeared in some places because of pollution. |
【推荐3】You may not think it very much—a used ice cream tub on the beach,or a cigarette butt in the sand.But these little pieces of litter amount to around 8.8 million tons of trash in the world’s oceans,poisoning and choking sea life,according to figures from the World Wild Fund for Nature(WWF).
Now,a set of images titled The Price Of Convenience by Waters has shown the devastating(毁灭性的)effects casual littering has on creatures.In one image called “your convenience is their extinction”,a sea turtle’s shell is hollowed out and filled with banana skins,soda cans,and other debris(碎片).
“What is shocking is the amount of trash in the oceans,” Waters,23,said,describing his project in which he has begun a campaign to the WWF.“When you leave litter on the beach,you are treating the ocean like a trash can.When you throw trash over the side of a boat,you’re treating the ocean like a trash can.And when you leave litter at a beach festival or party,it’s the same.Obviously it would be impossible to clean the oceans but I felt I had to try something.” Waters explained that he,like many other westerners,has always been aware of environmental concerns but did not begin to do anything about it.
The turning point came as he visited Malaysia with his girlfriend last year.To his surprise,he reached the shore to find piles of trash.He had a strong feeling for it after he started researching trash in the ocean.A few months later,he came across the video of a sea turtle in obvious agony(极度痛苦)with a drinking straw stuck up its nostrils.That video inspired the first of Waters’ three images.“Sea turtles are such gentle creatures.I felt sick watching that video.Trash left on a beach by humans caused so much pain and suffering.These animals don’t have voices so we’ve got to speak up for them,” he added.
Waters has not yet received a response from WWF regarding his images.For now,he says,he is inspired to develop more and more campaigns that raise awareness of environmental concerns.
1. What does the author want to tell us with the figures from the WWF?A.How seriously the oceans are polluted. |
B.When people can take their action. |
C.What measures people should take. |
D.Where people should throw the rubbish. |
A.Excited. | B.Anxious. |
C.Shocked. | D.Disappointed. |
A.The used ice cream tub. |
B.The cigarette butt. |
C.The banana skins. |
D.The drinking straw. |
A.To beautify the polluted oceans. |
B.To raise people’s awareness of sea pollution. |
C.To protect the gentle sea creatures. |
D.To get some support from the WWF. |
【推荐1】Do you ever talk to yourself? Although it’s not always a conscious habit, most of us practice self-talk on a daily basis, as away of guiding, motivating or supporting ourselves.
Over the years, research has shown that self-talk can increase productivity, motivation and confidence, and even help manage feelings. “There is solid evidence that self-talk strategies improve learning and performance,” according to sport psychologist Antonis Hatzigeorgiadis, who studies the phenomenon of self-talk.
He explains that there are generally three reasons why we practice self-talk: to instruct, to motivate or to evaluate. Instructional self-talk happens when we need to guide ourselves through a specific task, such as learning a new skill. Motivational self-talk usually is used when we want to prepare ourselves for something challenging; it can help to increase confidence. Evaluative self-talk mostly is related to past events or actions.
Hatzigeorgiadis stresses that if we want to use such self-talk to good advantage, it needs to be short, precise and, most of all, consistent. Of course, self-talk also can be ineffective and even detrimental if it’s not done right.
“It is a matter of personal preference or what works for each person; but generally, it is advised that self-talk be positively rather than negatively phrased and focus on what you should do rather than on what you should avoid,” Hatzigeorgiadis says. So, for example, it would be better to say “stay cool” instead of “don’t get upset”. Although both instructions convey the same meaning, you should use positive words rather than negative ones. In this way you can avoid ill results.
Another thing that can make a difference when practicing self-talk is the way you address yourself. According to research published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, using “you” rather than “I” when talking to yourself tends to be more effective. The researchers explain that when you think of yourself as another person, it allows you to give more objective and useful feedback.
1. What does the research say about self-talk?A.It is a daily habit for everyone. | B.It can make people feel better. |
C.It may help strengthen memory. | D.It is always an unconscious behavior. |
A.Self-talk occurs in different situations. | B.Self-talk usually makes one brave. |
C.Self-talk arises with various feelings. | D.Self-talk is closely linked with a certain task. |
A.Confusing. | B.Useless. | C.Harmful. | D.Unbearable. |
A.Self-talk: a close relation to the past | B.Self-talk: a great way to avoid ill results |
C.Self-talk: a useful tool to benefit our life | D.Self-talk: a matter of personal preference |
【推荐2】Teenagers who talk on the cell phone a lot, and hold their phones up to their right ears, score worse on one type of memory test. That’s the finding of a new study. That memory impairment might be one side effect of the radiation (放射线) that phones use to keep us connected while we’re on the go.
Nearly 700 Swiss teens took part in a test of figural memory. This type helps us remember abstract (抽象的) symbols and shapes, explains Milena Foerster. The teens took memory tests twice, one year apart. Each time, they had one minute to remember 13 pairs of abstract shapes. Then they were shown one item from each pair and asked to match it with one of the five choices. The study volunteers also took a test of verbal memory. That’s the ability to remember words. The two memory tests are part of an intelligence test. The researchers also surveyed the teens on how they use cell phones. And they got call records from phone companies. The researchers used those records to figure out how long the teens were using their phones. This allowed the researchers to work out how big a radiation exposure (接触) each person could have got while talking.
A phone user’s exposure to the radiation can differ widely. Some teens talk on their phones more than others. People also hold their phones differently. If the phone is close to the ear, more radiation may enter the body, Foerster notes. Even the type of network signal that a phone uses can matter. Much of Switzerland was using an older “second-generation” type of cell phone networks, the study reports. Many phone carriers (通讯公司) have moved away from such networks. And more companies plan to update their networks within the next few years.
The teens’ scores in the figural memory tests were roughly the same from one year to the next. But those who normally held their phones near the right ears, and who were also exposed to higher levels of radiation, scored a little bit worse after a year. No group of teens showed big changes on the verbal memory test. Why might one type of memory be linked to cell phone use, but not another? Foerster thinks it could have to do with where different memory centers sit in the brain. The site that deals with the ability to remember shapes is near the right ear.
1. According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is TRUE?A.The teens took two types of memory tests four times in total. |
B.The teens needed to report the average time spent on their phones. |
C.Researchers paid little attention to the teens’ habits of using phones. |
D.The teens’ ability of remembering words is shown in figural memory test. |
A.How people hold their phones has no effect on their bodies. |
B.Phone users can make more money with new networks. |
C.The cell phone network type has little to do the cell phone use. |
D.Radiation levels are affected by the cell phone network types. |
A.matching numbers | B.reading signals |
C.remembering shapes | D.learning words |
A.Cell phone use and safety warnings |
B.Facts about cell phone use at school |
C.Dangerous levels of cell phone use among teens |
D.Teen’s cell phone use linked to memory problems |
【推荐3】Artificial intelligence (AI) might be able to spot the next virus to jump from animals to humans, Scottish researchers report.
Identifying diseases before they become a threat to humans is challenging, because only a few of the nearly 2 million animal viruses can infect humans. By developing machine learning models, researchers can analyze genetic patterns of viruses that might infect people. “Our findings show that the zoonotic (动物传染人的) potential of viruses can be inferred to a surprisingly large extent from their genome sequence (基因组序列).” the researchers at the University of Glasgow reported. “By highlighting viruses with the greatest potential to become zoonotic, genome-based ranking allows further ecological and virological characterization to be targeted more effectively.”
The researchers said the models are only a first step in identifying animal viruses with the potential to infect humans, however. Viruses flagged by the models will need laboratory test confirmation before researchers pursue funding for further study. Although these models may predict if viruses might infect humans, that’s only one part of the broader risk. Zoonotic risk is also influenced by how destructive a virus is in humans, as well as its ability to transmit between people, and ecological conditions at the time of human exposure.
The findings were published online in the journal PLoS Biology. Co-author Simon Babayan said these findings add important information to that collected from genetic sequencing of viruses using AI techniques. “The more viruses are characterized, the more effective our machine learning models will become at identifying the rare viruses that ought to be closely monitored and prioritized for vaccine development.” Babayan added.
1. What is the significance of genome-based ranking?A.To identify viruses which have threatened humans. |
B.To discover human viruses that can infect animals. |
C.To highlight viruses with the slightest chances to become zoonotic. |
D.To target ecological and virological characterization more effectively. |
A.The fund for further study has been put in place. |
B.There is still a long way to go for AI models to function ideally. |
C.Viruses flagged by the models have been confirmed by researchers. |
D.Viruses’ transmission ability is the most influential factor for zoonotic risk. |
A.Positive. | B.Ambiguous. | C.Indifferent. | D.Doubtful. |
A.AI Models Spot Various Viruses in Nature. |
B.AI Models Monitor Vaccine Development. |
C.AI Models Predict Potential Zoonotic Viruses. |
D.AI Models Cure Potential Zoonotic Diseases. |