组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自我 > 语言学习 > 语言与文化
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.85 引用次数:1177 题号:312609
E
How words came into being is unknown.All we assume is that some early men invented cortain sounds,in one way or another,to express thoughts and feelings,actions and things,so that they could talk with each other.Later they agreed upon certain signs,called             letters,which could be put together to show those sounds,and which could be written down.Those sounds,whether spoken or written in letters,are called words.
The power of words,then,lies in their associations-the things they bring up to our minds.Words become filled with meaning for us by experience;and the longer we live,the more certain words bring back to us the happy and sad events of our past;and             the more we read and learn,the more the number of words that mean something to us increases.
Great writers are those who not only have great thoughts but also express these thoughts in words which have powerful effects on our minds and feelings.This clever use of words is what we call literary style.Above all,the real poet is a master of             words.He can express his meaning in words which sing like music,and which by their position and association can move men to tears.We should therefore learn to choose our words carefully and use then correctly,or they will make our speech silly             and common.
1. We learn from the text that language might have begun with( )
A.expressionsB.actionsC.signsD.sounds
2. What is mainly discussed in Faragraph 2?
A.The ……of new wordsB.The importance of old words
C.The relation of human experience with wordsD.The gradual change and development of words
3. In the last paragraph,what does the anthor suggest that we should do?
A.Use words skilfullyB.Make musical speeches
C.Learn poems by heartD.Associate with listeners
2010·全国·高考真题 查看更多[6]

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约520词) | 较易 (0.85)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了英语里的一些谚语和由来。

【推荐1】There are proverbs (谚语) around spoken English. We do not normally put them in a composition or letter. Sometimes it is helpful if you know what common proverbs mean. Here are a few examples:

Once bitten, twice shy. If a dog bites me, I shall be twice as careful in future when I see it. This proverb is also used to apply to many things and not only to dogs. If you have been cheated at a shop, you will not go to the same shop again.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. If I am a hunter, trying to catch birds, it is better to catch one bird than to see two birds in a bush but not be able to catch them. Thus this means that what you have already got is better than the chance of being able to get something bigger in future.

Too many cooks spoil the broth (soup). When too many people do something together, they get in each other’s way and cannot do a good job.

To pour oil on troubled waters. It is to try to calm things down. Oil is lighter than water. If a ship is in trouble at sea, another ship may come to help it. The second ship can send small boats to rescue people. However, it may first pour oil on the sea to make the sea less rough.

Don’t be a dog in a manger (槽). It means “Don’t be selfish.” In a stable (马房), the manger is the place where the horse’s food is put. Sometimes a dog will sleep in the manger and bark when a horse comes to get its food. The dog does not want to eat the hay in the manger but it will not let the horse eat it.

He is sitting on the fence. It means that somebody will not say whether he is in favor of a plan or against it. He is sitting on a fence between two opposing sides, perhaps waiting to see which side will win.

He who pays the piper calls the tune. A piper is a musician. The man who employs or pays a musician can say what tunes the man will play. Thus this means that if a man provides the money for a plan, he can say how it will be carried out.

You cannot get blood out of a stone. Means that you cannot get something from a person who has not got any of the things you want. For example, you cannot get a million dollars from a poor man.

1. Peter had a bicycle which was much too small for him but he did not want to let his younger brother ride on it. His mother was angry and said to him:“________”
A.The early bird gets the worm. B.You cannot get blood out of a stone.
C.Don’t be a dog in a manger. D.Don’t be a horse in the manger.
2. Mr and Mrs Smith had a quarrel. Their friend, Mr Brown, went to talk to them. When he came back, he told his wife that he had been trying to help the Smiths by ________.
A.being a dog in a mangerB.not to pour oil on waters
C.pouring oil on troubled watersD.getting blood out of a stone
3. Mr Wang paid for a new school. Some people did not like the design of the school but they did not argue with Mr Wang because ________.
A.he who pays the piper calls the tuneB.a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush
C.he was sitting on the fenceD.once bitten, twice shy
2023-03-28更新 | 124次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 较易 (0.85)
名校
文章大意:本文是说明文。文章探讨了双语学习能否使人变得更聪明这一话题。

【推荐2】Bilinguals are smarter, says science. But the idea is relatively new. Up until the 1970s, most educators had believed that learning two languages at the same time would confuse children and slow their cognitive growth.

Science disagreed with these opinions, says Ellen Bialystok, a professor of psychology. The arrival of new technology in the 1970s allowed scientists a new way to investigate how different brains process language.

Bialystok has been researching the bilingual brain for decades. She firmly believes bilinguals aren’t smarter than the single-language learners, but bilingual brains differ in their use of executive function-a system that both helps the brain access particular regions or memories and allows a person to switch between tasks.

Contrary to media reports, executive function is not the same as intelligence, Bialystok adds. Even if the relationship between bilingualism and actual intelligence is unclear, executive function can help people do a lot of things that may make them seem smarter, such as doing more things at the same time and cancelling out things that take their attention away.

Many people believe that knowing at least one other language makes it easier to learn a new one, and cognitive function may play a part in that-the equivalent of good study habits for your brain. But Bialystok thinks cognitive function has less impact on language learners than the similarities between languages’ structure and vocabulary. “In learning those patterns, you can get a bit of a free ride in learning a new language,” she says. Despite the overall cognitive benefits, bilingualism may present some disadvantages. When children learn vocabulary, monolinguals can spend more time remembering words in one language, while bilinguals have to construct two different vocabularies.

“The biggest advantage in being bilingual is the same as having great international friends: It allows a person to understand a different way of thinking, with unique philosophies and assumptions about how others see the world,” Bialystok adds.

1. What did most educators think of children’s bilingualism before the 1970s?
A.It surely made kids smarter.B.It could be a terrible experience.
C.It should be taught separately.D.It may promote cognitive growth.
2. What can make learning a new language easy according to Bialystok?
A.Executive function.B.Cognitive function.
C.Similar language patterns.D.Good study habits.
3. What is Bialystok’s attitude toward bilingualism?
A.Skeptical.B.Conservative.C.Tolerant.D.Objective.
4. Which could be the best title for the text?
A.Are bilinguals really smarter?B.Should kids learn another language?
C.Why do bilinguals have an advantage?D.What factors affect language learning?
2023-03-19更新 | 309次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约420词) | 较易 (0.85)
名校

【推荐3】The human sense of smell is weak.That is well known, and is suspected by many anthropologists of being the result of a trade-off(协调) in favor of visual processing power. In the specific case of people, however, the relative weakness of smell compared with sight extends to language, too. Humans have no difficulty putting names to colors but are notoriously bad at putting names to smells.

That might also be caused by how the brain is wired. But some doubt this. They suggest it is more likely a consequence of the tendency of languages to contain words useful to their speakers. Since smells matter little to most people, most languages have few abstract words for them. A study just published in Current Biology, by Asian Majid at Radboud University in the Netherlands and Nicole Kruspe at Lund University in Sweden supports this.

Dr. Majid knew from previous work she had done that the Jahai, a group of hunter-gatherers who live in western Malaysia, are remarkably good at naming smells. Dr. Majid suggested that it might, in part, be because the Jahai have a dozen wards dedicated to describing different sorts of smells in the abstract. For example, the Jahai use the word “cŋεs” for stinging(刺激的) sorts of smells associated with petrol, smoke and various insects, and “pleŋ” for bloody, fishy and meaty sorts of smells. According to Dr Majid, only “musty” is able to act in this way in English without drawing on analogy (banana-like, gooseberry-noted, and even earthy and sweet-smelling, are all analogies of some sort).

They also looked at how two other groups of people from the Malay Peninsula(马来半岛)used terms for colors and smells. These were the Semaq Beri who also hunt and gather for a living, and the Semelai, who cultivate rice. They found that the Semaq Beri used abstract terms for smells 86% of the time-about as often as they did for colours, which was 80%. The Semelai also used abstract colour descriptions at a similar rate, namely 78% of the time. But when it came to describing odours they relied on abstraction on only 44% of occasions, while resorting to analogies, such as “banana” and “chocolate”, 56% of the time. Given these findings, Dr.Majid and Dr.Kruspe argue that it is the hunting-and-gathering way of life, rather than the use of a particular language, that is crucial to the use of abstract names for smells.


1. What leads to the difficulty of describing smells according to Majid's study?
A.The imbalance between smell and sight.
B.The poor function of the human nose.
C.The structure of the brain.
D.Lack of relevant vocabulary.
2. What can be inferred   from the examples in Paragraph 3?
A.English mainly relies on analogy to name smells.
B.Analogy is often used in the Jan a i language to names smells.
C.“Musty”is an English word using analogy to name a smell.
D.English borrows some words for smells from the Jahai language.
3. What can we learn from the study about two other groups?
A.Language plays a decisive   role in_naming smells.
B.The two groups were equally good at describing colors.
C.The Semaq Beri's lifestyle helped them have an edge in naming smells.
D.Surviving in the forest has greater effect on human language than farming.
2020-05-03更新 | 45次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般