组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:119 题号:8653922

For several months, Cara has been working up the courage to approach her mom about what she saw on Instagram. Not long ago, the 11-year-old discovered that her mom had been posting photos of her, without her permission for much of her life.

Like most other modern kids, Cara grew up surrounded by social media. Facebook, Twitter, You Tube and Instagram have been around since she was a baby. While many kids may not yet have accounts themselves, their parents, schools, sports teams, and organizations have been creating an online presence for them since birth. The shock of realizing that details about your life have been shared online without your agreement or knowledge has become a pivotal(关键的) experience in the lives of many teens.

Recently a parenting blogger(博主) wrote in a Washington Post essay that despite her 14-year-old daughter's horror at discovering that her mother had shared years of personal stories and information about her online, she simply could not stop posting on her blog and social media. The writer claimed that promising her daughter that she would stop posting about her publicly on the Internet "would mean shutting down a vital part of myself, which isn't necessarily good for me or her. "

Cara and other teens say they hope to lay down ground rules for their parents, Cara wants her mom to tell her the next time she posts about her, and the 11-year-old would like veto power over any photo, which exposes her privacy or is against her wish, before it goes up.

Some legislatures(立法机构) are also getting involved. In 2014, Europe's highest court ruled that Internet providers must give users the "right to be forgotten". Under the ruling, European citizens can apply to have past damaging information, including crimes committed as a minor, hidden from Google search results. And in France, strict privacy laws mean kids can sue their own parents for publishing secret or private details of their lives without agreement In the United States, however, teens aren't offered such protections, and many simply walk on eggshells.

1. What is the main idea of the second paragraph?
A.Many social media have appeared before the young.
B.Many people don’t realize they have an online presence.
C.Many social media have a great influence on teens' life.
D.Many teens' life has been shared online without their permission.
2. How does the blogger's daughter feel when knowing her mother posting her information?
A.She feels happy.B.She feels terrible.
C.She feels very relaxed.D.She feels so embarrassed.
3. What does the underlined word "veto" mean in the fourth paragraph?
A.The right to say no.
B.The right to choose a leader.
C.The right to make something perfect
D.The right to change the original material.
4. What is the author's attitude towards American online situation?
A.He is satisfied with the current situation
B.He pays no attention to the situation at all.
C.He thinks American government should make laws.
D.He feels a little bit disappointed at the current situation.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约580词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐1】Working out exactly what students and taxpayers get for the money they spend on universities is a tricky business. Now the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD), a Paris-based think-tank for rich countries, is planning to make the task a bit easier, by producing the first international comparison of how successfully universities teach.

“Rather than assuming that because a university spends more it must be better, or using other proxy measures for quality, we will look at learning outcomes,” explains Andreas Schleicher, the OECD’s head of education research. Just as the OECD assesses primary and secondary education by testing randomly chosen groups of youngsters from each country in reading and mathematics, it will sample university students to see what they have learned. Once enough universities are taking part, it may publish league tables showing where each country stands, just as it now does for compulsory education. That may produce a fairer assessment than the two established rankings, though the British one does try to broaden its inquiry by taking opinions from academics and employers.

There is much to be said for the OECD’s approach. Of course a Nobel laureate’s view on where to study may be worth hearing, but those professors may be so busy writing and researching that they spend little or no time teaching—a big weakness at America’s famous universities. And changes in methodology can bring surprising shifts. The high-flying London School of Economics, for example, tumbled(暴跌)from 17th to 59th in the British rankings published last week, primarily because it got less credit than in previous years for the impressive number of foreign students it had managed to attract.

The OECD plan awaits approval from an education ministers’ meeting in January. The first rankings are planned by 2021. They will be of interest not just as a guide for shoppers in the global market, but also as indicators of performance in domestic markets. They will help academics wondering whether to stay put or switch jobs, students choosing where to spend their time and money, and ambitious university bosses who want a sharper competitive edge for their institution.

The task the OECD has set itself is formidable. In many subjects, such as literature and history, the syllabus varies hugely from one country, and even one campus, to another. But OECD researchers think that problem can be overcome by concentrating on the transferable skills that employers value, such as critical thinking and analysis, and testing subject knowledge only in fields like economics and engineering, with a big common core.

Moreover, says Mr Schleicher, it is a job worth doing. Today’s rankings, he believes, do not help governments assess whether they get a return on the money they give universities to teach their undergraduates. Students overlook second-rank institutions in favour of big names, even though the less grand may be better at teaching. Worst of all, ranking by reputation allows famous places to coast along, while making life hard for feisty upstarts. “We will not be reflecting a university’s history,” says Mr Schleicher, “but asking: what is a global employer looking for?” A fair question, even if not every single student’s destiny is to work for a multinational firm.

1. The project by OECD is aimed to__________.
A.assess primary and secondary education of each school that subscribe to the service
B.appraise the learning outcomes of university students as part of their academic performance
C.establish a new evaluation system for universities
D.set up a new ranking for compulsory education
2. The assessment method by OECD is different from the established rankings in__________.
A.that its inquiry is broader as to include all the students and staff
B.that its samples are chosen randomly based on statistical analysis of method
C.that it attaches more importance to the learning efficiency
D.that it takes opinions from the students to see what they have learnt
3. By the case of London School of Economies, the author wants to show that__________.
A.the OECD’s approach is very fair
B.the Nobel laureate’s opinion is not worth hearing
C.the British rankings pay more attention to the foreign students
D.different assessment methods may lead to different ranking results
4. The OECD’s ranking system will probably be welcomed most by__________.
A.parents who pay for the children’s secondary education
B.the famous colleges
C.those ambitious second-rank institutions
D.shoppers in the global market
2023-06-16更新 | 93次组卷
阅读理解-七选五(约290词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐2】Does Using Technology in the Classroom Help College Students?

Almost anywhere in the world, you are likely to find people doing the same thing in public places, on trains and buses or wherever else you look. They spend their day looking at laptop computers, smartphones or other personal electronic devices. They are thinking mainly about their electronic devices, and not much else.

    1    . More and more college students have no problem walking into a classroom and immediately opening their laptops. Others may spend an entire study period with a smartphone in hand.     2     But recent research suggests that using technology during class time may harm college students’ ability to remember and process the subject material they are learning.

Arnold Glass, a professor in Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, and a student researcher investigated the issue of divided student attention. During half of their daily class periods, the students in their study were permitted to use any electronic device as much as they wanted.     3    

The students’ academic performance was measured in several ways throughout the semester. They took a short test every day, longer tests every few weeks and a final exam covering all the class material. The researchers found that the average daily quiz results showed no evidence of harmful effects from the use of technology.     4     They showed that all the students performed poorly on questions covering material taught on days when they were permitted to use technology in the classroom.

Glass says that it shows the use of electronic devices in the classroom prevents students from processing information. The students hear what the professor is saying. But they might be buying things online or reading unrelated emails at the same time, for example. So they are not thinking deeply about the subject matter as they are hearing it.     5    

A.The same can be said about the world of college education.
B.However, the average results of the larger tests and final exam told a different story.
C.And that, Glass says, makes it harder for the information to enter their long-term memory.
D.Technology, in general, is not the only way that students find to distract themselves in class.
E.But even if technology is helpful to some students, there are times when it needs to be turned off.
F.Some students argue that the increasing use of technology can have many helpful effects on society.
G.During the other half, researchers closely watched them to make sure no one was using any technology.
2019-03-20更新 | 172次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约270词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。实验室培育的食品可能有助于解决英国住房负担能力危机,但并非所有的养殖系统都存在可持续性和气候变化问题,有人提出的简单解决方案可能并不全面,牲畜是人类未来食物需求的重要组成部分。

【推荐3】One overlooked benefit of lab-grown food is that it may help the UK deal with the crisis in housing affordability. As farming is replaced by precision fermentation (发酵) , the significant amount of land currently used for livestock farming(including parts of the green belt) will be freed up for development in places that people actually want to live.

However, we’d take a different lesson from the promise of lab-grown meat. Free-market environmentalism and harnessing the power of innovative technologies — supported by market-based measures like a border-adjusted carbon tax — can successfully tackle the problem of man-made climate change without fundamentally uprooting the way we run society. Saving the planet doesn’t have to cost us the earth.

It is important to acknowledge that certain types of livestock farming may have issues with sustainability and climate change. But it is not true of all farming systems; and the issues that do exist are being dealt with using the latest research into genetics and biotechnology-for example, recent research has shown that certain types of seaweed can reduce methane emissions from cattle to close to zero.

Farmer data also shows that increased sales of milks have not seen a corresponding reduction in dairy sales.

The global food system, consumer choices and climate change are incredibly complex issues, and anyone who proposes simple solutions is almost certainly not in possession of all the relevant facts and data. Livestock are an important part of humanity’s future food needs.

1. Why does lab-grown food help Britain to solve the housing affordability crisis?
A.As farming is replaced by precision fermentation, the level of agricultural development is improved.
B.The significant amount of green belts are used for development in places that people actually want to live.
C.Lab-grown food is more environmentally friendly and beneficial to human health.
D.A large amount of land used for livestock farming will be freed up for residence.
2. What lessons have learned from the promise of lab-grown meat?
A.Free-market environmentalism can change the way society operates.
B.Adjusting carbon tax can successfully solve the problem of climate change.
C.Adopting the power of innovative technologies is useful for saving the earth.
D.Saving the earth requires changing the way society operates.
3. Which of the following best explains “harnessing” underlined in paragraph 2?
A.obtainB.exploitC.inheritD.develop
4. It can be inferred from this passage that .
A.global food issue is so complex that there are no complete research data.
B.sustainability and climate change are common problems in agricultural systems.
C.some kinds of seaweed can make the amount of methane emitted by cattle ineffective.
D.the sales of substitute dairy products increased, and the sales of dairy products decreased accordingly.
2024-01-14更新 | 215次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般