组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:66 题号:8694100

When men and women take personality tests,some of the old Mars-Venus stereotypes(定式)keep reappearing. On average,women are more cooperative,kind,cautious and emotionally enthusiastic. Men tend to be more competitive,confident,rude and emotionally flat. Clear differences appear in early childhood and never disappear.

What's not clear is the origin of these differences. Evolutionary psychologists think that these are natural features from ancient hunters and gatherers. Another school of psychologists argues that both sexes' personalities have been shaped by traditional social roles,and that personality differences will shrink as women spend less time taking care of children and more time in jobs outside the home.

To test these hypotheses(假设),a series of research teams have repeatedly analyzed personality tests taken by men and women in more than 60 countries around the world.For evolutionary psychologists,the bad news is that the size of the gender gap in personality varies among cultures.For social-role psychologists,the bad news is that the change is going in the wrong direction.It looks as if personality differences between men and women are smaller in traditional cultures like India's or Zimbabwe's than in the Netherlands or the United States.A husband and a stay-at-home wife in a patriarchal(男权的)Botswanan clan(部族)seem to be more alike than a working couple in Denmark or France.The more Venus and Mars have equal rights and similarjobs,the more their personalities sem to separate.

These findings are so unbelievable that some researchers have argued they must be due to cross-cultural problems with the personality tests. But according to new data from 40.000 men and women on six continents,David P. Schmitt and his colleagues conclude that the trends are real. Dr. Schmitt,a psychologist at Bradley University in I llinois and the director of the International Sexuality Description Project,suggests that as wealthy modern societies level(使平等)the barriers between women and men,some ancient internal differences are being developed.

The biggest changes recorded by the researchers involve the personalities of men, not women.

Men in traditional agricultural societies and poorer countries seem more cautious and anxious, less confident and less competitive than men in the most progressive and rich countries of Europe and North America.

To explain these differences, Dr. Schmitt and his partners from Austria and Estonia point to the hardships of life in poorer countries. They note that in some other species, environmental stress tends to extremely affect the larger sex. And, they say, there are examples of stress decreasing biological sex differences in humans.

1. According to personality tests, the differences between men and women begin to exist________.
A.ocesionally and temporarilyB.randomly and forever
C.regularly and constantlyD.early and permanently
2. What is stated in Paragraph 2 is to indicate________.
A.psychologists have no way to know the origin of the differences
B.experts fight against one another
C.the explanation for the differences is open to tests
D.women will solve the problem of the personality differences
3. Now researchers tend to believe that the differences between men and women________.
A.originate from ancient hunters and gatherersB.are shaped by traditional social roles they play
C.are affected by traditional culturesD.vary from one culture to another
4. What can be inferred about Dr. Schmitt?
A.He doesn't recognize the findings above.
B.He thinks social environment contributes to some internal differences.
C.He believes wealthy women and men are equal.
D.He has no examples to explain the differenees at all.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约440词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了人类除了五种感知外,还有其他一些感知,利用好这些感知,可提升我们的感知能力。

【推荐1】We’re all familiar with the phrase “healthy body, healthy mind”. But for a healthy mind, we need healthy senses, too. However, if we want to make the most of our senses to enhance our wellbeing, we have to consider: more than sight, hearing, taste, touch and smell. We have many other senses that add to our extraordinary human capacity for sensing.

Vestibular senses — Our vestibular system allows us to sense the direction of gravity, as well as horizontal (水平的) and vertical movement(as in a car or a lift). Research shows that a healthy vestibular system is important not only for balance but for our sense of being grounded inside a physical body; in fact, people with vestibular problems are more likely to report out-of-body experiences. They’re also more likely to get lost, because a healthy vestibular system is important for a good sense of direction.

For all of us, though, the older we get, the duller all our vestibular responses become. But we can benefit from dynamic movements that require moving the head, like those involved in climbing a tree or practising tai chi, as well as anything that challenges our balance.

Proprioception — the sensing of the location of our body parts in space-has been relatively ignored, but it’s critical for confidence in using our bodies. If you now shut your eyes, and extend a leg, it’s thanks to this sense that you know exactly where your legis. To go for a run, then, or workout in the gym, and not fall or injure yourself, you need a good sense of proprioception. Our sedentary (久坐的) lifestyles are a threat to this sense. But climbing trees, walking along balance beams, crossing stepping stones are all proprioceptively demanding, and so train this sense. You may develop such a sense by practising complex moves with your eyes shut.

Inner sensing — About 10%’of us are really good at sensing our own heartbeat without feeling for a pulse, 5-10% of us are terrible at it, and the rest fall in between. Research shows that people who are better at sensing their own heartbeat experience emotions more intensely, enjoy more nuanced (细微的) emotions, and are better at recognizing other people’s emotions, which is a critical first step in sharing another person’s emotions. Training inner sensing helps to improve our emotional wellbeing. If you can’t sense your heart beating try exercising first, because this makes it easier.

1. Why does the author suggest practising tai chi?
A.To be able to climb a tree.B.To keep healthy in one’s old age.
C.To deal with vestibular problems.D.To develop one’s vestibular sense.
2. Which of the following needs a good sense of proprioception most?
A.Shutting your eyes.B.Playing table tennis.
C.Sensing the direction.D.Recognising emotions.
3. How does the author think you can gain inner sensing?
A.By training.B.By sharing emotions.
C.By sensing our heartbeat.D.By improving emotional wellbeing.
4. Which of the following is a suitable title for the text?
A.Making the Most of Our Healthy Senses
B.Exercising Regularly to Enhance Our Senses
C.Increasing Our Human Capacity for Sensing
D.Using New Senses Instead of the Five Senses
2023-06-10更新 | 39次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。主要介绍了吃得更晚,会更胖,以及通过研究给出了科学解释。

【推荐2】We all know that eating later in the day isn’t good for our waistlines, but why? A new study weighed in on that question by comparing people who ate the same foods — but at different times in the day. “Does the time that we eat matter when everything else is kept consistent?” said first author Nina Vujovic, a researcher at Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital. The answer was yes — eating later in the day will double your odds of being hungrier, according to the study published in the journal Cell Metabolism (新陈代谢).

The study does show eating later results in “an increase in hunger, impacts hormones and also changes gene expression, especially in terms of fat metabolism with a tendency towards less fat breakdown and more fat deposition,” said Dr. Bhanu Prakash Kolla, a professor of psychiatry and psychology at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine.

The study was small — only 16 overweight or obese people — but carefully planned to eliminate other potential causes of weight gain. All participants were in good health, with no history of diabetes or shift work and had regular physical activity. Each person in the study kept to a strict healthy sleep/wake schedule for about three weeks and were provided with prepared meals at fixed times for three days before the lab experiment began.

Participants were then divided into two groups randomly. One group ate calorie-controlled meals at 8 am, noon and 4 pm, while the other ate the same meals four hours later, at noon, 4 pm and 8 pm for the six days reported in the study. Measures of hunger and appetite were gathered 18 times each while tests for body fat, temperature and energy expenditures were gathered on three separate days.

After a break of a few weeks, the same participants reversed the procedure — those who had eaten earlier moved to the late eating group and vice versa, thus using each person as their own control. Results showed that hunger pangs doubled for those on a night-eating regime (规则). People who ate later in the day also reported a desire for salty foods, meat and, to a lesser extent, a desire for dairy foods and vegetables.

1. What can we infer about eating later in the day from the text?
A.It does harm to our fat storage.
B.It helps keep our body in shape.
C.It has nothing to do with our health actually.
D.It has a negative effect on our fat breakdown.
2. How was the experiment performed?
A.By conducting a large-scaled test.
B.By analyzing the causes of the phenomenon.
C.By collecting many data to facilitate the study.
D.By giving examples to prove the scientific research.
3. What can we learn about the participants in the experiment?
A.All the participants weren’t out of shape.
B.Most of the participants lacked regular exercise.
C.The participants were restricted to particular foods.
D.The participants were grouped according to their weights.
4. Which of the following can be the best title for the text?
A.Eat Less, Live LongerB.Eat Later, Be Fatter
C.Eat Better, Live HealthierD.Eat More, Feel Hungry Later
2023-01-08更新 | 109次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇记叙文。文章讲述了1977年哈佛大学毕业生Irene Pepperberg决定通过与另一种生物交谈来研究它的思维过程,以及她研究鹦鹉的过程和遇到的困难。

【推荐3】In 1977, Irene Pepperberg, a Harvard graduate, decided to investigate the thought processes of another creature by talking to it. To do this, she would teach a one-year-old African gray parrot (鹦鹉), Alex, to reproduce the sound of the English language.

Pepperberg bought Alex in a pet store, where she let the store’s assistant choose him because she didn’t want other scientists to say that she had intentionally chosen an especially smart bird. Given that Alex’s brain was just the size of a walnut, most researchers thought Pepperberg’s communication study would be futile.

But with Pepperberg’s patient teaching, Alex learned how to follow almost 100 English words. He could count to six and had learned the sound for seven and eight. But the point was not to see if Alex could learn words by heart. Pepperberg wanted to get inside his mind and learn more about a bird’s understanding of the world.

In one demonstration, Pepperberg held up a green key and a green cup for him to look at. “What’s the same?” she asked. “Co-lor,” Alex responded without hesitation. “What’s different?” Pepperberg asked. “Shape,” Alex quickly replied. His voice had the soundh of a cartoon character. But the words—and what can only be called the thoughts—were entirely his. Many of Alex’s skils, such as his ability to understand the concepts of “same” and “different”, are rare in the animal world. Living in a complex society, parrots like Alex must keep track of changing relationnships and environments.

During the demonstration, as if to offer final proof of the mind inside his bird’s brain, Alex spoke up. “Talk clearly!” he commanded, when one of the younger birds Pepperberg was also teaching mispronounced the word “green”

Alex knew all the answers himself and was getting bored. “He’s moody,” said Pepperberg, “so he interrupts the others, or he gives the wrong answer just to be difficult.” Pepperberg was certainly learning more about the mind of a parrot, but like the parent of a troublesome teenager, she was learning the hard way.

1. Why did Pepperberg let the shop assistant choose the bird?
A.A bird with a small brain was needed.
B.She wanted a very smart bird for her study.
C.A research subject should be randomly chosen.
D.The shop assistant was better at choosing birds.
2. What might most researchers think of Pepperberg’s study at first?
A.Innovative.
B.Practical.
C.Costly.
D.Fruitless.
3. Which of the following aspects of Alex’s ability did Pepperberg’s study focus on?
A.Understanding concepts.
B.Calculating.
C.Recognizing voices.
D.Creating English words.
4. What caused Pepperberg’s struggle in her study?
A.Her instructions had to be easy for Alex.
B.Alex was sometimes too clever to control.
C.Alex would point out other birds’ mistakes.
D.She had trouble understanding Alex’s mood.
2023-08-09更新 | 226次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般