1 . Afroz Shah, a lawyer in Mumbai, hasn’t had a weekend off in four years. But he hasn’t spent this time preparing for
His mission? Saving the world’s oceans from
It’s a calling he found in 2015 after moving to a community in Mumbai called Versova Beach. He had played there as a child and was
“The whole beach was like a
In October 2015, Shah began
For Shah, the work has always been a
He’s now spent 209 weekends on this mission,
“This world talks too much. I think we must talk
A.teaching | B.court | C.housework | D.cleaning |
A.river | B.soil | C.plastic | D.oil |
A.upset | B.excited | C.delighted | D.hesitant |
A.grown | B.changed | C.reserved | D.protected |
A.pure | B.golden | C.shiny | D.visible |
A.carpet | B.curtain | C.painting | D.photograph |
A.temporary | B.permanent | C.ugly | D.pretty |
A.sticks to | B.keeps off | C.gives back | D.ends up |
A.killer | B.cleaner | C.guest | D.decoration |
A.sweeping | B.attacking | C.visiting | D.beautifying |
A.pulling | B.thinking | C.picking | D.looking |
A.came | B.failed | C.went | D.spread |
A.involved | B.lived | C.stuck | D.paid |
A.easy | B.tough | C.personal | D.general |
A.known | B.regarded | C.decided | D.honored |
A.cause | B.case | C.position | D.fame |
A.requiring | B.rejecting | C.inviting | D.inspiring |
A.originally | B.finally | C.politically | D.theoretically |
A.fewer | B.less | C.better | D.worse |
A.honor | B.beauty | C.hope | D.love |
2 . Steven Stein likes to track garbage trucks. He says, “It’s hard to resist.” Stein’s strange habit makes sense when you consider that he’s an environmental scientist who studies how to reduce litter, including stuff that falls off garbage trucks as they run down the road. What is even more interesting is that one of Stein’s current plans is defending an industry behind a source of trash: plastic shopping bags.
Americans use more than 100 million plastic bags every year. So many end up in tree branches or along highways that a growing number of cities are banishing (排除) them from checkout lines. The bags are outlawed in some places in the USA.
Facing these situations, plastic-bag manufacturers are hiring scientists like Stein to make the case that their products are not as bad for the planet as most people assume. “It’s important to base your decisions on facts,” says Stan Bikulege, CEO of Hilex Poly, which has hired Stein.
Among the bag makers’ argument: many cities with bans still allow shoppers to purchase paper bags, which are easily recycled but require more energy to produce and transport. And while plastic bags may be ugly to look at, they represent a small percentage of all garbage on the ground today.
The industry has also taken aim at the product that can take the place of plastic bags: reusable shopping bags. The sturdier a reusable bag is, the longer its life and the more plastic-bag use it cancels out. But this plan has another side. Longer-lasting reusable bags often require more energy to make.
Environmentalists don’t agree with these points. They hope paper bags will be banned someday too and want shoppers to use the same reusable bags for years. So are reusables our destiny? The answer is probably yes. And Andy Keller, inventor of reusable polyester (聚酯纤维) bags, says, ”If you can carry it out in your hands or put it back in your car, you don’t need a bag.”
1. The first paragraph serves as___________.A.an explanation | B.an introduction | C.a comment | D.a background |
A.To collect facts about shopping bags. |
B.To show plastic bags are eco-friendly. |
C.To research on people’s consuming habits. |
D.To prove plastic bags are better than people thought. |
A.They look a bit ugly. | B.They are easy to break. |
C.Their prices are comparatively high. | D.Their production is energy-consuming. |
A.Stronger. | B.Lighter. | C.Heavier. | D.Softer. |
A.Forget about plastic bags. | B.Paper bags are coming. |
C.Paper, plastic or neither. | D.A strange scientist. |
3 . Styrofoam, or polystyrene, is a light-weight material, about 95 percent air, with very good insulation (隔热) properties, according to Earthsource.org. It is used in products from cups that keep your drinks hot or cold to packaging material that protects items during shipping. With the above good features, Styrofoam still enjoys a bad reputation. It cannot be recycled without releasing dangerous pollution into the air. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency says it is the fifth-largest creator of harmful waste.
But now the common worms which are usually disgusting can come to the rescue, specifically, mealworms. Scientists from the U. S. and China have discovered that mealworms can digest plastic. One mealworm can digest a pill-sized amount of plastic a day. Study co-author Wei-Min Wu says that in 24 hours, the plastic is turned into carbon dioxide.
Since Styrofoam has no nutrition at all, are the worms hurt by eating plastic? Much to the scientists’ surprise, the study found that worms eating Styrofoam were as healthy as worms eating bran (谷糠). The researchers will study the worm’s eating habits and digesting system, looking to copy the plastic breakdown but on a larger scale. Once the way can be put into practice, it will make a revolutionary difference to the disposal of plastic.
“Solving the issue of plastic pollution is important”, says Wu, a Stanford University environmental engineering instructor. After all, our earth is small and landfill space is becoming limited with too much garbage waiting to be dealt with, he says.
About 33-million tons of plastic are thrown away in the United States every year. Plastic plates, cups and containers take up 25 percent to 30 percent of space in America’s landfills. One Styrofoam cup takes more than 1 million years to recycle in a landfill, according to Cleveland State University.
1. What do we know about Styrofoam?A.It can be used to cool drinks. |
B.It is a weightless material. |
C.It is harmful when recycled. |
D.It is usually used on ships. |
A.Mealworms have amazing digesting power. |
B.Mealworms are not bad in their nature. |
C.Mealworms can rescue people’s lives. |
D.People misunderstood mealworms in the past. |
A.To find ways to help mealworms grow larger. |
B.To imitate their ways of breaking down plastic. |
C.To help develop their digesting ability. |
D.To make sure of their safety after eating plastic. |
A.by raising amounts of mealworms |
B.by environmental engineering instructors |
C.using a method inspired by eating mealworms |
D.without sending out dangerous pollution |
A.Styrofoam is widely used in daily life. |
B.Mealworms are genius at eating plastic. |
C.Plastic recycling may be no more a problem. |
D.Plastic can be turned into carbon dioxide. |
4 . In the UK, the government showed throwaway cups should be forbidden altogether by 2023 if they are not all being recycled. As a result, Starbucks said it would try out a 5p (5 pence) cup charge in 20 to 25 central London shops. “We will begin it next month and at first it will last for three months,” the company said, adding that it continued to offer a 25p (25 pence) discount to customers who brought their own reusable cups.
The government agrees plastic waste is a problem and will consider taxing disposable (一次性的) plastics. The committee’s chair, Mary Creagh, said, “The UK throws away 2.5 billion disposable coffee cups every year. Almost none are recycled. Coffee cup producers and shops haven’t taken action to change this. So we need to kick-start a change in recycling.”
The Liberal Democrats said they had been suggesting a charge on coffee cups since September 2016. The party’s spokesman, Tim Farron, said, “The result is clear that the tax works. The 5p charge on plastic bags has largely cut down the usage and helped protect our environment.”
The 5p tax is being against by the makers of paper cups. Mike Tuner, of the Paper Cup Alliance, said paper cups were the safest solution for drinks. “The paper cups we produce in the UK can be recycled, and are being recycled. We are trying to increase recycling rates. Taxing the morning coffee run won’t solve the problem, but it will hurt consumers,” he said.
Disposable coffee cups are technically recyclable, but most are not because the UK has just three machines that can split the paper and plastic parts for recycling. The committee has called on the government to require coffee cups from cafes without in-store recycling systems to carry “not recycled” marks to remind customers. Cafes with in-store recycling systems should print their cups with “recyclable in store only”.
1. About the throwaway cups, Starbucks will ________.A.offer a half-price discount to customers with their own cups |
B.support the idea of forbidding throwaway cups till 2023 |
C.charge customers 5p per throwaway cup in some shops |
D.stop to offer throwaway cups in its shops right now |
A.Coffee cup makers will take action to recycle the water. |
B.The use of the disposable plastics is a nationwide problem. |
C.Coffee cup users pay much attention to the plastic problem. |
D.The UK government will ban all disposable coffee cups by 2023. |
A.More people will fight against the charge. |
B.There will be little change in our environment. |
C.Fewer people will use the disposable coffee cups. |
D.There will be a competition between coffee shops. |
A.will be supported by the makers of the paper cups |
B.will affect the consumers instead of solving the problem |
C.can give a hand to increasing recycling rates of the makers |
D.can be the best solution for the government to cut down waste |
A.There are not enough professionals in this area. |
B.There is not enough professional equipment. |
C.Consumers don’t have recycling knowledge. |
D.Cafes don’t have recycling systems at all. |
5 . A major new facility to pull CO2 out of the atmosphere has started operating in Iceland, which is a boost to an emerging technology that experts say could eventually play an important role in reducing greenhouse gases.
The plant in southwest Iceland is the biggest of its kind, its builder says. It is able to capture 900 tons of CO2 every year but it needs heat and electricity to work. It is using energy produced from waste and is built on the roof of a waste incineration plant, and through the burning of rubbish, energy is generated.
Human-sized fans are built into a series of boxes. They take CO2 out of the air, catching it in spongelike filters (过滤器). The filters are blasted with heat, freeing the gas, which is then mixed with water and pumped deep into deep underground basalt caves, where over time it turns into dark-gray stone. Pumping CO2 into the ground is just one way to deal with it. The makers are also selling the gas to be used again. The CO2 can be captured just a few 100 miles away. It is pumped through an underground pipeline directly into a greenhouse. Vegetables and plants love CO2 and higher concentrations of the gas within the greenhouse improve the growth of plants.
By 2050, humanity will need to pull nearly a billion metric tons of CO2 from the atmosphere every year through direct air capture technology to achieve carbon neutral goals, according to International Energy Agency recommendations. The plant in Iceland will be able to capture 4000 metric tons annually — just a small amount of what will be necessary, but an engineer in Climeworks, the company that built it, says it can grow rapidly as efficiency improves and costs decrease.
“This is a market that does not yet exist, but a market that urgently needs to be built,” said Christoph Gebald who co-founded Climeworks. “This plant that we have here is really the blueprint to further increase the size and really industrialize.”
1. What do we know about the carbon capture facility from paragraph 2?A.It is built at high altitudes. | B.It uses waste to produce power. |
C.It makes Iceland free of air pollution. | D.lt produces lots of heat during operation. |
A.The methods of breaking down CO2. |
B.The approaches to reusing waste gas. |
C.The necessity of building greenhouses. |
D.The workings of the carbon-catching plant. |
A.It will decrease the cost of energy production. |
B.It can help reach the carbon neutral goals in advance. |
C.It will speed up the reduction of CO2 levels in the air. |
D.It may replace the traditional carbon storage system. |
A.The capture of CO2 in the atmosphere is able to kill many birds with one stone. |
B.CO2 will be delivered to greenhouses after being turned into dark-gray stones. |
C.A major new market to pull CO2 out of the atmosphere has started operating. |
D.The plants in Iceland greenhouses can capture a small amount of CO2. |
A.Ambiguous. | B.Neutral. |
C.Disapproving. | D.Supportive. |
6 . Eradajere Oleita thinks she may have a partial solution for two of her country’s persistent (持续的) problems: garbage and poverty (贫困). It’s called the Chip Bag Project. The 26-year-old student and environmentalist from Detroit is asking a (n)
Chip eaters drop off their
It
Since its start in 2020, the Chip Bag Project has
Sure, it would be simpler to
And, of course, there’s the symbolism of recycling bags that would otherwise land in the
A.advice | B.question | C.favor | D.permission |
A.throw | B.track | C.leak | D.lock |
A.design | B.detect | C.digest | D.donate |
A.homeless | B.disabled | C.old | D.sick |
A.heavy | B.empty | C.luxury | D.full |
A.moments | B.decisions | C.locations | D.conclusions |
A.clean | B.load | C.soften | D.resolve |
A.dig | B.slice | C.lift | D.knock |
A.pays | B.takes | C.delays | D.wastes |
A.resulting in | B.figuring out | C.contributing to | D.depending on |
A.out | B.around | C.over | D.on |
A.reached | B.related | C.found | D.collected |
A.destroyed | B.repaired | C.compared | D.created |
A.lose | B.lend | C.raise | D.drop |
A.goal | B.income | C.profit | D.way |
A.risking | B.recommending | C.attaining | D.realizing |
A.driving | B.devoting | C.enjoying | D.encouraging |
A.store | B.trash | C.solution | D.family |
A.day after day | B.step by step | C.face to face | D.hand in hand |
A.generations | B.inspirations | C.connections | D.expectations |
7 . Fire ants are famous for their construction projects (as well as their burning bites). When they need to, colonies of these insects turn themselves into ladders, chains and walls. And when flood water rises, a colony can float to safety by making an unusual boat. The ants hold tightly to each other, forming a floating disk atop the water. The antraft may float for months seeking safe harbor. The ants on the bottom don’t drown, and the ants on the top stay dry. Working together, the ants float to safety — even though a single ant alone in the water will struggle to survive.
“They have to stay together as a colony to survive.” Nathan Mlot said.
Fire ants and water don’t mix. The ant’s hard outer shell, naturally repels water. A drop of water can sit on top of the ant like a backpack. When an ant does end up underwater, tiny hairs on its body can trap bubbles of air that give the bug a boost up.
To investigate the science behind the antraft, the scientists placed hundreds or thousands of ants at a time in the water. A group of ants took about 100 seconds, on average, to build a raft. The researchers repeated the experiment multiple times. Each time, the ants organized themselves the same way, creating a raft about the size and the thickness of a thin pancake. The rafts were flexible and strong, staying together even when the researchers pushed the rafts underwater.
The scientists then froze the rafts in liquid nitrogen and studied them under powerful microscopes to figure out how the ants kept everyone safe and the water out.
The team found that some ants used their jaws to bite other ants’ legs. Other ants joined their legs together. Thanks to these tight bonds, say the scientists, the ants did a better job at keeping the water away than any one ant could do on its own. By working together, thousands of ants can stay alive in the face of a crisis like a flood by using their own bodies to build a boat.
1. When flood comes, fire ants ________.A.will run away separately | B.find a hole to hide themselves |
C.combine themselves into a raft | D.climb onto boats on the water |
A.Tiny hairs on their body. | B.Their hard outer shell. |
C.Their slippery skin. | D.Their backpack on its body top. |
A.built a raft in 100 minutes | B.organized themselves into a flexible raft |
C.organized themselves in different ways | D.liked to look for the food of pancakes |
A.practice | B.calmness | C.cooperation | D.speed |
A.how fire ants react in face of danger | B.fire ants’ differences from common ants |
C.fire ants’ ability to live underwater | D.the building ability of fire ants |
8 . In the United States, most of our electricity comes from power plants (发电厂) that burn coal and oil.
There are two big problems with using these things for electricity. First, their supply is limited (有限的). Second, burning them causes pollution. So to make sure we always have power and to keep our planet clean, we must find other ways to make electricity.
Some people think that wind power is our best choice. First, there will always be more wind. Also, wind power does not pollute the environment. Best of all, we don’t have to search for wind.
Today, less than 1 percent of our electricity comes from wind. But scientists have been developing better wind machines. As a result, wind power is getting more popular in this country.
Yet wind power may not keep growing so quickly in years to come. Why not? Many wind turbines (风力涡轮机) are needed to make much electricity. So wind-power companies try to build wind farms but are competing (竞争) with other uses for the land. A wind farm is a group of turbines placed close together in an area with frequent winds.
In places where companies try to build wind farms, people think that lines of turbines are ugly. Noise from turbines often troubles people. Also, turbines kill birds that fly into them.
Wind-power supporters disagree. They think the sight of wind turbines is lovely. They point out that people have gotten used to living near noisy highways. They say ways can be found to keep birds away from turbines.
In today’s world, we need clean and unlimited power sources more than ever. Unless a better power source comes along, people may just have to accept wind power as a part of their lives.
1. The underlined part “these things” in the second paragraph refers to ________.A.frequent winds. | B.wind turbines. |
C.power plants. | D.coal and oil. |
A.How wind power works. |
B.How wind power was found. |
C.The advantages of wind power. |
D.The development of wind power. |
A.It is very expensive to build lots of wind turbines. |
B.It is difficult to improve the wind power technology. |
C.There are few people who accept it as a new power source. |
D.Many wind turbines are needed and there is less space for them. |
A.make a loud noise. |
B.look very beautiful. |
C.are built near highways. |
D.provide places for birds to stay. |
A.The Role of Wind. |
B.The Power of Wind. |
C.The Cost of Wind Power. |
D.The History of Wind Power. |
9 . Priscilla Ouchida’s “energy efficient” house turned out to be a horrible dream. When she and her engineer husband married a few years ago, they built a $100,000 three-bedroom home in California. Tightly sealed to prevent air leaks, the house was equipped with small double-paned windows and several other energy-saving features. Problems began as soon as the couple moved in, however. Priscilla’s eyes burned. Her throat was constantly dry. She suffered from headaches and could hardly sleep. It was as though she had suddenly developed a strange illness.
Experts finally traced the cause of her illness. The level of formaldehyde gas in her kitchen was twice the maximum allowed by federal standards for chemical workers. The source of the gas? Her new kitchen cabinets and wall-to-wall carpeting.
The Ouchidas are victims of indoor air pollution, which is not given sufficient attention partly because of the nation’s drive to save energy. The problem itself isn’t new. “The indoor environment was dirty long before energy conservation came along,” says Moschandreas, a pollution scientist at Geomet Technologies in Maryland. “Energy conservation has tended to accentuate the situation in some cases.”
The problem appears to be more troublesome in newly constructed homes rather than old ones. Back in the days when energy was cheap, home builders didn’t worry much about unsealed cracks. Because of such leaks, the air in an average home was replaced by fresh outdoor air about once an hour. As a result, the pollutants generated in most households seldom built up to dangerous levels.
1. It can be learned from the passage that the Ouchidas’ house ________.A.is well worth the money spent on its construction |
B.is almost faultless from the point of energy conservation |
C.failed to meet energy conservation standards |
D.was designed and constructed in a scientific way |
A.Poor quality of the air inside. | B.Poor quality of the construction. |
C.Gas leakage in the kitchen. | D.The newly painted walls. |
A.relieve | B.accelerate | C.worsen | D.improve |
A.Because indoor cleanliness was not emphasized. |
B.Because energy used to be inexpensive. |
C.Because environmental protection was given top priority. |
D.Because they were technically unavoidable. |
A.Energy Conservation | B.House Building Crisis |
C.Air Pollution Indoors | D.Traps in Building Construction |
10 . My wife and I moved into our home nine years ago. We have a yard a “rock garden”. There the rocks appear to be just thrown up onto the dirt as if someone were in a hurry to finish. Very often when we have more flowers, Denise or I would plant them between the rocks, just to bring some color to the area.
Last summer I found, in the rock garden, a tiny little plant that I could not immediately recognize. I knew I didn’t plant it and Denise said she didn’t either. We decided to let it continue growing until we could find out what it was.
Weeks passed and as I made my way back to the strange plant, it appeared to be a sunflower. It looked thin and tall with only one head on it. I decided to baby it along and weed (除草) around it. As I pulled rocks from the area to get to the weeds, I noticed something unusual. The sunflower had not started where I saw it begin. It actually had begun under a big rock and grown under and around it to reach the sun.
If a tiny little sunflower didn’t let a big rock stand in its way of developing, we too have the ability to do the same thing. If we believe in ourselves like that little sunflower, we can reach where we aim to go and get what we need for growth.
We need to believe in ourselves knowing we have the ability to achieve our goals. Like the sunflower, it knew it had the ability to get over the rocks because it had faith in itself that it would succeed. Stand tall like the sunflower and be proud of who and what we are, then other things will begin to support us. We will find a way to go under or around any “rocks” in order to realize our goals.
1. The family planted flowers in the yard ________.A.to attract visitors | B.to remove the rocks |
C.to please their neighbors | D.to make the area colorful |
A.to see how long it could live | B.to see how big it could grow |
C.to find out what it actually was | D.to know if his wife had planted it |
A.it was very thin and tall | B.it had only one head on it |
C.it grew on top of a big rock | D.it began to grow under a rock |
A.rocks cannot prevent us from success |
B.we can get over difficulties if we trust ourselves |
C.we should take good care of the rock gardens |
D.sunflowers are able to grow everywhere |
A.Stand Tall Like the Sunflower | B.The Sunflower and My Family |
C.Being Proud of the Sunflower | D.The Secret of the Sunflower |