1 . Before 2019, an estimated 500 million plastic straws (吸管) were used in the U.S. alone every single day, according to the National Geographic. Since then, they have been banned in numerous states, encouraging many businesses to offer paper alternatives in an attempt to cut plastic waste.
But, according to a new study, published in the journal Food Additives and Contaminants, these straws come with their own problems.
“Straws made from plant-based materials, such as paper and bamboo, are often advertised as being more sustainable and eco-friendly than those made from plastic,” Thimo Groffen, an environmental scientist at the University of Antwerp in Belgium who is involved in the study, said in a statement. “However, the presence of PFAS (全氟和多氟烷基物质) in these straws means that’s not necessarily true.” After analyzing 39 different brands, Groffen and his team found that paper straws were more likely to contain toxic-forever chemicals than those using other materials.
These forever chemicals, known as PFAS, can be found in a range of everyday products. And they can lead to increased blood cholesterol and blood pressure, reduced immunity and an increased risk of certain cancers. Not only are these chemicals dangerous to human health, but they can build up in the environment too.
Of the brands tested, 90 percent of paper straws contained these chemicals, compared to 75 percent made of plastic and 40 percent of glass. They were not detected in any of the steel straws investigated.
The study did not test whether the PFAS could leach out into (浸入) the surrounding liquid so further tests are needed to determine the full impact of these products. While more work is needed, the study has highlighted that paper and bamboo straws are perhaps not as “clean” as they claim to be.
1. Why have plastic straws been banned in many states?A.They are likely to get dirty. | B.They contain PFAS chemicals. |
C.They are not sustainable and eco-friendly. | D.They can lead to increased blood pressure. |
A.The origin of PFAS. | B.The ways to cope with PFAS. |
C.The brief introduction of PFAS. | D.The potential risks associated with PFAS. |
A.Paper straws. | B.Plastic straws. |
C.Glass straws. | D.Steel straws. |
A.Plastic straws are the most dangerous to human health. |
B.PFAS chemicals can leach out into the surrounding liquid. |
C.Paper straws might not be better for you or the environment. |
D.Paper and bamboo straws are more sustainable than plastic straws. |
2 . After years of heated debate, gray wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park. Fourteen wolves were caught in Canada and transported to the park. By last year, the Yellowstone wolf population had grown to more than 170 wolves.
Gray wolves once were seen here and there in the Yellowstone area and much of the continental United States, but they were gradually displaced by human development. By the 1920s, wolves had practically disappeared from the Yellowstone area. They went farther north into the deep forests of Canada, where there were fewer humans around.
The disappearance of the wolves had many unexpected results. Deer and elk populations — major food sources (来源) for the wolf — grew rapidly. These animals consumed large amounts of vegetation (植被), which reduced plant diversity in the park. In the absence of wolves, coyote populations also grew quickly. The coyotes killed a large percentage of the park’s red foxes, and completely drove away the park’s beavers.
As early as 1966, biologists asked the government to consider reintroducing wolves to Yellowstone Park. They hoped that wolves would be able to control the elk and coyote problems. Many farmers opposed the plan because they feared that wolves would kill their farm animals or pets.
The government spent nearly 30 years coming up with a plan to reintroduce the wolvers. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service carefully monitors and manages the wolf packs in Yellowstone. Today, the debate continues over how well the gray wolf is fitting in at Yellowstone. Elk, deer, and coyote populations are down, while beavers and red foxes have made a comeback. The Yellowstone wolf project has been a valuable experiment to help biologists decide whether to reintroduce wolves to other parts of the country as well.
1. What is the text mainly about?A.Wildlife research in the United States. |
B.Plant diversity in the Yellowstone area. |
C.The conflict between farmers and gray wolves. |
D.The reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone Park. |
A.Damage to local ecology. |
B.Preservation of vegetation. |
C.A decline in the park’s income. |
D.An increase in the variety of animals. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Uncaring. | C.Positive. | D.Disapproving. |
3 . Disney announced Tuesday that it has partnered with Impossible Foods to serve plant-based hamburgers at Disneyland in Anaheim, California. Impossible Foods makes hamburgers that taste like meat but are made from plants instead of
The plant-based product isn’t just another kind of
Now plant-based hamburgers run to the
That’s why Americans have been increasingly interested in meat replacements that don’t require them to
“Our
A.vegetables | B.animals | C.chickens | D.sausages |
A.avoiding | B.eating | C.buying | D.donating |
A.disaster | B.problem | C.goal | D.conclusion |
A.cheap | B.unhealthy | C.ugly | D.tasty |
A.solve | B.study | C.show | D.meet |
A.dropping | B.reviving | C.growing | D.competing |
A.harvest | B.produce | C.absorb | D.need |
A.park | B.trap | C.ruin | D.rescue |
A.menu | B.variety | C.analysis | D.application |
A.improvement | B.loss | C.market | D.size |
A.concentrate on | B.give up | C.make up | D.depend on |
A.ignore | B.appreciate | C.ensure | D.imagine |
A.characters | B.students | C.adults | D.guests |
A.forced | B.stopped | C.amused | D.inspired |
A.courage | B.hope | C.chance | D.power |
4 . Want to help fight global warming? Take off your tie, says the Italian health ministry. It has urged employers to let their staff dress casually at work in the summer so that the air conditioning can be turned down.
“Taking your tie off immediately lowers the body temperature by 2 or 3 degrees centigrade,” the ministry said in a statement. “Allowing a more sensible use of air conditioning brings about electricity savings and protects the environment.”
It called on all public and private offices to let employees wear no tie during heatwaves like the one that has brought Africa-like temperatures to many parts of Italy this week.
The move reacts to a similar action from Italy’s biggest oil group, ENI, which told its staff earlier this month they need not wear a tie at work. The tie makers, however, were left hot under the collar.
“Italy confirms (证实) that it is a strange country,” Flavio Cima said angrily in a letter to financial daily IL Sole~24ORE under the headline: “I, tie maker, am responsible for global warming.”
“We can now happily continue with our lifestyle, using cars, consuming fuel, heating and cooling our homes at leisure. On one condition: we should not wear a tie while we do so,” he wrote.
“I should have listened to my friends and become an oil producer instead.”
Italy is one of the European Union’s worst performers on the pollution front and is among the EU countries expected to exceed (超出) their greenhouse gas emission (排放) targets.
1. What’s the purpose of the move of taking off ties?A.To dress casually. | B.To fight global warming. |
C.To keep the body temperature. | D.To improve working conditions. |
A.ENI. | B.Flavio Cima. |
C.A financial daily. | D.The Italian health ministry. |
A.Angry. | B.Speechless. |
C.Delighted. | D.Puzzled. |
A.He stands by the oil group. | B.He agrees with the ministry. |
C.He admits his responsibility. | D.He argues against taking off ties. |
5 . Depleted forests are never out of the headlines, but do you know that several tech-led techniques are being employed to improve reforestation and bring these lungs of nature, a key source of oxygen in the atmosphere, back to life? Nature news website, Mongabay, recently devoted a mini-series to exploring the newest technological solutions that support worldwide reforestation efforts, but not without pointing out that reforestation efforts often have weaknesses.
This Mongabay review speaks frankly about the blemishes of labor-intensive reforestation efforts as poor planning leads to underreported tree planting outcomes. For example, perhaps trees were planted where they didn’t suit the chosen habitats.
According to Mongabay, the challenge is to match rising demand for restoration with ecologically sound, scalable (可扩展的) reforestation methods. “Scale is the biggest challenge to restoration and reforestation projects worldwide,” said Charlotte Mills, chief ecologist at AirSeed Technologies in Australia. The good news is that new tech solutions can help make tree planting at scale easier, faster and more successful.
For instance, solar-powered, seed-planting robots, able to plant up to 600 trees in a morning, are being carried out by conservationists working in the Peruvian Amazon. Drones (无人机) are employed to drop seeds in precise areas, especially at remote and difficult-to-access sites. One company operating them is Mast Reforestation, a Seattle-based one working on North America’s conifer (针叶树) forests destroyed by logging, insects and wildfire.
The Globe and Mail reports on how Canadian start-up, Flash Forest, uses drones that fire seeds at a high speed into the soil. It has a great goal to go beyond changing forestry to slow down climate change and finally conserve ecological diversity.
Sending people out on field monitoring to assess the health of new trees which take years to mature is time-consuming and costly. Here, satellites are stepping up to provide large-scale data sets over time on how huge reforested sites are going. Food giant Nestle announced in April 2023 that it’s working to monitor its reforestation efforts long-term using satellites.
1. What does the underlined word “blemishes” in Paragraph 2 mean?A.Dangers. | B.Disadvantages. | C.Features. | D.Results. |
A.To criticize the underdeveloped technologies. |
B.To tell the rising demand for restoration. |
C.To call on practicable reforestation methods. |
D.To show the trouble with global reforestation. |
A.Preserving biodiversity. | B.Making a change to forestry. |
C.Dropping seeds at remote areas. | D.Driving drones at high speeds. |
A.Trees Are Suffering | B.Forests Are Recovering |
C.Technology for Trees | D.Technique for Challenges |
1.保护环境的重要性;
2.如何低碳生活;
3.发出倡议。
注意:1.词数100左右;
2.可以适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。
Dear fellow students,
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Student Union
7 . Plastic straws (吸管) have been a major problem in global discussions of environmental damage. Maybe because of their small size, the production cost of straws is low. In many countries, straws are offered freely after buying soft drinks. Therefore, plastic straws are one of the most used plastics and pollutants in the world.
The plastic straw is light and small. Due to their small size, plastic straws are often eaten by sea animals. Environmentalists have shown that the death of many sea animals is caused by eating plastic straws. The other damaging characteristic of plastic straws is that they are made of materials which cannot degrade. That means the materials cannot be changed into small harmless (无害的) ones.
The most effective way of dealing with the environmental pollution caused by plastic straws is the reuse or banning (禁止) the use of plastic straws. Being plastics, the straws can be made new items. Many organizations around the world change used straws into new products. In Africa, local communities collect used plastic straws and use them to make mats and bags. Another way of dealing with environmental pollution caused by plastic straws is placing a ban on their production and use. Experts advise governments to ban using plastic straws to save the environment. A few countries in the world such as Rwanda, Macedonia, China, Kenya have already banned the use of plastic bags and are expected to include plastic straws and bottles. But it will be a long way to do this effectively.
There are few environmentally friendly and biodegradable productions to take the place of plastic straws. These productions include paper straws, bamboo straws. However, such straws are usually expensive as their production cost is high. It’s still a question whether they can entirely take the place of plastic straws.
1. Why can people be free to use plastic straws?A.They are very cheap. | B.They are light and small. |
C.They are dangerous. | D.They are easy to use. |
A.Cut up. | B.Because of. | C.Go on. | D.Break out. |
A.It’s not difficult to ban using plastic straws. |
B.Many countries have stopped using plastic straws. |
C.Experts advise people to stop producing plastic straws. |
D.Some Africans change plastic straws into new products. |
A.It is a must to use them. |
B.It’s not easy to reuse them. |
C.There are still some problems to be solved. |
D.There are some other kinds of cheaper straws. |
8 . China and India are leaders in improving global (全球的) tree cover, a new study based on NASA research showed.
They took a 31.8 percent part together of the total global new leaf area between 2000 and 2017. China played a major role, adding 25 percent to this increase, and India added 6.8 percent, followed by Canada and Russia.
The study in the Nature Sustainability journal shows that more than 5.5 million square km of green leaf area was added globally. Since 2000, there has been a five-percent increase in global green cover, it said.
“The greening over the last twenty years shows an increase in leaf area on plants and trees which is as large as the area of the entire Amazon rainforest,” Chi Chen, a Boston University researcher and lead of the study told Nature Sustainability. Large plantation activities to protect forests in China contributed nearly 42 percent to the country’s green cover, and agriculture (农业) added another 32 percent. In India, 82 percent of the increase in leaf area was because of agriculture.
“China and India take up one-third of the greening, but hold only nine percent of the planet’s land area covered in green plants,” Chi Chen told NASA Earth Observatory. “That is a surprising finding, considering the land degradation (退化) in countries with large populations.”
Boston University’s research team first detected (检测)an increase in global green cover in the 1990s but were unsure about what contributed to (导致) the increase. Finally, with the help of NASA’s Terra and Aqua satellites research, they managed to find out the increase in leaf cover from different areas and places.
1. Which country increased the largest part of the new leaf area?A.India. | B.Canada. | C.Russia. | D.China. |
A.To show how great the achievement (成就) was. | B.To show the importance of rainforest. |
C.To explain what difficulties we have now. | D.To explain the reason for increasing forests. |
A.Worried. | B.Interested. | C.Surprised. | D.Disappointed. |
A.An increase in global green cover |
B.China and India—pioneers of the world’s green cover increase |
C.China and India’s role in increasing tree cover in Asia |
D.The importance of increasing green cover |
9 . For more than 100 million years sea turtles (海龟) have covered huge distances across the world’s oceans, making them among the oldest creatures on the planet. However, they are on the list of endangered species.
Different from some animals like snakes, the sex of the baby sea turtles, called hatchlings , is determined by the environment after fertilization (受精). The temperature of the eggs during a certain period of development is the deciding factor in determining sex, and small changes in temperature can cause very big changes in the sex ratio (比例). Often, eggs at low temperatures (22—27℃) produce males, while eggs at higher temperatures (30℃ and above) produce females. At temperatures in 29℃, which is good for a balanced sex ratio of turtle hatchlings. If temperature reaches 36℃, no hatchlings will be produced.
Climate change has a powerful effect on turtle nesting (筑巢) sites. It changes sand temperatures, which then affects the sex of the hatchlings. Scientists have found that unusually warm temperatures caused by climate change are upsetting the normal ratios, resulting in fewer male hatchlings. The past four hottest summers in Florida have seen only female sea turtles. And an Australian study has shown a similar effect in which 99% of the hatchlings are female.
In addition to rising temperatures, turtles are also facing the threat of too much plastic in the oceans, along with a number of other threats. “Plastic pollution is a problem for turtles as they can mistake plastics for food easily. Even a single piece of plastic can kill a turtle,” Dr Couper, working at the Queensland Museum, said. “We have collected some plastics taken from turtles’ stomachs to show people what kinds of things are showing up on beaches. I want it to be an eye opener.”
1. Which temperature is good for a balanced sex ratio of turtle hatchlings?A.26℃. | B.29℃. | C.31℃. | D.36℃. |
A.Sea turtles will build their nesting sites elsewhere. |
B.Global warming is an extreme threat to sea turtles. |
C.Global warming is much more obvious in Australia. |
D.Over 90% of the turtle hatchlings are female globally. |
A.Turtles do not have enough sources. |
B.Turtles do not have a good sense of smell. |
C.People should clean up beaches more often. |
D.People should raise environmental awareness. |
A.Turtles are also facing the threat of too much plastic in the oceans, along with a number of other threats. |
B.Turtles are also facing the threat of hunting. |
C.Turtles are also facing the threat of losing living places. |
D.Turtles are also facing the threat of hunger. |
10 . Plant a tree!
What’s causing global warming? Is it man-made? Or are temperatures simply changing naturally? Whatever the case, we can at least try to slow things down. But how?
The Wilderness Project has an idea.
Now, lots of people all over the world have already been planting more trees. In fact, if everyone plants one tree, just one, it will do great good to our environment.
So, what can you do to help?
So, go on, plant a tree…and save the earth!
A.Maybe you can buy a young tree to grow |
B.They suggest that we should plant more trees |
C.Another question is how quickly the sea level will rise |
D.Many countries are calling on people to plant more trees |
E.What’s more, they improve human health by producing oxygen (氧气) |
F.He was nine when he came up with the idea of planting trees around the world |
G.Farmers don’t want to go and help them plant more trees |