1 . Bringing species like beavers (河狸) back to England is no longer a priority, the government said on Friday to criticism from wildlife groups.
A recent report shows that one in six UK species are at risk of extinction. In September more than 60 conservation organisations reported a significant decline in species due to expansions in farming and the effects of climate change. In recent years, animals and plants have been reintroduced by charities as part of efforts to restore the country’s reduced biodiversity.
Despite the government allowing this, the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee concluded in July that there was an absence of long-term plans on how to manage this. In response, the government has now said that the “reintroduction of species is not a priority”.
The government said it was focused on increasing biodiversity through habitat restoration. The government’s environment department has come under scrutiny (详细审查) for not doing more to prevent sewage dumping and other forms of pollution in England’s waterways.
Sir Robert Goodwill, chair of the Committee, said he was disappointed with the government response. Bringing back extinct species is a controversial issue — although farmers and landowners appear broadly supportive, there are risks of reintroducing new species, and without clear guidance, problems could arise.
A recent study showed that river barriers similar to those built by beavers can protect communities at risk of flooding. But there have also been cases documented in Europe where beavers have built their dams in places that have damaged crops and changed rivers.
Joan Edwards, director of Policy & Public Affairs at The Wildlife Trusts said, “Reintroducing wildlife must be part of the UK government’s arsenal (武器) for tackling nature loss and climate change — it is astonishing there is no strategy for doing so.”
“The return of wild beavers can help to recreate lost wetlands, with a knock-on effect that benefits other wildlife including insects, invertebrates and birds. Beavers also slow the flow of water, which can reduce flood risks to towns and villages,” she said.
1. What does paragraph 2 want to convey?A.The situation of species in the UK is severe. |
B.Reintroduction of species in the UK is not a priority. |
C.Expansions in farming have a great effect on climate change. |
D.The UK government’s response to reduced biodiversity is disappointing. |
A.By developing strategy. |
B.By offering guidance. |
C.By expanding farming. |
D.By restoring habitat. |
A.It was messy. | B.It was limited. |
C.It was beneficial. | D.It was costly. |
A.The advantages of reintroducing wildlife. |
B.The responses to a government statement. |
C.The effects of climate change on farming. |
D.The approaches to increasing biodiversity. |
2 . World Water Day
Everyone needs water, and every drop is precious. On 22 March, World Water Day draws attention to the essential role of water in our lives.
We all need water to stay alive, but about two billion people around the world live without clean water in their homes
In 1992, the United Nations made a special day for water, and World Water Day has been celebrated on 22 March every year since 1993. On this day, many countries hold events to educate people about the problems of dirty water.
Some charities organize fundraising events for World Water Day. People do things like sponsored walks, cycles and swims.
A.We all need to join in some events |
B.We should drink lots of water to be healthy |
C.People may get sick from drinking dirty water |
D.That’s around a quarter of the world’s population |
E.Other groups organize events like “Walk for Water” |
F.It also focuses on the difficulty many people have getting clean water |
G.They try to find solutions to providing everyone in the world with clean water |
A new report suggests Canada’s Western Hudson Bay polar bear population
Every autumn, bears
But a report
Polar bears depend on frozen salt water called sea ice
John Whiteman,
4 . 2005 was a big year for me. After my family moved to New Orleans in June, Hurricane Katrin a hit the
Then some
I remember when Louisiana Superdome reopened, the energy of the city
I was too young to understand what the
A.city | B.shelter | C.family | D.country |
A.explored | B.left | C.found | D.destroyed |
A.peaceful | B.advanced | C.broken | D.powerful |
A.war | B.flood | C.fire | D.earthquake |
A.wise | B.brave | C.injured | D.kind |
A.visit | B.rebuild | C.introduce | D.sweep |
A.lost | B.quit | C.mastered | D.known |
A.history | B.market | C.memory | D.energy |
A.suddenly | B.easily | C.finally | D.similarly |
A.came out | B.came down | C.came along | D.came back |
A.changed | B.entered | C.described | D.appreciated |
A.bored | B.tired | C.excited | D.confused |
A.player | B.audience | C.judge | D.coach |
A.Thus | B.Besides | C.However | D.Otherwise |
A.thankful | B.anxious | C.sorry | D.careful |
5 . Objects in the night sky are disappearing from view because of light pollution, according to a new study. Outdoor lighting from street lamps, office buildings and vehicle headlights leads to sky less bright, which is when the night sky gets brighter. The brighter it is at night, the harder it is to see stars and planets from Earth.
Christopher Kyba, an astronomer with the GFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, led his team studying over 50, 000 star observations between 2011 and 2022. “If the brightening of the night sky continues at the current rate,” Kyba said, “a child born in a place where 250 stars are visible will only be able to see 100 stars by the time he or she turned 18.”
The issue is global but particularly common in North America, where 80% of people cannot see the Milky Way galaxy (银河系). This huge group of billions of stars should look like a wide strip of light in the dark night sky. However, only very remote places, such as the Sahara Desert and the Amazon Rain Forest, have a truly dark night sky.
Light pollution makes it harder for astronomers to study stars and planets. It also causes problems for animals. Animals active at night like bats become confused and crash into objects. Turtles that hatch (孵化)at night need moonlight to find the sea, but artificial lights can confuse them and make them head inland instead. Birds in cities often wake up and start singing earlier than they should. Human lights also cause themselves to produce less of a chemical called melatonin(褪黑激素). This can lead to sleep problems, headaches, tiredness, and mood issues.
To help, scientists want to raise awareness of light pollution. They suggest that people use outdoor lighting that causes less light pollution, such as motion-sensitive lights that switch on only when they’re needed.
1. How does the author lead in the topic of the text?A.By giving examples. |
B.By offering evidence. |
C.By making comparison. |
D.By bringing up the issue. |
A.Light pollution is becoming serious. |
B.Adults are easier to see stars than kids. |
C.Stars are becoming fewer year by year. |
D.Kids are losing interest in watching stars. |
A.Turtles are forced to hatch at sea. |
B.Humans produce more melatonin. |
C.Bats can get lost during the flight. |
D.Birds in cities wake up much later. |
A.A New Origin of Light Pollution |
B.Light Is Making Stars Unobserved |
C.Ways to Deal with Light Pollution |
D.Light Causes Human Sleep Issues |
The 14th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (RAMSAR COP14) took place in Wuhan, Hubei Province in November. It was the first time that China
Wuhan, the host city of RAMSAR COP 14. has 162,400 hectares (公顷) of wetlands, accounting
Nature provides the basic conditions for human
7 . Not too long ago, 41-year-old Garrett Fisher flew in a small airplane close to the surface of Europe’s largest glacier(冰川), which is in Norway. In that environment, the plane carrying a man who photographed glaciers seemed almost like a toy.
Fisher often combines two activities he loves, flying and photography, trying to photo- graph every glacier on Earth. He wants his photos to show the beauty of glaciers before some of them disappear. Scientists say many glaciers are melting or getting smaller because the Earth's average temperature is increasing. By 2100, the size of European glaciers can decrease by between 22 percent and 84 percent. Nearly all small glaciers in Norway will likely disappear. For Fisher, this means that time is running out. The melting pushes him to try to photograph them before it is too late.
As a child, Fisher lived next door to a small airport in the state of New York. His grand- father was a pilot and took Fisher on plane rides when he was a young child. His grandfather would tell him, “Whatever you set your mind to, you can do. ”
In the late 1990s, a friend told Fisher that the world’s glaciers were disappearing. This pushed him to combine his love of flying and photography to photograph the Earth's remaining glaciers. He believed he was in a race against time and that his photographs could be of great value to future generations. So, he launched Global Glacier Initiative, a non-profit group to support and show his work, and he planned to open his photos to the public for research.
Some people will ask him why he always risks flying over glaciers when satellites have already given pictures of them. Fisher says, “Satellite images can't really show the loveliness of glaciers the way my photos can. My photos show the colors and shapes as the light from the sun hits them. Science has all of the data we need. The problem is that it’s not beautiful. ”
1. What is paragraph 2 mainly about?A.Fisher’s social activities. |
B.Fisher’s trips to European countries. |
C.The reason for Fisher’s shooting glaciers. |
D.The cause of the rise in Earth temperature. |
A.His grandparents' dream. |
B.His childhood experiences. |
C.His curiosity for taking photos in the air, |
D.His interest in seeing glaciers from the air, |
A.Romantic. | B.Unattractive. | C.Confusing. | D.Valuable. |
A.They lack light processing. |
B.They lack the colors and shapes. |
C.They show the beauty of glaciers. |
D.They hardly show the loveliness of glaciers. |
8 . Mount Qomolangma, meaning “Holy Mother” in Tibetan, is the world’s highest mountain above sea level. Most people consider climbing to its top as one of their biggest achievements. More than 4,000 climbers, aging from 13 to 80, have managed to reach the top.
You may be surprised at these numbers but that’s just the start of it. Last year, cleanup crews collected as much as 8.4 tons of rubbish from Mount Qomolangma’s North Base Camp in Tibet at 5, 150 meters. And in the regions below that level, more than 335 tons of waste was collected. It is a sad fact that the highest mountain in the world is turning into the highest mountain of waste!
To reverse the situation, the Chinese government recently announced that it had closed the North Base Camp to tourists. From now on, ordinary tourists will only be able to travel as far as Rongbuk Monastery, about 5,000 meters above sea level. No more than 300 climbers with special permits will be allowed to climb Qomolangma each year. They are supposed to follow stricter rules, including carrying all their waste out with them and only climbing in spring.
Despite these tough measures, it is clear that tourism has caused much damage to the natural environment. Mount Qomolangma is not alone. Some popular parks around the world are also struggling to preserve their environments and keep up with tourism. Yellowstone Nation Park in the U. S. has long been troubled by the rubbish piles. Joshua Tree National Park suffered a wave of damage, with ancient trees destroyed. In order to protect the environment, the National Park Service had no choice but to close the park for a while.
As we can see, the natural environment can be destroyed by human activities in less than five minutes, but it might take hundreds of years to recover. Now it’s time for ordinary tourists to leave “Holy Mother” alone and wait for her to restore her beauty.
1. Why are the figures about Mount Qomolangma mentioned in paragraph 2?A.To introduce how high it is. | B.To tell how hard it is to collect waste. |
C.To show what a popular tourist attraction it is. | D.To explain what serious pollution it is suffering. |
A.Increase. | B.Follow. | C.Change. | D.Inspire. |
A.By offering data. | B.By giving examples. |
C.By telling stories. | D.By making comparisons. |
A.Environment. | B.Society. | C.Science. | D.Education. |
9 . In a paper published in Nature Communications, a team led by scientists from the University of California, using climate models and satellite data, reveal for the first time how protecting tropical forests can yield climate benefits that enhance carbon storage in nearby areas.
Many climate scientists use computer simulations (模拟) to mimic the planet's climate as it exists today and how it may exist in the future as humanity keeps emitting greenhouse gases. Such models rely on accurate measurements of all the moving parts of the climate system, from how much sunlight hits and warms the climate, to the response of forest biomass (生物量) to changes in temperature, rainfall and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.
Jim Randerson, UCI professor of Earth system science, said, “This paper shows that avoiding deforestation yields carbon benefits in nearby regions as a consequence of climate feedbacks.”
He explained that for a new patch of deforestation in the Amazon, the regional climate changes that happen as a result led to an additional 5.1 percent more loss of total biomass in the entire Amazon basin. In the Congo, the additional biomass loss from the climate effects of deforestation is about 3.8 percent. Tropical forests store about 200 petagrams of carbon in their aboveground biomass. Since 2010, deforestation has been removing about 1 petagram of that carbon every year. (One petagram is equal to 1 trillion kilograms.)
Until now, climate modelers have, for lack of data, not considered tree mortality (死亡率) in their climate simulations. But by combining satellite data with climate variables, they obtained information about how sensitive carbon stored in vegetation is to climatic changes that result from tree mortality and fire.
1. What determines the results of the models?A.Accuracy of computer simulators. |
B.Precise calculations by researchers. |
C.Precise measurement of the climate system. |
D.Accurate measurement of global temperature. |
A.By simulating climate changes. | B.By giving warnings. |
C.By analyzing reasons. | D.By listing figures. |
A.Because it is of little value. |
B.Because of data shortage. |
C.Because of lack of enough trees. |
D.Because it is up to his expectation. |
A.Protecting Tropical Trees Is Beneficial To Humans |
B.Tropical Trees Are Experiencing Severe Damages |
C.Computer Simulations Can Predict Climate Change |
D.Protecting Tropical Trees Makes For Carbon Storage |
10 . Humankind’s growing need for food is in conflict with thousands of other species’ need for space. By 2050, humans may need to clear an additional 3.35 million square kilometers of land for agriculture. Changing the largely natural habitat would remove more than 17,000 species from the land, researchers report in Nature Sustainability.
“But changing how, where and what food is grown can reduce the effect,” says scientist David Williams of the University of Leeds. “We can feed the planet without making it too bad.”
To figure out how, Williams and his colleagues first identified habitat most likely to be cleared for cropland. The team then calculated how much food 152 countries would need to feed their growing population and mapped where crops would likely be grown in each, based on past land use changes. By 2050, the world’s 13 million square kilometers of cropland would need to increase by 26 percent, the team found. That growth is largely concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa, South and Southeast Asia.
The researchers then put these estimates (估计) on distribution (分布) maps of nearly 20,000 species. While almost all of these species would lose some habitat, the team estimated 1,280 species would lose at least 25 percent of their range and that 96 species would lose at least 75 percent.
“Changing the global food system could cut these losses,” the team says. Among the changes are improving crop output and increasing food imports for food-poor countries. Adopting these measures would actually reduce the world’s cropland area by 3.4 million square kilometers by 2050 and result in just 33 species losing more than a quarter of their natural range, the team found. “Achieving that may be difficult and needs governments’ effort,” Williams says, “but emptying our plates at the family dinner tables could still have big effects.” “The world needs to feed a growing population, but it can be done more sustainably (可持续地),” he says.
1. What will cause danger for species’ natural habitat in the future?A.Growing human population. | B.Reduction in cropland. |
C.Agricultural revolution. | D.Change in food planting. |
A.Scientific tests. | B.Accurate data calculation. |
C.Reasonable estimates. | D.Previous research results. |
A.Export more food. | B.Reduce food waste. |
C.Improve crop output. | D.Protect wild animals. |
A.To describe a natural law. | B.To state a scientific discovery. |
C.To introduce a biological opinion. | D.To discuss an environmental problem. |