| A．It’s safe to use. | B．Facebook friends are reliable. | C．It can waste your time. |
| A．Online videos. | B．Virtual reality. | C．Phone applications. |
1. What happened at the man’s dinner with his host family?
| A．He forgot to introduce himself. |
| B．He called the host by the wrong name. |
| C．He whispered to someone. |
| A．He apologized for his behavior. |
| B．He said nothing about it. |
| C．He made a joke of himself. |
| A．Helpful. | B．Embarrassed. | C．Grateful. |
4 . This question has fascinated behavioural scientists for decades: why do we give money to charity?
The explanations for charitable giving fall into three broad categories, from the purely altruisic (利他的)— I donate because I value the social good done by the charity. The “impurely” altruistic— I donate because I extract value from knowing I contribute to the social good for the charity. And the not-at-all altruistic— I donate because I want to show off to potential mates how rich I am.
But are these motives strong enough to enable people to donate as much as they would want to? Most people support charities in one way or another, but often we struggle to make donations as often as we think we should. Although many people would like to leave a gift to charity in their will, they forget about it when the time comes.
Many people are also aware that they should donate to the causes that have the highest impact, but facts and figures are less attractive than narratives. In a series of experiments, it was found that people are much more responsive to charitable pleas that feature a single, identifiable beneficiary(受益者), than they are to statistical information about the scale of the problem being faced. When it comes to charitable giving, we are often ruled by our hearts and not our heads.
The good news is that charitable giving is contagious—seeing others give makes an individual more likely to give and gentle encouragement from an important person in your life can also make a big difference to your donation decisions— more than quadrupling them in our recent study. Habit also plays a part— in three recent experiments those who volunteered before were more likely to do donate their time than those who had not volunteered before.
In summary, behavioural science identifies a range of factors that influence our donations, and can help us to keep giving in the longer term. This is great news not just for charities, but also for donors.
1. What can we learn about people who do charitable giving?| A．Most people support charity as often as they think they should. |
| B．Some people don’t want to leave a gift to charity until the time comes. |
| C．Those who donate because they can gain an advantage are purely altruistic. |
| D．Some people send money to charity simply to tell others they are wealthy. |
| A．Not revealing the names of the donors. |
| B．Showing figures about the seriousness of the problem. |
| C．Telling stories that feature a single, recognizable beneficiary. |
| D．Reminding people to write down what to donate in the will in advance. |
| A．People will learn from others and follow the suit. |
| B．Many people are familiar with charitable giving. |
| C．Charitable giving helps the beneficiary in all aspects. |
| D．Charitable giving can bring a lot of benefits to donors. |
| A．To persuade more people to donate. |
| B．To explain the science behind why people donate. |
| C．To criticize some false charitable giving behaviours. |
| D．To explore approaches to making people donate more. |
要求：
1. 利用本单元所学知识完成句子；
2. 使用恰当的过渡衔接词连句成篇。
①人类活动影响了动物的栖息地，大大降低了野生动物的数量。
②很多野生动物很难适应现在的环境。（it作形式宾语）
③政府已经关注这种状况，并采取了一系列措施来应对这个问题。
④与此同时，一系列的法律已经付诸实施。
⑤我相信我们会成功地消除这件事对我们的困扰。
⑥人类肯定可以与动物和平共处。
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6 . In today’s digital era, social media users are increasingly coming across fake news online. This leads to the pressing issue: What causes people to fall for misinformation on the Internet?
According to researchers at the Penn State College of Information Sciences and Technology, users can easily fall into an echo chamber (回声室)—a sort of virtual space where users consume only one-sided news, eventually distrusting any opposing views. “We all tend to agree with the group opinion. Hence, people naturally get together with others who hold the same opinion,” said Dongwon Lee, one of the researchers. “But if you’re not cautious, there is a high risk of falling into an echo chamber.”
To prevent this phenomenon, the researchers have crafted a novel tool, a game named ChamberBreaker, to help players resist echo chambers and reduce the rate of fake news spread. The fundamental approach employed by ChamberBreaker centers around a decision-making procedure that mirrors the creation of echo chambers. In ChamberBreaker, a player is tasked with trying to have community members fall into an echo chamber. To begin, the player is randomly assigned a situation that focuses on a health, political or environmental issue, and is presented with six pieces of news on that topic. Then, the player selects news that could cause the other members to fall into an echo chamber while at the same time maintaining their trust. If successful, the community members will fall into an echo chamber and the player will witness the resulting negative effects on the community.
After developing ChamberBreaker, researchers tested it with over 800 subjects to see if it raised awareness of echo chambers and changed news consumption behaviors. The researchers found that those who played ChamberBreaker were significantly more likely to state their intention to observe online information from more diverse perspectives and showed an increased awareness of the echo chamber phenomenon.
Ultimately, the researchers hope that their methodology can excite a greater interest in the scientific and scholarly study related to information consumption. The application of tools like ChamberBreaker, which focuses on fostering analytical reasoning, may lead us towards a more informed online community.
1. What can be learned about an online echo chamber?| A．It encourages well-judged views. |
| B．It gathers like-minded individuals. |
| C．It functions as a virtual reality platform. |
| D．It serves as a tool for identifying fake information. |
| A．Assignment of situations. | B．Trust-building exercises. |
| C．News selection strategy. | D．Community impact assessment. |
| A．The results of scientific testing. |
| B．The theoretical framework of the game. |
| C．The description of the game procedures. |
| D．The common challenges faced during gameplay. |
| A．Reducing news inquiry. | B．Encouraging passive reading. |
| C．Strengthening prejudiced views. | D．Enhancing critical thinking. |
1. Where should the students wait for the bus?
| A．By the school gate. | B．At the bus stop. | C．In the playground. |
| A．A brush. | B．A packed lunch. | C．A drink. |
| A．Feed animals. | B．Play baseball. | C．Climb on a wall. |
| A．At 3:20 p.m. | B．At 3:30 p.m. | C．At 4:15 p.m. |
1. Where are the speakers?
| A．In a car. | B．At home. | C．At Grandma’s house. |
| A．Roast chicken. | B．Apple pie. | C．Fried fish. |
| A．Excited. | B．Surprised. | C．Calm. |
| A．He will go to Grandma’s house by himself. |
| B．He made some cornbread for Thanksgiving. |
| C．He has just finished a business trip. |
9 . 听下面一段独白，回答以下小题。
1. Who usually reads the morning announcements?| A．Timmy. | B．Mr. McKinney. | C．Principal Johnson. |
| A．May 20th. | B．Next Wednesday. | C．One month from today. |
| A．The library hours. | B．The homework. | C．The computers. |
| A．A softball game. | B．A basketball game. | C．A baseball game. |
10 . 听下面一段较长对话，回答以下小题。
1. What’s wrong with the woman’s room?| A．It’s not quiet. | B．It’s a little dark. | C．It’s smelly. |
| A．Moving to another room. |
| B．Checking in another hotel. |
| C．Waiting for a non-smoking room. |
