假如你是你校野生动物保护协会会长李华,恰逢协会成立10周年,请你写一篇博文介绍这十年协会做出的成就,并在博文中广泛征集全校师生的建议,如何更好保护野生动物。
1.协会成立的初衷:培养观察和探索自然的能力,提高保护野生动物的意识。
2.协会在每年3月3日“World Wild life Day”都会在校内举办活动:张贴海报,播放宣传视频,举办讲座和知识竞赛等,受到欢迎和好评。
3.欢迎全校师生对协会如何更好保护野生动物提出建议。
【写作要求】
1.字数100—120词左右。
2.包括以上内容要点,可适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。
I am Li Hua, President of our school’s Wildlife Conservation Association.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2 . In US emergency rooms (ER), the average wait time to see a doctor is more than two hours. There are more patients in need than there are doctors, nurses and other staff to help them. Many parents have suffered through hours in the ER with a sick, upset child, only to get sent home because their case is not considered urgent. What if there was another choice—like a house call from an intelligent machine?
Now, a new study shows that AI systems can assess (评估) a child’s medical chart and come up with a diagnosis (诊断), a determination of what is wrong with that patient.
The study took place at Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center in southern China. First, a team of doctors reviewed 6, 183 medical charts. They summarized the information in these charts into a list of keywords linked to disease-related symptoms or signs, such as “fever”. Researchers then taught these keywords to the AI system. Once trained, the system scanned children’s charts for the key terms, checking if they were present or not in order to come to a conclusion. Finally, it offered diagnoses based on the charts, narrowing down from among 55 illness categories.
Dongxiao Zhu, an assistant professor of computer science at Wayne State University who did not take part in the study, however, sees this as “augmented intelligence (增强智能)” rather than “artificial intelligence”, because the system handled only 55 illness categories. Compare that to thousands of possibilities in the real world. The machine cannot yet get into the more complex aspects of a medical decision.
Zhu is also concerned about the amount of human work that went into the study—namely, the time and energy spent by human doctors. They spent hours grading the machine’s assessments and comparing them to their own. It’s no wonder that the process took four years. Considering that, it may be a while before you can skip the ER and see a robot-doctor instead.
1. What can we infer from Paragraph 1?A.Patients pay too much for the ER. |
B.American doctors aren’t responsible. |
C.Children are treated urgently in the ER. |
D.The emergency rooms are crowded with patients. |
A.AI systems still have a long way to go. |
B.AI systems diagnose disease like doctors. |
C.AI systems will take over from doctors someday. |
D.AI systems get into complex medical decisions. |
A.By examining a patient first. |
B.By reviewing many medical charts. |
C.By scanning keywords about a disease. |
D.By observing disease-related symptoms. |
A.They need to be improved a lot. |
B.They will replace real doctors soon. |
C.They are suitable for complex disease. |
D.They help doctors make a quick analysis. |
注意:
1. 词数100左右(开头和结尾已给出, 但不计入总词数);
2. 可适当增加细节, 以使行文连贯。
参考词汇: 沉溺于be/become addicted to 网瘾Internet addiction
Dear Mike,
I am glad to hear from you.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yours,
Li Hua
–I am sorry, but you cannot imagine _________ difficulty I had _________ up this morning.
A.which; getting | B.which; got | C.what; getting | D.what; got |
A.that; that | B.that; when | C.when; that | D.when; when |
6 . Smartphones are our constant companions. For many of us, their glowing screens are a ubiquitous (十分普遍的) presence, drawing us in with endless distractions. They are in our hands as soon as we wake, and command our attention until the final moments before we fall asleep.
Steve Jobs would not approve.
In 2007, Jobs took the stage and introduced the world to the iPhone. If you watch the full speech, you will be surprised by how he imagined our relationship should be with this iconic invention. This vision is so different from the way most of us use these devices now.
In his remarks, Jobs spent an extended amount of time demonstrating how the device utilized (应用) the touch screen before detailing the many ways Apple engineers had improved the age-old process of making phone calls. It’s the best iPod we’ve ever made,” Jobs exclaimed at one point. “The killer app is making calls,” he later added. Both lines drew thunderous applause.
The presentation confirms that Jobs imagined a simpler iPhone experience than the one we actually have more than a decade later. For example, there was no App Store when the iPhone was first introduced, and this was by design. Jobs was convinced that the phone’s carefully-designed native features were enough. He did not seek to completely change the rhythm of users’ daily lives. He simply wanted to take experiences we had already found important-listening to music, placing calls, generating directions-and make them better.
The minimalist (简约主义者) vision for the iPhone Jobs offered in 2007 is unrecognizable today-and that is a shame.
Under what I call the “constant companion model,” we now see our smartphones as always-on portals (通道) to information. We have become so used to it over the past decade that it is easy to forget the novelty (新奇之处) of the device. It seems increasingly clear to me that Jobs probably got it right from the very beginning: Many of us would be better-off returning to his original minimalist vision for our phones.
Practically speaking, to be a minimalist smartphone user means only using your device for a small number of features that do things of value to you. Otherwise, you simply put it away outside of these activities. This approach dethrones (废黜) this device from the position of a constant companion down to a luxury object, such as a fancy bike, that gives you great pleasure when you use it but does not dominate your entire day.
Early in his 2007 keynote, Jobs said, “Today, Apple is going to reinvent the phone.” What he didn’t add, however, was the follow-up promise: “Tomorrow we’re going to reinvent your life.” The smartphone is fantastic, but it was never meant to be the foundation for a new form of existence.
If you return this innovation to its original role, you will get more out of both your phone and your life.
1. The underlined word “it” in the last but two paragraphs probably refers to .A.information | B.the smartphone |
C.the always-on portal | D.the constant companion model |
A.It allowed the users to have access to the internet. |
B.It was actually an iPod that could make phone calls. |
C.It was installed with applications by third-party developers. |
D.It could fulfill people’s desire to multitask in their daily lives. |
A.expect to reinvent his life with the device |
B.buy the latest model of iPhone and see it as a luxury |
C.remove all the unnecessary applications from the device |
D.spend more time working than playing with his device |
A.tell readers why Steve Job created the iPhone |
B.remind readers not to be addicted to their smartphones |
C.show readers that smartphones can greatly change our lives |
D.encourage readers to block internet access on their smartphones |
7 . As the international demand for narrative(叙事的) film/TV content continues to increase with popular streaming services like Netflix and others the two questions then come: will the coming generations receive most of their entertainment through visual means rather than through the written word and will such an increase of narrative film/ TV reduce the importance of reading?
Growing examples of this trend include the diminishment(减少) of fiction in the common core (核心的)curriculum, the ever-rising culture of computer games, the wave of streaming services of wide international reach, and movies filled with special effects made for children and teenagers. Nor must we ignore the economic dangers that lie ahead for the written word. The narrative film industry is a moneymaker that dwarfs(使相形见绌) the publishing industry.
The other underlying question, of course, is “does it really matter if the written word bows to the world of film/TV?” From my point of view, any diminishment of fiction delivered by words is a loss for mankind.
There is no greater human feature than the imagination. It lies at the very soul of the human species. It is the brain’s most powerful engine. It is the essential muscle of life and like all muscles it must be exercised and strengthened.
Writing and reading are the principal tools that inspire, create and empower our imagination. Anything that diminishes that power is the enemy of mankind.
It should be known that I am not opposed to new media and technological advances. Instead, I have always felt it necessary to adapt to advancing technology. In fact, a number of my novels are in various stages of development for film, TV, and live stage productions. My hope is that the written word will only stand to be complemented(补充)by its visual counterparts(对应物), not pushed to the edge of extinction.
Of course, there are those who will present arguments for the superiority of the moving image over the written word. Each has its place. My argument is for finding the right balance between it and the moving image.
1. In what way does narrative film/TV embarrass the written word?A.Economic benefits | B.International reach |
C.Cultural influence | D.Educational importance |
A.It strengthens our muscles. | B.It helps sharpen imagination. |
C.It distinguishes man from each other. | D.It paves the way for narrative film/TV. |
A.Cautious | B.Skeptical |
C.Positive | D.Critical |
A.The fate of reading. | B.The extinction of fiction. |
C.The impact of the written word. | D.The future of the moving image. |
---Never______________ it, actually.
A.had I learned | B.did I learn |
C.I had learned | D.I learned |
A.devoted to doing | B.devoted to do |
C.devoting to do | D.is devoted to doing |
A.in which | B.for which | C.so that | D.in that |