1 . When you hear “I have a dream…”, one of the most famous speeches in human history, you’ll never have the idea how the audience on the scene were fueled by emotional intelligence. When Martin Luther King. Jr. presented his dream, he chose language that would stir the hearts of his audience. Delivering this electrifying(震撼性的) message required emotional intelligence—the ability to recognize, understand, and manage emotions.
Emotional intelligence has been highly recommended by leaders, policymakers, and educators as the solution to a wide range of social problems. Emotional intelligence is important, but the uncontrolled enthusiasm has obscured (掩盖)a dark side. New evidence shows that when people sharpen their emotional skills, they become better at controlling others. When you’re good at controlling your own emotions, you can hide your true feelings. When you know what others are feeling, you can motivate them to act against their own best interests.
Social scientists have begun to document this dark side of emotional intelligence. In a research led by University of Toronto professor Jochen Menges, when a leader gave an inspiring speech filled with emotion, the audience was less likely to scrutinize (细察) the message and remembered the content. Ironically(讽刺 的是), audience members were so moved by the speech that they claimed to recall more of it.
The authors call this the awestruck effect, but it might just as easily be described as the dumbstruck effect. One observer reflected that Hitler’s persuasive impact came from his ability to strategically express emotions—he would “tear open his heart”—and these emotions affected his followers to the point that they would “stop thinking critically and just emote.”
Leaders who master emotions can rob us of our abilities to reason. If their values are out of step with our own, the results can be destructive. New evidence suggests that when people have self-serving motives, emotional intelligence becomes a weapon for controlling others.
Throwing light on this dark side of emotional intelligence is one mission of a research team led by University College London professor Martin Kilduff. According to these experts, emotional intelligence helps people disguise (伪装) one set of emotions while expressing another for personal gain. Professor Kilduff’s team writes, “The strategic disguise of one’s own emotions and the controlling of others’ emotions for strategic ends are behaviors evident not only on Shakespeare’s stage but also in the offices and corridors where power and influence are traded.”
Of course, people aren’t always using emotional intelligence for nefarious ends. More often than not, high EQ is helpful in most aspects of our life. Emotional intelligence—like any skill—can be used for good or evil. So whether it is a gift or a curse lies in your hand.
1. Why does the author mention Martin Luther King, Jr?A.To honor the great leader for his courage. |
B.To recommend his speech to other leaders. |
C.To introduce the major topic to readers. |
D.To advocate a society with fewer problems. |
A.Developing the capability to control one’s own emotion. |
B.Influencing people to do what brings disadvantages to them. |
C.Appealing to the audience to concentrate and remember more. |
D.Encouraging the moved audience to learn more of the speech. |
A.His followers would tear open their hearts to him. |
B.His followers would express emotions strategically. |
C.His followers would lose the ability to reason properly. |
D.His followers would develop the self-serving motives. |
A.They disguise their true emotions and show another one. |
B.They help their colleagues to build up confidence. |
C.They present their strategic behaviors on the stage. |
D.They lower their own dignity to gain popularity. |
A.Immoral. | B.Unimportant. | C.Illegal. | D.Uncontrollable. |
A.The benefits of emotional intelligence. |
B.The advantages and disadvantages of emotions. |
C.The reasons for using emotional skills. |
D.The dark side of emotional intelligence. |
1. 人口普查的主要目的:查清我国人口数量、结构和分布。
2. 普查的方式:普查员(census takers)将入户了解情况。普查员的照片在通知最底部。
3. 需要提供的主要信息:姓名、年龄、职业、婚姻状况等。
注意:(1)词数不少于100;
(2)内容充实、行文连贯;
(3)开头已给出,不计入总词数。
NOTICE
Dear Sir / Madam,
The seventh China Population Census has begun.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Community Committee
A.so as to | B.such as to |
C.so that | D.such that |
4 . It was a cold evening and my daughter and I were walking up Broadway. I didn't notice a guy sitting inside a cardboard box. But Nora did. She wasn't even four, but she
I don't remember my reply. But I do remember a sudden
A few days later, I saw an article in the newspaper about volunteers who picked up a food package from a nearby school on a Sunday morning and
The building was in a bad state. Facing us was a silver-haired woman in an old dress. She took the package and asked us to come in. Nora ran inside. I unwillingly followed.
Professionals call such a(n)
A.pulled | B.glanced | C.waved | D.armed |
A.would | B.can | C.need | D.must |
A.general | B.funny | C.heavy | D.curious |
A.area | B.part | C.eyesight | D.world |
A.insects | B.animals | C.plants | D.birds |
A.coldness | B.illness | C.suffering | D.ignorance |
A.delivered | B.returned | C.devoted | D.posted |
A.held | B.hurried | C.signed | D.lined |
A.casual | B.sorry | C.astonished | D.excited |
A.creative | B.valuable | C.shocking | D.simple |
A.warn | B.stop | C.allow | D.push |
A.turn back | B.get away | C.show up | D.come out |
A.Therefore | B.Obviously | C.Still | D.Also |
A.called | B.promised | C.invited | D.helped |
A.Although | B.Once | C.Because | D.As |
A.stay | B.visit | C.adventure | D.challenge |
A.fair | B.famous | C.difficult | D.enjoyable |
A.collect | B.make | C.order | D.wear |
A.let | B.made | C.watched | D.noticed |
A.increased | B.benefited | C.tried | D.seized |
5 . To learn to think is to learn to question. Those who don't question never truly think for themselves. These are simple rules that have governed the advancement of science and human thought since the beginning of time. Advancements are made when thinkers question theories and introduce new ones. Unfortunately, it is often the great and respected thinkers who end up slowing the progress of human thought. Aristotle was a brilliant philosopher whose theories explained much of the natural world, often incorrectly. He was so esteemed by the scientific community that even 1,200 years after his death, scientists were still trying to build upon his mistakes rather than correct them!
Brilliant minds can intimidate upandcoming thinkers who are not confident of their abilities. They often believe they are inferior to the minds of giants such as Aristotle, leading many to accept current paradigms instead of questioning them.
I, like many thinkers of the past, once believed in my mental inferiority. I was certain that my parents, my teachers-adults in general-were always right. They were like a textbook to me; I didn't question what was written on those pages. I respected them, and accepted whatever they told me. But that attitude soon changed. My mind's independence was first stimulated in the classroom.
A stern, 65yearold elementaryschool science teacher once told me that light is a type of wave. I confidently went through years of school believing that light is a wave. One day,however I heard the German exchange student mention that light could be made up of particles. As the others laughed at his statement, I started to question my beliefs.
Maybe the teachers and textbooks hadn't given me the whole story. I went to the library, did some research and learned of the lightasawave versus lightasaparticle debate. I read about Einstein's discovery of the dual nature of light and learned the facts of a paradox(悖论) that puzzles the world's greatest thinkers to this day. Light behaves as both a particle and a wave, it is both at once. I realized I had gone through life accepting only half of the story as the whole truth.
Each new year brought more new facts, and I formulated even more questions. I found myself in the library after school, trying to find my own answers to gain a more complete understanding of what I thought I already knew. I discovered that my parents and teachers are incredible tools in my quest for knowledge, but they are never the final word. Even textbooks can be challenged. I learned to question my sources, I learned to be a thinker. I once believed that everything I learned at home and at school was certain, but I have now discovered to reexamine when necessary.
Questions are said to be the path to knowledge and truth, and I plan to continue questioning. How many things do we know for sure today that we will question in the future? At this moment, I know that our sun will burn for another five billion years, and I know nothing can escape the gravity of a black hole. This knowledge, however, may change in the next 20 years-maybe even in the next two. The one thing we can control now is our openness to discovery. Questions are the tools of open minds, and open minds are the key to intellectual advancement.
1. In the first paragraph, Aristotle is taken as an example to show that ______.A.he is the greatest and respected philosopher of all time |
B.huge influence of great thinkers may block human thought |
C.advancements are made when thinkers question theories |
D.great thinkers often make mistakes and then correct them |
A.Frighten. | B.Encourage. | C.Strength. | D.Persuade. |
A.what he learned from textbooks before turned out to be wrong |
B.he was inspired by the different ideas from an exchange student |
C.he was laughed at by other students for his unacceptable statement |
D.he was not satisfied with his life and desperate to achieve success |
A.looks down upon great thinkers all the time |
B.never doubts what he has learned in the textbook |
C.always throws himself into the laboratory |
D.determines to be a thinker and questioner |
A.the author is not quite sure about his future |
B.we human beings don't dare to predict future |
C.theory of black holes will change in two years |
D.questioning is necessary to promote advancement |
A.Following rules. | B.Challenging yourself. |
C.Questioning giants. | D.Predicting future. |
6 . What is it about kids these days that makes older generations so easily angry? In some way or another, older generations have been disappointed at the youth's decline since the earliest days of civilization. Even Aristotletalked smack abouthow young folks thought they knew everything back in the 4th century BC.
So why do people throw all the shade on the next generation? A study out last month in Science Advances shows that negative opinions about kids aren't always based on their actions; it's more about how adults praise their past and current selves.
In the study, researehers looked at a trio of characteristics in three groups of US adults: respect for elders or authoritarianism(权威主义),intelligence, and enjoyment of reading. The team, led by John Protzko, a cognitive scientist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, asked the participants whether they thought kids in the modern age shared the same qualities. They found that adults who tested especially strong in one of the categories tended to see children today as weak in il. For example, if an adult got tagged or self-identified as intelligent, they were more likely to see "kids these days" as less intelligent than they used to be. This, Protzko thinks, is because they remembered their younger selves to be smarter, whether true or not. What's more, they only reserved their strong opinion for characteristics they related to.
In another stage of the study, the authors assigned random scores to participants to trick them into thinking how well-read they were. Many of the adults changed their opinions on kid's reading ability as a result, Protzko speculates that there are two reasons for the shift: How memories can go wrong and the lack of objective knowledge of what childhood is really like. "People who are high in a trail are imposing(迫使)their current high standing in that trait back in time, thinking 'Oh this must have been what all kids were like,' " he says. Over the years, the same memory bias(偏见)keeps occurring, making it seem like kids are somehow failing more and more. In fact,(he older a participant was, the more heavily this bias came into play, Protzko says.
While there's still a lot to learn about why adults might see younger generations as mediocre, this researeh can hint that an age-old phrase can boil down to one classic human trail:vanity(自负).
―From Popular Science
1. What does the underlined phrase in the first paragraph mean?A.Expressed his a flection for . | B.Talked positively about. |
C.Spoke ill of. | D.Thought highly of. |
A.Negative opinions about kids come from their ill behavior. |
B.Adults always keeps their previous and present glories in mind. |
C.Adults hold positive opinions about kids for their actions. |
D.Kids are always blamed by adults who are more outstanding. |
A.Because adults got tagged or self-indentified as intelligent. |
B.Because adults thought they themselves much smarter. |
C.Because adults hold the view that kids were weaker than them. |
D.Because adults only remembered their own strengths subjectively. |
A.Adults hold the bias that kids these days are failing. |
B.Adults probably forgot all kids have the same characteristics. |
C.That the same memory bias keeps occurring led to kid's failure. |
D.The participants ignored the bias as they grew older. |
A.①②--③④⑤ | B.①--②③④---⑤ |
C.①②③--④---⑤ | D.①---②---③---④⑤ |
7 . By now you’ve probably heard about the “you’re not special” speech, when English teacher David McCullough told graduating seniors at Wellesley High School: "Do not get the idea you're anything special, because you're not." Mothers and fathers present at the ceremony — and a whole lot of other parents across the internet — took issue with McCullough's ego-puncturing words. But lost in the anger and protest was something we really should be taking to heart: our young people actually have no idea whether they're particularly talented or accomplished or not. In our eagerness to elevate their self-esteem, we forgot to teach them how to realistically assess their own abilities, a crucial requirement for getting better at anything from math to music to sports. In fact, it's not just privileged high-school students: we all tend to view ourselves as above average.
Such inflated (膨胀的) self-judgments have been found in study after study, and it's often exactly when we're least competent at a given task that we rate our performance most generously. In a 2006 study published in the journal Medical Education, for example, medical students who scored the lowest on an essay test were the most charitable in their self-evaluations, while high-scoring students judged themselves much more strictly. Poor students, the authors note, "lack insight" into their own inadequacy. Why should this be? Another study, led by Cornell University psychologist David Dunning, offers an enlightening explanation. People who are incompetent, he writes with co-author Justin Kruger, suffer from a "dual burden": they're not good at what they do, and their wry ineptness (笨拙) prevents them from recognizing how bad they are.
In Dunning and Kruger's study, subjects scoring at the bottom of the heap on tests of logic, grammar and humor "extremely overestimated" their talents. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they guessed they were in the 62nd. What these individuals lacked (in addition to clear logic, proper grammar and a sense of humor) was "metacognitive skill" (元认知技巧): the capacity to monitor how well they're performing. In the absence of that capacity, the subjects arrived at an overly hopeful view of their own abilities. There's a paradox (悖论) here, the authors note: “The skills that develop competence in a particular domain are often the very same skills necessary to evaluate competence in that domain. "In other words, to get better at judging how well we’re doing at an activity, we have to get better at the activity itself.
There are a couple of ways out of this double bind (两难). First, we can learn to make honest comparisons with others. Train yourself to recognize excellence, even when you yourself don't possess it, and compare what you can do against what truly excellent individuals are able to accomplish. Second, seek out feedback that is frequent, accurate and specific. Find a critic who will tell you not only how poorly you're doing, but just what it is that you're doing wrong. As Dunning and Kruger note, success indicates to us that everything went right, but failure is more ambiguous: any number of things could have gone wrong. Use this external feedback to figure out exactly where and when you screwed up.
If we adopt these strategies — and most importantly, teach them to our children — they won't need parents, or a commencement(毕业典礼) speaker, to tell them that they're special. They'll already know that they are, or have a plan to get that way.
1. The underlined phrase "took issue with" in paragraph 1 most probably means .A.totally approved of | B.disagreed with |
C.fully understood | D.held discussion about |
A.we don’t know whether our young people are talented or not |
B.young people can't reasonably define themselves |
C.no requirement is set up for young people to get better |
D.we always tend to consider ourselves to be privileged |
A.They lack the capacity to monitor how well they are performing. |
B.They usually give themselves high scores in self-evaluations. |
C.They tend to be unable to know exactly how bad they are. |
D.They are intelligently inadequate in tests and exams. |
A.are not confident about their logic and grammar |
B.tend to be very competent in their high-scoring fields |
C.don't know how well they perform due to their stringent self-judgment |
D.is very careful about their self-evaluations because they have their own limits |
A.the best way to recognize excellence is to study past success and failure |
B.through comparison with others, one will know where and when he fails |
C.we need internal honesty with ourselves and external honesty from others |
D.neither parents nor a commencement speaker can tell whether one is special |
A.Special or Not? Teach Kids To Figure It Out |
B.Let's Admit That We Are Not That Special |
C.Tips On Making Ourselves More Special |
D.Tell The Truth: Kids Overestimate their Talents |
A.me misunderstood | B.my misunderstanding |
C.my being misunderstood | D.me be misunderstood |
A.that; that | B.that; when | C.when; that | D.when; when |
A.Considered | B.Supposed | C.Given | D.Supposing |