A.Orange. | B.Green. | C.Red. |
A.6:00. | B.6:30. | C.9:00. |
3 . French officials are preparing to offer flying taxi services to people attending the Paris Summer Olympics in 2024. If the taxis are actually used in the French capital, it could mark the first major real world show of the flying technology.
Some air taxi developers attended the recent Paris Air Show to show off their products and seek industry support. One of the companies in attendance was Germany’s Volocopter, which plans to offer a flying taxi service during the Olympics.
But so far, no air taxi maker has received government permission to launch service in France. Volocopter hopes to be the first. But the company still needs to run its aircraft through rigorous weather tests and provide thousands of pages of documentation to the European Union Aviation Safety Agency.
Company chief Dirk Hoke said that in addition to worries about government approvals, air taxi companies have also faced difficulties linked to economic slowdowns affecting the world. Robin Riedel, who co-leads the Center for Future Mobility at the business advisory company McKinsey, said companies formed to support air taxi projects have lost about 30 percent of their value in recent years. In addition, many investors(投资人) have decided to put money into drones(无人机) instead of flying taxis.
Hoke has thought about a person he would like to be the first rider of his flying taxis-French President Emmanuel Macron. “That would be super amazing,”Hoke said, “That would be a strong sign to Europe to see the president flying.”
In the beginning, air taxi trips are likely to be short and costly. This is because current battery technology limits the distance and number of paying passengers the aircraft can carry. The long-term success of air taxis will also be dependent on effective systems to manage all the air traffic using the skies. Experts say such systems will need new technology to provide safety for all flyers. As the industry progresses, the number of air taxis is expected to reach into the millions.
1. What does the underlined word “rigorous” in paragraph 3 mean?A.Strict. | B.Simple. | C.Creative. | D.Similar. |
A.To secure the president’s investment. |
B.To welcome the Paris Summer Olympics. |
C.To increase public trust in air taxis. |
D.To get government approval more quickly. |
A.Crowded roads. | B.Limitations of batteries. |
C.Investors’ requirements. | D.The government’s decisions. |
A.The rapid development of drones. |
B.An industry report to ensure safety. |
C.The strong support from French officials. |
D.A good system for managing all air traffic. |
1. How did the speaker get to Miami?
A.By ship | B.By plane. | C.By train. |
A.It was cheaper. | B.It was nearer. | C.It was warmer. |
A.In the hotel room. | B.In the dining hall. | C.Outdoors near the pool. |
A.In the morning | B.In the afternoon. | C.In the evening. |
A.The store. | B.The movie theater. | C.The railway station. |
6 . On July 19, China’s first high-speed Maglev (磁悬浮) train with a speed of 600 kilometers per hour rolled off Qingdao, Shandong. Experts believe it will fill the gap between high-speed rail (铁轨) and air transportation.
Maglev technology was first described by Jonathan Swift in 1726 in Culliver’ Travels. It was first developed in the 1940s by British engineer Eric Laithwaite. Shanghai Maglev Train is the fastest passenger train globally, reaching 430 km/h in operation today. The only other Maglev systems currently serving the public are Linimo in South Korea. In 2015, an experimental Maglev train in Japan broke the record for the fastest train globally, traveling at 603 km per hour.
The benefits of Maglev are hard to doubt. The trains can reach higher speeds. Preventing interactions between wheels and rails also means less noise and no mechanical damage. It is highly efficient in maintenance (维护) and has much less trouble in bad weather. It uses 30 percent less energy than traditional trains. Maglev trains use only electricity, which reduces pollution. The main problem facing the development of Maglev has always been high costs. Unlike traditional high-speed trains, the new trains do not adapt to existing transport systems. They can operate only on their unique tracks, unable to switch to thousands of miles of traditional paths. There was already a rail network between two cities, and it was much cheaper to upgrade the lines than to build new lines with new technology.
Roger Goodall, a professor at Loughborough University says, “Maglev is a competitor to cars and planes, as well as buses and subway systems. It has many natural enemies but no natural friends.” He remains convinced that its most significant benefit is “connecting cities”, but doubts that this technology will gain widespread acceptance any time soon.
What will win in the end, the brilliant future of the new technology or the cold mathematics?
1. Which country has the fastest Maglev train in operation?A.Britain. | B.China. | C.South Korea. | D.Japan. |
A.Maglev’s wheels don’t touch rails. | B.Maglev moves at higher speeds. |
C.Maglev receives more attention. | D.Maglev uses only electricity. |
A.Objective. | B.Positive. | C.Negative. | D.Doubtful. |
A.The Differences Between Maglev and Traditional Trains |
B.The Bright Future of the New Technology |
C.Is the Air Transportation Still Far Away? |
D.Is There a Future for Maglev Trains? |
7 . Cycling is considered one of the most efficient ways to travel due to its small carbon footprint. Many people are happy to ride a bike in their everyday life. However, better infrastructure (基本设施) and a cultural shift are needed to ensure that more people will ride a bike. Bike kitchens are part of a worldwide movement that can help with such a challenge.
In bike kitchens, tools, used parts, and repair assistance are provided to their members. They donate bikes and have become spaces for social exchange. They also make efforts to improve basic infrastructure, which plays a key role in ensuring the safety and comfort of cyclists in areas such as the development of bike lanes and bike parking. But that alone is not enough. Building a cycling culture that is socially accepted to most, means having significant amounts of people developing skills of riding bikes.
Cycling has various benefits, like promoting physical and mental health. More importantly, the infrastructure needed for bikes doesn’t require a huge budget. Besides, bicycles are the most practical and sustainable means of travel for short and medium distance, and also for recreation and sport. Therefore, a cycling culture appears urgent and significant. For individuals in many developed countries, transport can be the largest part of their carbon footprint. Transport accounts for about one-fifth of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. For short or medium distances, bikes are one of the lowest-carbon ways to travel. Even more shockingly, using a bike instead of a car for short trips would reduce a person’s travel emissions by 75 percent.
Bike kitchens in particular, extend the lifespan of bikes and their parts. They help build a community economy that prevents waste generation, since most parts are secondhand, fixed, or reused. Either through the supply of tools, parts, workshops, fixing sessions, or bikes for free, bike kitchens encourage a more sustainable way of traveling that makes cities friendlier, while strengthening community values.
1. Which of the following can be done in bike kitchens?A.Exchanging bikes. | B.Teaching others to ride bikes. |
C.Purchasing the new parts. | D.Developing riding skills. |
A.Cycling is a sustainable way to travel. |
B.Transport is still a challenging problem. |
C.Everyone should have an eco-friendly travel. |
D.Bikes are also suitable for a long distance travel. |
A.Critical. | B.Doubtful. | C.Positive. | D.Grateful. |
A.Bike kitchens reduce people’s travel influences. |
B.Bike kitchens are helping boost cycling culture. |
C.Bike kitchens are gaining popularity in the world. |
D.Bike kitchens make cycling accessible to everyone. |
8 . During Amsterdam’s chaotic rush hour, nine -year-old Lotta Crok cycles to a very busy junction. “Look,” she says. “There’s traffic coming from everywhere. Four trams from four different directions. For a child on a bike, that’s really confusing!”
Lotta is the first junior cycle mayor in the world and her working area is the Dutch capital. You would think this challenge would be superfluous in a city known as the bicycle capital of the world. The number of bicycles in Amsterdam is estimated at 800,000 — more than the city’s 750,000 inhabitants. According to an estimate made 5 years ago, 490,000 bicyclists take to streets daily.
But children who cycle in Amsterdam face challenges. Lotta says, “The three biggest problems for us are cars, cycling tourists and scooters (小型摩托). The cars take up too much space, the tourists are always swinging side to side and stop when you least expect it, and the scooters simply run you over.”
Lotta became junior cycle mayor in June last year when she won a contest in which school children were asked to come up with plans to make cycling safer and more fun. Her idea was to add children’s bikes to the popular bike share programme.
Since Lotta was appointed junior cycle mayor, she has been busy, giving interviews, opening cycling contests in the city and being a jury (评审员) member during the Amsterdam Light Parade, an event in which Amsterdammers decorate their bikes with lights.
She is now planning a meeting with the city’s mayor to discuss ideas that children have come up with: “One of our proposals is a bicycle park where children can learn how to cycle. Right now, most of us learn it in the street, which can be quite busy. Another idea is to create an app for tourists to teach them the rules of cycling, because most of them really don’t know.”
Following the success of the Amsterdam scheme, cycle mayors around the world are now planning to appoint junior colleagues. “They see it works really well,” Boerma, the senior mayor, says. “I talk to the parents. Lotta talks to the children. And if you look at the city through the eyes of a child, you will also make it accessible for others. A city that’s good for an eight-year-old is also good for an 88-year-old.”
1. Which word can best replace the underlined word “superfluous” in paragraph 2?A.Important. | B.Difficult. |
C.Unnecessary. | D.Valuable. |
A.To teach children how to ride. |
B.To ensure cycling is safer for children. |
C.To give suggestions to the city’s mayor on how to run the city. |
D.To organize the cycling contests in the city. |
A.She has solved the three biggest problems for children cycling in Amsterdam. |
B.She has won a contest about cycling. |
C.She has given interviews and been a jury member during a parade. |
D.She has given proposals to the city mayor. |
A.Cautious. | B.Favorable. |
C.Ambiguous. | D.Disapproving. |
9 . An electric flying vehicle called Skai was shown yesterday near Los Angeles, California. Skai is made by Alaka’i Technologies. The vehicle has six rotors(旋翼)on the roof and seats inside for five people.
Like a drone(无人机), the vehicle from Alaka’i Technologies takes off and lands vertically(垂直地). It’s one of many similar electric flying vehicles in production, including ones from Boeing and Airbus. But most of them are powered by batteries, which can add a lot of weight. The Skai instead uses very light hydrogen fuel cells to run its rotors, giving it a range of 400 miles(644 kilometers)and the capacity to carry 1,000 pounds(454 kilograms)in people or goods, the company says.
Alaka’i says it’s planning a test flight near its Massachusetts headquarters. It will be flown by an on ⁃ board pilot(飞行员), but the technology exists to eventually fly it remotely and even autonomously. However, it will be years before the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA)allows the autonomous flight of passenger vehicles, said Thaddeus Lightfoot, who helps companies navigate FAA rules.
“Drone⁃ like vehicles such as the Skai must first simply prove their airworthiness, like any common plane. After that, getting commercial certification is another complex process. The technology is interesting, but the regulatory road will be very long,”said Lightfoot, adding that the idea of allowing people to fly in a large aircraft without a pilot is“well outside the current regulatory system.”
Hanvey, CEO of Alaka’i Technologies, said that it could take at least a decade before the company realizes his goal of electric flying vehicles ferrying passengers over major cities at nearly 120 mph. Before that, he hopes to see Skai aircraft used by first responders to send in food or water following disasters like hurricanes or wildfires. It could also serve as a mobile cell tower, staying in the sky for up to 10 hours over a neighborhood to provide communication services, he said.
1. What is the advantage of the Skai?A.It is quite light. | B.It uses batteries. |
C.It carries more people. | D.It lands autonomously. |
A.It costs a lot. |
B.It saves energy. |
C.It is not readily available now. |
D.It will soon get approved by FAA. |
A.Prove its safety to fly. | B.Conduct a test flight. |
C.Get a commercial license. | D.Obey the International Air Law. |
A.In the countryside. | B.In some major cities. |
C.In mountainous areas. | D.In disaster⁃stricken areas. |
10 . Driving while talking on the phone increases the likelihood of an accident and is actually more dangerous than driving drunk, U.S. researchers report. This holds true whether the driver is holding a cell phone or using a hands⁃free device.
“As a society, we have agreed on not tolerating the risk associated with drunk driving,”said researcher Frank Drews, an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Utah.“This study shows us that somebody who is conversing on a cell phone is exposing him or herself and others to a similar risk — cell phones actually are a higher risk,”he said.
In the study, 40 people followed a pace car along a prescribed course, using a driving simulator (模拟仪). Some people drove while talking on a cell phone, others drove while drunk(meaning their blood-alcohol limit matched the legal limit of 0.08 percent), and others drove with no such distractions. The researchers found an increased accident rate when people were conversing on the cell phone. Drivers on cell phones were 5.36 times more likely to get in an accident.
The bottom line: Cell⁃phone use was linked to“a significant increase in the accident rate,” Drews said.
The phone users did even worse than the inebriated, the Utah team found. There were three accidents among those talking on cell phones — all of them involving a rear⁃ending(追尾) of the pace car. In contrast, there were no accidents recorded among participants who were drunk.
In response to safety concerns, some states have declared it illegal to use hand ⁃ held cell phones while driving. But that type of law may not be effective, because the Utah researchers found no difference in driver performance whether the driver was holding the phone or talking on a hands⁃free model.
“We have seen again and again that there is no difference between hands⁃free and hand⁃held devices,”Drews said.“The problem is the conversation. The best solution to the problem is obvious: Don’t talk on the phone while you are driving. ”
1. Which group of drivers performed worst in the study?A.Those phone users. |
B.Those who are drunk. |
C.Those following a pace car. |
D.Those with hearing problems. |
A.The drunk drivers. |
B.The researchers. |
C.The cell⁃phone⁃free drivers. |
D.The Utah team. |
A.Driver performance has nothing to do with the use of mobile phones. |
B.It is timely to ban the use of hand⁃held phones while driving. |
C.The Utah researchers find the traffic safety law works as well as before. |
D.Talking on the phone while driving should be avoided. |
A.Sports. |
B.Economy. |
C.Society. |
D.Entertainment. |