In many urban Chinese offices, a trend (趋势) is gaining popularity among young professionals. The trend
This trend is not just about
The appeal of these fruit-bearing plants is evident on social media platforms, where thousands of these plants
2 . Whenever we see a button, we are eager to press it because we know something will happen. This is true in most cases, for example on a doorbell and on the “on / off” on the TV. But some buttons are actually fake, like the “close” button on a lift.
Many people are in the habit of pressing the “close” button because they don’t have the patience to wait for the lift doors to shut. But lifts’ “close” buttons are a complete scam, at least in the US — the doors will not close any faster no matter how hard you press.
It started in the 1990s when the Americans with Disabilities Act was passed in the US, making sure that all lifts stayed open long enough so that people with disabilities could enter. Only US firefighters and repairmen can use the buttons to speed up the door-closing process if they have a code or special keys.
But to normal lift riders, the buttons aren’t completely useless. According to psychologists, fake buttons can actually make you feel better by offering you a sense of control.
“Perceived (能够感知的) control is very important. It reduces stress and increase well-being,” Ellen J. Langer, a psychology professor, said, “Having a lack of control is associated with depression.”
Experts have revealed that a lot of buttons that don’t do anything exist in our lives for this same purpose. For example, many offices in the US have fake thermostats (温度调节器) because people tend to feel better when they think they can control the temperature in their workspace.
But psychologists found it interesting that even when people are aware of these little “white lies”, they still continue to push fake buttons because as long as the doors eventually close, it is considered to be worth the effort.
“That habit is here to stay,” John Kounios, a psychology professor, said, “Even though I have real doubts about the traffic light buttons, I always press them. After all, I’ve got nothing else to do while waiting. So why not press the button in the hope that this one will work.”
1. What was the author’s main purpose in writing the article?A.To analyze the functions of fake buttons. |
B.To describe some different kinds of fake buttons. |
C.To explain the advantages and disadvantages of fake buttons. |
D.To explore people’s different habits when it comes to pushing buttons. |
A.Tool. | B.Trick. | C.Button. | D.Scan. |
A.are fake for the convenience of disabled people |
B.work only when people press them hard for a while |
C.were specially designed to give people a sense of control |
D.cannot speed up the process of closing the door in any case |
A.should give up this habit | B.probably do so to kill time |
C.don’t know that what they press is fake | D.consider what they do to be meaningless |
1. What do we know about the accident?
A.It caused a man to die. | B.It occurred in the evening. | C.Two drivers were hurt. |
A.Bad weather. | B.Careless driving. | C.Speeding. |
A.At 2:00 am. | B.At 4:00 am. | C.At 9:00 am. |
字数:100词左右
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5 . Digital reading (数字阅读) appears to be destroying habits of “deep reading”. Astonishing numbers of people with years of schooling are in fact illiterate (文盲). This month’s Ljubljana Manifesto (宣言) explains: “The digital field may promote more reading than ever in history, but it also offers many attractions to read in a casual and scattered (零散的) manner— or even not to read at all. This increasingly endangers higher-level reading.”
That’s frightening, because “higher-level reading” has been necessary to civilization. It made the understanding and an international increase in empathy (共鸣). Without it, we would suffer a lot. As the Ljubljana Manifesto notes, “as much as one-third of Europeans struggle even with lower-level reading skills.” More than one-fifth of adults in the US “fall into the illiterate/functionally illiterate category”. Separately, post-pandemic (后疫情时期) reading scores for American13-year-olds are the lowest in decades. And the Washington-based Center for Global Development recently estimated that literacy (读写能力) in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa among those with five years of schooling has decreased by 10% this past half century.
Experts in the Ljubljana Manifesto record the demerits of digital reading: “Recent studies of various kinds indicate a decline of thoughtful reading, slow reading and long-form reading.” When you read a book on paper, you can be entirely inside the experience, absorb hundreds of pages of details thoroughly and begin to catch the world’s complexity. Online, says Maryanne Wolf of UCLA, we are “skimming, scanning and scrolling”. The medium is the message: doing deep reading on your phone is as hard as playing tennis with your phone. Recently, a bright 11-year-old boy told me I was wasting time on books: he absorbed more information faster from websites. He had a point. But digital readers also absorb more misinformation and seldom absorb fine opinions.
In short, as professors from Northwestern University predicted in 2005, we are returning to the days when only an elite (精英) “reading class” reads long texts, which is worrying.
1. What can we learn about digital reading from paragraph 1?A.Digital reading has weakened the practice of deep reading. |
B.Digital reading has solved the problem of illiteracy. |
C.Digital reading has made deep reading accessible to wider readers. |
D.Digital reading has caused a greater appreciation for deep reading. |
A.Digital reading’s great popularity. | B.The importance of deep reading. |
C.American students’ reading skills. | D.The lowering of the level of literacy. |
A.Functions. | B.Depths. | C.Shortcomings. | D.Features. |
A.Advantages of digital reading. | B.Measures to practice deep reading. |
C.Ways to encourage digital reading. | D.Benefits of lower-level reading. |
6 . Technology seems to discourage slow, careful reading. Reading on a screen tires your eyes and makes it harder for you to keep your place. Online writing tends to be more skimmable (易略读的) and list-like than print. The neuroscientist Mary Walt argued recently that this new standard of skim reading is producing“an invisible, game-changing transformation”in how readers process words. The neuronal circuit (神经回路) that maintains and supports the brain’s ability to read now prefers the rapid absorption of information.
We shouldn’t overplay this danger. All readers skim. From about the age of nine, our eyes start to skim quickly across the page, reading only about a quarter of the words properly, and filling in the gap s by inference. Nor is there anything new in these fears about declining attention spans (持续时间). So far, the anxieties have proved to be false alarms. “Quite a few critics have been worried about attention spans lately and see very short stories as signs of cultural decline,” the American author Selvin Brown wrote. “No one ever said that poems were evidence of short attention spans.”
And yet the Internet has certainly changed the way we read. For a start, it means that there is more to read, because more people than ever are writing. And digital writing is meant for rapid release and response. This mode of writing and reading can be interactive and fun. But often it treats other people’s words as something to be quickly taken as materials to say something else. Everyone talks over the top of everyone else, eager to be heard.
Perhaps we should slow down. Reading is constantly promoted as a source of personal achievement. But this argument often emphasizes “enthusiastic” “passionate” or “eager” reading, non e of which words suggest slow, quiet absorption. To a slow reader, a piece of writing can only be fully understood by immersing oneself in the words and their slow understanding of a line of thought.
The human need for this kind of deep reading is too tenacious for any new technology to destroy. We often assume that technological change can’t be stopped and happens in one direction, so that older media like “dead-tree” books are kicked out by newer, more virtual forms. In practice, older technologies can coexist with new ones. The Kindle has not killed off the printed book any more than the car killed off the bicycle. We still want to enjoy slowly-formed ideas and carefully-chosen words. Even in a fast-moving age, there is time for slow reading.
1. Which statement would Selvin Brown probably agree?A.Online writing harms careful reading. | B.Fears of attention spans are unnecessary. |
C.The situation of cultural decline is serious. | D.Poetry reading helps lengthen attention spans. |
A.It demands writers to abandon traditional writing modes. |
B.It depends heavily on frequent interaction with the readers. |
C.It leads to too much talking and not enough deep reflection. |
D.It prepares readers for enthusiastic, passionate or eager reading. |
A.Deep-rooted. | B.Widely-acknowledged. | C.Slowly-changed. | D.Rarely-noticed. |
A.Slow Reading is Here to Stay | B.The Wonder of Deep Reading |
C.The Internet is Changing the Way We Read | D.Digital vs Print: A Life-and-Death Struggle |
7 . According to a recent article in The Wall Street Journal, we might all be braggarts (大话王) in this competitive society addicted to social networking.
Take a close look at your social-networking sites. Do you like to post photos of yourself in restaurants to show others what an exciting life you have? Or do you like to write about how happily in love you are? Or perhaps you are of the subtle type who constantly complain about jobs but really just want to impress others with your important position.
According to the results of a series of experiments conducted by Harvard University neuroscientists (神经科学家), the reward areas of our brain — the same areas that respond to “primary rewards” such as food — are activated when we talk about ourselves. We devote between 30 to 40 percent of our conversation time to doing just that. Unfortunately, Bernstein says, some people can’t tell the difference between sharing positive information that others might actually want to know and direct bragging. She suggests that bragging involves comparison, whether stated or implied.
“We are expected to be perfect all the time. The result is that more and more people are carefully managing their online images,” says Elizabeth Bernstein, a columnist with the Wall Street Journal.
But the issue is not limited to the Internet. In a fiercely competitive job market we must sell ourselves on multiple platforms and show that we are better than others. In fact, we have become so accustomed to bragging that we don’t even realize we are doing it, says Bernstein. This is harmful to our relationships and puts people off.
Bernstein talked to some experts who said that people brag for all sorts of reasons: to appear worthy of attention; to prove to ourselves we are doing fine and that people who said we would fail are wrong; or simply because we’re excited when good things happen to us.
“Feel sorry for them, because they’re doing this unconscious, destructive thing that won’t help them in the long run,” said Professor Simian Valier, a research psychologist at Washington University.
1. The underlined word “subtle” in Para.2 is closest in meaning to “________”.A.hidden | B.apparent | C.outstanding | D.simple |
A.They control conversation and only talk about themselves. |
B.They know well how to share positive information. |
C.They self-promote to stand out in their career. |
D.They don’t pay much attention to their online image. |
A.Braggarts make a good first impression but the effect decreases over time. |
B.People who like bragging know what they are doing. |
C.Braggarts always adopt comparison directly to show they are excellent. |
D.They care much about the feelings of others when talking. |
A.Are you a braggart? | B.Society addicted to networking |
C.Why do we keep on bragging? | D.How to deal with a braggart? |
8 . As a general rule, all forms of activity lead to boredom when they are performed on a routine basis. As a matter of fact, we can see this principle at work in people of all
A.parties | B.races | C.countries | D.ages |
A.working | B.living | C.playing | D.going |
A.confidence | B.interest | C.anxiety | D.sorrow |
A.well-organized | B.colorfully-printed | C.newly-collected | D.half-filled |
A.broad | B.passing | C.different | D.main |
A.silently | B.impatiently | C.gladly | D.worriedly |
A.promise | B.burden | C.right | D.game |
A.graduation | B.independence | C.responsibility | D.success |
A.children | B.students | C.adults | D.retirees |
A.carefully | B.eagerly | C.nervously | D.bravely |
A.required | B.obtained | C.noticed | D.discovered |
A.need | B.learn | C.start | D.plan |
A.only | B.well | C.even | D.soon |
A.lost | B.chose | C.left | D.quit |
A.pets | B.toys | C.friends | D.colleagues |
1.说明现象和理由;
2.提出建议。
注意:词数在80词左右(参考词汇:litter 乱扔垃圾 spit 吐痰)
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10 . It’s no secret that reading good news feels a lot better than reading bad news. Like, would you rather bite into a lemon, or sip on a fresh glass of lemonade?
In fact, good news, known as solutions journalism, is becoming more popular, as publishers and news stations discover the benefits of sharing positive stories. Good Good Good is one of them.
“If it bleeds, it leads.” has long been a saying used in the media to describe how news stories about violence, death and destruction draw readers’ attention.
A.Share good news with people around you. |
B.It’s just that we don’t hear as much about them. |
C.But the “bad news” has its place in the world. |
D.It provides a more balanced view of the world. |
E.And so, negative news stories are everywhere on news media. |
F.Heartwarming stories make you cry and feel good. |
G.The news media company is devoted to providing good news intentionally. |