增加:在缺词处加一个漏字符号(∧),并在其下面写上该加的词。
删除:把多余的词用斜线(\)划掉。
修改:在错词下划一横线,并在该词下面写出修改后的词。
注意:
1. 每处错误及其修改均仅限一词;
2. 只允许修改10处, 多者(从第11处起)不计分。
Do you often talk with your parents? A recently survey shows that nearly half of the high school students doesn’t like to talk with their parents. 43. 3% of them have trouble communicate with their parents. What was worse, 82. 8% of them don’t want to share their secrets their parents. Actually, it is important for us to communicate with our parents though they are the dearest people in our life, whom care for us all the time. By letting them know that what we think, we can get practical advice from them, which can help us to deal with many problem in life.
In this way, we can feel more confident about us and live happily.
Have you ever wondered what life is like now
So what did they talk about? For
That said, it’s not all a matter of improvement. Quite a few people told me that they feel more stressed these days because they rely a lot on technology and they are always
3 . A new study shows that U.S. teens see more television commercials (广告) for alcohol than for jeans, sneakers, or other teen products, the New York Times reported Dec. 18.
For the study, the Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth (CAMY) at Georgetown University studied the 208,909 alcohol commercials on television. They found that nearly 25 percent of the ads were viewed mainly by teenagers, rather than adults.
Furthermore, 12-to-20-year-olds viewed more commercials for beer and other alcoholic drinks than products marketed directly to young people, such as gum, snacks, and juice. “No one is watching what the industry is doing, and the industry is in denial (拒绝承认),” said David A. Kessler, dean of the School of Medicine at Yale and an adviser to CAMY.
The alcohol industry uses voluntary rules to reduce the number of ads seen by those under age 21. The rules say that ads should not air during programs where at least half of the audience is underage (未成年的).
“We do not forgive illegal underage drinking under any circumstances,” said Jeff Becker, president of the Beer Institute. “This industry does not, and never has, targeted our advertising to people who can’t legally buy our products.”
However, the report found that alcohol ads ran during 13 of the 15 most popular shows for teenagers, including “Seventh Heaven,” “Gilmore Girls, ” “Dark Angel,” “That ‘70s Show,” “Friends,” “E.R.,” and sporting events.
Jim O’Hara, executive director of CAMY, said the industry rules are false. He added, “These standards do not protect youth from exposure and overexposure to alcohol advertising and marketing.”
1. What’s the result of the study conducted by CAMY?A.Teenagers like alcohol than jeans and sneakers. |
B.Alduts see more alcohol ads on TV than teenager. |
C.Teenagers see ads for alcohol ads on TV more than adults. |
D.The older teenagers are, the better they like ads for alcohol ads. |
A.The alcohol industry is widely praised. |
B.The alcohol industry is closely watched. |
C.The underage will see less ads for alcoholic drinks in the near future. |
D.Young people can easily buy such products as alcoholic drinks, snacks and juice. |
A.Dark Angel and Seventh Heaven are shows for adults. |
B.The industry rules protect youth from alcohol advertising. |
C.Not all the most popular shows for teenagers air alcohol ads. |
D.Teenagers can drink alcohol with the permission of their parents. |
A.Alcohol commercials on TV. |
B.Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth. |
C.Illegal underage drinking is not permitted. |
D.Teenagers see more TV ads for alcohol than other products. |
1. What does Jim like?
A.Antiques. | B.Chinese culture. | C.Valuable paintings. |
A.They used Jim’s key. |
B.They broke the window. |
C.They knocked at the door. |
A.Jim’s watch. | B.Jim’s phone. | C.Jim’s iPad. |
A.Jim. | B.David. | C.Jack. |
5 . A new study from the Netherlands has found that an important factor in a child’s ultimate level of education, even more important than their own family’s economic situation, is whether they grow up with rich neighbors nearby.
Researcher Agata Troost and her colleagues at Delft University of Technology used a national database to track the address of every Dutch baby born in 1995, a total of 140,338 people, from birth to age 23. Using geolocating software, they drew up a socioeconomic profile (概况) for each child's immediate neighborhood, figuring the percentage of neighbors who were rich, middle class or disadvantaged.
After controlling a number of other factors, including parents’ earnings and levels of education, the researchers found that a child's own experience of wealth or poverty mattered less to their ultimate level of schooling than exposure to well-off neighbors. The data suggest that growing up in a rich area, with well-maintained parks, libraries and soccer fields, as well as interactions with educated neighbors, could boost a poor child's ability to see beyond their immediate horizons (眼界).
“Rich families create neighborhoods and activities that create opportunities,” said Ms. Troost, and these advantages are shared with other children who happen to live nearby. The finding echoes an earlier study by Mr. Chetty and his colleagues, which showed that having even one inspiring teacher in middle school can improve a student’s career prospects. Whether in the classroom or on the street, it seems that social interactions outside the family can start a young person's motivation and ambition.
At the same time, the study also stressed the importance of the home environment. When parents are well educated, children are likely to be, too. And that's the moral of the story: Neighborhoods can have different effects on different children, depending on how educated their parents are, whether they are male or female, and how much casual contact they have with people who are different from their own families. “Location, location, location” may be a old saying for buying a house, but we're learning that it also holds true for children's development.
1. What aspect of the research is paragraph 2 mainly about?A.Its purpose. | B.Its principle. | C.Its method. | D.Its result. |
A.Goes against. | B.Agrees with. | C.Works for. | D.Relates to. |
A.An advertisement. | B.A novel. | C.A magazine. | D.A guidebook. |
A.The Benefits of Educated Parents | B.The Power of a Good Neighborhood |
C.The Decisive Factor in a Child's Growth | D.The Location Your New House Should Have |
Two graduates, from Central China Normal University in Wuhan, Hubei Province, using the names Wanwan and Chaochao,
In the video, Wanwan,
“When you can accept your failure, you will feel that it is not that bad. When working at the hotpot restaurant, my biggest
The video was one of the trending videos of last year, gaining more than 5.44 million views and more than 26,000 comments since it
Netizens said they were warmed by their courage to share failures with the public, strong determination
7 . One recent report found that adults in the US check their phones, on average, 344 times a day — once every four minutes — and spend almost three hours a day on their devices in total. The problem for many of us is that one quick phone-related task leads to a quick check of our email or social media feeds, and suddenly we’ve been sucked into endless scrolling (滚屏).
It’s a vicious circle. The more useful our phones become, the more we use them. The more we use them, the more we lay neural pathways in our brains that lead to picking up our phones for whatever task is at hand — and the more we feel an urge to check our phone even when we don’t have to.
What we do know is that the simple distraction of checking a phone or seeing a notification can have negative consequences. This isn’t very surprising; we know that, in general, multitasking harms memory and performance. One of the most dangerous examples is phone use while driving.
In another recent study, researchers asked participants to either put their phones next to them so they were visible (like on a desk), nearby and out of sight (like in a bag or pocket), or in another room. Participants then completed a series of tasks to test their abilities to process and remember information, their problem-solving, and their focus. They were found to perform far better when their phones were in another room instead of nearby — whether visible, powered on or not. That held true even though most of the participants claimed not to be consciously (有意识地) thinking about their devices.
The mere proximity (靠近) of a phone, it seems, contributes to “brain drain”. Our brains may be subconsciously hard at work in controlling the desire to check our phones, or constantly monitoring the environment to see if we should check our phone (eg, waiting for a notification). Either way, this diverted attention can make doing anything else more difficult. The only “fix”, the researchers found, was putting the device in a different room entirely.
1. How does the author bring up the topic of the text?A.By offering a piece of news. | B.By sharing a magazine article. |
C.By describing his own experience. | D.By citing previous research findings. |
A.Full. | B.Magic. | C.Tight. | D.Bad. |
A.Never wait for a notification. |
B.Use our phone as little as possible. |
C.Stay away from our phone when doing things. |
D.Focus on one thing when finishing difficult things. |
A.The Pros and Cons of Using Mobile Phones |
B.How Have Mobile Phones Changed Our Brains Negatively? |
C.The Consequences of Using Mobile Phones |
D.Do You Want to Control the Desire to Check Your Mobile Phones? |
A recently released
Over 1.48 million
An average adult would spend 23.13 minutes on average per day
Moreover, listening to audiobooks was another rising habit among Chinese readers,
Public reading services continued to meet the needs of Chinese readers, as 78.2 percent of the people
“In Hangzhou, for instance, reading venues, including public libraries, self-service libraries and rural reading rooms,
Reading on mobile phones also remained a habit among Chinese readers. According to the survey, 77.8 percent read on their phones last year, 0.4 percent
9 . It’s 9:30 A.M. in Los Angeles. Jamiah Hargins pulls a few short, green-leafed plants out of the ground in his West Adams backyard, revealing the peanuts (花生). He opens one and gives it a taste.
Hargins started growing food at home because he wanted more nutritious options for his family. He soon found that he grew more than they could eat, so he turned to social media to start a “crop swap (交换)” with neighbors who were dealing with a similar situation. Launched in 2018, Crop Swap LA has since moved towards a more expansive yard-sharing model.
Hargins’ attempt at urban farming was also driven by bigger concerns. A 2016 Deloitte study identified a shift in the priorities shoppers said helped determine their choices, with social impact values including local sourcing and sustainability (可持续性) now ranking alongside traditional drivers like “taste” and “price”.
Crop Swap LA has branched into farmer’s markets, workshops for kids, and other community-focused offerings. It encourages homeowners to “share” their yards with the Crop Swap LA team, which will plant crops. When the crops are harvested, they’ll be sold primarily in low-income areas. Ten percent will be donated back to the neighborhood where they were grown and then an additional percentage will be sold in higher-income areas. Some funds made are given back to the landowner, which Hargins expects will amount to about $5,000 annually.
This summer, Crop Swap LA received $50,000 from the LA 2050 Grant Challenge, which was used to change their first seven gardens, One homeowner, Mychal Creer, is a Los Angeles native who said he has always wanted to grow food but never real got the ball rolling. He’s excited to watch his land transform. And he’s excited to meet more neighbors.
“I’m glad that we are creating a community using crops as the means of connection,” Creer said.
1. Why did Hargins start growing food in his backyard?A.He followed the example of his neighbors. |
B.He hoped to make a profit by selling the food. |
C.He wanted to provide healthy food for his family. |
D.He learned about the benefits of home-grown food on social media. |
A.Whether it is grown through modern farming method. |
B.Whether it is popular among local consumer. |
C.Whether it is grown by professional farmer. |
D.Whether it is friendly to the environment. |
A.It brings food and profit to the landowner. |
B.It mainly attracts people from low-income areas. |
C.It will help the growers make up to $5,000 every year. |
D.It donates ten percent of the food to low-income families. |
A.He feels a stronger sense of connection. |
B.He has made $50,000 from the lands so far. |
C.His garden has become more beautiful than before. |
D.He enjoys greater popularity among his neighbors. |
10 . Nowadays, smartphones fill us with text messages. Social media attack us with endless notices. Many consumers are buying the latest digital devices, from tablets and fitness trackers to commercial drones. Simple living seems to be a thing of the past.
Thoreau would beg to differ. As a writer who claimed the value of simplicity almost two centuries ago, he went against his time. He lived during the height of the Industrial Age, distinguished by the rise of huge factories and powerful machines such as steam engines. Thoreau withdrew from city life to live alone in the woods. He brought with him only the necessities of life and wrote about this adventure in his book Walden.
In Walden, Thoreau is basically making a philosophical statement: We are not living deliberate or meaningful lives, thanks to modern technology. We created powerful machines to make life more convenient. Unfortunately, these machines have done the opposite. In his words, “Men have become the tools of their tools”.
When technology causes that much distraction and confusion, it may be healthy to simplify life by shortening these technological use. Personally, I’ve done so in two ways. First, I don’t use data on my cellphone. I only use it to call or text. Second, I quit most social media. As a result, my technology distracts me very little, which allows me to live in. less confusion and, therefore, more deliberation. Sure, that’s not as extreme as Thoreau-moving to the woods, but it’s a realistic move I can make toward a more meaningful life.
One final clarification: Thoreau’s message of simplicity isn’t about rejecting all technology. It is, however, rejecting technological consumerism, or compulsively buying more technology for the sake of having more technology. This is why Walden is such an important book for technology education. Simplicity means minimizing material distractions so as to maximize life’s meaning.
1. What do we know about Thoreau in paragraph 2?A.He lived in the high industrial building. |
B.He moved to a place close to nature. |
C.He thought highly of modern technology. |
D.He was fond of adventure in urban areas. |
A.Men haven’t made full use of their technology . |
B.Some digital devices are inconvenient to use. |
C.Men have become the slaves of modern technology. |
D.Modern machines are powerful enough to control people. |
A.By using date on the phone. | B.By abusing technological devices. |
C.By living in less confusion. | D.By quitting using most social media. |
A.Less is more. | B.The more, the better. |
C.Knowledge is power. | D.No pains, no gains. |