A.At 2:00. | B.At 4:00. | C.30 minutes after work. |
A.In a shop. | B.In a hotel. | C.In a hospital. |
A.A pilot. | B.A doctor. |
C.A salesman. | D.A host. |
A.Dr. Johnson may not be a good choice. |
B.Dr. Johnson’s waiting room is not tidy. |
C.Dr. Johnson enjoys reading magazines. |
D.Dr. Johnson is really a good dentist. |
5 . The stomach is an extremely strong organ, full of acid to break down each meal. In order to prevent this acid from burning a hole in our stomachs and damaging other organs, our stomach lining is specially adapted to contain the acid safely.
H. pylori are able to live in the stomach by living in the lining, safe from harsh stomach acid. These bacteria are actually pretty common in people, approximately a third of Australians have H. pylori in their bodies, but not all have symptoms.
The bacteria can eventually create infection in stomach lining, a condition known as gastritis, by wearing away the lining and allowing stomach acid to burn away stomach tissue, causing painful ulcers.
Up until the 1980s, it was thought that bacteria could not survive in stomach acid. The cause of stomach ulcers was due to lifestyle choices: stress, smoking, spicy foods; the stomach acid was breaking through the lining on its own.
This belief was first questioned in 1979 by Robin Warren, an Australian pathologist, who found bacteria on a microscope slide containing the stomach lining of a patient with gastritis. In the years that followed Warren continued his research.
Warren then teamed up with Barry Marshall in 1981 and the two continued with the research, trying to separate the mystery bacteria and find a cure. Over the next three years, they tested their theories with some positive results; however, the idea that bacteria could be the cause of gastritis was not widely accepted or even acknowledged.
Finally, fed up with being ignored and confident in his findings, Bary Marshall decided to test on himself. He infected himself with H. pylori and soon developed gastritis and terrible stomach ulcers. Marshall then began to cure himself by taking a dose of antibiotics. This once and for all proved not only that bacteria could grow in stomach acid, but it could also cause gastritis and stomach ulcers.
Eventually, the world fully acknowledged Warren and Marshall’s huge contribution to science and medicine and the two were awarded the Nobel prize in Medicine in 2005, twenty-six years after Robin Warren first began his research.
1. We can learn from the text that H. pylori are a kind of________.A.organs | B.infections | C.bacteria | D.symptoms |
A.Lifestyle choices caused stomach ulcers. |
B.Stomach acid could break through the lining on its own. |
C.Bacteria couldn’t survive in the stomach. |
D.Some bacteria can create infection by burning away stomach tissue. |
A.Choosing unhealthy lifestyles. | B.Introducing H. pylori to his own stomach. |
C.Finding the bacteria on stomach lining. | D.Growing H. pylori in the lab. |
A.chemists | B.patients | C.researchers | D.the general public |
6 . Health Care Workers Getting Panic Buttons
Hundreds of health care workers at Cox Medical Center in Missouri will soon be equipped with personal panic buttons, following over a year of increased violence against staff members. The pandemic (流行病), the medical center said, has greatly
A medical worker, once experiencing an attack, can press the button attached to his working ID card to activate a personal
The panic buttons are being
Those buttons are
Alan Butler, Cox Health’s system director, agreed the buttons were a(n)
A.covered up | B.contributed to | C.developed with | D.got through |
A.medical | B.emotional | C.tracing | D.facilitating |
A.blocker | B.menu | C.command | D.alert |
A.designed | B.tested | C.questioned | D.stored |
A.assign | B.explain | C.hand | D.expand |
A.implemented | B.analyzed | C.eliminated | D.restricted |
A.conditionally | B.financially | C.psychologically | D.theoretically |
A.bounced | B.advanced | C.shrunk | D.multiplied |
A.predictable | B.irreplaceable | C.tricky | D.timely |
A.However | B.Instead | C.Hence | D.Furthermore |
A.overestimated | B.underreported | C.updated | D.downloaded |
A.confusing | B.promising | C.primary | D.risky |
A.selfless | B.grateful | C.qualified | D.protected |
A.Actually | B.Consequently | C.Naturally | D.Eventually |
A.prohibited | B.cautioned | C.committed | D.overlooked |
7 . Elizabeth wouldn’t walk or talk as an infant. Angela’s left leg was so enlarged that it hurt to stand. Emma needed a breathing machine just to sleep. Their suffering may take different forms, but their stories share a common thread: Neither they nor their families knew what was actually causing these issues.
Undiagnosed diseases are more common than you might think. Tens of millions of Americans likely suffer from disorders they cannot name. For many, the symptoms are minor. But in some cases, patients come to their doctors with serious problems caused by diseases that challenge medical knowledge.
Those cases are precisely where the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) steps in. Established in 2008, the UDN’s mission is to provide answers for patients with diseases that doctors are unable to diagnose. Anyone can apply to the program and the UDN works hard to screen every application it receives.
Today, the UDN covers 12 clinical sites around the country, and has evaluated over 1,400 patients. More than 400 of those patients have received a diagnosis thanks to the UDN. In some of these cases, the network is able to match a patient with an already known condition. In others, UDN researchers must work to describe an entirely new disease and enter it into the medical dictionary. The program has added at least 25 entirely new diseases in this way. Additionally, the UDN covers the cost of the tests, meaning patients aren’t burdened with crushing medical debt.
This kind of groundbreaking work helps more than just the patients themselves. Insights from studying rare diseases offer new knowledge about the human body that can benefit all of us. For example, the discovery of statins, a class of drugs commonly recommended today to help regulate high blood pressure, arose from the study of a rare genetic disorder.
“I think they’ve really advanced and changed the whole model for how we approach many of these illnesses,” says Anne Pariser, director of the Office of Rare Diseases Research. She says the UDN’s multidisciplinary approach — bringing different specialists together to talk about challenging cases — has helped advance the field of rare disease research, especially when it comes to genetic diseases.
Living with a disease without a name can be its own kind of suffering. “You grow up feeling like, I’m in this, crazy, all by myself, and no one really understands me,” says Angela Moon, a UDN participant. For patients like her, the UDN offers hope for treatment, but also for finally being seen.
1. The purpose of the first paragraph is to ________.A.arouse the readers’ interest in the UDN |
B.give a vivid description of rare diseases |
C.introduce the background for the UDN’s founding |
D.raise a complicated problem that will be solved later |
A.the way the UDN is operated nationwide |
B.the progress the UDN has made so far |
C.the reasons why the UDN is so popular |
D.the development stages the UDN has gone through |
A.She used to live in despair. |
B.She failed to identify with others. |
C.She is receiving treatment now. |
D.There will be a cure for her condition. |
A.It has helped spread the knowledge of undiagnosed diseases. |
B.It prioritizes participants’ privacy over solving medical mysteries. |
C.It is specifically designed to deal with challenging genetic diseases. |
D.It emphasizes close cooperation between specialists in separate fields. |
A.On the basketball court. | B.At the hospital. |
C.At the police station. | D.In the sports shop. |
9 . A three-year study comparing three different treatment options for tooth decay (腐烂) in children’s teeth has found no evidence to suggest that conventional fillings are more telling than sealing (封闭) decay in teeth, or using prevention techniques alone, in stopping pain and infection from tooth decay.
The FiCTION trial, the largest of its kind to date, also found that 450 children who took part in the study experienced tooth decay and pain, regardless of which kind of dental treatment they received.
Professor Nicola Innes, Chair of Paediatric Dentistry at the University of Dundee, said, “Our study shows that each way of treating decay worked to a similar level but that children with tooth decay at a young age have a high chance of experiencing toothache however the dentist manages the decay. From our trial, the best way to manage tooth decay is not by drilling it out or sealing it in, but it’s by preventing it in the first place.”
During the study, one of three treatment approaches was then chosen randomly for each child’s dental care for the duration of the trial for three years. The first approach aimed to prevent new decay by reducing sugar intake, ensuring twice-daily brushing with fluoride toothpaste (含氟牙膏). The second option involved drilling out tooth decay. For the third treatment strategy, tooth decay was sealed in to stop it progressing.
Of all three different ways of treating decay, sealing-in with preventive treatment was the most likely to be considered the best way of managing children’s decay if society is willing to pay a minimum of £130 to avoid an episode of pain or infection.
Professor Anne Maguire, Chair of Preventive Dentistry said, “The FiCTION findings have focused again on the need to prevent dental decay. The good news is that tooth decay can be prevented. Brushing your teeth with fluoride toothpaste, especially before bedtime, avoiding sugary drinks and snacks between meals and seeing a dentist regularly are all small habits that can help boost the overall health of your teeth.”
1. What does the underlined word “telling” in paragraph 1 mean?A.Popular. | B.Pessimistic. | C.Expensive. | D.Effective. |
A.Let tooth decay fall out naturally. |
B.Drill tooth decay out at the dentist’s. |
C.Prevent tooth decay as early as possible. |
D.Have conventional fillings to manage tooth decay. |
A.To use different ways. | B.To get precise findings. |
C.To explore other fields. | D.To analyse more reasons. |
A.We should take good care of our teeth. |
B.Children shouldn’t eat any snacks. |
C.The study’s findings may be one-sided. |
D.He will do further research on tooth decay. |
10 . Robotic surgery is one thing, but sending a robot inside the body to carry out an operation is quite another, which has long been a goal of some researchers to produce tiny robotic devices being capable of traveling through the body to deliver drugs or to make repairs without the need for a single cut, the possibility of which has just got a bit closer.
However, unlike the plot of one film—which featured a microscopic crew and submarine traveling through a scientist’s bloodstream—this device could not be inserted into blood vessels because it is too big. While other types of miniature swallowable robots have been developed in the past, their role has mostly been limited to capturing images inside the body. In a presentation this week to the International Conference, Daniela Rus and Shuhei Miyashita of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology described a robot they have developed that can be swallowed and used to collect dangerous objects accidentally taken in.
To test their latest version, Dr. Rus and Dr. Miyashita designed a robot as a battery hunter, which might seem to be an odd task, but more than 3,500 people in America alone, most of their children, swallow the tiny button cells used in small electronic devices by accident every year. To start with, the researchers created an artificial esophagus (食道) and stomach made out of silicone (硅胶). It was closely modeled on that found in a pig and filled with medical liquid; the robot itself is made from several layers of different materials, including pig intestine (肠), and contains a little magnet. This is folded up and wrapped in a 10 mm×27 mm capsule of ice. Once this reaches the stomach, the ice melts and the robot unfolds which is moved and guided with the use of a magnetic field outside the body. In their tests, the robot was able to touch a button battery and draw it with its own magnet, and during dragging it along, the robot could then be directed towards the intestines where it would eventually be gotten rid of through the anus (肛门). After it, the researchers sent in another robot loaded with medication to deliver it to the site of the battery burn to speed up healing.
The artificial stomach being transparent on one side, the researchers were able to see the batteries and visually control the robots. If not, that will require help from imaging system, which will be a bit more of a challenge, but Dr. Rus and Dr. Miyaslhita are determined to succeed.
1. According to the passage, the robot operation will probably be able to________.A.travel through a scientist’s bloodstream |
B.photograph the body to convey to the doctor |
C.enter the body to deliver drugs or make repairs |
D.operate on a person outside the body completely |
A.The researchers did the experiment on a chosen animal. |
B.Only one robot took drugs and magnet at the same time. |
C.Digesting the swallowed batteries is difficult for children. |
D.The actual size of the robot may be larger than the capsule of ice. |
A.The surgeries will cost patients much money. |
B.Patients will suffer less for some surgeries. |
C.Fewer children will swallow the button cells. |
D.A robot will be invented traveling blood vessels. |
A.To introduce a tiny robot designed to operate inside bodies. |
B.To show readers an experiment on robots. |
C.To explain robotic operations inside the body are unachievable. |
D.To advise patients to have robotic surgery to avoid a single cut. |