Can We Eat Meat Without Damaging the Environment?
“I’ve eaten meat my whole life, but the more I learn about our planet, the more I question how we treat it,” says Liz Bonnin at the start of the BBC documentary Meat: A Threat To Our Planet?.
“Unless we do things very differently,” says Liz, “the impact the meat industry has
Eat grass-fed meat
We actually need to eat more grass-fed meat, mainly beef and lamb. University of Oxford Professor Myles Allen has recalculated the amount of CH4 emissions from ruminants(反刍动物). The inference from this new research is that we don’t have to stop
Consider
There are responsible ways of eating meat. You can begin with knowing the farm your animal came from and what kind of life the animal
It’s important to ensure pastures are well-managed and not over-grazed(过度放牧). It’s almost possible to eat meat and be environmentally and socially conscious,
2 . The January fashion show, called Future Fashion, exemplified how far green design has come. Organized by the New York-based nonprofit Earth Pledge, the show inspired many top designers to work with sustainable fabrics for the first time. Several have since made pledges to include organic fabrics in their lines.
The designers who undertake green fashion still face many challenges. Scott Hahn, a cofounder with Gregory of Rogan and Loomstate, which uses all-organic cotton, says high-quality sustainable materials can still be tough to find. “Most designers with existing labels are finding there aren’t comparable materials that can just replace what you’re doing and what your customers are used to,” he says. For example, organic cotton and non-organic cotton are virtually indistinguishable once woven into a dress. But some popular synthetics, like stretch nylon, still have few eco-friendly equivalents.
Those who do make the switch are finding they have more support. Last year the influential trade show Designers & Agents stopped charging its participation fee for young green entrepreneurs who attend its two springtime shows in Los Angeles and New York and gave special recognition to designers whose collections are at least 25% sustainable. It now counts more than 50 green designers, up from fewer than a dozen two years ago. This week Wal-Mart is set to announce a major initiative aimed at helping cotton farmers go organic: it will buy transitional cotton at higher prices, thus helping to expand the supply of a key sustainable material. “Main-stream is about to occur,” says Hahn.
Some analysts are less sure. Among consumers, only 18% are even aware that eco-fashion exists, up from 6% four years ago. Natalie Hormilla, a fashion writer, is an example of the unconverted consumer. When asked if she owned any sustainable clothes, she replied, “Not that I’m aware of.” Like most consumers, she finds little time to shop, and when she does, she’s on the hunt for “cute stuff that isn’t too expensive.” By her own admission, green just isn’t yet on her mind. But thanks to the combined efforts of designers, retailers and suppliers—one day it will be.
1. What is said about Future Fashion?A.It inspired leading designers to start going green. |
B.It showed that designers using organic fabrics would go far. |
C.It served as an example of how fashion shows should be organized. |
D.It convinced the public that fashionable clothes should be made durable. |
A.much more time is needed to finish a dress using sustainable materials |
B.they have to create new brands for clothes made of organic materials |
C.customers have difficulty telling organic from non-organic materials |
D.quality organic replacements for synthetics are not readily available |
A.can attend various trade shows for free |
B.are readily recognized by the fashion world |
C.can buy organic cotton at favorable prices |
D.are gaining more and more support |
A.She doesn’t seem to care about it. |
B.She doesn’t think it is sustainable. |
C.She is doubtful of its practical value. |
D.She is opposed to the idea very much. |
3 . There’s more fresh water hidden below Earth’s surface in underground aquifers (含水层) than any other source besides the ice sheets. That groundwater earns an unshakably important place for rivers worldwide, keeping them running even when droughts bring their waters low.
But in recent decades humans have pumped trillions of gallons out of those underground reservoirs. In a new research, water experts and scientists are taking a global look at where groundwater is already being extracted at such a rate that it has caused water levels to drop so much in rivers and streams that they will slip into the ecological danger zone.
Much of that water is being removed much faster than it can be refilled. That has enormous potential consequences for people and crops in areas that don’t get enough rain. But far before those impacts emerge, the effects will fiercely hit rivers, streams, and the habitats around them. Hundreds of rivers and streams around the world would become so water-stressed that the entire ecological system would hit a danger point, says Inge de Graaf, the lead author of the research. “We can really consider this ecological effect like a ticking time bomb,” she says. “If we pump the groundwater now, we don’t see the impacts until like 10 years further or even longer.”
But the severity of the impacts might still be underestimated. As a baseline, they used the global water demand in 2010 and spun their climate model forward to predict how stresses on groundwater systems might develop. But as populations swell and the demand for food rises, those stresses could skyrocket for reasons other than climate change, speeding along the extraction from underground water sources.
The effects of over-pumping groundwater take years, if not decades, to become visible. Changes in rain have immediate, obvious effects on river flow. When it pours, rivers often rage. But groundwater is hidden and changes don’t always manifest in the place where the pumping occurs and are programmed to “wait for the perfect moment”. That makes aquifer management issues extra challenging. In the meantime, rivers and streams are the signal that says we’re using water in an unsustainable fashion, we need to take a hard look at what we’re doing.”.
1. The underground water is of critical importance to rivers due to the fact that ________.A.it helps to maintain the same water level of rivers |
B.it stops the running of rivers during dry spells |
C.it leaves rivers drying out due to droughts |
D.it ensures the flow of rivers throughout the year |
A.it is thrilling to explore the ecological danger zone |
B.pumping underground water is convenient though dangerous |
C.the underground water level has dropped to an alarming level |
D.the constant drop of water level prevents people feeling secure |
A.Because the water demand data in 2010 was not accurate. |
B.Because the water demand has soared ever since 2010. |
C.Because the water demand was not stressful in 2010. |
D.Because the water demand prediction didn’t consider climate change. |
A.the changes are waiting for a heavy rain |
B.underground water is used sustainably |
C.the changes take longer to come to light |
D.underground water is inexhaustible |
Sustainable fashion, also called eco fashion, is part of the growing design philosophy and trend of sustainability, the goal of which is to create a system which can be supported indefinitely in
There are some organizations
According to Earth Pledge, a non-profit organization (NPO), nothing can better
Acid rain is now a familiar problem in the industrialized countries in Europe. Harmful gases like Sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide are produced by power stations and cars.
Acid rain is also capable of dissolving some rocks and buildings made of soft rock, such as limestone, are particularly badly affected. The acid rain attacks the rock, and so carvings and statues are worn away more quickly.
The acid rain is said to be caused by pollution from oil wells in the Gulf of Mexico. Car exhaust gases are also a problem. Local volcanic eruption make the problem even worse. Nevertheless, with enough money and effort, researchers say that many of the problems could be solved and the rate of dissolving reduced.
Mexico’s current lack of funds is also partly due to oil. The country has rich oil field and a few years ago, when oil was expensive, Mexico was selling large quantities of oil to the USA and earning a lot of money. The government was therefore able to borrow huge sums of money from banks around the world, thinking they would have no problem repaying their debts. However, the price of oil then dropped, and Mexico has been left owing enormous sums of money and with not enough income from oil sales to pay back the loans.
A.However, the Mexican government does not have enough money to do the work, and needs to spend what money it has on the Mexican people. |
B.That is enough to have caused some of the ancient carvings to become seriously damaged already. |
C.So unless the price of rises, it is unlikely that Mexican will be able to afford to clean up the pollution and save its Mayan ruins from destruction. |
D.These measures would reduce the pollution, but would not stop it completely. |
E.The problem, however, is not a European one. |
F.They dissolve in rainwater and this makes acid rain, which damages trees, rivers and streams. |
A. alarming B. properties C. revealed D. invasive E. rescue F. instrumental G. households H. document I. concerned J. amateur K. initiatives |
Before science became professionalized in the 19th century,
Volunteers and enthusiasts can be powerful drivers for big changes. On the Isle of Man, more than 8,000 people (nearly 10% of the population) are involved in regular weekend beach cleans. At one recent event, 123 volunteers turned up and removed 183 bags of litter in just a couple of hours. Thanks to
Recreational divers are making a real difference underwater too. They monitor the spread of
Volunteers and enthusiasts can be powerful drivers for big changes. No one can know better, or care more about, our most special places than the people who live in them and give up their free time to look after them. As a group of divers and
World leaders get some face-to-face time at the U.N. climate summit
Sometimes in diplomacy, the sideline(副业) is where all the action is. That was the case at the
The threat of terrorism
8 . Living in an urban area with green spaces has a long-lasting positive impact on people’s mental well-being, a study has suggested. UK researchers found moving to a green space had a sustained positive effect, unlike pay rises or promotions, which only provided a short-term boost.
Co-author Mathew White, from the University of Exeter, UK, explained that the study showed people living in greener urban areas were displaying fewer signs of depression or anxiety. “There could be a number of reason,” he said, “for example, people do many things to make themselves happier: they strive of promotion or pay rises, or they get married. But the trouble with those thins is that with those things is that within six months to a year, people are back to their original baseline levels of well-being. So, these things are not sustainable; they don’t make us happy in the long term. We found that for some lottery winners who had won more than £500,000 the positive effect was definitely there, but after six months to a year, they were back to the baseline.”
Dr. White said his team wanted to see whether living in greener urban areas had a lasting positive effect on people’s sense of well-being or whether the effect also disappeared after a period of time. To do this, the team used data from the British Household Panel Survey compiled by the University of Essex.
Explaining what the data revealed, he said: “What you see is that even after three years, mental health is still better, which is unlike many other things that we think will make us happy.” He observed that people living in green spaces were less stressed, and less stressed people made more sensible decisions and communicated better.
With a growing body of evidence establishing a link between urban green spaces and a positive impact on human well-being, Dr. White said, “There’s growing interest among public policy officials, but the trouble is who funds it. What we really need at a policy level is to decide where the money will come from to help support good quality local green spaces.”
1. According to one study, what do green spaces do to people?A.Improve their work efficiency. |
B.Add to their sustained happiness. |
C.Help them build a positive attitude towards life. |
D.Lessen their concerns about material well-being. |
A.How it affects different people. |
B.How strong its positive effect is. |
C.How long its positive effect lasts. |
D.How it benefits people physically. |
A.Their stress was more apparent than real. |
B.Their decisions required less deliberation. |
C.Their memories were greatly strengthened. |
D.Their communication with others improved. |
A.Find financial support. |
B.Improve urban planning. |
C.Involve local residents in the effort. |
D.Raise public awareness of the issue. |
9 . Escaping predators (食肉动物), digestion and other animal activities—including those of humans—require oxygen. But that essential ingredient is no longer so easy for marine life to obtain, several new studies reveal.
In the past decade ocean oxygen levels have taken a dive—an alarming trend that is linked to climate change, says Andreas Oschlies, an oceanographer at the Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research in Germany, whose team tracks ocean oxygen levels worldwide. “We were surprised by the intensity of the changes we saw, how rapidly oxygen is going down in the ocean and how large the effects on marine ecosystems are,” he says. It is no surprise to scientists that warming oceans are losing oxygen, but the scale of the drop calls for urgent attention. Oxygen levels in some tropical (热带的) regions have dropped by an astonishing 40 percent in the last 50 years, some recent studies reveal. Levels have dropped less significantly elsewhere, with an average loss of 2 percent globally.
A warming ocean loses oxygen for two reasons: First, the warmer a liquid becomes, the less gas it can hold. That is why carbonated drinks go flat faster when left in the sun. Second, as polar sea ice melts, it forms a layer of water above colder, more salty sea waters. This process creates a sort of lid that can keep currents from mixing surface water down to deeper depths. And because all oxygen enters the surface, less mixing means less of it at depth.
Ocean animals large and small, however, respond to even slight changes in oxygen by seeking refuge in higher oxygen zones or by adjusting behavior, Oschlies and others in his field have found. These adjustments can expose animals to new predators or force them into food-scarce regions. Climate change already poses serious problems for marine life, such as ocean acidification, but deoxygenation is the most pressing issue facing sea animals today, Oschlies says. After all, he says, “they all have to breathe.”
Aside from food web problems, animals face various other physiological challenges as their bodies adjust to lower oxygen levels. Chinese shrimp (虾) move their tails less vigorously to preserve energy in lower oxygen environments. Some creatures, such as jellyfishes, are more tolerant of low oxygen than others are. But all animals will feel the impact of deoxygenation because they all have evolved their oxygen capacity for a reason, says Oschlies. “Any drop in oxygen is going to damage survivability and performance,” he says.
1. According to the first two paragraphs, what worries scientists the most?A.The worsening deoxygenation in the warming ocean. |
B.The survival of predators and various marine animals. |
C.The alarmingly changeable oxygen levels in the ocean. |
D.The lack of attention to the warming of tropical oceans. |
A.Polar ice melting consumes much oxygen in the ocean. |
B.Global warming reduces the amount of oxygen in the air. |
C.The surface polar ice water prevents oxygen going down. |
D.Salty water holds less gas in the increasingly warmer ocean. |
A.Ocean deoxygenation changes some animals’ natural territories. |
B.Ocean acidification is more serious a problem than deoxygenation. |
C.Not all ocean animals are bothered by the decreasing oxygen levels. |
D.Some animals reduce their movements in order to absorb more oxygen. |
A.The Oxygen Levels of Marine Life | B.Ocean Warming Affects Food Web |
C.The Survivability of Ocean Animals | D.The Ocean Is Running Out of Breath |