1 . The older you are, the less likely you are to swear (except in the car—studies say most people swear when driving). As we get older, swearing becomes part of the rich lexicon of language that we use to express ourselves, and while we might associate swear words with negative communication. Only eight percent of people actually swear to cause offence. “There are many other reasons that we swear, including positive uses like expressing excitement, emphasis.” says Dr Karyn Stapleton, a senior lecturer in Communication at Ulster University. “And there’s cathartic (宣泄的) swearing, which provides a means of releasing strong emotions, or feelings like anger, pain or frustration.”
Cathartic swearing fascinates scientists as it shows some really interesting facts about bad language. Studies at the UK’s Keele University revealed that when under stress, a person can think of considerably more swear words than someone asked to do the same task when relaxed, and it’s now suspected that rather than being controlled by the normal part of the brain that handles language (the left cortex), swear words are actually processed by the limbic (边缘的) system that normally controls emotional thoughts. Be warned though—the more you swear in general speech, the less effective the cathartic effects of swear words are when you really need them!
What makes a word offensive is also very interesting. “The two main categories of swear words are bodily functions and religion—and that’s not just in English, it’s observed across many languages,” says Dr Robbie Love, lecturer in English Language at Aston University in Birmingham. “It’s like the brain has encoded these words with a special meaning so that it knows they are different in some way. I think there’s almost an innate human need to have some linguistic items that can be used to process intense moments.”
Generally though, we’re swearing less than we used to. Dr Love’s research found the use of 16 common swear words has declined by 27 percent over the last 20 years. According to a survey by the British Board of Film Classification, only 12 percent of those aged 55-64 swear regularly compared to 46 percent of 20-somethings. “It’s possible that as we get older we might have fewer uses for swearing. We don’t need it to bond with coworkers. Also, older adults have often had to spend some time restraining their language around children—no matter how our own feelings about swearing change, we still don’t want to expose children to it,” says Dr Love.
1. What can we learn from the first paragraph?A.People swear more easily as they get older. | B.People swear merely to release negative emotion. |
C.Swearing often offends others. | D.Swearing is a way of expressing ourselves. |
A.person can think less swear words in relaxation than in pressure. |
B.Swear words come from the brain system that controls emotional thought. |
C.Bodily functions and religion are two types of swear words just in English. |
D.People swearing more in daily life may not release their emotions well on necessary occasions. |
A.Helpful | B.Offensive | C.Special | D.Indifferent |
A.Young people swear in order to connect with their coworkers. |
B.Older people may swear less to create better language setting for children. |
C.There are fewer swear words people use. |
D.People swear less than they used to. |
2 . Wang Xiaojun is twelve years old. He lives in the country in Hunan. Today is his birthday. His parents prepare a nice dinner for him, but the boy says, “I won’t have the dinner, today is over, and my parents are going to Shenzhen tomorrow. I don’t want to let them go.”
Wang Xiaojun has the birthday with his parents for the first time in the past three years. Three years ago, his parents went to Shenzhen to work. They stayed and worked there for three years. Tomorrow they have to go back to Shenzhen. Wang is not the only stay-at-home child. In the country of China, there are many children staying at home without their parents. Stay-at -home children have a lot of problems. Most of them stay with their grandparents. Some of them don’t study well because their parents can’t help them with their study. The Chinese government (政府) now is trying to solve their problems.
1. When was Wang Xiaojun born?A.In 2010. | B.In 2011. | C.In 2012. | D.In 2013. |
A.there isn’t a birthday cake | B.the food isn’t delicious |
C.his parents are going to Shenzhen tomorrow | D.he doesn’t like the dinner |
A.爱家儿童 | B.顽皮儿童 | C.留守儿童 | D.离家儿童 |
A.don’t study well | B.don’t like to stay with parents |
C.don’t love their parents | D.don’t have dinner with their parents |
A.There are a lot of children like Wang Xiaojun in China. |
B.The Chinese government is trying to solve these problems. |
C.Wang Xiaojun’s parents go to Shenzhen to make money. |
D.Stay-at-home children don’t have any problems. |
popular know like difficulty course their how ability early get new |
Social media posts (上传) about a cooking
According to a(n)
Many people
4 . Paris mayor Anne Hidalgo has long worked to make her city less dependent on cars. She wanted to see more people using bicycles to get around. Over a number of years, the city government set limits on cars and increased the amount of bike paths from 200 kilometers to over 1,000 kilometers.
This year, Parisians are not complaining about too much automobile traffic. Instead, they say there are too many bikes. “Now, it’s really like a bike traffic jam(阻塞),” Thibault Quere, a spokesperson for France’s Federation of Bicycle Users, said. ”It’s kind of a good difficulty to have, especially when we think about what Paris used to be.”
Some famous roads along the River Seine are completely closed to cars. Now you see people riding bikes, running and walking with their families along the river. In another part of Paris, a bike path on Sebastopol Boulevard is one of the busiest in Europe, after opening in 2019. In one week in early September, it reached a record high of 124,000 riders.
The city will host the Summer Olympics in 2024 and plans to add more bike paths by then. Paris wants to reduce its pollution by half during the games, even as visitors from around the world will be in the city for the event. Organizers say all of the competition sites will be reachable by bike through a 60-kilometer network of bike paths.
The change to Paris, however, has not been easy. With more people using bikes, more people are making mistakes. Some of them are new to cycling and disobey traffic rules. But the environment may be improving. Cycling is good exercise and helps reduce pollution, which is still a problem for the large city. The French government blames atmospheric pollution for 48,000 early deaths in the country each year.
Hidalgo was re-elected in 2020 and plans to keep making what she calls a “Paris that breathes”. Her newest five-year bike plan includes over $250 million for more bike paths and bike parking. The new budget is an increase of over $100 million from her first five-year plan.
1. What can be learned from the second paragraph?A.Hidalgo’s effort has paid off. | B.Parisians prefer to travel by car. |
C.Parisians find it difficult to ride bikes. | D.Quere disagrees with Hidalgo. |
A.To compare the famous roads in France. |
B.To praise people enjoying riding bicycles. |
C.To stress the importance of France in Europe. |
D.To show how busy a cycle path is in Paris. |
A.Tour local bike shops. | B.Ride to competition sites. |
C.Promote the sights in France. | D.Support the athletes around the world. |
A.Friendly. | B.Helpful. | C.Determined. | D.Honest. |
5 . In the days before the Internet, critical thinking was the most important skill of informed citizens. But in the digital age, according to Anastasia Kozyreva, a psychologist at the Max Planck Institute of Human Development, and her colleagues, an even more important skill is critical ignoring.
As the researchers point out, we live in an attention economy where content producers on the Internet compete for our attention. They attract us with a lot of emotional and eye-catching stories while providing little useful information, so they can expose us to profit-generating advertisements. Therefore,we are no longer customers but products, and each link we click is a sale of our time and attention. Toprotect ourselves from this, Kozyreva advocates for learning the skill of critical ignoring, in which readers intentionally control their information environment to reduce exposure to false and low-quality information.
According to Kozyreva, critical ignoring comprises three strategies. The first is to design ourenvironments, which involves the removal of low-quality yet hard-to-resist information from around. Successful dieters need to keep unhealthy food out of their homes. Likewise, we need to set up a digital environment where attention-grabbing items are kept out of sight. As with dieting, if one tries to bank onwillpower not to click eye-catching “news”, he’ll surely fail. So, it’s better to just keep them out of sightto begin with.
The next is to evaluate the reliability of information, whose purpose is to protect you from false and misleading information. It can be realized by checking the source in the mainstream news agencies which have their reputations for being trustworthy.
The last goes by the phrase “do not feed the trolls.” Trolls are actors who internationally spread false and hurtful information online to cause harm. It may be appealing to respond to them to set the facts straight, but trolls just care about annoying others rather than facts. So, it’s best not to reward their bad behaviour with our attention.
By sharpening our critical ignoring skills in these ways, we can make the most of the Internet while avoiding falling victim to those who try to control our attention, time, and minds.
1. What can we learn about the attention economy from paragraph 2?A.It offers little information. | B.It features depressing stories. |
C.It saves time for Internet users. | D.It seeks profits from each click. |
A.To discuss the quality of information |
B.To prove the benefits of healthy food. |
C.To show the importance of environments. |
D.To explain the effectiveness of willpower. |
A.Reveal their intention. | B.Turn a deaf ear to them. |
C.Correct their behaviour. | D.Send hard facts to them. |
A.Reasons for critical thinking in the attention economy. |
B.Practising the skill of critical ignoring in the digital age. |
C.Maximizing the benefits of critical ignoring on the Internet. |
D.Strategies of abandoning critical thinking for Internet users |
6 . A competition about Versailles literature (凡尔赛文学) was carried out on Sina Weibo recently. So what is Versailles literature?
The psychology behind humblebragging is to be recognized for one’s successes and be liked by others at the same time, according to scholars.
“
So, how can we annoy humblebraggers back? “Just pretend you don’t get whatever it is they try to show off,” a netizen advised. “
A.And respond with sincere pity for their complaints. |
B.Having too many houses, how can I decide which one to decorate? |
C.I’m fed up with living in the countryside with no shopping malls around. |
D.The key factor that makes the two groups of people different is sincerity. |
E.Actually, the term has nothing to do with the French palace or with literature. |
F.However, studies show that humblebragging as a self-promotion strategy does not work. |
G.The intention is to show off things of materialistic values, yet pretending that’s not the point. |
7 . Is it shi(是) or si(斯) in the sentence “Thus when Heaven is about to confer a great office on any man(故天将降大任于是/斯人也)…”? Not long ago, people had a heated discussion online about this. Most people “clearly remember” that it’s si, while their childhood textbooks say it’s shi.
It shows how unreliable(不可靠的) our memory can be. According to US psychologist Faith Brynie, memories can be influenced by imagination, belief and time. Many studies have proven that “feeling certain” about a memory sometimes has nothing to do with the facts.
Attitudes and beliefs change our memory.
Scientists at Cornell University, US, told college students a story about a man who walked out without paying a restaurant bill. The first group was told that the man “liked to steal”. The second group was told that he left because he got an emergency(紧急的) phone call.
One week later the first group remembered a higher bill-10 to 25 percent more than the bill actually was. The second group remembered a lower bill. The study showed that how we expect or believe things to happen can distort(扭曲) our memories.
Remembering things that never happened
In another experiment(实验), people watched a film and were asked: “How fast was the white car going when it passed the barn(谷仓) while traveling along the country road?”Actually there was no barn in the film. But about 20 percent of the students said they had seen the barn. Northwestern University scientist Kenneth Paller said that parts of the brain for really seeing an object and imagining an object overlap(重叠). So imagination after getting a hint(暗示) could leave a memory trace(痕迹) in the brain.
Si or shi
In the case of si or shi, some people said that si sounds more like ancient Chinese. That’s why most people relate it to the ancient classic. On the Internet, the version(版本) of si is also more widespread than shi, giving people a wrong hint.
1. In the first experiment, the first group remembered a higher bill because ________.A.the students forgot the bill completely. |
B.the students thought the man was rich enough. |
C.the scientists made the students believe the man was bad. |
D.the scientists told the students that the man should pay more. |
A.The sights in the film. | B.Kenneth Paller’s words. |
C.The word “barn” in the question. | D.A real barn in students’ memories. |
A.Feelings can decide people’s memories. | B.The version of shi is more widespread. |
C.People’s memories are always unreliable. | D.There was no sound of shi in ancient Chinese. |
A.Are you really sure? | B.Have you forgotten yet? |
C.What should be remembered? | D.How is the memory improved? |
place ride however with after deal bravely better feel remind different |
Located in one of Beijing’s most active art communities, the Loneliness (孤独) Museum is always very crowded.
People may get used to loneliness as they get older
Luckily, our society is more tolerant (宽容的) towards this kind of young group, often encouraging them to face this crazy changing world
9 . Regarding the increasing rate of childhood obesity in the U.S., the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended that doctors put obese kids as young as two on intensive, family-based lifestyle and behavior plans. It also suggested giving weight-loss drugs and surgery to children. Yet the recommended lifestyle programs are expensive and hard to maintain.
Rather than that, we need to invest in more and safer places for children to play. Studies show clearly that moving more helps both physical and mental health. In 2020 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found, unsurprisingly, that kids’ sports participation increases with their parents’ incomes.
Children between 6 and 17 should get at least an hour of physical activity every day. Yet only 21% to 28% of U.S. kids meet this target, surveys found. Why is it so hard to get kids moving? In addition to fewer opportunities at school, researchers list increased screen time, changing norms around letting kids play outdoors, and a lack of safe places for them to play outside. Lower-income neighborhoods tend to have the fewest public play spaces. And although rural areas have more undeveloped outdoor space, they often lack playgrounds, tracks and exercise facilities.
Kids everywhere need more places to play: trails, skate parks and climbing walls, gardens and ball fields, bike paths and basketball courts. Public funding to build and keep up these areas is crucial, but other options such as shared-use agreements can make unused spaces available to the public. Only 10 percent of U.S. schools let people into their playgrounds when school is out, the Trust for Public Land (TPL) found, and opening up these spaces would give 5.2 million more children access. “Play streets”— residential streets or parking lots that are temporarily closed for activities — are another affordable way to give kids more chances to run around.
These opportunities aren’t about changing children’s waistlines — they’re how we keep childhood healthy and fun.
1. What does AAP suggest about dealing with obese children?A.Training them on the basis of the family. |
B.Providing more safe playgrounds for them. |
C.Setting aside regular school time for sports. |
D.Finding ways to increase their parents’ incomes. |
A.Their studies take up most of their normal lives. |
B.They spend more time on mobiles or computers. |
C.They have drugs as an alternative to stay healthy. |
D.They’re not admitted to undeveloped outdoor space. |
A.They are a necessary part of sports facilities. |
B.They are all lent to the public on agreements. |
C.They can’t run smoothly for lack of public fund. |
D.They’re mostly inaccessible when school is off. |
A.They’re set to reduce childhood obesity. |
B.They call for government’s joined efforts. |
C.They’ll make children’s life full of fun. |
D.They work best with kids in “play streets”. |
10 . Two climate activists made for a beautiful Monet painting exhibited at the National Museum in Sweden on a recent Wednesday morning, gluing (粘) a hand to the artwork’s protective glass and putting it in red paint. Similar scenes have unfolded at more than a dozen museums over the last year, leaving cultural workers at a loss for how to prevent climate activists from targeting delicate artworks. Meanwhile, the costs for security, conservation and insurance are growing, according to cultural institutions that have experienced attacks.
Cultural institutions are attempting to be active when their budgets allow. At the Metropolitan Museum of Art, more security has been added to certain exhibitions. Returning a painting to its former glory after attacks can require hours of careful conservation work, and expensive glass cannot prevent liquids from getting through the protective barrier.
The number of workers required to clean a painting like the Monet is big, with about 10 people working for a couple of days. But there are limited options for a state-run museum to prevent an attack. “An extreme consequence would be to close the museum,” said Hedstrom from the National Museum, though that was unrealistic, since the collection belongs to the Swedish public.
Last month, Joanna and Tim were charged for damaging an exhibit at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, after they put paint on the case surrounding the fragile sculpture of “Little Dancer” in April. Each charge carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison and fines of up to $250,000. It was seen as a turning point, while climate activists have called the sentence unjust. “We didn’t mean to rampage anything in the museums but call for people to think about what they value on Earth,” Joanna said. Kaywin, the National Gallery’s director, said she appreciated the work done by the authorities to bring these serious charges. “What on earth does Degas’s ‘Little Dancer’ have to do with climate change? Of course, the answer is nothing,” she said.
1. What accounts for the activists’ actions at the museum?A.Destroying the valueless paintings. |
B.Exposing paintings to the public. |
C.Expressing their climate concern. |
D.Testing the security of the museums. |
A.Further actions will include losing the museums. |
B.It’s not practical to close the museums for safety. |
C.The museums aren’t to blame for the climate crisis. |
D.The government should cover the cost of the repair. |
A.Ear. | B.Avoid. | C.Promote. | D.Destroy |
A.The artwork has nothing to do with climate crisis. |
B.The activists shouldn’t be punished for their action. |
C.The activists should protect the valuable artworks. |
D.Activists and museums can join hands in protection. |