1 . People in Paris, France are growing concerned about a problem that has worried people for centuries: bedbugs, which are small, flat insects that live in beds and other places.
With more and more reports of bedbugs being found, the French government is worried about the problem. Millions of people will be traveling to Paris this summer for the 2024 Olympics. France doesn’t want the country to leave a bad impression by letting its visitors get bitten by bedbugs. No one likes bedbugs, but it’s important to remember that they can be upsetting and leave itchy bites behind, but they do not spread diseases. They’ve been around for thousands of years, and even found in old Egyptian tombs.
After World War II, people began using dangerous chemicals to kill them, which caused bedbugs and many other pests to become much less common. But in the past 20 or 30 years, bedbugs have become common again. For one thing, now many bedbugs aren’t affected by most of the chemicals that used to kill them. Some people think that the bedbugs that are left may be ones that the chemicals don’t work on. For another, people are traveling more these days. Bedbugs can hide in tiny spaces, including inside suitcases. When people bring their suitcases to new places, bedbugs can spread to new areas — or from those areas back home.
In France, bedbugs are a long-standing problem. Jean-Michel Berenger, a scientist who studies insects in Marseille, says, “Every late summer we see a big increase in bedbugs.” That’s mainly from people returning after traveling. And now, in addition to reports of bedbugs in hotels and apartments, there’re also reports of them being found in other places: on seats at movie theaters, on long-distance trains, on the Paris subway, and at the country’s busiest airport. French officials are making sure Paris’ apartments, along with hotels and other places where tourists stay, are safe and clean.
1. Why does the French government start dealing with bedbugs?A.They are spreading diseases. | B.They may affect a big event. |
C.They bite more and more people. | D.They exist in France for too long. |
A.The places where bedbugs often live. | B.The ways that bedbugs travel globally. |
C.The reasons why bedbugs come back. | D.The fact that bedbugs beat chemicals. |
A.Bedbugs can be easily got rid of. |
B.The bedbug problem is getting worse and worse. |
C.Bedbugs live mainly in hotels and apartments. |
D.The number of bedbugs decreases sharply in late summer. |
A.A local newspaper. | B.A travel brochure. |
C.A sports magazine. | D.A research report. |
2 . My grandparents were always busy with food. My grandmother could pull out the feathers of a chicken in less than half an hour. They picked vegetables from their garden. Animal fat was saved.
It took hours and made my fingers hurt. After an adult life spent buying rather than growing food, as a so-called new farmer, I finally began to understand my grandparents.
My grandparents’ generation spent a third of their income on food.
But until I began talking to the farmers around me, I had not understood the human costs faced by those asked to produce milk sold for less than bottled water.
Research has found that regenerative farming not only benefits the land, but profits can be 78% higher than conventional farms.
A.We spend less than a tenth. |
B.And any leftover meat was cut up for pies. |
C.Regenerative farming is welcomed by thousands of farmers now. |
D.I began to understand the work that we took for granted. |
E.I realized that keeping a big family was really a big burden for them. |
F.New technology helped these farmers raise a diversity of crops and farm animals. |
G.Then I came across a farming reform that sought to change this traditional system. |
3 .
Some adults worry that you’re more interested in the screen in front of you than the world around you.
A.Other adults worry that today’s youth are spoilt (宠坏的) and don’t want to face the challenges of adult life. |
B.If you’re reading this, you were probably born in the 2000s. The oh-ohs. |
C.today’s youth seem to prefer to live like teenagers even when they are in their 20s or 30s. |
D.They think of you as the “face-down generation” |
E.But what do other people think about your generation? |
4 . A pen has always been an important tool when we are taking exams. However, in the digital age, this traditional tool may become a thing of the past. Cambridge University in Britain is considering ending 800 years of written exams and allowing students to use laptops or iPads to take exams instead. The move comes after Cambridge teachers complained (抱怨) that students’ handwriting is becoming too hard to recognize. The fall in writing clearly depends on laptops in lessons and elsewhere.
As a result, more and more students with poor handwriting are being forced to return to university during the summer holidays to read their answers aloud to their teachers. However, some criticized (批评) the move, fearing the handwritten word would become a lost art.
Tracey Trussell, a handwriting expert, asked Cambridge to “make sure that students continue to write by hand, particularly in lessons”. She told The Telegraph that writing by hand could help students improve their memory and understand lessons better.
The move also draws the attention of Harvard professor Eric Mazur. He believes that the rise of mobile Internet use means that we live in an age in which we don’t need to remember anything.
So he encourages students to bring their laptops and mobile phones into exams. With them, students can “look up whatever they want, whenever they want” and be tested on their productive skills, rather than the ability of memory.
1. Why is Cambridge University considering ending written exams?A.Because we are already in the digital age. |
B.Because students’ handwriting is too poor. |
C.Because traditional tools are out of date. |
D.Because writing on laptops is faster. |
A.The end of written exams. | B.Students’ returning to university. |
C.The rise of mobile Internet use. | D.Bringing mobile phones into exams. |
A.Unfavorable. | B.Uncaring. |
C.Doubtful. | D.Supportive. |
5 . From teenage to adulthood, you go through a basket of changes—graduation, jobs and relationships that come and go. But as you grow older, does your personality change? Personality is the pattern of thoughts, feelings and behaviors unique to a person.
People tend to think of personality as fixed. But that is not how it works. “Personality is a developmental phenomenon instead of something that you’re stuck with and can’t get over.” said Brent Roberts, a psychologist at the University of Illinois.
Roberts and other researchers have surveyed the personalities of participants regularly over man years, showing that our personality is actually stable within each decade of life. You don’t notice it on a 1-to-5-year time range, but in the long term, it becomes pronounced.
In 1960, psychologists surveyed over 440, 000 high school students who answered questions about everything from how they reacted to emotion at situations to how efficiently they got work done. Fifty years later, researchers tracked down 1,952 of these students and gave them the same survey. The results found that in their 60s, participants scored much higher than they did as teenagers on questions measuring calmness, self-confidence, leadership and social sensitivity.
Again and again, studies have found similar results. Personality tends to get “better” over time. Psychologists name it “the maturity principle”. People become more extroverted, emotionally stable, agreeable and gentle as they grow older. Some individuals might change less than others, but in general, “the maturity principle” applies to everyone.
So what causes the change? Evidence suggests it’s not dramatic life events, such as marriage, the birth of a child or loss of a loved one. Instead, changing expectations placed on us—as we adjust to university, the work force, starting a family—slowly wear us in, almost like a pair of shoes, Roberts said. “Over time, you are asked to do things differently and thus learn how to behave in these situations.” So we adapt.
1. What has Roberts found about personality according to the passage?A.It is a stable phenomenon. |
B.It changes on a daily basis. |
C.It is a fixed patter of thoughts. |
D.It develops gradually as we age. |
A.By classifying the facts. | B.By making comparisons. |
C.By giving various examples. | D.By quoting previous researches. |
A.An approachable and stable character. |
B.A calm and self-centered personality. |
C.A successful and extraordinary career. |
D.An unusual and emotional sensitivity. |
A.Additional expectations are placed on us. |
B.Dramatic life events have happened to us. |
C.We gradually adapt to different life situations. |
D.It is stressful to behave ourselves in adulthood. |
6 . Sores Duman is a normal 29-year-old. Later in the week he will see an action movie with his mate Piebe. Before that, he may go to McDonald’s with Martey, another friend. It might take more time than usual for his friends to get ready for these activities. Piebe is 79 and Martey 94. Does Sores think his weekend plans are strange? “No, I do similar things with friends of my own age. I don’t see the difference in age as an obstacle (障碍).”
Mr. Duman lives at the Humanitas care home in Deventer, Holland. His housemates’ average age is over 85. He lives there with ten other students and around 150 elderly residents. They are part of a project that provides them with free housing in exchange for 30 hours per month living as a “good neighbour”.
Both parties appear to benefit from the programme. Mr. Duman estimates that he has saved over €10,000 per year in rent. He claims that living in a care home has not affected his university experience. “We have big parties here.” he says, “we host things from chess games to yoga classes.” In a promotional video, one resident calls the project gezelling a Dutch word that roughly translates as homelike: “Now and then they put me into the walker and race me through the hall,” she explains.
Such projects could help fight against loneliness, an increasing problem across the rich world. I goes hand in hand with social isolation(隔离). Nearly half of Britons over the age of 65 say that television or pets are their main form of company. Loneliness is also said to have serious health consequences: a study from 2015 found that lonely people had on average a 26% higher risk of dying in its seven-year study period than those who were not lonely. And the problem may get worse as social isolation is becoming more common. Creating a space for the elderly to mingle with youngsters can lift spirits—and help cash-strapped millennials (千禧一代).
1. How does Mr. Duman feel about his present life?A.Dull. | B.Content. | C.Strange. | D.Special. |
A.Rough. | B.Beneficial. | C.Comfortable. | D.Promotional. |
A.Various activities are held in the care home. |
B.Mr. Duman is required to live with 150 elderly people. |
C.Mr. Duman pays over €10,000 per year for the rent. |
D.It helps to fight against the loneliness of British elders. |
A.Care—Hold up the Blue Sky of the Elderly |
B.Live with the Old to Enrich Your College Life |
C.A Win-win Project—Housing Students with the Old |
D.Loneliness—the Number One Killer of the Old-aged |
7 . Music streaming platforms (平台) such as Spotify and Apple Music have completely changed how people listen to music nowadays. By paying very affordable prices, people can access music very easily. However, while these platforms may provide benefits for some artists, up-and-coming artists are being left behind because they only focus on big names and creating profits.
Because of COVID-19, musicians have not been able to tour or perform live in many countries, which contributes to a large part of their income. In a YouTube interview, up-and-coming Texas artist Mobey mentioned that “The majority of my income comes from playing live shows. Usually that means around 50% — 70% of what we expect to make in a year”. With these factors, small artists are finding it increasingly difficult to make it in the industry due to the lack of investment (投资) into new talent.
Small artists on Spotify and Apple Music can expect to make little to nothing. An artist on Spotify can expect to earn an average of $0.003 per stream or around $3 per 1,000 streams for one of their songs. On Apple Music, artists can expect to make a little more with an average of $0.01 per stream, or around $10 with 1,000 streams. Even if they could hit around 1,000 streams, they have to pay music distribution (分发) platforms needed for their music to be shown on the streaming platforms such as DistroKid, whose cheapest plan is $20.
A new artist would find it very difficult to promote their music outside of their social media accounts which may not even have a large amount of followers. They probably cannot get large amounts of streams on their music since it is not being promoted due to the lack of exposure (宣传) they have on social media.
With the takeover of music streaming platforms, many artists are finding it increasingly difficult to make a sustainable (可持续的) living from their love for music. A simple way these platforms can enable new artists to keep making music is to increase their payouts per stream for their music. Hopefully the music streaming industry will make similar changes to improve the situation of their artists.
1. What is the problem with music streaming platforms?A.They ignore small artists. | B.They are not user-friendly. |
C.They are very difficult to manage. | D.They limit the number of small artists’ songs. |
A.His lack of investment. | B.His total income in a year. |
C.The main source of his income. | D.The reason for his fewer live shows. |
A.How a music streaming platform works. |
B.Small artists’ hope for music streaming platforms. |
C.Small artists’ dislike for music streaming platforms. |
D.Why small artists earn little on music streaming platforms. |
A.Music streaming platforms: Do they really put profits first? |
B.Music streaming platforms: Are they a chance or challenge to artists? |
C.Music streaming platforms: Have they harmed the industry for artists? |
D.Music streaming platforms: Could they offer music lovers better services? |
8 . The topic “slash youth”, referring to those refusing to be defined or bound by just one personal identity and choosing to undertake multiple careers, has fueled heated debate on social media. On Douban, a Chinese social networking platform, the topic has attracted about 11,000posts and has been viewed over 400 million times. China’s young people are keen to share their slash youth stories online, presenting themselves as multiple and sometimes distinct identities, such as a nurse and model, a teacher and stand-up comedian, and an engineer and musician.
Xing Eryang, a 31-year-old female resident in Beijing, founded the Douban topic in 2021.While staying diligent about her daytime work, she is developing her hobbies, including stand-up comedy and vlogging, into secondary careers during her spare time. And she is amazed to find her “slash life” philosophy followed by so many of her peers.
Weiheng, a 26-year-old woman in Guangzhou, and Tang Yuhan, a 27-year-old man in Xuancheng city, Anhui province, are both participants in the topic, with their stories earning thousands of likes so far. The two are both musicians in their spare time, even though they are thousands of miles apart and have different jobs in media and finance. Their passion for music has grown since college and they didn’t abandon their enthusiasm, even after entering the workplace.
Their reaction showed the gap between the young and former generations. “My parents used to say, ‘music cannot earn you money’, so the band thing was regarded as a waste of time. However, we want to pursue whatever we love and are willing to pay for it.” says Weiheng.
“The ‘slash life’ mania(狂热)shows that, along with China’s economic development, our society is becoming more and more diversified and inclusive, and it welcomes everyone’s self-fulfillment,” says Shi Yanrong, an associate researcher from Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences. “Young people no longer have to rely on work and money for their sense of self-worth. They tend to practice a carpe diem(活在当下)philosophy and create their own identities.”
1. What are “slash youth” more likely to do?A.Create a topic on Douban. |
B.Take diverse occupations. |
C.Become a stand-up comedian. |
D.Share their own stories online. |
A.Other young people’s positive response. |
B.Hobbies developed while working. |
C.The growing social networking platform. |
D.Thousands of likes earned on Douban. |
A.They sent their stories online to gain more funds. |
B.They shared similar interests in both their hobbies and jobs. |
C.They never lost passion for music even if they had to quit college. |
D.They stuck with their dream despite the older generation’s opinion. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Supportive. |
C.Unfavorable. | D.Indifferent. |
9 . David Rees runs a very distinctive business. He charges customers $15 to sharpen their pencils to perfection, using a variety of tools.
I know what you’re thinking—is this a joke? The 39-year-old gets asked that question a lot. To clarify everything, he even created a special section on his website telling everyone he’s actually providing a real service.
You can supply your own pencil or you can have Rees sharpen one of his own favorite 2B pencils. After that, he mails it to you in a display tube with the shavings in a separate bag, and an authentic certificate which just happens to mention the pencil is so sharp as to be a dangerous object.
To achieve the desired result, the master sharpener uses all kinds of tools, including general sandpaper, pocket knives and even a special $ 450 sharpening machine. “It depends on what the customer wants to use his/her pencil for,” he says. That determines the most appropriate pencil-sharpening technique. Some customers buy pencils as inspirational symbols while others buy them because of their special memories of classic 2B pencils.
$15 to have a pencil sharpened is a bit expensive though, right? You’re not the only one who feels that way, and David’s unique business has really angered lots of people, who talk of inequality in America, saying it is so insane for the wealthy to pay $15 to sharpen a pencil. But others will say, “This is just our urge to put an end to the welfare state because new ideas arise along with the business.”
David admits his trade is sort of unusual. But there are those who actually value his service, as is proven by the over 500 orders he has gotten.
1. How could David make money by sharpening pencils?A.He invented new tools for the job. |
B.He provided quality service for his customers. |
C.He promoted his skill on his website. |
D.He saved lots of time for other people. |
A.He provides personalized services. |
B.He knows all kinds of pencil users. |
C.He values ideas behind the pencils. |
D.He always writes in pencil. |
A.Deliberate. | B.Rewarding. | C.Unreasonable. | D.Irresponsible. |
A.It’s a waste of time and money. | B.It needs further improvement. |
C.It’s awfully expensive. | D.It’s a fancy service. |
10 . Do you need to throw your smart phone away to live your best life? Not necessarily, according to researchers from Ruhr Universitat Bochum who suggest that we could all benefit from cutting down on screen time-just only a little bit time.
On average, we spend more than three hours a day glued to our smart phone screens. Between social media, news feeds, endless video games, and an app for pretty much everything else, there’s always something to draw our attention. In recent years, studies have blamed smart phones for modern problems ranging from rising anxiety rates to neck pain. It begs the question: Are people all really better off switching back to landlines (座机)?
“The smart phone is both a blessing and a curse,” says study leader Dr. Julia Brailovskaia, whose team set out to answer that question by gathering together 619 volunteers, hoping to know how much the smart phone is good for us. Two hundred people put their smart phones completely aside for a week; 226 reduced the amount of time they used the device by one hour a day; 193 people didn’t change anything in their behavior.
Researchers interviewed each person about both their overall lifestyle habits and well-being four months later after the experimental week ended. “We found that both completely giving up the smart phone and reducing its daily use by one hour had positive effects on the well-being of the participants,” as Brailovskaia sums up the upshots. Notably, changing their smart phone habits for just one week appeared to produce lasting outcomes among subjects. Even four months afterward, participants who were told to avoid using their smart phones totally were using their phones for an average of 38 minutes less per day.
Meanwhile, the “one hour less” group were using their phones as much as? 45 minutes less per day after four months. This group also showed improved life satisfaction, more exercise, and less depression.
“It’s nor necessary to completely give up the smart phone to feel better.” Brailovskaia concludes.
1. What’s the purpose of Paragraph 2?A.To answer the question on the smart phones. |
B.To explain why the experiment was done. |
C.To state disadvantages of the experiment. |
D.To stress the benefits of smart phones. |
A.They trained them. | B.They interviewed them. |
C.They gave them a physical exam. | D.They divided them into groups. |
A.Purposes. | B.Reasons. | C.Results. | D.Doubts. |