组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 法律法治
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 14 道试题
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要通过上海海滩上4岁女孩因为父亲疏忽导致死亡的事件作为引入,提出了关于父母对儿童造成伤害是否应被视为犯罪行为进行了讨论。

1 . The recent reports of a 4-year-old girl on a Shanghai beach have gone viral on social media platforms, provoking debate about whether China should criminalize negligence in child supervision.

The father of the little girl claimed that he left her alone on the beach for about 12 minutes to fetch his phone. However, she was nowhere to be found when he was back. Surveillance (监控) videos show that she waited for about 10 minutes before walking toward the water’s edge alone, and then disappeared into the water. Two weeks later, her body was discovered about 100 kilometers away in neighboring Zhejiang Province.

The core issue in this case is the father’s leaving his young daughter unattended on the beach, causing her tragic death. Should such behavior, when it causes harm to a child, be seen as a criminal act? In an online survey, more than 90 percent of respondents insisted that the father be held legally responsible and face criminal punishments.

Nevertheless, according to Liu Chunquan, a lawyer, it may not satisfy the criteria for criminal negligence, since the primary focus of Chinese criminal law is on extreme cases of parental neglect, such as physical abuse and mental torture. Rarely do legal authorities charge parents; instead, they are just likely to face penalties consisting of warnings and fines.

In 2022, a 2-year-old baby drowned in a cesspool while in the company of his father. The court ruled shared responsibility between the father and the cesspool’s owner, with a 7:3 proportion. The owner was ordered to pay 20,000 yuan to the child’s family. Unluckily, similar cases do exist nationwide. Roughly, 100,000 children lose their lives in accidents annually in China, which is largely due to negligence, such as parents leaving their children unattended, either in locked cars or at home. Besides, drowning is now the main cause of death for children aged 1 to 14 years old.

It is no wonder that an increasing number of netizens request that specific laws and regulations be passed to ensure the safety of children and their well-being. Hopefully, criminalizing child supervision negligence in China can serve as a warning and precaution.

However, downsides of introducing such legislation may also emerge. For instance, it’s difficult to distinguish between a regrettable accident and criminal negligence, so that over-criminalization can be triggered, in which well-meaning parents making honest mistakes are charged with a crime.

Therefore, a more balanced approach to addressing the issue of infant safety should involve a combination of new legislation, education and support services. The ultimate objective is to prevent similar catastrophes in the future. We must recognize that children are not only their parents’ offspring, but also the nation’s future.

1. What can we infer from the tragedy of the 4-year-old girl?
A.Her father’s carelessness and negligence should be to blame.
B.The beach in Shanghai should not be open to small children.
C.Her father has been sentenced to severe penalties by the police.
D.She would have survived if she had not waited in the water for a long time.
2. What are the figures in paragraph 5 intended to prove?
A.Irresponsible adults contribute to children’s death.B.People can’t be too concerned about child safety.
C.Kids shouldn’t be allowed to swim alone.D.Parents’ constant monitoring is a must.
3. Updated legislation in child supervision is in demand for the following reasons except _______.
A.the mild penalties in the existing lawsB.parents’ ignorance of potential dangers
C.frequent occurrence of such incidentsD.masses of netizens’ urgent appeals
4. What attitude does the author hold to criminalizing child supervision negligence in China?
A.Indifferent.B.Negative.C.Objective.D.Supportive.
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中(0.65) |
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文,美国国会通过一项议案,敦促各州削减温室气体的排放。

2 . A measure in the House’s $ 2 trillion economic bill would require states to cut greenhouse gas emissions (排放) promising rewards for transportation departments that post reductions and “consequences” for those that don’t.

Peter A. DeFazio, chairman of the Transportation Committee, said the proposal is designed to push states to act. “We’re going to give them very large motivation to actually make those meaningful targets and deliver on those targets,” he said. According to the proposal, states that cut emissions could get a $ 1 billion pot of money and potentially receive other bonus funding from the federal government. The bill doesn’t spell out potential consequences for not reducing emissions, leaving the decision to national transportation officials. Experts say they could include barriers to accessing highly prized grant funds (拨款).

Much of the attention on cutting emissions from the transport industry-the nation’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases-has focused on the adoption of electric vehicles by putting money in charging factories and supporting battery-powered cars. The new measure sides with environmental advocates who argue the nation can’t battle a changing climate without changing how Americans move around. Environmentalists say the nation’s changing to electric vehicles probably won’t happen quickly enough to limit temperature rises unless Americans can be convinced to drive less, and that would mean building new networks focused on walking, cycling and transit (运输).

Opposition to the emission measure is deep-seated. The heads of five western state transportation departments wrote a letter to Capitol’s committee last month saying the proposal would harm rural areas because options such as heavy-traffic pricing are not well-suited to places which are populated in few people, and it doesn’t make sense to target those state agencies when there are multiple reasons that influence emissions, including fuel economy standards for cars and local decisions about where to build stores and homes.

Kevin DeGood, a transportation researcher, said basic construction shape how people can get around. “It is funny that the state transportation departments suggest in the letter that they do not deeply influence greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation industry,” he said.

1. How does the government provide motivation?
A.By praising.B.By punishing.
C.By financing.D.By restricting.
2. What is an intended result of the bill?
A.Greatly changed climate.B.More convenient stores.
C.Stable fuel economy standards.D.Eco-friendly transport system.
3. Why did some states mention heavy-traffic pricing?
A.To oppose the emission measure.B.To introduce solutions to emission.
C.To call for attention to rural areas.D.To list several reasons for emission.
4. What’s Kevin’s attitude towards the letter in paragraph 4?
A.Supportive.B.Disapproving.
C.Shocked.D.Confident.
2023-05-28更新 | 55次组卷 | 1卷引用:湖北省华大新高考联盟2021-2022学年高三下学期4月教学质量测评英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中(0.65) |
名校

3 . Are you the only child in your family? If so, do you enjoy it or do you want more siblings(兄弟姐妹)?

On May 31, a key meeting of the Communist Party of China unveiled a policy that would allow all couples to have up to three children.

The move is expected to maximize the population's role in driving economic and social growth, since this is a critical time for China to transform the world's most populous country into a powerhouse(强国)with a quality workforce, according to the National Health Commission.

The three-child policy is also expected to prevent the decline in the nation's birthrate and address the challenge of a rapidly aging population, China Daily reported.

China's annual number of newborns has fallen for four years in a row. The country's total birthratethe average number of children born to each womanstood at 1.3 in 2020. The number is below the rate of 2.1 that would maintain a stable population, according to the National Bureau of Statistics.

The declining birthrate has also brought a sharp increase in the proportion of the population aged 60 or above, rising from 10.3 percent to 18.7 percent in the past decade. An increasingly elderly population will increase the cost of labor and the pressure on the social security net. It also means there will be a lack of young labor force. Therefore, it's not good for economic growth, according to Chen Youhua, a professor at Nanjing University.

In fact, the new birth policy is a step to further relax the family planning policy. The one-child policy was introduced in the 1970s and aimed to control the fast-growing population. Then in 2013, China allowed couples to have a second child if either parent was an only child, and in 2016, all couples were allowed to have two children.

However, not all people have shown their support for this latest policy. Many couples complained about the rising costs of raising a child. A netizen named Qinfeng commented, "High cost of education and both the physical and mental exhaustion stopped me from having more than one child." Also, many women are reluctant(不情愿的)to give birth because that could mean sacrificing their career prospects, according to Mu Guangzong, a professor at Peking University.

In that case, Mu noted that it is better to implement supporting measures with the three-child policy, such as more preferential(优惠的)policies for couples that would ease their parental burden.

1. What might NOT be the main cause for the new policy?
A.To increase the population's role.
B.To stop the declining birthrate.
C.To improve the child- care service system.
D.To address the challenge of the aging population.
2. What can be known from the text?
A.China's annual number of newborns has fallen for decades.
B.The government will protect the legal rights of women in employment.
C.Measures will be taken to improve the high-quality education.
D.The new policy allows couples to have up to three children.
3. Which of the following can replace the underlined word "implement"?
A.To carry out.B.To get along with.
C.To make use of.D.To have a command of.
4. What is the author's purpose in writing the text?
A.To show his love of children healthcare.
B.To introduce the new family size policy.
C.To share his concerns about birthrate.
D.To emphasize the physical and mental exhaustion.

4 . The sudden death of the 23-year-old female emplovee of Pinduoduo has sparked a heated debate, with many criticizing the overwork culture. Three experis share their views. Excerpis (节选) follow:


Labor laws compatible (兼容的) with digital era needed

This case should inspire society to reflect on how to better protect employees’ rights in the digital era. The relevant clauses in the Labor Law cannot be specifically applied to charge internet companies suspected of violating laborers' rights and interests.

The blurring (模糊) of the line between social and economic activities in the digital era makes it difficult to define fixed working hours.

Lawmakers should find out the new factors affecting labor relations due to the rapid development of internet and communications technology. This can pave the way for law-making on working hours in the digital era. “996” working schedule is against labor laws.

More than one year ago, it was shocking to hear e-commerce tycoons (巨头) Liu Qiangdong and Jack Ma publicly support the "996" working schedule to push their employees to work harder. A growing number of companies have been using different methods to exercise ever-increasing control over their employees.

To correct the situation, it is vital that the country bring in specific law on internet enterprises, especially in terms of labor contracts and work schedules, and make it clear that the “996” working schedule is illegal.


Death due to overwork needs legally definition

Work pressure and long working hours can seriously affect workers' physical and mental health, making. them more easily hurt by occupational and stress-related diseases.

But it is difficult to prove that a person dies of overwork. Only a person who dies at the workplace or of a sudden illness within 48 hours of getting off work is considered a victim of work.

China should issue guidelines explaining in detail what leads to death due to overwork.

1. What do the three experts agree on?
A.The Labor Law in China is non-effective.
B.It is difficult to define fixed working hours.
C.Supervision on companies should be tightened.
D.Improvement should be made to the current laws.
2. Why does the expert mention Liu Qiangdong?
A.To highlight the models of e-commerce.
B.To introduce tycoons' attitudes to overwork.
C.To confirm their efforts to protect employees.
D.To express disagreement on “996” working schedule.
3. What does the underlined exercise mean in the text?
A.To make somebody anxious.B.To do sports or other physical activities.
C.To use your power to achieve something.D.To test or make experimental use of something.
4. Who can be considered a victim of work?
A.Someone dies on his way to office.B.Someone dies of a heart attack in his office.
C.Someone dies three days after work.D.Someone dies after work without symptoms.
2021-05-11更新 | 165次组卷 | 4卷引用:湖北省华中师范大学第一附属中学2020-2021学年高二上学期期末检测英语试题
智能选题,一键自动生成优质试卷~

5 . Food brings us together and connects us to our families, friends, nature and to foreign cultures. Food is universal. Food waste, on the other hand, has become a universal problem, as it significantly contributes to climate change. Luckily, there are countries that have laws to require supermarkets or other businesses to donate unsold food.

About one third of all food grown for human consumption is thrown out or wasted according to the Food and Agriculture Organization(FAO). This creates both environmental and financial problems, since traditional agriculture requires large amounts of resources including land and water. Food production is also a major cause of greenhouse gases and climate change.

Food waste occurs at every step of food production from the field to the store. In fact, fruits, vegetables, and roots have the highest waste. Donating food that is unusually wasted does not mean giving away damaged food. Sometimes it is simply a case of food being mislabeled, a can that has a torn label, or slightly bruised fruit.

To reduce both the financial and environmental pressure, Italy passed a law to encourage businesses and farmers to donate unsold food to charities. Companies that donate their leftovers will pay lower taxes on waste removal.

Waste management is also a very costly thing for governments. In fact, according to Global Citizen, in 2016, Italy spent over $13.3 billion on waste management. The idea behind the law is that when it is economic and convenient, companies will happily follow the law.

France was the first country to pass a food donation law in 2016. It required supermarkets that are at least 4,300 square feet to donate unsold food to charity. Since then, 90 percent of supermarkets began donating food, the number of which was 66 percent before the law.

To increase food donations, Israel passed a law in 2018 to ensure that unused food from restaurants, hotels and other places goes to the people that need it most.

1. What does paragraph 2 focus on?
A.FAO's guidelines.B.Human eating diets.
C.Global climate change.D.Food waste problems.
2. What is most likely to be given away according to the law?
A.Heavily broken canned food.B.Unhealthy vegetables.
C.Slightly bruised fruit.D.Damaged food.
3. What benefit will the Italian government get from the law?
A.It will sell donated food to make money.B.It will ask companies to pay higher taxes.
C.It will save money on waste management.D.It will attract more international companies.
4. What is known about the food donation law?
A.It seems difficult to pass in Israel.B.It takes effect gradually in France.
C.It is just applied in supermarkets.D.It is an unsuccessful try in France.
2021-02-06更新 | 87次组卷 | 2卷引用:湖北省荆州市六县市区2020-2021学年高二上学期期末考试英语试题(含听力)

6 . A teenager of 17 walks into a corner store and grabs a Coca-Cola, but the cashier refuses to sell it to him because he is underage. That rule is expected to soon become reality in parts of Mexico, as lawmakers in several states push legislation (立法)to keep junk food away from children. know it can sound a bit difficult but we have to take action now," says Lopez, a lawmaker in Oaxaca's Congress.

More than 70,000 Mexicans have died from COVID-19, the world's fourth-highest recorded death toll, tracked by Johns Hopkins University. 89% of those who died in Mexico had an underlying medical condition such as obesity, diabetes (糖尿病),high blood pressure and heart problems. That has led to a new urgency to change diets so that the younger generation doesn't suffer those illnesses.

The critics, however, say the leaders are using preexisting health conditions in COVID-19 patients to distract from a weak government response to the virus outbreak. Yet few people would deny that the country consumes large amounts of sugar-sweetened drinks and processed snacks with little nutrition --- or that Mexico has a major weight problem.

Oaxaca's governor approved the state's junk food prohibition last week. Legislators still have to complete the legal systems, and punishment could include fines and even jail. Lopez says legislators from all over the country have called her for advice. Many other states are debating a junk food ban. However, a nationwide law would not be easy. "There are powerful commercial interests that least want it to happen, but we must prioritize the well-being of our children,"   Lopez says.

1. What is Lopez 's attitude towards the junk food?
A.Negative.B.Neutral.
C.Positive.D.Indifferent.
2. What does the underlined word "distract" mean in paragraph 3?
A.Keep distance.B.Avoid illnesses.
C.Break away.D.Shift attention.
3. Which of the following statements is true?
A.Selling children junk food has been banned nationwide in Mexico.
B.Most Mexicans who died of COVID-19 had other health problems.
C.The younger generation doesn't suffer any weight problems.
D.People who break the prohibition in Oaxaca will only be warned.
4. According to the last paragraph, who are most likely to oppose the legislation?
A.Teenagers.B.Legislators.
C.Soft drink companies.D.State governors.
阅读理解-七选五 | 较易(0.85) |
名校

7 . California will be the first state to ban the sale and manufacture of new fur products.    1    It will go into effect on January 1, 2023.

California’s fur law was one of several bills designed to prevent cruelty to animals. “California is a leader when it comes to animal protection and today that leadership includes banning the sale of fur, ” said Governor Newsom in a news report. “    2    We are making a statement to the world that beautiful wild animals like bears and tigers have no place on trapeze (高空秋千) wires or jumping through flames.”    3    More than a dozen European countries, including the United Kingdom, Austria, Norway and the Netherlands have also passed laws to limit the fur trade.

    4    “The signing of the ban shows the point that today’s customers simply don’t want wild animals to suffer extreme pain and fear while keeping up with the fashion,” said Kitty Block, president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States and president of Humane Society International. Not everyone, however, was pleased with the ban. Banning the killing of animals for their fur means killing the fur business, says Hyatt, an owner of a fur store.    5    

Many retailers are also ending fur sales. In mid-October, Macy’s (American’s department store) announced it will stop fur from all its stores by the end of 2020. The stores will also close all fur vaults and salons. Other fashion brands such as Prada, Gucci, Michael Kors and Burberry have taken similar steps in recent years.

A.But we are doing more than that.
B.California is taking the lead in protecting animals.
C.Similar laws have been carried out globally already.
D.And that in turn will leave many people unemployed.
E.Two other California cities had already banned fur sales.
F.Not surprisingly, the ban is welcomed by animal rights activists.
G.The ban applies to clothing, shoes, handbags and other things that contain fur.

8 . How often are students absent from school? Are they ready for college? Is their school a welcoming place? States are beginning to plan new ways to grade their schools. Under the new law, states are paying more attention to whether students are getting better at school. They will not only look at whether students have achieved a certain level of understanding in reading and maths, but also see whether students have improved over time.

Mike Petrilli, the president of an organization that supports education, said the new law was different from the No Child Left Behind Act, the earlier education law. “It will be a fairer way to measure school quality,” he said. With the No Child Left Behind Act, schools were measured(评价)by how well students did on tests. If students did not do well, their schools would often get less money from the government. The new law gave states more choice about how their schools should be measured.

So far, nine states have given their plans to the National Education Department, while seven other states are completing them. When checking school quality, states are experimenting with new measures. Almost all of the early states have considered absences as a key measure, which counts how many students are absent from school more than one-tenth of the school year.

Connie and Delaware will track college preparation. They will see whether high school students are taking advanced classes. At the same time, they will also see how well students do on tests to get into college. Tennessee wants to give every public school a grade from A to F, and the grade will consider how well English learners are doing. It also will look at whether disabled students are being served. In addition, the schools will also be graded by whether students are ready for college, as well as how many students graduate.

Marc.Magee, an official of an education group, said, “there are so many differences in how states want to examine their schools. Then comparing states to each other could be difficult.”

1. According to the passage, the No Child Left Behind Act_______.
A.doesn’t care about the quality of education
B.pays more attention to students’ scores
C.forces schools to give up students’ physical practice
D.encourages the government to give schools more money
2. What can we learn about Tennessee’s new way to grade schools?
A.Students’ scores are not important.
B.Schools have to provide Chinese lessons.
C.Schools’ grades are related to college preparation.
D.The more students graduate, the more money schools will get.
3. What can we learn from Marc Magee’s words?
A.Comparison among schools should be called off.
B.Students may be doubtful about the new law.
C.The new law will have a long way to go.
D.States should be given equal rights.
4. What’s the author’ s attitude(态度) to the new law?
A.Objective(客观的)B.HopefulC.DoubtfulD.Uninterested
2020-10-19更新 | 72次组卷 | 1卷引用:湖北省武汉市部分学校2020-2021学年高一10月联考英语试题
语法填空-短文语填 | 适中(0.65) |
名校
9 . 阅读下面材料,在空白处填入适当的内容(1 个单词)或括号内单词的正确形式。

China’s two sessions( 两 会 ), a key event on the country’s political calendar,     1    (begin) on May 21th after being put off for more than two     2    (month) due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Apart     3     the delayed opening, this year’s two sessions are     4    (usual) in many aspects, as China Daily noted.

First and the foremost, the world will keep an eye on how China builds a prosperous society and achieve     5    (it) development goals, while     6    (effective) preventing coronavirus(冠状病毒) risks, reported Xinhua.

In 2019, China achieved a GDP     7    (grow) of 6.1%, and with     8    (strong) measures, China could develop faster than that of all other major economies.

In the two sessions, national lawmakers and political advisers will be discussing how to make advances in economic development while implementing regular epidemic prevention,     9     is extremely significant this year.

Meanwhile,     10    (make) sure of public health safety, some changes for the session have been made. According to Xinhua, the session has been shortened from two weeks to about one. There are also fewer reporters covering the event, according to Global Times.

2020-10-13更新 | 46次组卷 | 1卷引用:湖北省咸宁市崇阳县第一中学2019-2020学年高一下学期五月联考英语试题

10 . A video of a three-year-old girl being kicked by her own mother during a photo shot went viral on Thursday, indicating China’s underperformance in regulating the emerging child modeling industry.

The girl, known as Niu Niu, was physically abused (虐待) by her mother in several videos. The videos have annoyed Chinese media and Internet users alike. Many netizens and scholars call for local authorities to carry out further investigations into possible child abuse.

In response to the public outcry (强烈抗议), Niu Niu’s mother issued an apology via Sina Weibo on Thursday, condemning accusations of abuse. She noted that she was merely guiding her daughter for better shots and the girl is well looked after.

Despite her apology, many E-shops which used Niu Niu’s images for brand promotion have canceled their cooperation with the mother, while over 110 well-known child garment shops on Taobao have signed up for a campaign to provide better protection for child models.

“It is necessary to adopt comprehensive laws and regulations to further protect the kids, preventing their parents and companies from exploiting them,” Fang Zhiqing, a lawyer and child protection expert, said.

Niu Niu is not alone. In Zhili, a small town in Zhejiang province, thousands of children from across China are taken here by their parents to seize the chance of fame. With a population of 450,000, Zhili has over 13,000 manufacturers of child clothing. In 2017.the town earned over 7 billion yuan by selling clothing for children online, thus providing opportunities for child models.

“China’s current advertisement law isn’t workable with respect to the industry of child modeling, as it lacks clear regulatory measures and clear legal punishment.” Fang added, “It is important to issue new laws which regulate child modeling.”

1. What caused the public outcry?
A.A girl being physically abused by her mother.
B.Problems in Chinese advertising industry.
C.Several cases of child abuse in recent China.
D.Videos showing how child models work.
2. What happened after the public outcry?
A.Local authorities have thoroughly looked into Niu Niu’s case.
B.Niu Niu’s mother admitted abusing her daughter.
C.Shops stopped their cooperation with the mother.
D.The online sales of child clothing are increasing.
3. Which opinion may Fang Zhiqing agree with?
A.China’s current advertisement law isn’t workable.
B.There are too many child models in China.
C.New economic laws should be issued in China.
D.China should regulate child modeling.
2020-05-28更新 | 38次组卷 | 2卷引用:湖北省武汉市第一中学2019-2020学年高一下学期5月月考英语试题
共计 平均难度:一般