组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 法律法治
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 8 道试题
文章大意:本文是一篇新闻报道。美国食品药品监督管理局(简称FDA)周三公布了一项新提案,将改变该机构认定包装食品“健康”的标准,旨在令该机构处理营养信息的方式现代化,并减少与饮食有关的疾病负担。

1 . The Food and Drug Administration (F. D. A.) announced a new proposal on Wednesday that would change the criteria for which packaged foods the agency considers “healthy”, in an attempt to modernize its approach to nutrition and reduce the burden of diet-related diseases.

Currently, about 5 percent of all packaged foods are labeled “healthy”, according to the agency. The definition, which was set in 1994, allows for food manufacturers to add the word “healthy” to their products, as long as the products have limited amounts of total fat, saturated (饱和的) fat, cholesterol and sodium (钠) and provide at least 10 percent of the daily value of one or more of the following nutrients: vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium, iron, protein or dietary fiber. (Seafood, game meat and raw fruits and vegetables have slightly different criteria.) In 2021, the F. D. A. updated its guidelines to allow for some foods to contain more total fat and to include some that provide at least 10 percent of the daily value of vitamin D. Importantly, there is currently no limit on added sugars under the current definition- an omission that the F. D. A. believes is inconsistent with today’s nutrition science.

“The old rule was really outdated— you could create any kind of Frankenstein food that met the nutrient criteria and label it as healthy,” said Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, a professor of nutrition in Boston. “This is a major advance.”

The proposed rule, which the agency announced to coincide with Wednesday’s White House Conference on Hunger, Nutrition and Health, introduces a new limit on added sugars-in general, no more than 2.5 grams per serving, although this can vary depending on the food.

The new definition aims to encourage healthy eating by prioritizing a mix of vegetables, fruits, grains, dairy, proteins and certain oils, including vegetable oils.   A “healthy” food would need to contain a minimum amount of at least one of those food groups and be under the proposed limits for saturated fats and added sugars. Raw whole fruits and vegetables would automatically qualify. Many sugary cereals (谷物), highly sweetened yogurts and white breads, which might currently qualify as “healthy” under the existing definition, would be removed under the new rule.

1. What can we know about the old rule?
A.It was set in 1994.
B.It can guarantee people’s health.
C.It has strict limit on added sugar.
D.It was consistent with today’s nutrition science.
2. What’s Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian’s attitude to the new proposal?
A.Negative.B.Doubtful.C.Uncaring.D.Supportive.
3. Which of the following will automatically qualify for the new proposal?
A.Seafood.
B.Highly sweetened yogurts.
C.Raw whole fruits and vegetables.
D.Food containing large amounts of total fat.
4. Where is the text probably taken from?
A.A diary.B.A textbook.C.A newspaper.D.A science fiction.
阅读理解-七选五 | 适中(0.65) |
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了加州通过了一项法律来保障学生的充足睡眠,文章介绍了睡眠不足对学生造成的不良影响。

2 . Students to get more sleep

When your alarm clock rings and you drag yourself out of bed, you probably wonder: Why on Earth does school have to start so early?     1    

A law in California, passed on Oct 13, requires that public middle schools begin classes no earlier than 8:00 am and that high schools start no earlier than 8:30 am. The law will go into effect by July 1, 2022. Starting school at 8:00 or 8:30 in the morning may not sound like too big of a change.     2    

“The effect of that one hour is something they will be feeling as 40-year-old adults,” Sumit Bhargava, a sleep expert at Stanford University, told The New York Times.     3    

Some might say that urging students to go to bed earlier could have been a much easier solution than changing the school timetable across an entire state. But according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, teenagers go through biological changes when they enter adolescence.     4     So when school starts at 8:00 or earlier, they can hardly get the ideal 8.5 — 9.5 hours of sleep that experts suggest they need to do their best in the daytime.

    5     In the short run, students’ school performances should improve immediately. Kyla Wahlstrom, a researcher, found that students who have enough sleep are more alert in class and get better grades. This is why when the new law came out, its author, Anthony Portantino, said, “Generations of children will come to appreciate this historic day and our governor for taking brave action.”

A.Students can benefit a lot from more sleep.
B.Fortunately, there is a new law to back you up.
C.Here are some tips to help you solve this problem.
D.But it could mean one more hour of sleep for students.
E.Regular sleeping schedule is definitely good for students.
F.Not having enough sleep can increase the risk of obesity and diabetes.
G.It’s difficult for them to fall asleep before 11:00 pm during that period.
2022-08-08更新 | 154次组卷 | 1卷引用:2022届湖南省怀化市高三上学期第一次模拟考试英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中(0.65) |
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了为应对过度包装问题而制定的新法令EPR和它可能带来的影响与作用。

3 . We’ve all been there, trying our best to do our bit to help save the planet, when a really essential item that you had to order online arrives in such an unbelievable amount of packaging that it makes you feel like it’s an unprepared game of passing the parcel.

It’s made even worse by the fact that some of the packaging can’t be recycled. In fact, 10 million tonnes of packaging waste are produced in the UK every year. A lot of this ends up in landfill, two-thirds of which could have instead been recovered.

The good news, however, is that how packaging waste is managed is in for a BIG shake-up in line with the “polluter pays principle”. By placing the main point of duty to pay on brand owners, they will be encouraged to choose more sustainable packaging options which are recyclable and reusable as much as possible. Otherwise, they will have to pay higher fees.

This is a system known as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) — meaning that those who have control over packaging design decisions will be encouraged to do the right thing for the planet at the beginning and consider what happens at the end of the packaging’s life from the start.

What this means is that instead of local authorities picking up the bill for household waste management, companies will have instead to pay for managing your household packaging waste as well as the form businesses, and they will be met with the associated little costs too.

And, as an added bonus, the new EPR laws on packaging will also mean that producers are required to put clear mandatory (强制性的) labelling on packaging, for example, this could be “RECYCLE” or “DO NOT RECYCLE”. Of course, we hope that the “DO NOT RECYCLE” category labelling is the minority. It is aimed that by 2030, 78% of packaging will be recycled in the UK.

1. What can we know from the first two paragraphs?
A.Two-thirds of packaging waste is recycled.
B.Over-packaging is often the case in life.
C.The quality of goods cannot be guaranteed.
D.Online shopping is getting less popular.
2. Who will be responsible for paying packaging waste costs according to the law?
A.Designers.B.Producers.C.Customers.D.Local authorities.
3. What can the EPR laws lead the brand owners to do?
A.Pay higher taxes and recycle the packaging waste.
B.Put clear labelling on packaging and promote sales.
C.Cut packaging waste and improve packaging recycling.
D.Follow the packaging design trend and to right things.
4. What can be learned about the items ordered online in the future?
A.Their labelling on packaging will be simple and generous.
B.The majority of their packaging needn’t be recycled.
C.They will be of high quality and inexpensive.
D.They’ll arrive in the right amount of recyclable packaging.

4 . Families will be rewarded for the first time for putting out less rubbish under new plans to significantly promote recycling, especially of valuable materials like glass.

The new plan for collecting waste in England will scrap fines (罚款) for putting plastic in the wrong recycling bin. Instead, families will be offered rewards for recycling more rubbish measured by a microchip (芯片) in the rubbish bin. Caroline Spelman, an Environment Secretary, said, “It is better to use a plan that offers people rewards, rather than punishing them. We want to help those people who want to do the right thing by reducing waste and recycling at home. This means making sure communities are getting the collection services they want and not punishing hard-working families who make mistakes by putting bins out on the wrong day or leaving the waste in the wrong recycling bin.”

Though the punishment for putting waste in the wrong recycling bin has been given up, plans to try and remove the unpopular twice-a-week bin collections have largely failed despite the efforts of Eric Pickles, a Communities Secretary. Although Mrs. Spelman made it clear that communities will be supported in efforts to increase the times of collections, and the Conservative Party will not force local authorities to return to weekly collections. Most communities expect the introduction of weekly rubbish collections, as this will solve some of the problems about environment.

“We will continue to help local communities develop local solutions to collecting and dealing with family waste and will work with communities to meet families’ reasonable expectations for weekly collections, particularly of smelly waste.” said Mrs. Spelman.

1. What will families be rewarded for in future?
A.Producing less rubbish.B.Putting bins out on the right day.
C.Throwing rubbish into the bin.D.Leaving rubbish in the wrong recycling bin.
2. Which can replace the underlined word “scrap” in Para.2?
A.reduceB.removeC.increaseD.pay
3. What can we know from what Mrs. Spelman said?
A.The Conservative Party refuses the weekly collection.
B.Both Rewards and punishment should be carried out.
C.Local solutions to collecting family waste will be stopped.
D.People will not be punished for putting rubbish wrongly.
4. Which section of a newspaper does the text probably come from?
A.Travel.B.Literature.C.Environment.D.Medicine.
2021-01-28更新 | 52次组卷 | 1卷引用:湖南省怀化市2020年下高一期末考试英语试题
智能选题,一键自动生成优质试卷~

5 . Texas has been one of the most restrictive gun-rights states in America.Thanks to a new law,however,the state will be one of the most relaxed,to the degree that police are discouraged from even asking about someone's guns. And if they do, they may not have much power to do anything if the person refuses to show a license.

To be sure, the law is strict in its own way,offering a model for regulation. Under the law, open-carry citizens have to be licensed, a process that includes safety and shooting tests. They also have to show no prior psychological problems, and they have to be at least 21 years old.

It is true that gun violence dropped sharply after restrictive laws were put in place in countries like Great Britain and Australia. However,the US public seems more interested than ever in weapons and the power they convey,despite gun control groups' concern over the increase of violence. Most states in America have steadily expanded gun rights since the end of a 10-year assault(攻击)weapons ban in 2004. Black Friday this year saw the biggest gun cache(贮存)ever purchased in one day.

Considering those trends,there's a heated debate about whether the new Texas law is a model piece of legislation(立法)for a changing America,or a walking disaster just begging for trouble. As the law doesn't provide any punishment for those who refuse to show a license to a police officer, critics fear that officers may find it tough to handle potentially deadly situations. After all, armed citizens will no longer be considered suspicious, even though a lot of people might be alarmed by the sight. Most police in Texas have been told to not engage gun carriers unless they are doing something questionable or appear drunk.

For sure,New Year's Day will be an exciting one for Texas gun owners. What's not yet known is how the rest of Texas will respond.

1. All of the following are required in the new Texas law for open carry EXCEPT
A.age limit
B.mental condition
C.online registration
D.gun-operating skills
2. What is mainly talked about in Paragraph 3?
A.The reason for putting forward the new Texas law.
B.The present situation of gun possession in America.
C.The impact of the assault weapons ban in 2004.
D.The inaction of the US government as to gun control.
3. What do critics think the new Texas law will probably lead to?
A.Heavier workload for policemen.
B.Disrespect for officers.
C.Lack of trust among citizens.
D.Difficulty in crime prevention.
4. What is the author's attitude towards the new Texas law?
A.Negative.
B.Cautious.
C.Indifferent.
D.Approving.
2020-11-20更新 | 329次组卷 | 5卷引用:湖南省湖南师大附中2021届高三月考(三)英语试题

6 . Lawmakers in Massachusetts have introduced a law that would ban children in the seventh grade or younger from playing tackle football(冲撞式橄榄球).The Act for No Organized Head Impacts to Schoolchildren, or the NO HITS Act, was introduced last month in an effort to protect children’s heads from blows while at a particularly fragile age.

The bill, which would still allow flag or touch football to be played, would cause fines of up to $2,000 for each time the law is broken. People who frequently break the law, or those whose actions cause physical harm, would face bigger fines.

“It’s all about kids’ health and we have a number of studies that say that repeated contacts(接触) to the head are very bad for you and the younger that starts, the worse it is," said Rep. Paul A. Schmid III (D),who introduced the bill with House Minority Leader Bradley Jones (R).

According to a 2017 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers examining 111 brains belonging to former NFL (National Football League) players found the brain disease Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, or CTE, in 110 of them. The disease is associated with repeated head injuries, not just concussions(脑震荡),and is generally found in athletes, retired soldiers and others with a history of repetitive brain injuries, according to the Concussion Legacy Foundation, a non—profit organization that works to study, treat and prevent future                                                     cases of brain injuries among athletes and other at—risk groups.

Similar laws have been considered elsewhere in the country, including California and Illinois last year, though they didn’t secure enough votes to become law. Those against previously proposed(提议的)bans have argued that adequate progress has been achieved to make the sport safer and that the sport offers too many benefits for children to totally avoid it.

Several former NFL players, who have been directly or indirectly affected by CTE, have argued differently, however. “I made the mistake of starting tackle football at 9 years old. Now, CTE has taken my life away.Y outh tackle football is all risk with no reward," Pro Football Hall of Famer Nick Buoniconti told CNN last year.

1. Why was the law introduced by lawmakers in Massachusetts?
A.To make tackle football safer for players.
B.To ban children from doing sports too young.
C.To encourage the popularity of some safe sports.
D.To keep young children from suffering brain injuries.
2. What is Paragraph 2 mainly about?
A.The reason why the sport is forbidden.
B.The consequences of breaking the new law.
C.The causes of the new law in Massachusetts.
D.The fines of playing tackle football incorrectly.
3. What does the author want to show by mentioning the 2017 study?
A.Future cases of brain injuries can be reduced.
B.NFL players used to pay much attention to CTE.
C.Repeated head blows can result in brain diseases.
D.Brain injuries can really be prevented with action.
4. Which would most probably show Nick Buoniconti’s opinion?
A.Tackle football is less dangerous than people think.
B.Young children should avoid playing tackle football.
C.Tackle football should be made easier to play than before.
D.Young children often make mistakes while playing tackle football.
2020-10-28更新 | 63次组卷 | 1卷引用:湖南省郴州市2021届高三第一次质检英语试题

7 . Hundreds of new drivers have been given bans (禁令) for using their mobile phones at the wheel, as part of stricter new laws introduced. In March, the punishment for driving while on the phone was doubled to six points — meaning drivers with less than two years’ experience faced a ban.

New laws meant the punishment for being caught on a mobile phone at the wheel was increased to six points. The new rules were introduced in England, Scotland and Wales. Drivers who get six points within two years of passing their test will lose their licence, creating a one-strike rule for mobile phone users. To get back behind the wheel, new drivers have to retake both the theory and practical parts of the driving test.

Mr Williams in the RAC said, “These people have spent hours and hours and hundreds of pounds learning to drive to gain their personal freedom only to throw it all away through this foolish behaviour. The only comfort is that they won’t be drawn into some terrible crashes caused by the distraction (使人分心的事物) of a hand-held mobile phone.”

When the new laws were introduced, Transport Secretary Chris Grayling said they would act as a strong warning to mobile phone users. However, the numbers suggested a total of 15,752 drivers received the punishment of six points for using a mobile phone between March and August. This is an increase from 15, 237 drivers in the same period of last year.

National Police Chiefs’ Council Lead on roads Policing, Chief Constable Anthony Bangham, said the police took the offence (违法行为) seriously. “This is not a small offence and is never a risk worth taking because a moment’s distraction behind the wheel can change lives forever.” “Our message is simple — don’t do it,” he added.

1. What can we infer from Paragraph1?
A.The new laws have not been passed.
B.The new laws are not strict enough.
C.Drivers with less than two years’ experience won’t be affected.
D.Punishment for driving while phoning used to be three points.
2. What will happen if a Welsh citizen who got a licence last year gets six points?
A.He will be fined a lot.
B.He must learn the new rules.
C.He will lose his driving licence.
D.He will be given a warning.
3. When the new laws were first introduced, _________.
A.traffic accidents were cut down
B.there were still many drivers who broke them
C.drivers thought the laws were unfair to them
D.fewer people broke them compared
4. What does Anthony Bangham mean?
A.The police didn’t take the new rules seriously.
B.The roads policy should be improved for safety.
C.A moment of carelessness may cause big accidents.
D.The laws need to be improved a lot and retested.
改错-短文改错 | 适中(0.65) |
8 . 假定英语课上老师要求同桌之间交换修改作文,请你修改你同桌写的以下作文。文中共有10处语言错误,每句中最多有两处。每处错误仅涉及一个单词的增加,删除或修改。
增加:在缺词处加一个漏字符号(),并在其下面写出该加的词。
删除:把多余的词用斜线(\)划掉。
修改:在错的词下划一横线,并在该词下面写出修改后的词。
注意:1. 每处错误及其修改均仅限一词;

2.只允许修改10处,多者(从第11处起)不计分。

Get a good education is more important today than ever before .In Canada mostly children attend public schools. Public schools are mainly found by governments through tax income. Students in Canada taught in English and in French. The rests of Canadian children attend private schools, that are supported mainly by fees paying by parents .By law ,the children must attend the school from age 5 to 16. There are several different       levels in the Canadian education system .The first was called Elementary Schools ,which includes kindergartens through grade 7 or 8.

2017-06-01更新 | 95次组卷 | 1卷引用:湖南省冷水江市第一中学2016-2017学年高二下学期期中考试英语试题
共计 平均难度:一般