Machines might one day replace human laborers in a number of professions, but surely they won’t ever replace human artists. Right?
Think again. Not even our artists will be safe from the inevitable machine takeover, if a new development in artificial intelligence(AI) by a team of researchers from Rutgers University and Facebook’s AI lab offers a clue of what’s to come. They have designed an AI capable of not only producing art, but actually inventing whole new aesthetic(美学的) styles similar to movements like impressionism or abstract expressionism. The idea, according to researcher Marian Mazzone, was to make art that is “novel, but not too novel”.
The model used in this project involves a generator network, which produces the images, and a discriminator network, which “judges” whether it’s art. Once the generator learns how to produce work that the distributor recognizes as art, it’s given an additional instruction: to produce art that doesn’t match any known aesthetic styles.
“You want to have something really creative and striking — but at the same time not to go too far and make something that isn’t aesthetically pleasing,” explained Ahmed Elgammal.
The art that was generated by the system was then presented to human judges alongside human-produced art without showing which was which. To the researchers’ surprise, the machine-made art scored slightly higher overall than the human-produced art.
Of course, machines can’t yet replace the meaning conveyed in works by human artists, but this project shows that artist skill sets certainly seem reproducible by machines.
What will it take for machines to produce content with meaning? That might be the last AI frontier. Human artists can at least hang their hats in that field for now.
“Imagine having people over for a dinner party and they ask, ‘Who is that by?’ And you say, ‘Well, it’s a machine actually.’ That would be an interesting conversation starter,” said Kevin Walker.
1. What is implied in the second paragraph?A.Artists won’t be replaced by AI. | B.AI can produce new styles of art. |
C.AI is totally at a loss about impressionism. | D.AI fails to reflect abstract expressionism. |
A.AI can please human judges with its art. | B.AI can combine content with meaning. |
C.AI can make art aesthetically unpleasant. | D.AI can create high quality arts. |
A.Discover. | B.Hold. | C.Struggle. | D.Appear. |
A.she uses machines to cook for a party | B.she likes to join in a dinner party |
C.she expects the arrival of AI | D.she cares about the starter of a chat |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Researchers are building a database of human voices that they’ll use to develop A-based tools that could eventually diagnose (诊断) serious ds eases; they’re targeting everything from Alzheimer’s to cancer. The National Institutes of Health-funded project is an effort to turn the human voice into something that could be used as a biomarker for disease, like blood or temperature.
The research team will start by building an app that will collect voice data from participants with conditions like Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, depression, and autism. They would be asked to say sounds, read sentences, and read full texts through the app.
Then, they’ll use the datasets to build AI models that could detect the various conditions. The research team is working with the medical AI company Owkin to build and train the AI models in the project. The model learns separately on each dataset, and then the results of those trainings comeback to a central location. Then, the updated combined model is sent back out to each of the locations, and the process begins again.
That lends an additional layer of privacy protection to the voice data, which is unique in that it can be easily tied back to the person it comes from. People’s voices are easily identifiable, even if their name is removed. A team of bioethicists (生物伦理学家) is working on the project to study whether it is morally and legally acceptable to build a voice database and to diagnose diseases based on it. They’re going to be thinking through, for example, if voice is protected and whether patients own their own voice data.
For now, the new research program isn’t interested in building programs for home devices. It’s focused on developing tools that would be used by doctors in doctor’s offices and clinics. It’d be particularly helpful in lower-resourced settings where someone might not be able to see a specialist.
1. What do the second and third paragraphs focus on?A.The research tools. | B.The research process. |
C.The research method. | D.The research background. |
A.Some medical institutions. | B.Nursing homes for the elderly. |
C.Villagers living in remote areas. | D.Citizens with access to family doctors. |
A.Your voice might diagnose diseases. |
B.AI models are built with joint efforts. |
C.Voices are collected to cure diseases. |
D.An app is being built to collect voice data. |
【推荐2】When Dmitry Ivanovsky was still a student in 1887 he began his work on the Tobacco mosaic disease (烟草花叶病). The disease appeared to take hold in tobacco plants early on in their growth cycle, causing green and brown mosaics on the affected leaves. Ivanovsky first repeated and confirmed experiments performed by Adolf Mayer in which he took diseased leaves, extracted their sap (the liquid in a plant that carries food to all its parts), and injected (注入) the sap into healthy plants. Up to 80% of the healthy plants then became infected in these experiments.
Ivanovsky originally thought the disease was bacterial, and so he designed an experiment in which the diseased sap of a tobacco plant was filtered (过滤) through a Chamberland filter-candle which could filter out bacteria and works much like a modern water purifier. After filtering the sap, Ivanovsky injected it into healthy tobacco leaves. When the healthy plants began to show signs of infection, Ivanovsky proved bacterial filtering of diseased sap did not prevent the disease, and thus the infective creatures had to be unlike any bacteria that they had seen before.
Additionally, Ivanovsky provided evidence that the creature that was infecting tobacco plants was more of a particle (颗粒) than a liquid. He thought that the disease was more likely caused by either a living creature or a large molecule (分子). In his 1902 research paper he concluded: The sap of diseased plants was infectious; when the infected sap is heated, it is no longer infectious (heat changes the structure and characteristics of RNA and virus proteins, essentially killing them, so this makes sense); infection through bacteria may cause the disease.
It wasn’t until advancements in technology in the early-to-mid 20th century allowed scientists to take the first images of viruses that we were able to identify the Tobacco mosaic virus, and thus separated it from other living creatures such as bacteria and fungi. But it is because of the early work of Ivanovsky and Mayer scientists are able to understand viruses and viral diseases and continue the search for life-saving vaccines for fatal diseases such as COVID-19.
1. What did Adolf Mayer’s experiments prove?A.The sap of diseased tobacco plants is infectious. |
B.The mosaics on infected plants are green or brown. |
C.The disease affects tobacco plants at an early stage. |
D.The infective creature threatens most tobacco plants. |
A.To put much pressure on infected leaves. |
B.To add some pure water to the infected sap. |
C.To filter infected food in the tobacco leaves. |
D.To remove the infective bacteria in the sap. |
A.Filtering the diseased sap can prevent the disease. |
B.The infected sap is no longer infectious when heated. |
C.Some kind of large molecules might cause the disease. |
D.The unknown creature was more of a particle than a liquid. |
A.It showed the differences between viruses and bacteria. |
B.It took the first images of the Tobacco mosaic virus. |
C.It made later identification of the virus possible. |
D.It led to an effective life-saving vaccine. |
【推荐3】The US space agency NASA has revealed an astonishing picture revealing new secrets of the Earth’s home galaxy (星系), the Milky Way. The sun is just one of hundreds of billions of stars that form the huge shape of our galaxy. Our solar system sits in an outlying region but the new image focuses on the centre of the Milky Way, a “noisy” area because of all the crowded stars. Light from this region takes about 26,000 years to reach Earth. For comparison, light takes just eight minutes to reach us from the sun.
The researchers use the data collected by two telescopes that see the sky in ways that are very different from the visible light our eyes can see to form the new image. Most of the data comes from 370 different pictures taken over the past 20 years by NASA’s Chandra X Observatory. This satellite telescope detects X-rays out in space. X-rays are a from of radiation that is sent out when violent events heat matter to temperatures of millions of degrees. Other data comes from the MeerKAT telescope in South Africa, which can detect radio waves from space. These waves have much less energy than X-rays. They are usually produced by cooler material, such as huge clouds of gas between the stars.
The brightest sources include neutron stars which are the cores of huge stars that ran out of fuel and collapsed to city-sized balls of super hot matter. Many neutron stars and black holes jet out gases that appear in the picture as purple streaks (斑纹). Powerful magnetic fields in the area cause the jets to bend as they get further from their source. Astronomer Dr Daniel Wang, who has worked on the image over the past year, said the new picture described “a violent or energetic ecosystem”.
1. What can be learned about the Milky Way?A.The center of it remains unknown. |
B.The sun isn’t located in the center of it. |
C.Its center is very peaceful. |
D.Its center features fewer stars. |
A.The collection of space data. |
B.The function of the MeerKAT telescope. |
C.The differences of space waves. |
D.The formation of the new image. |
A.They will absorb surrounding materials. |
B.They will form super big matter. |
C.They get bent if away from their source. |
D.They are likely to explode when superheated. |
A.Our galaxy’s violent heart | B.An attempt to travel in outer space |
C.Radio waves from outer space | D.Stars’ purple streaks |
【推荐1】As a photographer, have you thought about entering photo competitions? Which photo competition should you enter? If you’ve found yourself asking the questions, you’re in the right place. This article will induce some of the most famous photo competitions to you.
World Press Photo Awards
If you want to test your photojournalism (摄影新闻报道) skills against other more than one competition, consider joining the World Press Photo Awards. The competition has been hosted each year since 1955 and there are regional and overall winners.
Deadline: January
Entry Fees: Free
Prizes: Regional winners: €1,000. Global winners: € 6,000.
Istanbul Photo Awards
The Istanbul Photo Awards is hosted each year by Anadolu Agency, Turkey. But you don’t need to have a base in Istanbul to enter the competition.
You can apply for several categories, including single news, story news, and categories ranging from sports to nature. The competition is organized mainly for news photographers.
Deadline: February
Entry Fees: Free
Prizes: Category winner: $ 3,000. Runners-up (亚军):$1,500. Third-placed: $1,000.
Amateur Photographer of the Year
The Amateur Photographer of the Year award is held every year. You’ll have the opportunity to enter several rounds throughout the year, each of which has a different topic.
Deadline: Varies
Entry Fees: Free
Prizes: Winner gets £500 (each round); £1,000 for the overall winner. Second-placed get £1,000.Third-placed get £50.
Landscape Photographer of the Year
If you live in the UK and want to show your country beauty, you might want to consider entering the competition. The competition has several categories, including city life, black and white, and classic view.
Deadline: May
Entry Fees: £9.99
Prizes: Winner: £10,000 and a book. Category winners: £1,000 and a book. Category runners-up: a book.
1. Which competition can a photographer enter several times in a year?A.Istanbul Photo Awards. | B.World Press Photo Awards. |
C.Amateur Photographer of the Year. | D.Landscape Photographer of the Year. |
A.They require entry fees. |
B.They set three levels of prizes. |
C.They are hosted in the same month each year. |
D.They are mainly held for news photographers. |
A.€2,000 | B.€1,000 | C.€3,000 | D.€10,000 |
An X-ray of a painting is one of the best ways to tell if it was created by a famous painter or if it is a forgery(赝品). If there is a question as to whether an old master has painted a certain painting or not, X-rays are made and compared to those of paintings that are known to be original. If the brushstrokes (笔迹), for example, are shown to be totally different than in other work done by a certain artist, then the painting is proved to be a fake copy.
Since modern paints are usually made from different materials than paints of hundreds of years ago, the image they leave on an X-ray film looks different. This is another way X-rays can be used to spot a forgery. A modem artist will try to make a forgery look hundreds of years old by painting dirty varnish on it or by using artificial means to get the varnish to look cracked. To the naked eye the forgery may look old, but when a careful study of the X-ray image is made, the deception is obvious.
It was common many years ago for an artist to finish a painting, decide it wasn't any good, and paint a completely different picture on top of it. Or artists would paint over others' work —it was their version of recycling. Taking an X-ray is the only way to find out if there is a picture underneath the picture you see with your eyes. Sometimes museums will be more interested in the painting beneath than the one on top, and will restore the older one by having the top layer painstakingly removed.
1. What is the main purpose of the article?
A.To provide information to police who are looking for stolen art. |
B.To persuade art dealers to check for fake copies before selling art. |
C.To explain how modern technology can be applied in unique ways. |
D.To help artists restore damaged artwork to its original appearance. |
A.make repairs on paintings in the past |
B.identify the authenticity of an artwork |
C.change the materials of a forgery |
D.remove the recyclable paints |
A.comparison | B.drawback | C.trickery | D.judgement |
A.X-ray Detectives |
B.Creative Uses of Technology |
C.Forgery Studies |
D.X-ray Painting Techniques |
【推荐3】In 1968, William Anders took what has been described as the greatest environmental photograph of all time while venturing farther than any other human had travelled before aboard the Apollo 8 spacecraft. He was orbiting the Moon when a half-illuminated slice of our home planet suddenly emerged beyond the lunar horizon.
A.Impressed deeply by the splendid scene, Anders never forgot it in his life. |
B.This wasn’t the first time that art had proved to be an important tool for environmentalists. |
C.Grabbing his camera, Anders captured the image that later moved the world. |
D.Yet while Yellowstone, the world’s first national park, today enjoys a little of protection, our planet is in serious trouble. |
E.Though Yellowstone still exists, people ignore our planet. |
F.But Anders’ adventure on Apollo 8 went beyond national boundaries. |
G.A lot of Co2 was produced when Apollo 8 was launched into orbit. |
【推荐1】Many black-footed ferrets(雪貂) once lived in the American West. They live mainly on the prairie dogs(土拨鼠). But when farmers began killing off prairie dogs, lots of them died, too. Additionally, the environment in which they lived was destroyed. By the 1970s, most experts believed that black-footed ferrets no longer existed. Then, in 1981, a group of them were found in Wyoming, but they were suddenly hit by an unknown disease in the mid-1980s, and their population decreased to just 18. The US Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS) caught all of them and tried to protect them. All but seven died.
Currently, there’re between 400 and 500 ferrets remaining. But all of them are related to the seven animals rescued from Wyoming except Elizabeth Ann.
Normally, the DNA of the animals gets mixed up when different pairs of animals have babies. The small differences in their DNA can help protect the group as a whole. Because all living black-footed ferrets are closely related, they all have similar weaknesses. But Elizabeth Ann is cloned from an animal that died in the 1980s, so her DNA is very different. When this DNA is mixed back in, future black-footed ferrets will be healthier in general.
In the 1980s, the DNA from a ferret named Willa was stored in the “Frozen Zoo” run by San Diego Zoo Global. Hopefully, cloning would allow black-footed ferrets to return to the wild. The idea of cloning was understood, but it was hard to carry out for many animals. The matter was left hanging in the air. But in 1996, a scientist cloned a sheep, called “Dolly”. Since then, many other animals have also been cloned. The USFWS has been talking about cloning black-footed ferrets since 2013. In 2018, they finally gave a group called Revive & Restore permission to try it.
On December 10, 2020, Elizabeth Ann was born. Blood tests have proven her to be 100% black-footed ferret.
1. What was the main cause of black-footed ferrets’ almost dying out by the 1970s?A.They were short of food. | B.They were killed by farmers. |
C.They lost their living places. | D.They suffered from a bad disease. |
A.The effective method. | B.The great significance. |
C.The different types. | D.The potential risk. |
A.Unexpected. | B.Unconcerned. |
C.Unresolved. | D.Unexposed. |
A.A new cloning age is coming. |
B.An endangered species survived by cloning. |
C.The research of ferrets’ DNA was conducted. |
D.The truth of the extinction of the ferrets was revealed. |
【推荐2】This was a major week in AI (Artificial Intelligence), with some of the largest companies announced their most updated and leading models: GPT-4 from OpenAI’s made its first show to the public, while Google put out its Med-PaLM 2, a new-and-improved medical model etc. Meanwhile, Company Anthropic introduced its lighter and cheaper Claude API, which is a ChatGPT competitor. And in China, Tsinghua launched ChatGLM, a chat-based Chinese-English model, in somewhat as a reminder of ChatGPT. In this AI spring, much awaits for customers.
Designs are on the rise. November’s release ChatGPT turned AI a breaking news. Two months later, it increased to 100 million monthly active users, making it the fastest-growing consumer application in history. Earlier this month, OpenAI came to market for the first time—the ChatGPT, with its models still advancing. Finally, both Google and Microsoft put out AI plans as well.
Funds are flooding. Recent attention turns to a large amount of investment on Microsoft’s $10 billion OpenAI. The past few months have witnessed a “gold rush” for new AI model startups (新企业). Some outstanding ones: Adept raised $350 million, Google dropped another $300 million into Anthropic, Character AI raised $200 million from Andreesen Horowitz, Perplexity raised $25 million, and Salesforce Ventures launched a $250 million fund.
Demands for policy. As foundation models change rapidly, the demand for AI policy grows as well, which catches the attention of top policymakers across the world, attempting to ensure AI security. In the U.S., Congressman Ted Lieu presented a report calling for AI regulation that was written by ChatGPT, accompanied by a column (专栏) in the New York Times.
“AI is no longer a matter of science fiction, nor is it a technology confined or restricted to research labs. AI will dramatically change our lives. Jobs like journalists, lawyers and doctors are facing challenges. AI is a technology that is already being highly concerned.”
1. What do you know about AI according to paragraph 1?A.AI develops fast in these weeks. | B.GPT-4 is failed in the first show. |
C.Tsinghua released a medical model. | D.AI reminds people of the spring. |
A.Tsinghua developed one on medicine. |
B.More competitors were beaten recently. |
C.ChatGPT attracted 100 million users. |
D.GPT-4 is a newly updated version of ChatGPT from OpenAI. |
A.It’s just in America that AI technology develops. | B.Better policies are demanded for AI security. |
C.Google and Microsoft will make the best AI. | D.Funds are raised for a lot of new startups. |
A.Some professions are in face of challenge. | B.Models are lighter and cheaper. |
C.Quite a few funds are invested lately. | D.It develops rapidly in the west. |
【推荐3】Expanding (扩大) the world’s natural reserve to help protect animals and plants is less effective on its own because of rising levels of human activity. In general, recognizing spaces as protected is not decreasing human activity in atrisk areas.
The researchers found that a lack of money to pay for land protection is affecting protection efforts, but a lack of connection between people who live in protected natural areas and outsiders is also deleterious to protecting natural reserves.
The researchers found evidence of increased human activity in most protected areas in every area. However, they noted that human activity appeared to be more of a problem in nations with fewer roads and a lower place on the Human Development Index, which uses information about education and earnings to judge countries on human development.
Across the northern countries of the world and Australia, protected areas often proved effective at slowing human activity when compared with unprotected areas. In South America, Southeast Asia and African countries south of the Sahara Desert, unreasonable human activity inside protected areas was greatly higher.
The study also found agriculture is a major driving force behind human activity in protected areas. For example, African mangrove (红树林) forests listed as protected have experienced 13 percent greater loss because of agricultural activity than unprotected mangrove areas between 1995 and 2010.
Researchers say governments need to provide extra support to help protected areas. Simply setting aside a place as protected can’t be the beginning and the end of protection effort. Working with local communities and encouraging them to join the protection efforts is also important. If they’re not the partners of the protected areas, the wildlife protection will be much more difficult.
1. Which of the following can replace the underlined word “deleterious” in Paragraph 2?A.beneficial | B.harmful | C.important | D.unnecessary |
A.To offer the evidence. |
B.To introduce the topic. |
C.To explain the reasons. |
D.To explain the problem. |
A.Expand the protected areas. |
B.Offer more useful suggestions. |
C.Improve cooperation with local people. |
D.Stop people from agricultural activity. |
A.Reserves Are Managed at a High Cost |
B.Reserves in the World Should Be Canceled |
C.Reserves Should Be Ruled by Local People |
D.Reserves Are Not Enough to Protect Wildlife |
【推荐1】My 11-year-old daughter has been awarded an academic scholarship to a private schoo1. It’s only a small discount, but the scholarship means she’ll skip the waiting list provided my husband and I can cover$20, 000 a year.
Should we pay the private school fees, or choose free education instead?
I always assumed my children would go to a private school, like I did. Not because my family is wealthy, but because I believe that the best education is private.
It took years for me to make peace with the fact that my two children attended our local public primary schoo1.
They’ll go to a private high school, I told myself. Yet here we are. My eldest is now in her last year of primary school, and my husband and I will struggle to afford private schoo1.
If we’re to send our girl to private school, I could increase my work hours. My law degree was supposed to be my ticket to a good job and a solid income, but that’s not quite how it turned out.
The guilt and expectations are mine alone. I’m terrified that my daughter’s potential will be wasted at the public schoo1. And yet, I know that working more hours will make me break down.
During many sleepless nights, I felt troubled by the decision. Although I want the best for my daughter, I have my own dreams too. I can’t sacrifice everything for my precious girl. I explain that I want to be a positive role model for my daughter, and an unhappy parent is terrible strain on a family. I point out not even the privilege of private school will protect my children from disappointment or struggle.
And ultimately, it’s decided. My daughter is going to the public school behind our home. She couldn’t be more pleased.
It’s taken me a little longer, but now I’m content. More than my fancy private school education, it’s my family that shaped me. With high school now 25 years in the past, I can no longer remember the mathematical problems and Shakespearean quotes I once knew so perfectly. The lessons from my childhood home, however, have proved impossible to forget.
1. Why did the author want her daughter to go to a private school at first?A.Her daughter earned an academic scholarship. |
B.She wanted her daughter to receive the best education. |
C.She wanted her daughter to skip the waiting list. |
D.Her daughter’s potential was wasted at the public primary schoo1. |
A.private school doesn’t guarantee a solid income |
B.she didn’t want her daughter to struggle in private school |
C.however hard she worked, she couldn’t afford private school |
D.public school is the most balanced choice for her family |
A.the author’s daughter was disappointed |
B.the author felt sorry and guilty about it |
C.both the author and her daughter were satisfied with the result |
D.the author inspired her daughter to be a positive role model at school |
A.Family influences a child’s growth more than school education. |
B.The lessons learned during our childhood will stay with us forever. |
C.It always takes people a long time to make a fight decision. |
D.Private school education is not as good as people expect. |
【推荐2】If you're thinking about reaching for another biscuit to get you through the working day,think again.Eating unhealthy snacks at your desk makes you pile on almost half a stone a year,a survey has revealed.The waistlines of women suffer the most,with the average female putting on 61b 3oz—the equivalent of a whole dress size—while men see their weight increase by 51b 20z.
The report into our eating habits found that,on average,we eat at least two snacks a day,with 30 percent of us tucking into three or more.Women admit eating more than men,with a further 13 percent of ladies scoffing four or more snacks a day.The research,by The Village Bakery,found biscuits are the most common vice,with 42 percent regularly opening a pack,closely followed by chocolate (38 percent),crisps (32 percent) and cakes (13 percent).
And office workers are worse than most.Cakes and biscuits brought into work by colleagues are one of the main temptations office staff give in to.In addition,33 percent admit reaching for nibbles to cope with stress and 22 percent say they need a sugar rush to perk them up in the afternoon.
Simon Staddon,of The Village Bakery,said:"We were aware time-poor office workers can find it difficult to easily access a nutritional lunch.But we were really shocked by the extent to which 'quick fix' lunches are affecting weight gain and general well-being.Popular mid-afternoon pick-me-ups such as biscuits,chocolate and cakes are high in calories,fat and full of sugar,all of which affect your blood sugar levels and ultimately lead to weight gain."
The survey of 2,000 British men and women suggests we are often ashamed of our unhealthy eating. Twenty-four percent of Britons admit lying about how many snacks they eat with 33 percent of women lying, compared to 20 percent of men.Unfortunately,it's as if we are not likely to do anything positive to counteract the sweet treats.
1. According to the passage,women usually put weight on first______.A.on the face | B.on the legs |
C.on the feet | D.in the middle |
A.Colleagues eat them to save money. |
B.Staff use them to cope with their lunches. |
C.Colleagues often bring them to office. |
D.Bosses invite staff to eat them. |
A.Because it has much of nutrition. |
B.Because it has little effect on weight gain. |
C.Because it has little effect on general well-being. |
D.Because they have a short time to have their lunches. |
A.less likely to lie on snacks than men |
B.more likely to lie on snacks than men |
C.more ashamed of eating snacks than men |
D.less ashamed of eating snacks than men |
【推荐3】If you believe that scientists and artists are most creative when they're young, you are missing an important part of the story. A new study published in De Economist looked at Nobel Prize winners in the field of economics. It found there are two different peaks of creativity. One comes early in a person's career, while another comes later.
The research supports previous work by the authors that found similar patterns in the arts and other sciences.
"We believe what we found in this study isn't limited to economics, but could apply to creativity more generally," said Bruce Weinberg, lead author of the study and professor of economics at The Ohio State University.
"Many people believe that creativity is exclusively associated with youth,but it really depends on what kind of creativity you're talking about."
In the study, those who did their most groundbreaking work early in their careers tended to be "conceptual" innovators(创新者).
These type of innovators "think outside the box", challenging conventional wisdom and suddenly coming up with new ideas. Conceptual innovators are not yet immersed(沉浸于)in the accepted theories of their field, Weinberg said.
But there is another kind of creativity, he said, which is found among "experimental" innovators. These innovators accumulate knowledge through their careers and find new ways to understand it.
The long periods of trial and error for important experimental innovations come later in a Nobel laureate's(荣誉获得者的)career.
"Whether you hit your creative peak early or late in your career depends on whether you have a conceptual or experimental approach," Weinberg said.
The researchers took a novel, empirical(经验主义的)approach to the study, which involved 31 laureates. They arranged the laureates on a list from the most experimental to most conceptual.
This ranking was based on the laureates' most important work, classifying them into "conceptual" or "experimental".
After classifying the laureates, the researchers determined the age at which each laureate made his most important contribution to economics and could be considered at his creative peak.
They found that conceptual laureates peaked between ages 25 and 29. Experimental laureates peaked when they were roughly twice as old, in their mid-50s.
"Our research suggests that when you're most creative is more about how you approach your work."
1. What did the study published in De Economist find?A.Creativity comes at any age, young or old. |
B.Creativity tends to decrease as people get older. |
C.Economists, artists and other scientists have much in common. |
D.Economists are more creative than artists and other scientists. |
A.Follow rules strictly. |
B.Experiment on boxes. |
C.Break old thought patterns. |
D.Figure out how to escape from a box. |
A.They usually come up with new ideas all of a sudden. |
B.They make discoveries through constant trial and error. |
C.The majority of them reach their creative peak in their twenties. |
D.They make more contributions than "conceptual" innovators. |
A.One's personality type. |
B.What kind of job one takes. |
C.How one handles their work. |
D.One's attitude toward their work. |