组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:264 题号:11305845

Microplastics are everywhere in our environment. It’s hardly surprising that the tiny fragments have also been found in the human body. A new study shows that Americans are consuming as many as 121,000 particles each year.

Measuring 50 to 500 microns in length, microplastics come from a variety of sources, including large plastics that break down into smaller and smaller pieces. Therefore, much remains unknown about the common existence of these materials within the human body, as well as the impact on human health.

Hoping to fill in some of these gaps, a research team, led by Kieran Cox, a Ph. D. candidate at the University of Victoria, looked at 26 papers assessing the number of microplastics in commonly consumed food items, among which are seafood, sugar, salt, honey, alcohol and water. The team also evaluated the potential consumption of microplastics through inhalation (吸入) using previously reported data on microplastic concentrations in the air and the Environmental Protection Agency’s data on respiration rates. Based on these data, the researchers calculated that our annual consumption of microplastics via foods and drinks ranges from 39,000 to 52,000 particles. When microplastics taken in through inhalation are taken into account, the range jumps to between 74,000 and 121,000 particles per year.

The authors of the study found that people who drink exclusively from plastic water bottles absorb additional 90,000 microplastics each year, compared with 4,000 among those who only consume tap water. “This shows that small decisions, over the course of a year, really matter and have an impact.” Cox says. The new study, according to its authors, was the first to investigate “the accumulative human exposure to microplastics”. But in all likelihood, the research tells only a small part of the entire story. Collectively, the foods and drinks that the researchers analyzed represent 15 percent of Americans’ caloric intake. The team could not account for food groups like fruits, vegetables and grain because there simply is not enough data on their microplastic content.

For those who worried about microplastic consumption, cutting down bottled water is a good place to start. But for the heart of the problem, we have to stop producing and using so many plastics.

1. What makes it difficult to know microplastics commonly exist in the human body?
A.The quality of microplastics.
B.The quantity of microplastics.
C.The size of microplastics.
D.The shape of microplastics.
2. How did Kieran Cox’s team calculate the potential consumption of microplastics?
A.By analyzing existing data.
B.By comparing the impact.
C.By studying papers.
D.By conducting experiments.
3. What can we know according to the text?
A.The study is among the earliest ones to investigate human exposure to microplastics.
B.Drinking less plastic bottle water helps to take in fewer microplastics.
C.Cox’s team gained comprehensive information of microplastics taken in by humans.
D.People consume 74,000 to 121,000 particles of microplastics per year from foods and drinks.
4. What is the best title for the text?
A.The Potential Problems of Microplastics
B.Microplastics Found Within Human Bodies
C.Microplastics Coming From Various Sources
D.The Impact of Microplastes on Human Health

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了一项研究发现,当学生以更快的播放速度观看录制的讲座时,理解不会受到负面影响,但当播放速度达到正常速度的2.5倍时,理解会受到影响。

【推荐1】Recorded lectures have become a part of course instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic, and college students often try to watch these recordings at double their normal speed or even faster. But does comprehension (理解) suffer as a result?

Surprisingly, no-up to a point. A new UCLA study has found learning and knowledge memory is not negatively affected when students watch recorded lectures at faster playback speeds. However, comprehension was found to suffer when playback reached 2.5 times normal speed.

The study divided 231 students into four different playback speed groups (normal speed, 1.5X, 2X and 2.5X). Each group watched a pair of short lecture videos and then immediately completed a 40-question comprehension test.

Little difference was found between the normal playback speed group and the 1.5 times or double speed groups. They all performed similarly on the tests, but the group watching videos at 2.5 times normal speed didn’t do as well. A second test a week later saw similar results, suggesting neither short- or long-term comprehension was negatively affected by watching videos at faster playback speeds.

“Surprisingly, video speed had little effect on both immediate and delayed comprehension until learners go beyond twice the normal speed,” explains lead author Dillon Murphy.

Murphy says students should be careful about how they use faster playback in terms of finding optimal study strategies. If students choose to speed up lecture playback, Murphy says, they should use the time saved for additional learning.

“While our study didn’t show obvious negative results to watching lecture videos at up to double the normal speed, we are against using this strategy to simply save time,” Murphy says. “Students can deepen learning if they spend the time saved on things like reviewing flashcards or taking practice tests.”

1. Why does the author mention the question in paragraph 1?
A.To express his doubts.B.To introduce the topic for discussion.
C.To describe recorded lectures.D.To compare different ideas.
2. How did the researchers make the findings?
A.By using earlier studies.B.By building models.
C.By comparing experiment data.D.By interviewing teachers.
3. The underlined word “optimal” in paragraph 6 is closest in meaning to ________.
A.bestB.simplifiedC.complexD.acceptable
4. What is the purpose of the study?
A.To check the speed of understanding.
B.To prove how important taking notes is.
C.To find the most appropriate learning approach.
D.To see how viewing speeds affect learning effects.
2022-07-06更新 | 188次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。主要介绍的是关于ChatGPT的常见问题解答,其中一项是关于如何设置作业阻止学生使用ChatGPT的回答和学生在写作过程中如何使用ChatGPT。

【推荐2】Recently, the artificial intelligence app ChatGPT has been making headlines in the higher education media and beyond. Some have taken an alarmist approach, such as a recent Atlantic piece titled “The College Essay Is Dead.” Others have been more optimistic, examining the limitations of the app as well as offering suggestions for how it can inform student learning and writing. Below is an FAQ about ChatGPT.

Q: How can I design assignments to discourage use of ChatGPT?

A: One important strategy for preventing use of ChatGPT or other similar technologies is to create assignments that require students to show stages of their work (outlines, rough drafts, etc.).

Ask students to refer to course materials and discussions, which would be impossible for ChatGPT to access and would also promote valuable integration skills.

Ask students to engage in and submit a reflection about what they have learned from completing the assignment. Sample tips include: a) Discuss the most challenging and most rewarding aspects of your project. b) What was the most surprising thing you learned in the course of this project? c) If you had the chance to do it again, what one thing would you have done differently on this project?

Teach citation skills and research skills, including expression of original thought.

It is worth considering why you assign writing in your classes and discussing that clearly with students. For most professors, writing represents a form of thinking. But for some students, writing is simply a product, a collection of words repeated back to the teacher. According to John Warner, a blogger and author of two books on writing, “If you can create an atmosphere where students are invested in learning, they are not going to copy, and they are not going to dodge the work. But the work has to be worth doing on some level, beyond getting the grade.”

Q: How can I use ChatGPT in the writing process?

A: These types of apps are not going away and will no doubt rise sharply in the future, so encouraging students to use them productively could be seen as an important contribution to information competence.

1. What can we learn from the first paragraph?
A.College essay is dead because of ChatGPT.
B.ChatGPT offers suggestions only for students.
C.There is no limitations to this app.
D.ChatGPT is a hot issue in certain fields.
2. Which of the following assignment may NOT discourage use of ChatGPT?
A.Write an essay by referring to course materials.
B.Write an essay about group discussion.
C.Hand in homework with specific steps.
D.Attach your paper with citations.
3. What does John Warner say about teaching?
A.Making sure students are actively engaged.
B.Creating a happy atmosphere for students.
C.Teaching students how to think wisely.
D.Making learning an investment for students.
4. Which of the following is the best title for the text?
A.ChatGPT: A Smart Artificial Intelligence App
B.ChatGPT: A Useful Tool for Student Learning and Writing
C.ChatGPT: Assignments Created for Students
D.ChatGPT: A Double-edged Sword for Teaching and Learning
2023-04-21更新 | 78次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约300词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】From ancient myths(神话) to modern research, left-handed people have been labeled by society—for good and bad. Nowadays, “lefties” are generally believed to be more talented—Leonardo da Vinci, Pablo Picasso and Michelangelo Buonarroti were all left-handed.

However, nobody has been quite sure what determines a person’s dominant(占主导地位的) hand. In a new study, scientists have pinpointed for the first time the part of our DNA that relates to left-handedness.

According to a report in the Guardian, the authors found these DNA regions(区域) after analyzing the genomes(基因组) of around 400,000 people in the UK, including about 38,332 who were left-handed.

The researchers looked for differences in the DNA between left- and right- handed participants. They found that four genetic(基因的) markers that related strongly to left-handedness, with three located in genes that influence making proteins(蛋白质) for brain development.

The researchers also linked these regions to language-related features in the brain. Using detailed brain scans(扫描) of about 9, 000 of the participants whose DNA had been analyzed, they found that the left and right sides of the brain that deal with language work in a better way in lefties.

However, the researchers also pointed out that genes aren’t everything when it comes to being left- or right- handed. According to the BBC, researchers believe that “handedness” is about 25 percent genetic, meaning that the other 75 percent may be determined by a person’s environment.

“Here, we have shown that left-handedness is a result of the developmental biology of the brain, in part driven by the complex interplay(相互作用) of many genes,” said Dominic Furnissa, a professor at the University of Oxford.

“It is part of the rich tapestry(织锦) of what makes us human, ”he adds.

1. The underlined word “pinpointed” in the second paragraph is closest in meaning to “________”.
A.IdentifiedB.Explained
C.ConnectedD.Considered
2. What did researchers find from their study?
A.Left-handedness is determined by four genetic markers.
B.Left-handedness is a result of more protein in the brain.
C.Lefties carry out language-related work better than righties.
D.The regions dealing with language in the brain work better in lefties.
3. What would Dominic Furnissa probably agree with, according to the text?
A.Genes are the main reason for left-handedness.
B.Left-handedness could help one’s brain develop better.
C.Left-handedness is caused by a variety of factors that include genes.
D.A person’s living environment contributes little to their left-handedness.
2020-03-31更新 | 13次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般