组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:72 题号:11582456

The more parents talk to their children, the faster those children’s vocabularies grow and the better their intelligence develops. Dr. Hart and Dr. Risley published their study in 1995.

They found a close relationship between the number of words a child’s parents had spoken to him by the time he was three and his academic success at the age of nine. At three, children born into professional families had heard 30 million more words than those from a poorly performed family. Besides, recent studies show that words should be spoken directly to a child, rather than simply heard in the home. Leaving children in front of the television does not have the same effect. Neither does letting them sit at the feet of academic parents while the grown-ups talk about Plato.

The effects can be seen directly in the brain. Babies are born with about 100 billion neurons more or less, and connections between these neurons form at an exponentially(以指数方式) rising rate in the early years of life. It is the pattern of these connections that determines how well the brain works, and what it learns. By the time a child is three years old, there will be about 1,000 trillion connections in his brain, and that child’ s experiences continuously determine which are strengthened and which decreased. This process—gradual and irreversible, has shaped the path of the child’s life.

Fortunately, there are tools that can help those silent parents. One such is a Language Environment Analysis (LENA) device. It is like a pedometer, but instead of recording users’ walking steps, this device keeps track of words by analyzing the speech children hear. Parents use it to monitor and improve their patterns of words, much as a pedometer-wearing couch potato might try to reach 10,000 steps a day. Plus, parents are taught to make the words they speak to their children more enriching. In this way parents can make sure of an enough input.

1. Which factor influences the children’s intelligence development most according to the text?
A.The wealth of households.B.Parents' academic success.
C.Babies’ inborn language ability.D.Effective vocabulary input by parents.
2. What can we learn from paragraph 3?
A.The number of neurons at birth varies a lot.
B.Neurons connections can be decided by experiences.
C.Individual efforts can also shape the kids' development.
D.School education leads to faster increase of the connections.
3. Why is the "pedometer" mentioned in the last paragraph?
A.To give parents two options.B.To offer two possible solutions.
C.To show the similarity to LENA.D.To tell the difference from LENA.
4. What should parents do for their babies according to the text?
A.Involve in their games.B.Share more quality time with them.
C.Enlarge their vocabulary through media.D.Expose them to being spoken to directly.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】Many people think that communication is the source of most of their work-related conflicts but they'd be wrong. In a work context, more conflicts come from structural relationships and personal differences than communication itself.

Organizations create job descriptions, specialized work groups, and authority relationships, all with the intent to improve coordination (协调). But in doing so, they separate people and create the potential for conflicts. For instance, departments within organizations have diverse goals. Purchasing is concerned with the timely acquisition of materials and supplies at low prices; quality control's attention is focused on improving quality and ensuring that the organization's products meet standard…When groups within an organization seek diverse ends, there is increased potential for conflicts.

Have you ever met people to whom you took an immediate disliking? Most of the opinions they expressed, you disagreed with. Even insignificant characteristics-the way they cocked their head when they talked or smirked when they smiled-annoyed you. We've all met people like that, and many of us have to work with people like this.

Today's organizations are increasingly diverse in terms of age, gender and race. So, not surprisingly, employees differ on the importance they place on general values such as responsibility, equality and ambition. They also differ on job-related values such as the importance of family over work or freedom against authority. These differences often surface in work-related interactions and create significant interpersonal conflicts.

The above doesn't mean that communication can't be a source of conflicts. It can. Differing word connotations, insufficient exchange of information, poor listening skills, and the like, create conflicts. But the belief that “we can deal with our differences if we just communicate more” is not necessarily true. The evidence actually shows that the potential for conflicts increases when there is too much communication as well as when there's too little.

So when you're trying to manage conflicts, take a thoughtful look at their source. It's more likely that the conflict is coming from work-related requirements, personality differences, or dissimilar values, it is from poor communication. And that might influence the actions you take to resolve the conflict.

1. From Para.2, we know that in an organization, __________.
A.job descriptions can effectively improve cooperation
B.different goals of branches may cause disagreements
C.division of labor usually results inharmonious relationship
D.the setting of different departments is to encourage competition
2. The author holds that __________.
A.fewer conflicts will appear if we communicate more
B.most people share similar values in the same organization
C.communication is just one of the reasons for most conflicts
D.we'd better calm down before taking action when in conflict
3. Which of the following shows the structure of the passage?
A.B.
C.D.
2021-03-28更新 | 268次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】Think you have already reached your peak in life? You might want to think again. According to a new research, we're happiest at two periods in our lives — not just one. Researchers at the London School of Economics and Political Science asked 23,000 German volunteers aged 17 to 85 to rate their life satisfaction. Participants predicted how happy they would feel in five years, and then, after five years' time, reported back on how they actually felt.

Their results? Anything but unpleasant! The study found that happiness tends to follow a U-shaped curve over an individual's lifetime, with satisfaction reaching higher levels during the extremes of the study’s age range and swinging down in middle age. Plus, the researchers noted the two most important years when happiness peaks: ages 23 and 69.

As is shown in our daily life, it makes a lot of sense. In our early 20s, we're energetic and excited about the changes that come along with young age: new jobs, new places to travel, and new people to meet. By the time we reach our 60s and 70s, though, we have likely retired and can now find the time — not to mention the money — to book a flight to Hawaii at a moment's notice. After all, your 40+ years are a busy time filled with raising families, climbing the corporate ladder, and you know, it's the life in general.

Of course, that's all the more reason to find easy ways to be happier without really trying, regardless of your age! Experts recommend prioritizing (优先考虑) small yet rewarding tasks like taking a walk or spending time with family. Just remember, now you have one more reason to look forward to getting older: an increase in happiness!

1. What does the author think of the research results?
A.They are predictable.B.They are annoying.
C.They are satisfactory.D.They are surprising.
2. What does the underlined word "it" refer to in Paragraph 3?
A.The outcome of the research.B.The second peak in life.
C.The study's age range.D.The first peak in life.
3. When does people’s satisfaction reach the lowest in a lifetime?
A.In one’s teens.B.In one's forties.
C.In one's twenties.D.In one's sixties.
4. Which of the following might be the best title for the text?
A.The shape of happiness.B.The older, the happier.
C.How to be happy.D.The happiest ages in life.
2020-03-20更新 | 53次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约490词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要讲述了美国宇航局将会撞击一颗小行星,试图改变它的轨道,试图阻止人类毁灭。

【推荐3】

NASA will crash a spacecraft into an asteroid (小行星) to try to change its orbit, attempting to prevent humans going the same way as the dinosaurs.

Earth is constantly being disturbed by small pieces of debris (碎片), but they usually burn up or break up long before they hit the ground. Once in a while, however, something large enough to do significant damage makes impact. About 66 million years ago, one such crash is thought to have wiped out the dinosaurs. Someday, something similar could end human beings-unless we can find a way to tackle it.

NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (Dart) mission is the first attempt to test if such asteroid redirection is a realistic strategy: investigating whether a spacecraft can autonomously reach a target asteroid and intentionally crash into it, as well as measuring the amount of redirection. “If it works, it would be a big deal, because it would prove that we have the technical capability of protecting ourselves,” said Jay Tate, the director of the National Near Earth Object Information Center.

The 610kg Dart spacecraft is scheduled to be launched at the target—the Didymos system-a harmless pair of asteroids consisting of a 163-metre “moonlet” asteroid called Dimorphos that orbits a larger 780-metre asteroid called Didymos (Greek for “twin”). The plan is to crash the spacecraft into Dimorphos when the asteroid system is at its closest to Earth-about 6.8 million miles away.

About 10 days before the impact, a miniaturized satellite called LiciaCube will separate from the main spacecraft, enabling images of the impact to be relayed back to Earth. Combined with observations from ground-based telescopes, and an onboard camera that will record the final moments before the crash, these recordings will enable scientists to calculate the degree to which the impact has changed Dimorphos’s orbit. The expectation is that it will change the speed of the smaller asteroid by approximately 1% and reduce its orbit around the larger asteroid.

Then, in November 2024, the European Space Agency’s Hera spacecraft will visit the Didymos system and conduct a further close-up analysis of the consequences of this snooker (斯诺克) game, recording details such as the precise makeup and internal structure of Dimorphos, and the size and shape of the hole left by Dart. Such details are vital for transforming asteroid redirection into a repeatable technique.

Even then, it is impossible that any single redirection strategy would be enough. “The problem is that no two asteroids or comets are alike, and how you redirect one depends on a huge number of variables. There is no silver bullet in this game. What you need is a whole folder of different redirection methods for different types of targets,” said Tate.

So, while this may be one small step towards planetary protection, many more are likely to be necessary to avoid destruction.

1. What is the purpose of Paragraph 2?
A.To examine the impact of dinosaurs’ extinction.
B.To explain the necessity of NASA’s Dart mission.
C.To show the damage caused by small pieces of debris.
D.To highlight the crisis threatening human beings at present.
2. Which of the following pictures illustrates the mission?
A.B.
C.D.
3. What is the function of LiciaCube?
A.Sending impact data back to Earth.
B.Calculating the length of Dimorphos’s orbit.
C.Helping the satellite separate from the spacecraft.
D.Recording the scientists’ ground-based observations.
4. What does the underlined sentence “There is no silver bullet in this game” mean?
A.There is no challenge too big to overcome.
B.There is no possibility to satisfy NASA’s needs.
C.There is no single solution to the complex problem.
D.There is no strategy to help make an obvious decision.
2022-08-11更新 | 677次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般