The constant rise of global demand for protein poses a threat of meat shortage in the agricultural sector. To address this, a few scientists use artificial meat as an alternative to traditional ones, which from the growing process to its benefits proves it does no harm or even it does good to us.
Currently, one of the most advanced techniques to grow meat in the lab involves taking cells from an animal and changing them to muscle cells. The cells are then cultured with nutrients and essential vitamins and can be developed to any quantity and then shaped into hamburgers, steaks or mince, and so it is also called “cultured” meat. “Cultured meat is not genetically engineered,” Dr. Mark Post of Maastricht University says. “It is meat grown from the same cells that produce the meat in the cow, but this time outside the cow.” He believes that cultured meat shouldn’t be any better or worse for you than old-school animal flesh.
This may sound like science fiction, but it is not such a strange idea and there are reasons to be excited about it. “The environment impacts of cultured meat could be lower than those of meat produced in the conventional way,” said Hanna Tuomisto, a researcher at Oxford University. The process would require between 7% and 45% less energy than the same volume of conventionally produced meat such as pork, beef or lamb, and could be engineered to use only 1% of the land and 4% of the water associated with conventional meat. Tuomisto’s research also shows that cultured meat could be part of the solution to feeding the world’s growing population, at the same time cutting emissions and saving both energy and water.
Aside from the above benefits, cultured meat should also provide cheap nutrition. Animal protein is an increasing part of diets, as millions of people in rapidly emerging economies are drawn out of poverty and become able to afford more meat in their diets. The pressure this creates has been an important factor in rapidly rising grain prices, deforestation in the Amazon basin, increasing water shortage and rising pressure to find new farmland. Growing meat artificially could potentially take huge pressure off farmlands around the world.
Another benefit would be to help animal welfare and protect endangered species. If most of our meat was grown, there would be no need for factory farms. Conditions for animals could be greatly improved. Elsewhere, it could also stop illegal endangered species hunts by providing an alternative way to produce meat form these species.
Exactly how long it takes before the meat is sold in supermarkets depends on the investment in research and development. One thing seems clear: Unless vegetarianism catches on in a very big way, the world’s demand for meat will soon outpace our supply of cows, chickens, pigs and other edible animals. The health and environmental impacts of cultured meat aren’t going to be hypothetical for much longer.
1. What does the underlined word “cultured” probably mean?A.grown. | B.sorted. | C.connected. | D.shaped. |
A.tastes much better | B.contains more nutrients |
C.saves more natural resources | D.changes people’s habit of eating meat |
A.comparing the results from different researches |
B.explaining the advantages of the artificial meat |
C.presenting the problems caused by meat shortage |
D.showing the current situation of food consumption |
I: introduction P: point SP: sub-point C: conclusion
A.![]() | B.![]() |
C.![]() | D.![]() |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Whether to put soda machines in community school
There is a discussion among members of our school district. It is about putting soda machines in community schools. Those in favor point to the money the schools will receive. Others think it is unhealthy for students.
We at the Rocky Ridge Town Center believe that there is a way for both sides to come to an agreement. Why not allow schools to have machines that sell bottled water?
Water is known to provide many health benefits. The bodies of human being are made up of 60% water. A child who does not drink adequate water may feel tired. He or she may also have headaches.
A.This idea makes cents and sense. |
B.Our suggestion is a win-win for everyone. |
C.However, soda is not healthy for students. |
D.This is because soda is almost made up of sugar. |
E.Therefore, machines selling water must be put at school. |
F.This can lower a child’s ability to concentrate in school. |
G.For health reasons, few students will choose to buy soda drinks. |
【推荐2】If the food in the supermarket is not fresh anymore or is near the “sell-by-date”, it goes into trash bins. Every day, a large amount of food is wasted.
To cut down on food waste, France passed a new law last month. It forbids supermarkets to throw away unsold food. Instead, they must donate it to charities. For food that isn’t safe for humans to eat, it can be used as animal feed. If not, the supermarkets will face fines of up to 75,000 euros (around 542,200 yuan) or two years in prison. The law also encourages educational programs for schools and businesses about food waste.
France is the first country to make a law that forbids wasting food, but it is actually a worldwide problem. According to the United Nations , each year 1.3 billion tons of food is wasted all over the world, and just 25 percent of that food could feed all the hungry people in the world.
The good thing is that people around the world are trying different things to deal with the food waste problem. Galdakao, Spain, put a public fridge in the center of town. Anyone can drop off food and anyone can come and take them. A supermarket in Canada, Loblaws, encourages people to buy “ugly food” by selling them at lower prices, so they won’t end up being wasted. In China, we also have the “clear your plate” campaign. This means you should eat everything on your plate or take away the food you haven’t eaten up.
1. The underlined words “sell-by date” in Paragraph 1 mean ______in Chinese.A.销售期 | B.购物节 |
C.保质期· | D.制造商 |
A.They should throw it away as soon as possible. |
B.They can donate it to poor people. |
C.They can take the food home and cook it for dinner. |
D.They must give it away to charities. |
A.help people not to waste food |
B.encourage people to buy “ugly food” |
C.have people clear their plate |
D.keep food to feed animals. |
A.the food waste problem is becoming more serious. |
B.People’s attitude towards wasting food is changing |
C.every country should make a law to forbid wasting food. |
D.a large amount of food is wasted every day. |
【推荐3】Changing the wording about expiration dates (保质期) on food items of easily going bad — which is currently unregulated (缺乏监管) and widely variable — could help reduce food waste, according to a new Cornell University study.
This work results from the “wild west” landscape of food date labels which is expected to be driven, to a large extent, by manufacturers’ (制造商) strong wish to sell more products. It is important for both the government’s decisions regarding date labels and the market impacts of reducing food waste.
A survey of consumers found that certain wording — “best by,” as opposed to “best if used by,” for example — had the possibility to reduce food waste, but that result differed depending on the type of food in question. The easier food is to go bad, the more likely it is to be thrown away.
“There are no practical rules about food date labels in the U.S. If you go into the yogurt section at a U.S. grocery store, you would see various date labels — ‘use by’, ‘best by’, ‘best if used by’, ‘fresh by’, or ‘sell by’, etc. Some consumers might smell the food to see if it is still good, while others might just look at the date label and drop it,” said Rickard, leader of the study team. “And the truth is that these date labels are not food safety dates; they’re just food quality dates.”
The 15 food items selected for the survey, including bread, cookies, chicken, packaged salad greens and canned soup, all typically use date labels with different wording variations. Survey results showed an increase in throwing intentions with the “use by” and the “sell by” date label, inferring that food with these date labels was more often thrown and replaced. So they think that the word “use” spoke more directly to the food safety impact of consuming food past the date listed on the package, and could therefore lead to an increase in food waste. However, the wording “best by” seemed to refer only to food quality beyond a certain date and led to less waste.
1. What is probably the main reason for so many date labels in the U.S.?A.The government wants to monitor the market. |
B.The producers intend to increase the food sales. |
C.The sellers tend to meet the needs of consumers. |
D.The manufacturers hope to ensure the food quality. |
A.“Best by”. | B.“Sell by”. | C.“Use by”. | D.“Best if used by”. |
A.To solve a problem. | B.To give a warning. |
C.To offer some advice. | D.To prove a fact. |
A.Similar Date Labels Mislead Shoppers |
B.Words Matter in Food Safety Messaging |
C.The Correct View of Consumption Is Important |
D.The U.S. Is Taking Measures to Reduce Food Waste |
【推荐1】Self-driving cars are just around the corner. Such vehicles will make getting from one place to another safer and less stressful. They also could cut down on traffic, reduce pollution and limit accidents. But how should driverless cars handle emergencies? People disagree on the answer. And that might put the brakes on this technology, a new study concludes.
To understand the challenge, imagine a car that suddenly meets some pedestrians in the road. Even with braking, it’s too late to avoid a crash. So, the car’s artificial intelligence must decide whether to swerve (急转弯). To save the pedestrians, should the car swerve off the road or swerve into oncoming traffic? What if such options would likely kill the car’s passengers?
Researchers used online surveys to study people’s attitudes about such situations with driverless cars. Survey participants mostly agreed that driverless cars should be designed to protect the most people. That included swerving into walls (or otherwise sacrificing their passengers) to save a larger number of pedestrians. But there is a dilemma. Those same surveyed people want to ride in cars that protect passengers at all costs — even if the pedestrians would now end up dying. Jean Bonnefon is a psychologist at the Toulouse School of Economics in France. He and his colleagues reported their findings in Science.
“Autonomous cars can completely change transportation”, says study co-author Iyad Rahwan. But, he adds, this new technology creates a moral dilemma that could slow its acceptance.
“Makers of driverless cars are in a tough spot,” Bonnefon’s group warns. Most buyers would want their car to be programmed to protect them in preference to other people. However, regulations might one day instruct that cars must act for the greater good. That would mean saving the most people. But the scientists think rules like this could drive away buyers. If so, all the potential benefits of driverless cars would be lost.
“Compromises (折中) might be possible,” Kurt Gray says. He is a psychologist at the University of North Carolina. He thinks that even if all driverless cars are programmed to protect their passengers in emergencies, traffic accidents will decrease. Those vehicles might be dangerous to pedestrians on rare occasions. But they “won’t speed, won’t drive drunk and won’t text while driving, which would be a win for society.”
1. What is the challenge facing self-driving cars?A.How self-driving cars reduce accidents. | B.The technical problems that self-driving cars have. |
C.How self-driving cars handle emergencies. | D.People’s negative attitudes towards self-driving cars. |
A.Quick decisions are required for self-driving cars’ AI. |
B.People are in a difficult situation about self-driving cars. |
C.The potential benefits of self-driving cars are ignored by buyers. |
D.Self-driving cars are supposed to protect passengers at any price. |
A.Favourable. | B.Doubtful. | C.Critical. | D.Neutral. |
A.People Disagree on the Future of Driverless Cars |
B.Driverless Cars are Revolutionising Transportation |
C.New Regulations Have Great Influence on Driverless Cars |
D.Moral Dilemma Could Limit the Appeal of Driverless Cars |
【推荐2】Dandelion (蒲公英) seeds can travel for miles before finally floating down and settling somewhere new. Researchers recently discovered how the plants decide to spread. “We noticed that the dandelion parachute (降落伞) is closed in foggy mornings but then open again when the sun is up during the day,” according to Naomi Nakayama, a researcher of bioengineering. “The dandelion uses a bunch of hairs to improve air drag and aid its flight. Unlike insects or birds, they don’t need any energy input to fly a long distance- even hundreds of kilometers—they simply catch the wind.”
Researchers discovered the parachutes open and close using what they say is like an actuator (触动器), a device that changes energy and signals into movement. But this actuator doesn’t use any energy. The middle of the dandelion’s parachute is able to sense the amount of humidity (湿度) by absorbing water molecules (分子) in the air. Using signals about humidity information, they either open their parachutes and fly off or they close them and stay where they are.
“The center of the parachute changes its shape, moving the hairs altogether in harmony,” Nakayama says. “It’s basically a sponge made of no-longer living plant cells, which are arranged in a tube empty inside. The inner side and the outer side swell with water to different degrees, and that drives the movement.”
Knowing what causes dandelions to spread their seeds could help scientists learn how they deal with climate change. They say understanding the response could help researchers design new soft robots, which are those made from flexible materials that imitate soft bodies. “How plants move their body parts are different from animals and a simple, localized expansion could be enough to move arms,” Nakayama says. “Movement of a few arms has been achieved, but this is the first of many arm actuators. It is simple in design, so there is a lot of space for biomimicry (仿生学)”.
1. What makes the dandelion fly?A.Energy. | B.Wind. | C.Fog. | D.Parachute. |
A.By spreading their seeds. | B.By changing energy into movement. |
C.By feeling humidity information. | D.By staying where they are. |
A.Scientists make a robot out of dandelion. | B.Plants move just like the animals. |
C.Dandelions move with arms. | D.Plants can inspire biomimicry. |
A.Observing Dandelions | B.Dandelions and Climate Change |
C.Making Soft Robots | D.Dandelions and Biomimicry |
【推荐3】A major new facility to pull CO2 out of the atmosphere has started operating in Iceland. Experts say the new technology could eventually play an important role in reducing greenhouse gases.
The plant in southwest Iceland is the biggest of its kind. It is able to capture 900 tons of CO2 every year but it needs heat and electricity to work. It is using energy produced from waste and is built on the roof of a waste incineration (焚烧) plant, and through the burning of rubbish, energy is generated.
Human-sized fans are built into a series of boxes. They take CO2 out of the air, catching it in sponge like filters (过滤器). The filters are exploded with heat, freeing the gas, which is then mixed with water and pumped (用泵输送) into deep underground caves, where over time it turns into dark-gray stone. Pumping CO2 into the ground is just one way to deal with it.
The makers are also selling the gas to be used again. The CO2 can be captured just a few 100 miles away. It is pumped through an underground pipeline directly into a greenhouse.
Vegetables and plants love CO2 and higher concentrations of the gas within the greenhouse improve the growth of plants.
By 2050, humanity will need to pull nearly a billion metric tons of CO2 from the atmosphere every year through direct air capture technology to achieve carbon neutral goals.
The plant in Iceland will be able to capture 4,00 metric tons annually—just a small amount of what will be necessary, but one that Climeworks, the company that built it, says can grow rapidly as efficiency improves and costs decrease.
“This is a market that does not yet exist, but a market that urgently needs to be built,” said Christoph Gebald who co-founded Climeworks. “This plant is really the blueprint to further increase the size and really industrialize.”
1. How does the carbon capture facility work?A.It needs heat and water to work. |
B.Energy is produced by burning waste. |
C.Carbon capture generates a lot of heat and electricity. |
D.It produces lots of heat and electricity during operation. |
A.The methods of breaking down CO2. |
B.The approaches to reusing waste gas. |
C.The necessity of building greenhouses. |
D.The workings of the carbon-catching plant. |
A.It will decrease the cost of energy production. |
B.It can help reach the carbon neutral goals in advance. |
C.It will speed up the reduction of CO2 levels in the air. |
D.It may replace the traditional carbon storage system. |
A.Supportive. | B.Neutral. |
C.Disapproving. | D.Uncaring. |
【推荐1】Kjell Inge Roekke is a billionaire owner of an oil company from Norway. As a young man, he was a high school dropout who moved to the US to become an ordinary fisherman. Now he is the tenth-richest man in his country. Worth two billion dollars, he plans to give much of his money away and is starting with cleaning up our oceans. In the Pacific Ocean, there is an island called the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, which is twice the size of the continental United States. It consists of nothing but small pieces of plastic and the dead bodies of sea life and birds. The billionaire is buying a state-of-the-art ship. With the latest equipment on board, the ship will remove five tons of plastic from our oceans daily.
Kjell started his business empire building industrial fishing boats. He believes he owes his fortune to the ocean and wants to pay the debt back. “I want to give back to society the majority of what I’ve earned. This ship is a part of it.” said the seagoing man. Managed by the conservation organization WWF, the ship’s mission is to get the poisonous things out of the oceans.
It couldn’t come at a better time. Earlier this year a killer whale washed up on a UK shore was poisoned by man-made chemicals. The whale called Lulu was the most poisoned on record. It was 20 years old and had never reproduced because her body had been badly damaged.
Kjell has given WWF complete control of the boat. The conservation organization is not comfortable with the practices of the Norwegian’s oil business. Yet in the struggle to save the environment, unlikely partners must work together. Without the world’s oceans, life on Earth wouldn’t exist.
1. What has Kjell decided to do?A.Make our oceans clean again. |
B.Put an end to his oil business. |
C.Stop using plastics in his daily life. |
D.Remove the rubbish with his own hands. |
A.Beautiful. | B.Advanced. | C.Expensive. | D.Comfortable. |
A.To ask people to help the creature. |
B.To invite people to join in the effort. |
C.To stress the consequence of the pollution. |
D.To draw attention to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. |
A.Ocean pollution calls for combined action. |
B.It is comfortable to work with a billionaire. |
C.His business is friendly to the environment. |
D.He has given up control of his newly bought ship. |
【推荐2】Sometimes maybe you take vitamins to support brain function, or stock up on foods that promote brain health. But new guidelines (指南) from the American Academy of Neurology suggest there are better things you can do to keep your mind sharp.
According to the AAN, one in four adults between the ages of 80 and 84 have mild cognitive impairment. To address this wide-spread problem, a group of neurologists and Alzheimer’s (阿尔茨海默症的) experts went through existing research to determine the best ways to prevent and treat cognitive decline----and you might be surprised by what they included and what they didn’t.
Surprisingly, the AAN guidelines do not include any medication(药物) or dietary recommendations. The authors stress that no high-quality long-term studies finding that food or drugs can help with cognitive decline. The guidelines also say doctors may consider recommending cognitive training to patients with memory loss, but not to rely on it. So far, the report’s authors say the evidence is too inconclusive to say for sure if brain exercises, like memory and attention training or problem solving for everyday issues associated with memory loss, are beneficial. Still, these morning brain exercises can’t do any harm.
But there was one big discovery from the new guidelines: exercising just twice a week could improve cognitive decline. One study showed adults with mild cognitive impairment who did resistance training twice a week scored better on executive function and associative(联想的) memory tests than a group that worked on balancing, stretching, and relaxing.
What’s more, another study had older adults attend either biweekly health classes or sessions of aerobics, strength training balance exercises, and multitasking training. Six months later, the ones who’d exercised regularly scored better on cognitive health and memory tests, plus had less brain shrinkage.
The AAN now recommends that doctors tell patients with memory loss to exercise twice a week to keep their minds clear. If you want to improve your memory, this is the best time to exercise. It looks like you’ve got just one more reason to clear time in your schedule for a workout---even if it’s only on the weekends.
1. What does the underlined word “impairment” in Paragraph 2 refer to?A.Decline. | B.Error. | C.Development. | D.Presence |
A.strength training | B.resistance training |
C.brain exercise | D.exercises twice a week |
A.Patients with memory loss can rely on cognitive training. |
B.Stocking up on vitamins supporting brainpower means nothing. |
C.Medication is of significance in the AAN guidelines. |
D.The AAN guidelines attach importance to exercise. |
A.Exercise. | B.Entertainment. | C.Health. | D.Science. |
【推荐3】As a woman who goes outside almost every day, I’m used to people looking at me for all kinds of different reasons. In certain cases, it can be harder to tell who’s looking where: on a crowded train, or across a packed bar. If you’re unsure if a person is noticing you, there’s a little trick that I have found to be very effective: It’s called mirroring.
In a 1999 study, psychologists defined mirroring as “nonconscious mimicry (无意识模仿)of the postures, facial expressions and other behaviors of one’s interaction partners”. It’s long been used as a strategy that successful people can employ strategically to show their engagement (参与度) during job interviews or at work. They believe when done on purpose, mirroring can help people understand each other’s ideas or feelings very well.
It’s a proven method. In an experiment, volunteers were asked for their opinions about a series of advertisements. A member of a research team mirrored half the participants, taking care not to be too obvious. A few minutes later, the researcher “accidentally” dropped six pens on the floor. Participants who had been mimicked were two to three times more likely to pick up the pens. The study concluded that mimicry had not only increased goodwill towards the researcher, but also contributed to an increased social orientation (取向) in general.
If you want to know how to figure out if a person is looking at you, just throw out some kinds of gestures and see who copies you. But not everyone uses mirroring to figure out who’s making eyes at who. My years of experience of analyzing the messages sent consciously and unconsciously by the human body has left me with particularly good powers of observation. However, the average person has not had the same chance to improve this skill.
Of course, once you’ve figured out who’s watching you, it’s up to you and the watcher to decide what happens next. Not everybody watches with intent or enjoys getting hit on in public, so knowing how to react properly is very necessary.
1. What can we learn about mirroring from Paragraph 2?A.It can benefit communication. |
B.It helps people get out of bad habits. |
C.People find it hard to apply at work. |
D.Psychologists just started researching it recently. |
A.It is beneficial for building teamwork. |
B.It makes interaction partners less active. |
C.It makes interaction partners more confused. |
D.It has positive influences on interaction partners. |
A.Some people have doubts about the effects of mirroring. |
B.It is unnecessary for average people to master the skills of mirroring. |
C.The author can use mirroring to read people’s body language well. |
D.Average people lack the good ability to observe their surroundings. |
A.Ways to draw people’s attention in public. |
B.Reasons for people hating being watched by others. |
C.Advice on dealing with situations where you are watched. |
D.The importance of paying attention to one’s body language. |
【推荐1】We all need waler to survive, but the general recommendation has been to drink more and more, with many guidelines now advising a minimum of eight glasses a day. Is there any evidence showing that this makes sense? The short answer is no. Studies looking at water intakes over 10 years in the elderly fail to show any benefits of extra water on kidney function or lifespan.
Clever marketing from bottled water companies has not only convinced us that we need to drink more water, but also that expensive bottled mineral water is somehow better for us. We now drink more bottled water than ever before, with the global industry growing rapidly at 10 percent a year. By 2025, the global market is estimated to be worth $215 billion. But research shows that tap water nowadays is perfectly safe, and with added fluoride (氨化物), it is also good for our teeth. There have been studies showing that tap water contains traces of common pharmaceutical(制药的)drugs, but they have also found the same levels when testing bottled water. Although water in many areas contains chemicals, the levels are too small to make a noticeable difference to our health.
Bottled water has devastating environmental costs, which is self﹣evident as there are already abundant reports on pollution caused by plastic bottles, and no proven health benefits. And, does it taste better?Probably not. On the contrary, there are even blind tastings showing that tap water scores higher than most mineral water.
So, still hesitate when presented with both bottled water and tap water?Probably you should not now. My advice is to stick with tap water: you will be reducing the global environmental cost of half a trillion plastic bottles piling up each year and taking a stand against the power of marketing.
1. According to the first paragraph,we can know________.A.eight glasses of water a day does harm to the elderly. |
B.eight glasses of water a day isn't so scientific as we thought. |
C.water is essential for us to survive. |
D.drinking extra water benefits our kidney. |
A.Tap water contains too much common pharmaceutical drugs. |
B.Bottled water is rich in various minerals. |
C.People are influenced by bottled water companies' marketing strategies. |
D.Tap water is not so tasty as bottled water. |
A.Potential. |
B.Beneficial. |
C.Challenging. |
D.Damaging. |
A.The more water we drink, the healthier we will be. |
B.Tap water should become our first choice of drinking. |
C.Both bottled water and tap water should be our main choices when thirsty. |
D.Bottled water and tap water both have a lot of advantages. |
【推荐2】Journalists need to be able to report the facts without unfairness and use only the right ways to get these facts. Unfortunately, not every journalist always does this.
Sting (圈套) operations to get a story are causing a lot of argument. They involve leading a well-known person into a false situation with the hope that they will do something newsworthy.
For example, in 2010 a newspaper accused the professional snooker player John Higgins of taking money to throw a game. Higgins and his manager met with two men who said they would give him money if he lost matches on purpose. The meeting, which took place in a hotel room, was planned and secretly filmed by the newspaper. Higgins agreed to do it but said later that he had only done so because he thought the two men were criminals and he had been frightened. It turned out that they were reporters from the newspaper itself.
While sting operations might be legal, phone-hacking (电话窃听) is certainly not. In 2007, the editor of a leading UK newspaper and a private detective had hacked into hundreds of voicemail messages of people who worked for the British royal family. The information they got was used in newspapers.
Although the editor said he regretted doing this and apologized, the judge sentenced him to four months in prison. He warned other journalists not to make the same mistake. Since then though, many famous people such as Jude Law and Sienna Miller have been subjected to illegal phone-hacking by journalists.
The paparazzi (狗仔队) are famous for following the rich and famous hoping to get a photograph to sell to the papers. In the last years of her life, singer Amy Winehouse was followed by photographers everywhere she went, and it got so bad that in 2009 she went to court and asked a judge to stop them. The judge warned the journalists and ordered the photographers to stay away from her home. Many other famous persons also need similar court orders to protect themselves and their families.
1. What happened to Higgins in 2010?A.He was tricked by two journalists. | B.He was threatened by his manager. |
C.He lost a lot of money. | D.He met two criminals. |
A.He was kept separate from the famous. | B.He was asked to leave the newspaper. |
C.He was warned seriously. | D.He was put into prison. |
A.Amy Winehouse. | B.Sienna Miller |
C.John Higgins | D.Jude Law |
A.Good newspapers, heavy duties | B.Being responsible reporters |
C.Making interesting news | D.Bad ways, bad news |
【推荐3】The latest discovery in cat research reveals that the lovely animal seems to have a basic grasp on both the laws of physics and the ins and outs of cause and effect.
According to a newly published study, cats seem to be able to predict the location of hiding prey (猎物) using both their ears and an inborn understanding of how the physical world works.
In a recent experiment, Japanese researchers taped 30 domestic cats reacting to a container that a team member shook. Some containers rattled; others did not. When the container was tipped over, sometimes an object fell out and sometimes it didn’t.
It turns out that the cats were remarkably smart about what would happen when a container was tipped over. When an object did not drop out of the bottom of a rattling container, they looked at it for a longer time than they did when the container behaved as expected.
“Cats use a causal-logical understanding of noise or sounds to predict the appearance of invisible objects,” lead researcher Saho Takagi says in a press release. The researchers conclude that cats’ hunting style may have developed based on their common-sense abilities to infer where prey is, using their hearing.
Scientists have explored this idea with other endearing creatures: babies. Like cats, babies appear to engage in what’s called “preferential looking”—looking longer at things that are interesting or unusual than things they perceive (认知) as normal.
When babies’ expectations are violated in experiments like the ones performed with the cats, they react much like their animal friends. Psychologists have shown that babies apparently expect their world to obey the laws of physics and cause and effect as early as two months of age.
Does the study mean that cats will soon grasp the ins and outs of cause and effect? Maybe, Okay, so cats may not be the next physics faculty members at America’s most important research universities. But by demonstrating their common sense, they’ve shown that the divide between cats and humans may not be that great after all.
1. What do we learn from a newly published study about cats?A.They can be trained to understand the physical world. |
B.They have a natural ability to locate animals they hunt. |
C.They know what kind of prey might be easier to hunt. |
D.They are capable of telling which way their prey flees. |
A.Their command of cause and effect. | B.Their unusual sense of direction. |
C.Their special ability to perceive. | D.Their inborn sensitivity to noise. |
A.They have higher intelligence than the majority of animals. |
B.They display outstanding abilities in hunting and hearing. |
C.They can aid physics professors in their research work. |
D.They interact with the physical world much like humans. |