组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:80 题号:12299392

We probably still remember as a child being discouraged from allowing our handwriting to slope backwards — We were warned the relaxed letters would be taken as a sign of an idle(懒散的) personality.

According to research from the National Pen Company in the U.S., your handwriting can give away clues about 5,000 different personality traits based on the way you space your letters and how you sign your name. A closer look at someone’s handwriting style can provide you surprising insights about their character and personality, enabling you to come off like a proper Sherlock.

According to the results, the size of someone’s handwriting can determine the type of personality they have. People with small handwriting tend to be shy, bookish and very careful. Tiny letters indicate the writer has somewhat low self esteem but is intelligent, whereas outgoing people who love attention will have larger handwriting. Moving onto the spacing of words, people who leave large gaps between words enjoy their freedom, while people who write words close together can’t stand to be alone.

If handwriting leans to the right, the person is open to new experiences and enjoy meeting new people. If it is to the left, that person tends to keep themselves to themselves. People whose handwriting doesn’t lean in either direction are logical and practical.

The results also claim that a person’s health can be identified from their handwriting, for example, people with high blood pressure tend to have writing that is sometimes heavy and dark, and at other times light.

The process of analyzing handwriting is called graphology( 笔迹学). It is classed as a pseudoscience (伪科学) because there are debates about how accurate it can be at determining psychological and even physical features.

1. Why does the author mention our child experience in Paragraph 1?
A.To arouse readers’ interest in the topic.
B.To waken one of our old memories.
C.To imply his love in handwriting.
D.To put forward an argument.
2. Which of the following can best explain the underlined phrase?
A.Become a handwriting master.
B.Act like a detective.
C.Work in a proper way.
D.Feel like a psychologist.
3. What is Paragraph 3 mainly about?
A.How to leave gaps between words.
B.How important the handwriting is.
C.What the size and space of words suggest.
D.Why we have different sizes of handwriting.
4. What do we know from the passage?
A.Graphology has been highly recognized.
B.Graphology can be helpful in mental healing.
C.People hold different ideas to graphology.
D.Physical conditions can be determined by handwriting.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文为一篇说明文。文章介绍了物理学家Elisabetta Chicca用像昆虫的机器人模型让我们深入了解昆虫是如何完成导航工作的,以及它们是如何如此高效地完成任务的。

【推荐1】With a brain the size of a pinhead, insects perform fantastic navigational (导航的) abilities. They avoid obstacles and move through small openings. How do they do this, with their limited brain power? Understanding the inner workings of an insect’s brain can help us in our search towards energy-efficient computing, physicist Elisabetta Chicca of the University of Groningen demonstrates with her most recent result: A robot that acts like an insect.

In search of the neural (神经的) mechanism that drives insect behaviour, PhD student Thorben Schoepe developed a model of its neuronal activity and a small robot that uses this model to navigate. Schoepe’s model is based on one main principle: always steer towards the area with the least apparent motion.

He had his robot drive through a long “corridor”— consisting of two walls with a random print on it—and the robot centred in the middle of the corridor, as insects tend to do. In other virtual environments, such as a space with obstacles or small openings, Schoepe’s model also showed similar behaviour to insects.

“The model is so good,” Chicca concludes, “that once you set it up, it will perform in all kinds of environments. That’s the beauty of this result.”

The fact that a robot can navigate in a realistic environment is not new. Rather, the model gives insight into how insects do the job, and how they manage to do things so efficiently.

Chicca explains, “Much of robotics is not concerned with efficiency. We humans tend to learn new tasks as we grow up and within robotics. This is reflected in the current trend of machine learning. But insects are able to fly immediately from birth. An efficient way of doing that is hardwired in their brains. In a similar way, you could make computers more efficient.”

1. Why does Chicca want to study how the insect brain works?
A.To make computers more efficient.B.To make use of insects’ brain power.
C.To understand the habit of insects.D.To reveal the inner part of insects’ brain.
2. What does the underlined word “steer” in paragraph 2 mean?
A.Stretch.B.Stare.C.Drive.D.Work.
3. How did Chicca feel at the performance of her robot?
A.Regretful.B.Shocked.C.Confused.D.Satisfied.
4. What are the last two paragraphs mainly about?
A.How to make a robot that acts like an insect.
B.Why insects navigate more efficiently than robots.
C.Why a robot can navigate in a realistic environment.
D.How humans tend to learn new tasks as they grow up.
2024-05-08更新 | 36次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了研究发现听莫扎特的音乐对孩子智力的提升没多大影响。

【推荐2】One of the most deeply-rooted myths in parenting is the so-called Mozart effect, which says that listening to music by the Austrian composer Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart can increase a child’s intelligence. The idea has been promoted by advocates for arts education and by retailers(零售商) who sell special recordings of Mozart’s works for infants(婴儿) and toddlers(学步的儿童). Some pregnant women have even gone so far as to play Mozart recordings on headphones pressed against their bellies.

So, if you have kids or you’re expecting to have them, how seriously should you take the Mozart effect? Will the child who has no access to Mozart s music when born live a life of mediocrity(平庸)? Relax. There is no scientific evidence that listening to Mozart improves children’s cognitive abilities.

The whole idea came from a small study done in 1993, which found that college students who listened to Mozart’s Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major (K 448) showed slight improvement in a test of spatial reasoning( 空间推理). This finding was later turned into something unrealistic by the musician and entrepreneur(企业家) Don Campbell, who in 1997 published the best seller The Mozart Effect: Tapping the Power of Music to Heal the Body, Strengthen the Mind, and Unlock the Creative Spirit. Campbell’s claims about the amazing power of Mozart s music was repeated endlessly in the media and sped up the enthusiasm for Mozart-based enrichment activities.

Since then, scientists have examined the claim that Mozart boosts intelligence and found no evidence for it. The original experiment with college students was reviewed in 1999, and the increase in the students’ spatial skills was found to be negligible. In 2007 the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research commissioned a team of experts to examine the scientific literature regarding Mozart and child development, and they found no reason to believe that it boosted intelligence.

1. Who might be in favor of Mozart effect?
A.People who are opposed to arts education.
B.Musicians who admire Mozart very much.
C.Businessmen who sell toys and infant food.
D.Pregnant women who want to make their children cleverer.
2. What sped up people’s behavior of listening to Mozart’s music?
A.People have benefited a lot from listening to Mozart s music.
B.Don Campbell successfully sold Mozart s music recordings.
C.The media repeatedly stressed the the amazing power of Mozart s music.
D.A small study showed Mozart’s music could make students much smarter.
3. What does the underlined word “negligible” in the last paragraph mean?
A.obvious.B.little.C.strong.D.sudden.
4. What’s the purpose of the passage?
A.To introduce the Mozart effect.
B.To correct a misunderstanding in parenting.
C.To stress the importance of listening to music.
D.To show parents how to make children smarter.
2023-04-18更新 | 90次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约220词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】Why does time seem to fly faster as we get old? You've got your aging brain to blame. This is likely due largely to the physical changes of our nerves and neurons( 神经元). New research suggests ‘rapid fire’ abilities of the young brain allow us to process more information during youth, causing the days to seem longer earlier in life. However, as we get old, researchers say the older brain takes more time to process information.

The new finding put forward by a Duke University researcher was published in a paper in the journal European Review this week. According to Adrian Bejan, the J.A Jones Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Duke, the physical changes of our nerves and neurons play a major role in our perception(知觉) of time as we get old. Over the years these structures become more complex and eventually begin to degrade.

“Little babies, for example, move their eyes much more often than adults because they're processing images at a faster rate,” Bejan says. For older people, this means fewer images are being processed in the same amount of time, causing experiences to seem as though they're happening more quickly.

1. What causes time to fly faster as we get old?
A.Information in our brain.B.Changes of our nerves and neurons.
C.The electrical signals.D.Rapid fire abilities.
2. What is unavoidable in the process of getting old?
A.Longer days.B.More images.C.Less experience.D.Aging brains
3. The passage shows that_________________.
A.the younger brain takes less time to process information
B.little babies move their eyes much more seldom
C.old people have fewer things to do than young people
D.young people are more energetic in their life
4. What is the best title of the text?
A.Nerves and Neurons.B.Time Flies Fast.
C.The Function of the Brain.D.The Older, the Faster.
2021-01-28更新 | 40次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般