We’ve been hearing for decades about the complex intelligence of plants; but a new study, conducted by researchers at the University of Missouri, managed to figure out one new important element: plants can tell when they’re being eaten, and they don’t like it.
The word “intelligence”, when applied to any non-human animal or plant, is imprecise and sort of meaningless: research done to determine “intelligence” mostly just aims to learn how similar the inner workings of another organism is to a human thought process. But these studies do give us insight into how other organisms think and behave, whatever “think” might mean.
The researchers were seeking to answer an unusual question: does a plant know when it’s being eaten? To do that, the researchers had to first make a precise version of the vibrations (振动) that a caterpillar (毛虫) makes as it cats leaves. The theory is that it’s these vibrations that the plant can somehow feel or hear. In addition, the researchers also came up with other vibrations the plant might experience, like wind noise.
This particular study was on the thale cress. It actually produces some mustard oils (芥子油), which are mildly poisonous when eaten, and sends them through the leaves to stop caterpillars. And the study showed that when the plants felt or heard the vibrations made by caterpillars, they sent out extra mustard oils into the leaves. When they felt or heard other vibrations? Nothing. It’s a far more dynamic defense than scientists had realized: the plant is more aware of its surroundings and able to respond than expected.
There’s more research to be done; nobody’s quite sure by what mechanism the plant can actually feel or hear these vibrations. But it’s really promising research; there’s even talk of using sound waves to encourage crops to, say, grow faster, or send out specific defenses against attacks. Imagine knowing that a frost is coming, and being able to encourage plants to fruit faster by simply blasting them with music. That’s the kind of crazy sci-fi future this indicates.
1. What does the underlined part “other organisms” in Paragraph 2 refer to?A.Intelligence of plants. | B.Non-human living things. |
C.Human thought processes. | D.The inner workings of plants. |
A.Keeping the plant’s surroundings safe. | B.Acting as defenses to stop caterpillars. |
C.Making the plant aware of the vibrations. | D.Sending warnings against caterpillars’ coming. |
A.The plants failed to identify other vibrations. |
B.The plants sent out more mustard oils into the leaves. |
C.The plants could identify vibrations from caterpillars. |
D.The plants prevented caterpillars from eating the leaves. |
A.The plans for the study. | B.The problems with the study. |
C.The significance of the study. | D.The achievements of the study. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Many people with autism (自闭症) have trouble making eye contact, reading the emotions in other faces, and sharing affection. And no drugs are approved to treat such social impairments. Now, results from a Stanford University study suggest increasing levels of vasopressin (加压素) -a hormone (荷尔蒙) active in the brain known to promote bonding in many animals-can improve social deficits in children with autism.
Recently, Karen Parker, a scientist at Stanford University, and her colleagues have turned up evidence that monkeys that were less social had lower levels of vasopressin. The group also found children with autism who had the most social impairment had the lowest vasopressin levels.
The Stanford team gave a nasal (鼻的) spray containing vasopressin to 17 children with autism, aged 6 to 12 years. Another 13 children with autism served as a control group and got a placebo (无效对照的) spray, before and after the 4-week treatment, the research team asked parents to rate the children on a questionnaire called the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2), which asks, for example, how often the children "would rather be alone than with others."
It turned out that vasopressin-treated children showed significantly more improvement-a seven-point-greater reduction-on the SRS-2 than those in the placebo group, the team reported in Science Translational Medicine. Those results "are very exciting," especially because the team didn't see major side effects, says Angela Sirigu, who is also investigating hormones for autism treatment.
Children with higher levels of vasopressin at the start of the study saw greater improvements. That's unexpected, Sirigu says—you'd expect children who were the most deficient in the hormone to benefit the most from the increase. Or maybe vasopressin is a marker for some other, yet-unknown feature of the children that predicts how much they'll improve with the treatment
The only weakness Pelphrey found with the Stanford study was its sample size: "if it were double, I would be jumping up and down." Still, he says, "I'm kind of rocking back and forth in my chair with excitement."
1. The underlined word "deficits" in the first paragraph can be replaced with .A.advantages | B.surplus | C.weaknesses | D.strengths |
A.the purpose of the experiment | B.the samples of the experiment |
C.the principle of the experiment | D.the method and steps of the experiment |
A.had no side effect on children with autism |
B.most benefited children with the most social impairment |
C.had a positive effect on children in the test group |
D.had a negative impact on children in the test group |
A.Run another trial of vasopressin enrolling 100 children. |
B.Give tested children a longer treatment to reach the maximum benefits. |
C.Decrease vasopressin in tested children to see the opposite results. |
D.Increase vasopressin in adults with autism to see its influence. |
【推荐2】In sports, sometimes a player has to take one for the team. The same appears to be true in the plant world, where reduced individual growth can benefit the broader community. The findings from the University of Michigan’s Paul Glaum and André Kessler of Cornell University help explain the persistence (持续存在) of some plant communities when theory predicts they should go extinct(绝种的).
“We looked at how chemical defense cues (信号) from plants, meant to prevent herbivores (食草动物), can also prevent pollinators,” said Glaum, a doctoral student in the U-M Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. “The surprising model result is that while this can lead to fitness losses for individuals, the population effects can be positive for pollinators and plants under some circumstances.”
Many plants, including the wild tomato species used in this study, produce chemical compounds to repel (排斥) insect pests and other hungry herbivores. But those same chemical defenses can reduce the number of visits to the plant by pollinators such as bees, resulting in less pollination of individual plants and decreased growth.
“Biologists have puzzled over how such a costly defense mechanism (机制) can be maintained in these plant populations,” Glaum said. “How would a plant population with such a strategy persist?” Glaum and Kessler developed a computer model showing that decreased growth of individual plants can benefit overall populations and community resilience (恢复力) by indirectly controlling herbivore population growth. The results introduce mechanisms of persistence into communities previously found to be prone (易于遭受的) to extinction in theoretical models.
Tomatoes and other plants produce repellent chemicals called volatile (易挥发的) organic compounds in response to herbivore attacks. The presence of these so-called herbivore-induced volatile organic compounds can make the plant less attractive to pollinators, which can reduce pollen deposition (沉淀物) and negatively affect individual plants, an effect known as herbivore-induced pollinator limitation.
Previous modeling studies have looked at the direct effects of herbivory on a three-species community: flowering plant, pollinator and herbivore. Some of those studies predicted extinctions because growing herbivore populations would reduce the number of plants, limiting resources available to pollinators. In response, the pollinator population would decline, lowering plant reproduction.
1. According to the passage, the persistence of some plant communities may depend on __________.A.chemical defenses of plants | B.increased individual growth |
C.reduced chemical compounds | D.defense mechanisms of pollinators |
A.a kind of insects that help plants reproduce | B.a kind of animals that eat plants |
C.a process of forming a plant community | D.a chemical that does harm to plants |
A.less attractive to pollinators |
B.able to have negative effects on individual plants |
C.known as herbivore-induced pollinator limitation |
D.chemicals produced by plants to attract herbivores |
【推荐3】It turns out that sunflowers are more than just a pretty face: the ultraviolet (紫外线的) colours of their flowers not only attract pollinators (传粉者), but also help the plant regulate water loss, according to new research.
The yellow sunflower is a familiar sight, but it’s hiding something from the human eye — an ultraviolet bullseye (靶心) pattern, invisible to humans but not to most insects including bees. These bullseye patterns have long been known to improve the attractiveness of flowers to pollinators by increasing their visibility.
“Unexpectedly, we noticed that sunflowers growing in drier climates have flowers with larger ultraviolet bullseyes, and found that those flowers are able to keep water more efficiently. This suggests that these larger ultraviolet bullseyes help plants adapt to these drier environments,” says Dr. Marco Todesco.
Dr. Todesco and his colleagues grew almost 2,000 wild sunflowers of two species at the university in 2016 and 2019. They measured the sunflowers’ ultraviolet patterns, and analyzed the plants’ genes, and found that wild sunflowers from different parts of North America had ultraviolet bullseyes of very different sizes.
Larger floral ultraviolet patterns that have more of these compounds could help reduce the amount of water loss from a sunflower in environments with lower humidity (湿度), preventing too much water loss. In humid, hot environments, smaller ultraviolet patterns would promote the water loss, keeping the plant cool and avoiding overheating.
Sunflowers are planted for various purposes, including sunflower oil production, a roughly $20 billion industry in 2020. This research could help add to knowledge about how to attract pollinators, potentially increasing crop yields, says Dr. Todesco. “This work also helps us understand how sunflowers, and potentially other plants, better adapt to different areas or temperatures, which could be important in a warming climate.”
1. What do we know about sunflowers?A.They don’t need pollinators. |
B.Their flowers have special functions. |
C.Their flowers can drive the insects away. |
D.They can be grown in extremely cold areas. |
A.They analyzed 2000 kinds of sunflowers. |
B.They planted sunflowers to carry out research. |
C.They travelled to different parts of South America. |
D.They helped people in North America plant sunflowers. |
A.Positive. | B.Doubtful. |
C.Negative. | D.Critical. |
A.A Hidden Function of Flowers of Sunflowers |
B.Researchers Found a New Species of Sunflower |
C.Sunflowers Can Change the Colours of Sunshine |
D.Ultraviolet Bullseye Patterns Attract More Insects |
【推荐1】Most of us don’t have any memories from the first three to four year of our lives. And when we do try to think back to our earliest memories, it is often unclear whether they are the real thing or just recollections based on photos or stories told to us. The phenomenon, known as “childhood amnesia,” bas been puzzling psychologists for more than a century.
It may seem that the reason we don’t remember being babies is that babies don’t have a fully developed memory. But babies as young as six months can form both short-term and long-term memories. In one study, six- month-olds who learned how to press a lever to operate a toy.
Of course, memory capabilities at these ages are not adult-like — they continue to develop until adolescence. In fact, developmental changes in basic memory processes have been put forward as an explanation for childhood amnesia, and it’s one of the best theories we’ve got so far. These basic processes involve several brain regions and include forming, maintaining and later bringing back the memory.
But this does not seem to be the whole story. Another factor that we know plays a role is language. From the ages of one to six, children progress from the one word stage of speaking to becoming fluent in their native language(s), so there are major changes in their language competence that overlap with the childhood amnesia period. It is true to some extent that a child’s ability to describe an event predicts how well they remember it months or years later.
While there are still things we don’t understand about childhood amnesia, it’s important to remember that, even if we can’t clearly remember specific events from when we were very young, they still influence our behavior. The first few years of life are forgettable and yet powerful in shaping the adults that we become.
1. What does the study mentioned in paragraph 2 show?A.Babies don’t have a fully developed memory. | B.Babies don’t suffer from childhood amnesia. |
C.Babies can remember things for weeks. | D.Babies can benefit from hands - on learning. |
A.Babies’ brains are not mature enough. |
B.Babies’ language skills need developing. |
C.Babies cannot go through basic memory processes. |
D.Babies rarely experience events that had a big impact. |
A.Specific events from early childhood should be told to children. |
B.The first few years of life should be taken seriously. |
C.We can overcome childhood amnesia someday. |
D.Childhood amnesia is fairly common. |
A.How our early childhood memories form | B.How childhood amnesia influences our lives |
C.Why some memories disappear and others don’t | D.Why we can’t remember our early childhood |
【推荐2】“If the self or person of today, and that of tomorrow, are not the same, but only like persons, the person of today is really no more interested in what will befall (降临到……头上) the person of tomorrow, than in what will befall any other person,“ Joseph Butler, a well-known philosopher wrote in 1736.
The theory caught the attention of a researcher called Hal Hershfield, who suspected that a disconnection from our future selves might explain many unreasonable elements of human behaviour including our unwillingness to exercise often.
To find out, Hershfield first had to find a way to measure someone’s ”future self-continuity”. He settled on a simple graphic that presented pairs of circles representing the current self, and a future self (see below).The circles overlapped (重叠) to varying degrees,and the participants had to identify which pair best described how similar and how connected they felt to a future self 10 years from now.
He then compared these responses to his participants’ real-life hehavior. Hershfield first looked at his participants’ real-life savings and he found that the more the participant felt connected to their future self, the more money they had already squirrelled away. What’s more, people who score highly on the future self-continuity measure have higher moral standards than the people who struggle to identify with their future selves.
Hershfield confirmed that someone’s (in) ability to identify with their future self can have long-term consequences for their overall wellbeing and that our sense of connection to our future selves can be strengthened. You might consider a simple imaginative exercise in which you write a letter to yourself 20 years from now, describing what is most important for you now and your plans for the coming decades.
It might seem strange to start a “conversation“ with an imagined person but once your future self becomes alive in your mind, you may find it much easier to make the small personal sacrifices (牺牲) that are essential to preserve your wellbeing.
1. What do we learn about the assumed person described by Joseph Butler?A.He is a self-centered person. |
B.He is curious about his future life. |
C.He is bored with the same old routine day after day. |
D.He is seldom worried about the long-term consequences of his actions. |
A.Draw a simple graph. |
B.Select a pair of circles. |
C.Predict their overall wellbeing. |
D.Compare their real-life behaviours. |
A.Cost. | B.Taken out. |
C.Donated. | D.Set aside. |
A.Considering your future self. |
B.Being grateful for what you have. |
C.Reflecting on your previous behavior. |
D.Making personal sacrifices to help others. |
【推荐3】When you go to the desert with David Strayer, a cognitive psychologist, don’t be surprised if he sticks electrodes to your head.
On the third day of a camping trip in Utah, Strayer explains the “three-day effect” to 22 psychology students. Our brains, he says, aren’t tireless machines; they are easily tired by our fast-paced, increasingly digital lives. But when we slow down, stop the busywork, and seek out natural surroundings, we not only feel refreshed but also improve our mental performance. Strayer has demonstrated as much with a group of participants, who scored 50 percent higher on creative problem-solving tasks after three days of wilderness backpacking.
Strayer’s hypothesis is that being in nature allows the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s command center, to rest and recover, like an overused muscle. Strayer has his students put my head into a sort of bathing cap with 12 electrodes in it. Wires from them will send my brain’s electrical signals to a recorder for analysis. Then I walk carefully to a grassy bank along the San Juan River, where I’m supposed to think of nothing in particular, just watch the wide water flow by. I haven’t looked at a computer or cell phone in days, and it’s easy to forget for a few moments that I ever had them.
A few months after our Utah trip, Strayer’s team sends me the results of my test, which shows my brain waves at a range of frequencies and confirms that the gentle beauty of the San Juan River succeeded in quieting my prefrontal cortex.
So far the other research subjects’ results also confirm Strayer’s hypothesis. But no study can offer a full explanation of the brain-on-nature experience; something mysterious will always remain, Strayer says, and perhaps that’s as it should be. “At the end of the day,” he says, “we come out in nature not because science says it does something to us but because of how it makes us feel.”
1. Why do Strayer and his students go to the desert?A.To relax themselves. | B.To conduct a study. |
C.To learn about the desert. | D.To experience life without digital products. |
A.Findings of Strayer’s research. | B.Reason for Strayer’s research. |
C.Method for Strayer’s research. | D.Purpose of Strayer’s research. |
A.There is no convincing evidence for it. | B.No researchers show interest in it. |
C.It has proved false. | D.A full explanation is needed for it. |
A.Enjoy Yourself in Nature. | B.My Unique Experience in the Desert. |
C.How Does Nature Inspire Creativity. | D.Is Nature Your Brain’s Powerful Medicine. |
【推荐1】Plants cannot run or hide, so they need other strategies to avoid being eaten. Some curl up their leaves, others produce chemicals to make themselves taste bad if they sense animals drooling on them, chewing them up or laying eggs on them—all signals of an attack. New research now shows some flora can feel a plant-eating animal well before it launches an attack, letting a plant prepare a preemptive(先发制人的)defense that even works against other pest species.
When ecologist John Orrock of the University of Wisconsin-Madison sprayed snail slime—a liquid the animals release as they slide along—onto soil, nearby tomato plants appeared to notice. They increased their levels of an enzyme(酶), which is known to prevent plant-eating animals. “None of the plants were ever actually attacked,” Orrock says. “We just gave them cues that suggested an attack was coming, and that was enough to cause big changes in their chemistry.”
Initially Orrock found this defense worked against snails; in the latest study, his team measured the slimy warning’s impact on another potential threat. The investigators found that hungry caterpillars(毛虫), which usually eat tomato leaves greedily, had no appetite for them after the plants were exposed to snail slime and activated their chemical resistance. This nonspecific defense may be a strategy that benefits the plants by further improving their overall possibilities of survival, says Orrock, who reported the results with his colleagues in March in Oecologia.
The finding that a snail’s approach can cause a plant response that affects a different animal made Richard Karban curious, a plant communications expert, who was not involved in the study. “It is significant that the plants are responding before being damaged and that these cues are having such far-ranging effects, ” Karban says. The research was comprehensive, he adds, but he wonders how the tomato plants felt chemicals in snail slime that never actually touched them.
“That’s the million-dollar question,” Orrock says. He hopes future research will make out the mechanisms that enable plants to sense these relatively distant cues.
1. John Orrock sprayed a liquid onto soil near tomato plants to ________.A.make them grow better |
B.give them a warning |
C.keep plant-eating animals away |
D.inform plant-eating animals of danger |
A.To introduce another animal. |
B.To confirm the result of the study. |
C.To appeal to people to protect animals. |
D.To analyze different resistance chemicals. |
A.How tomato plants become aware of danger. |
B.What the chemicals in the snail slime are. |
C.Whether the research is of practical value. |
D.What the finding of the research is. |
A.Watchful Plants. | B.Greedy Animals. |
C.A Snail’s Approach. | D.A Defense Attack. |
Trees around us are extremely important and have always been necessary for improving the human conditions. Our existing forests and trees we plant work to make a better world.
Trees produce oxygen
Carbon dioxide is a global warming suspect.
A.We could not exist as we do if there were no trees |
B.Trees help clean the sky |
C.A forest is a carbon storage area that can lock up as much carbon as it produces |
D.Trees control noise pollution |
E.Man has been planting trees to make the planet a more beautiful world |
F.The modern human community has other more practical reasons to admire and honor trees |
G.Trees can either store harmful pollutants or change the pollutants into less harmful forms |
【推荐3】An ancient plant, amaranth(苋菜),is drawing attention throughout the world and connecting indigenous people(土著人)to their history. It has become a billion-dollar food and cosmetic product since the 1970s. The ancient grain can be found in greater numbers of grocery stores in the US and Mexico, and increasingly in the Asia Pacific and Europe.
“This is a plant that could feed the world.” Beata Tsosie-Pena, a coordinator of the environmental, health and justice program at nonprofit Tewa Women United, told The Guardian.
Amaranth is actually a grain, like buckwheat, and native to Mesoamerica, a region including southern Mexico and many counties in Central America. Its seed is a highly nutritious source of protein, vitamins and minerals. It’s proved to be an attractive product for health-conscious shoppers.
A single amaranth plant produces hundreds of seeds and can be grown in a wide variety of climates and countries from India, China, Southeast Asia to West Africa and the Caribbean. It’s this resilience that allowed the plant to survive over the centuries, even when the Spanish arrived in the Americas in the 16th century and outlawed amaranth. Growing amaranth has also provided a degree of economic independence for indigenous farmers in Guatemala and the US, according to The Guardian. Even after facing a near-extinction event in Guatemala when state forces targeted the Maya people and burned their fields, farmers preserved their amaranth seeds by hiding them in jars in the field and under their floorboards.
“What we want is for the whole world to produce their own food,” Maria Aurelia Xitumul, a. member of agricultural community Qachuu Aloom, told The Guardian. ”For the seeds, distance doesn’t exist. Borders don’t exist.” Most recently, Xitumul said that during the pandemic, people with their own gardens, especially in locked down communities, felt secure knowing they had control over their food supply, thanks to amaranth.
“Amaranth has completely changed the lives of families in our communities, not only economically, but spiritually,” added Xitumul.
1. What do we know-about amaranth?A.It was found in Mesoamerica in the 1970s. |
B.It mainly grows in the Americas and Europe. |
C.Its seed contains abundant vitamins and minerals. |
D.It’s one of the most expensive foods in the world. |
A.Its ability to produce many seeds. |
B.Its function of offering economic independence. |
C.The quality of growing quickly in extreme weather. |
D.Its ability to adjust to different environments. |
A.Plants should be grown in line with local conditions. |
B.Countries should work together to promote the seeds. |
C.Amaranth gave people a sense of security during lockdown. |
D.Amaranth helped lift many families out of poverty. |
A.The Origin of Amaranth. |
B.The Value of Amaranth. |
C.The Popularity of Amaranth. |
D.The Wide Application of Amaranth. |