组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科学技术
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:130 题号:16375326

Scientists have recently developed a method to 3D-print greener buildings using local soil that they say has the possibility to be in the lead in the construction industry.

Sarbajit Banerjee, a professor of chemistry and materials science and engineering at Texas A&M University, said 3D printing enabled them to print the entire front of a building, although getting such structures to meet existing building rules was still a significant challenge.

Concrete (混凝土) is still the important material used in many construction projects but it cannot be recycled and requires a lot of energy to mix and transport. The research team’s aim is to print structures using the type of soil that can be found in any garden.

“While concrete is widely used in housing and has enabled the growth of cities, this has come at a considerable environmental cost,” said Banerjee.

“The move to 3D-print concrete threatens to exacerbate this problem. However, we try to make a new example of construction that uses naturally sourced materials. Using such materials will further pave the way for building designs that are specifically adapted to the needs of the local climate.

What’s more, the use of local materials would reduce the need to transport concrete long distances, further reducing the environmental impact of the buildings.

The research team’s plan to replace concrete with the earth beneath our feet depends on their ability to improve the soil’s capability to stand the weight of the whole house, towards which Banerjee said they “are making excellent progress”.

Once they have a clearer idea of the limits of the technology, Banerjee and his team plan to further investigate how it might allow for building on other planets. For instance, they have worked on addressing the problem of building all-weather roads near the arctic area. They hope the technology could one day be used beyond Earth, to create settlements on the moon or even Mars.

1. What’s the latest development in construction?
A.Recycling concrete.B.Reducing the construction cost.
C.3D-printing buildings from local soil.D.Changing the construction rules.
2. What does the underlined word “exacerbate” in Paragraph 5 probably mean?
A.solve.B.simplify.C.relieve.D.worsen.
3. What is the condition for replacing concrete with the earth?
A.The local climate.B.The soil’s weight-bearing capability.
C.The environmental footprint.D.The cost of transportation.
4. What is the last paragraph mainly about?
A.The outlook for further studies.B.The explorations of the arctic area.
C.The limits of the new technology.D.The barrier to building on other planets.
【知识点】 科学技术 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】Machines might one day replace human laborers in a number of professions, but surely they won’t ever replace human artists. Right?

Think again. Not even our artists will be safe from the inevitable machine takeover, if a new development in artificial intelligence(AI) by a team of researchers from Rutgers University and Facebook’s AI lab offers a clue of what’s to come. They have designed an AI capable of not only producing art, but actually inventing whole new aesthetic(美学的) styles similar to movements like impressionism or abstract expressionism. The idea, according to researcher Marian Mazzone, was to make art that is “novel, but not too novel”.

The model used in this project involves a generator network, which produces the images, and a discriminator network, which “judges” whether it’s art. Once the generator learns how to produce work that the distributor recognizes as art, it’s given an additional instruction: to produce art that doesn’t match any known aesthetic styles.

“You want to have something really creative and striking — but at the same time not to go too far and make something that isn’t aesthetically pleasing,” explained Ahmed Elgammal.

The art that was generated by the system was then presented to human judges alongside human-produced art without showing which was which. To the researchers’ surprise, the machine-made art scored slightly higher overall than the human-produced art.

Of course, machines can’t yet replace the meaning conveyed in works by human artists, but this project shows that artist skill sets certainly seem reproducible by machines.

What will it take for machines to produce content with meaning? That might be the last AI frontier. Human artists can at least hang their hats in that field for now.

“Imagine having people over for a dinner party and they ask, ‘Who is that by?’ And you say, ‘Well, it’s a machine actually.’ That would be an interesting conversation starter,” said Kevin Walker.

1. What is implied in the second paragraph?
A.Artists won’t be replaced by AI.B.AI can produce new styles of art.
C.AI is totally at a loss about impressionism.D.AI fails to reflect abstract expressionism.
2. What did Marian find in his study?
A.AI can please human judges with its art.B.AI can combine content with meaning.
C.AI can make art aesthetically unpleasant.D.AI can create high quality arts.
3. What does the underlined phrase “hang their hats” mean?
A.Discover.B.Hold.C.Struggle.D.Appear.
4. What Kevin said in the last paragraph tells us that         .
A.she uses machines to cook for a partyB.she likes to join in a dinner party
C.she expects the arrival of AID.she cares about the starter of a chat
2020-09-23更新 | 189次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文。文章主要论述了ChatGPT作为一种新型人工智能系统,虽然它有令人印象深刻的优点,但它缺少人类不可替代的品质,正是人工智能的这些局限性才让我们欣赏自我。

【推荐2】ChatGPT is a new AI system that sounds so human in conversations that it could host its own radio programs. Reading between its instantly generated, perfectly grammatical lines, people see different visions of the future. Without doubt, ChatGPT is impressive.

Some compare the emergence of ChatGPT to the impact of the iPhone, but that doesn’t do it justice. ChatGPT, as well as the generative AI that will follow and outsmart it, is more disruptive. And yet, that doesn’t necessarily mean the end of the world is upon us. On the contrary, ChatGPT, I would argue, might serve to make us more aware of our irreplaceable human qualities.

Take the creative act, writing in particular, as an example. If you want it to, the AI-powered chatbot always produces something because it has the whole world of online data to draw from. But unlike us, it lacks the consciousness. Thinking is hard, critical thinking even harder, and ChatGPT isn’t good at either. It just restates what has already been said; it is one big recycling machine.

There is another obvious limitation of ChatGPT. Philosopher Harry Frankfurt once claimed: the difference between a bullshitter (胡说八道的人) and a liar is that the liar knows what the truth is but decides to take the opposite direction; a bullshitter, however, has no regard for the truth at all. The AI scholar Gary Marcus applies this distinction to ChatGPT. He believes that we have reached a critical point when “the price of bullshit reaches zero and people who want to spread misinformation, either politically or just to make a profit, start doing that plentifully”. Unfortunately, ChatGPT will reproduce misinformation from any of its input sources — it is not an intelligent system that tries to balance or weight different perspectives. In this sense, everything that ChatGPT writes is bullshit.

This is why the so-called AIQ is critical. It is actually an extension and a measurement of our human IQ: our overall knowledge of AI tools, our mastery of clues, and our ethical awareness. ChatGPT is going to change everything and nothing. Creativity, imagination and ethics — these will all remain unique human domains. It is the AI’s very limitations that will make us appreciate our own.

1. What can we learn about ChatGPT?
A.It helps generate an artificial voice.
B.It provides instructions on writing skills.
C.It generates natural language responses.
D.It offers a service for language learning.
2. What does the underlined word “disruptive” in Paragraph 2 probably mean?
A.Evil.B.Comparable.C.Profitable.D.Revolutionary.
3. Why does the author consider ChatGPT as a bullshit generator?
A.It makes up lies constantly.
B.It can’t tell right from wrong.
C.It often makes unfair judgement.
D.It always takes a neutral standpoint.
4. Which can be a suitable title for the text?
A.ChatGPT Makes Us Human
B.ChatGPT Is Causing Panic Now
C.ChatGPT: Treat It Like a Toy, Not a Tool
D.ChatGPT: Why It Is Bound to Generate Bullshit
2023-11-03更新 | 52次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约410词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】Telescopes(望远镜)have come a long way since the first ones were invented early in the 17th century.Traditional telescopes allow astronomers to view objects in space thanks to the visible(看得见的)light those objects emit(发出), or reflect.However, for modern telescopes, any Electromagnetic(电磁的)radiation will be enough for the purpose of viewing objects in space.Extremely hot objects, such as stars, emit not only visible light but also high-energy gamma radiation.Specialized telescopes—such as NASA's space-based Chandra X-ray Observatory—are built to detect such radiation.Cold objects—like comets and asteroids—emit low-energy radiation, which is invisible to the naked eye.Much of the universe is even colder.The clouds of dust and gas of which stars are made are only slightly warmer than absolute zero—the temperature at which atoms stop moving.To catch images of cold objects, astronomers use radio telescopes.

A radio telescope is a device that typically uses a large dish antenna(抛物面天线)to collect the low-energy radiation emitted by objects in space.However, it was quite challenging to get a clear image of those objects using ground-based antennas.The reason is that low-energy radiation is absorbed and distorted by water vapor(水蒸气)in the Earth's atmosphere.The signal that a dish antenna on the ground finally receives is therefore weak.

The signal can be strengthened by positioning the antenna on a site with very dry air.It can be made even stronger by arranging several antennas in an array, combining their signals so that they function together as a single, more powerful telescope.And if the antennas are portable, the distance between them can be adjusted to change the sensitivity of the telescope.Placed far apart, they can focus on a small goal, such as a planet.Grouping the antennas closer together can be useful for catching images of an object as large as a galaxy.

Atacama Large Millimeter Array(ALMA), a large array of antennas, was officially opened in March 2013.Since the official opening of ALMA, there has been a steady stream of discoveries of great interest to astronomers.In July 2013, the telescope's high-quality images provided clues that may help answer a question that has long puzzled astronomers.ALMA is also helping researchers understand how planets are born, by providing the first-ever images of the planet-forming process.These observations are just the beginning.In the future, ALMA will show us even finer details of galaxies and star systems.

1. What images can radio telescopes catch that other telescopes cannot?
A.Images of distant atoms.
B.Images of distant hot objects.
C.Images of objects that emit visible light.
D.Images of objects that emit low-energy radiation.
2. What is a limitation of a radio telescope?
A.It can only be used in large and distant deserts.
B.It is greatly affected by water vapor from the Earth.
C.It often fails to combine signals with other telescopes'.
D.It breaks down easily due to using ground-based antennas.
3. What is a good way to get a wide-field shot of a galaxy?
A.Using a telescope with antennas spaced far apart.
B.Using several telescopes all aimed at the same place.
C.Using several telescopes all aimed at different places.
D.Using a telescope with antennas spaced closely together.
4. What is the purpose of the last paragraph?
A.To show the importance of ALMA.B.To explain the operation of ALMA.
C.To describe how ALMA was set up.D.To point out that ALMA has changed.
2021-11-15更新 | 33次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般