Alarming reports that the Antarctic ice sheet is becoming smaller misrepresent the facts. The ice sheet holds about 26.5 million gigatons(十亿吨)of water. If it were to melt(融化)completely, sea levels would rise 190 feet. Such a change is an issue for the far future, if it comes at all.
Much more modest ice loss is normal in Antarctica. Each year, some 2,200 gigatons of the ice is discharged(消融), while snowfall adds almost the same amount. The difference between the discharge and addition each year is the annual loss. That figure has been increasing, from 40 gigatons a year in the 1980s to 250 gigatons a year in the 2010s. But the increase is just a slight change in a complex process. If it continued at that rate, the sea level would be raised by 3 inches over 100 years.
Many fear that a warming globe could increase discharge and cause more rapid sea-level rise. Two recent studies focus on this issue. Researchers in the study of Thwaites Glacier(冰川)—an unusually broad and fast Antarctic glacier—infer that in the past it became smaller for half a year at more than twice the fastest rate ever observed. The cause of this specific event remains unknown, partly because the time of the rapid melting hasn’t yet been determined. But the media goes with this angle: “A ‘doomsday(末日)glacier’, the size of Florida, is breaking faster than thought.”
A second study tested the idea that the melted freshwater could be carried by currents to speed up the discharge of nearby glaciers. Researchers constructed a special model to prove their idea. If ocean currents can connect the discharges of distant glaciers, that would add to the complexity in the Antarctic ice sheet. To emphasize their idea, researchers used human influences almost three times larger. Even though that fact is stated in the paper, reporters rarely catch such nuance, and the media goes with headlines such as “a massive tsunami would drown New York City, killing millions.” A more accurate headline would read: “Ocean currents connecting Antarctic glaciers might quicken their melting.”
These two studies were conducted with clever methods to infer past conditions and advanced computer modeling to show possible situations. These papers describe the science with appropriate precision and caution, but it is a shame that the media misrepresents the research to raise alarm. That denies the public the right to make informed decisions about “climate action,” as well as the opportunity to be amazed at the science itself.
1. What does the author think of the annual loss of the Antarctic ice sheet?
A.It’s a danger. | B.It’s limited. |
C.It changes significantly. | D.It decreases yearly. |
A.Both studies constructed new models. |
B.The Thwaites Glacier melts faster than expected. |
C.The complexity of the ocean speeds up the discharge of glaciers. |
D.Neither the reason nor the time of the Thwaites Glacier’s melting is known. |
A.deny the obvious facts | B.pay attention to the difference |
C.evaluate the details | D.are serious about the warning |
A.Antarctic glaciers melting makes sea level rise greatly. |
B.Recent studies on the melting ice call for people’s action. |
C.Reports of the media on Antarctic glaciers mislead the public. |
D.The researches about the glaciers melting raise public awareness. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Have you ever bought a gift for a friend, simply because it’s a gift that you like yourself?
The study, “I Love the Product, but Will You? The Role of Interpersonal Attachment Styles in Social Projection,” is authored by David, an assistant professor of marketing, and published in Psychology & Marketing. Research results are based on the surveys of 1,272 people.
The research reveals that people who are “secure” in interpersonal settings are the ones most likely to engage in social projection. Conversely(相反),those who are “anxious” in such settings are less likely to assume that others share their own preferences.
“You’d think that secure people who tend to be older, in a committed relationship and earn a higher-income with lots of friends and healthy personal relationships would have a better idea of what someone would like as a gift.
Gifts should be thoughtful. Therefore, secure people should be mindful of their choice of gifts. They need to take caution when selecting and buying gifts.
A.But that’s not the case. |
B.However, anxious individuals may not always be the best. |
C.Secure individuals tend to be older and earn a higher income. |
D.If so, it’s likely that you projected your own attitudes onto your friend. |
E.Secure individuals make choices on behalf of others based on their own preferences. |
F.Thus, they are less likely to make choices for a friend based on their personal attitudes. |
G.Preferably, these individuals should put their own preferences aside when choosing gifts. |
【推荐2】How to stay focused?
When you were at school, were you ever told to stop daydreaming and concentrate?
Scientists have looked at what makes us delay and found a number of ways to help us stay in the zone. One of the most obvious things is getting rid of noise.
There are more practical tips to keeping your mind focused.
But according to Science Focus magazine, distraction isn’t all bad. “If we were always so focused that we never got distracted, we’d miss potential changes, such as threats, in our environment.
A.Distraction is vital for survival! |
B.The feeling may signal to your brain that it’s time to sleep. |
C.Another possible cure for a short attention span is brain training. |
D.Choose a time that works best for you, based on any required meetings and your energy levels. |
E.It was easy for your mind to wander if you weren’t interested in what you were learning. |
F.Research by Science Focus magazine found silence is best for concentration. |
G.These include making a time table of the tasks you have to do, or chewing some gum! |
【推荐3】We’ve learned bees can understand zero and do basic math. Now a new study shows their tiny insect brains may be able to connect symbols to numbers.
Adrian Dyer, a professor in the RMIT University, said the research showed brains far smaller than humans’ could know numbers. “Humans learn numbers as children, but being able to recognize what numbers really represent needs a certain level of cognitive (认知的) ability,” Dyer says, “Studies have shown primates (灵长类动物) and birds have this ability, but this is the first time we’ve seen this in insects.”
It’s important for humans to do the research. There are 86 billion neurons (神经元) in humans’ brains. Bees only have less than a million. If bees have the ability to learn something difficult to understand like human-made symbolic language, this will open up exciting new paths for future communication between humans and animals.
Studies have shown that a number of animals have been able to learn symbols of numbers, including parrots and monkeys. Monkeys were taught Arabic numbers and could order them correctly. An African grey parrot called Alex was able to learn numbers and could do simple calculation.
Understanding how tiny brains of bees manage information opens paths to technology, which is good for the future design of computing (计算) systems.
1. What does Adrian Dyer say about the research?A.The finding of the research is first seen in insects. |
B.Humans’ brains are the biggest on the earth. |
C.Birds can be as clever as primates. |
D.Bees are cleverer than birds. |
A.Humans may find a new path to communicate with animals. |
B.Bees have more neurons than monkeys. |
C.Insects have the ability to communicate with humans. |
D.Bees can solve basic math problems. |
A.A child. | B.A monkey. |
C.An expert. | D.A parrot. |
A.Bees can communicate with other animals. |
B.Bees can attach symbols to numbers. |
C.Some animals can do math problems. |
D.Bees can make communication with humans. |
【推荐1】Nine out of ten people on the planet breathe polluted air, even indoors, the World Health Organization (WHO) said. Some 92% of the population live in places where air pollution exceeds (超过) WHO limits.
Air pollution can contribute to lung cancer and heart disease. The Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions account for nearly two out of every three such deaths, with poorer countries "getting worse". Around three million deaths every year are linked to outdoor air pollution. When "indoor" air pollution ― which includes contaminants like wood smoke and cooking fires ― is added, air pollution is linked to one in every nine deaths worldwide, the WHO said. The air quality model used in the data measures the smallest particles (颗粒), less than 2.5 micrometres across, which can enter the bloodstream and reach the brain.
Country-by-country data showed that Turkmenistan is ranked first for the death rate connected to air pollution. Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, and Egypt rounded out the top five. "Rich countries are getting much better in improving the quality of the air," Dr Carlos Dora from the WHO told the Associated Press. "Poorer countries are getting worse." However, he said, North America is doing better than Europe, mostly because Europe depends more on diesel fuel(柴油) and farming practices. China, the country with the sixth-highest death rate linked to air pollution, is relatively wealthy, but is bothered by smog in its cities and polluted air from industrial sources.
The WHO pointed to sustainable transport, waste management, and renewable energies as possible ways to reduce air pollution. It said its latest data represented the most detailed study it has ever released. The analysis combined satellite measurement and more than 3,000 monitoring stations on the ground with air transport models. The report is based on 2012 figures, which are the most recent data available.
1. How is the text organized?A.Conclusions-Consequences-Examples-Solutions. |
B.Facts-Reasons-Examples-Solutions. |
C.Reasons-Effects-Solutions-Trends. |
D.Trends-Opinions-Reasons-Solutions. |
A.Heating tools. | B.Indoor waste. |
C.Producing activities. | D.Harmful substances. |
A.North America. | B.Turkmenistan. |
C.Egypt. | D.China. |
A.Control the population. | B.Invent energies. |
C.Use air transport models. | D.Go green. |
【推荐2】“The sun isn’t even out. You get up, button your uniform, tie your boot laces, and kiss your family goodbye. You close your eyes and take a moment to make peace with the reality that you may never see them again.” This is the daily routine of a ranger (护林员).
Globally, about 150 rangers die each year protecting parks and wildlife, according to the Thin Green Line Foundation. In recent years, the number of rangers lost is likely to increase as the COVID-19 pandemic has a bad effect — both in terms of rangers catching the disease and in carrying out their duties.
On July 31, World Ranger Day, the Global Wildlife Program (GWP), funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF), would like to honor the bravery and determination of all rangers by sharing their stories.
Patience Tsitsi Shumbayaonda has been a ranger with Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority (ZimParks) for several years. She and her colleagues patrol (巡逻) in conservation areas to strengthen biodiversity and ecosystems management in the Mid- and Lower Zambezi Valley in Zimbabwe.
“Being a ranger is physically demanding,” with a typical day involving patrolling protected areas, watching and checking for illegal activities, tracking poachers (偷猎者), keeping track of available water in water bodies, fire management, looking for animals in trouble, and helping communities address human-wildlife conflict.
“Our job is not only to protect the animals from the people, but also the people from animals,” she said, “We do come face to face with dangerous animals but if we keep our distance from them, they will go away. I think somehow, they feel our positive energy and do not attack us.”
“It’s not our duty only as rangers to look after wildlife, but it is everyone’s task — as communities, as nations, and globally. I hope that the illegal trade of endangered species is stopped and that people value wildlife as we rangers do, such that we live in harmony with nature.”
1. What is the major function of the first paragraph?A.To introduce the topic. | B.To arouse readers’ interest. |
C.To state the author’s viewpoint. | D.To provide a brief summary of the whole passage. |
A.To raise the awareness of environmental protection. |
B.To encourage the common people to look after wildlife. |
C.To let people know the troubles the rangers meet with. |
D.To show respect for the courage and willpower of the rangers. |
A.keeping track of hunters | B.preventing forest fires |
C.protecting wild animals | D.dealing with conflicts among people |
A.poaching is allowed in some countries | B.wild animals are likely to attack rangers |
C.we all have a responsibility to protect wildlife | D.it’s only rangers’ duty to protect endangered species |
【推荐3】Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns.
How does climate change make you feel? The news of melting glaciers and oil spills may seem overwhelming and can make you feel angry, frightened, hopeless or upset. This is called climate anxiety.
Positive action can inspire others too. Sisters Kim and Stella King from the charity Fights Against Plastic have picked up 90,000 pieces of plastic. They ask schools, businesses and organizations to follow their lead.
A.Why is there climate anxiety? |
B.And it is a normal, healthy response. |
C.This risks the lives of humans, animals and plants. |
D.Remember, it’s important to get support from people around. |
E.No one can fix climate change on their own but we can all play a part. |
F.These shifts may be natural, such as through variations in the solar cycle. |
G.So, tell friends and family what you’re up to and encourage them to join in. |
【推荐1】Chinese spacecraft finds lunar soil could make oxygen and fuel on the moon.
Lunar soil could be used to make oxygen and other products from chemical reactions that mimic photosynthesis (模拟光合作用), according to an analysis of samples brought back to Earth by the Chang’e 5 spacecraft. Reliable supplies of such substances are necessary for any future lunar base.
It is expensive to send goods into space, so any material that can be found on the moon and that doesn’t have to be brought from Earth can save a lot of money.
Yingfang Yao at Nanjing University, China, and his team examined a lunar soil sample to see if it could be used as a catalyst (催化剂) for a system that would transform carbon dioxide and water released by astronauts’ bodies into oxygen, hydrogen and other useful by-products that could be used to power a lunar base.
Yao and his team first analysed their sample using techniques to identify catalytically active components of the soil. They found high levels of iron and magnesium-based compounds (复合物) that could be useful in a reaction mimicking the photosynthesis that occurs in green plants.
The researchers then tested the soil as a catalyst in various chemical reactions that would form part of a photosynthesis-like process to produce hydrogen and oxygen from CO2 and water. They found that the soil’s efficiency wasn’t as good as catalysts we have on Earth and isn’t currently good enough to generate products in sufficient quantities to support human life on the moon, but that slight adjustments to the structure and composition of the lunar soil sample might see significant improvements.
1. Why is the finding about lunar soil’s products important?A.It gives evidence for plants to grow outside Earth. |
B.It provides efficient support for future lunar base. |
C.It makes clear how the moon is mostly made up of. |
D.It tells how photosynthesis happens on the moon. |
A.To test its chemical nature. | B.To compare it with that from the earth. |
C.To analyze its elements and by-products. | D.To find useful mines that are rare on the earth. |
A.A green plant. | B.An iron component. |
C.A lunar soil sample. | D.Oxygen and hydrogen. |
A.It needs further research. | B.It can’t mimic photosynthesis at present. |
C.It can only be used as soil for plant growing. | D.Its efficiency is better than catalysts on Earth. |
【推荐2】Whether you're a citizen, consumer or investor, it is fast becoming a key life skill to make out greenwashing, a word meaning a company claims that its products are environmentally friendly but actually not green at all. Misleading or not proved claims about benefits to climate can make it harder for people to make informed decisions. They can also weaken real efforts by companies to clean up their act and deal with the climate crisis.
The basic problem is a lack of clarity. Indeed, when it comes to spotting greenwashing, it can actually be more helpful to focus on the color grey—because it is the many grey areas that have helped make greenwashing appear in particular places. These grey areas might be around measurements, definitions, best practice, standards or regulations. Even the language we use is very imprecise, leaving lots of room for vagueness, confusion or complete cheating. For instance, what do words such as “green”, “sustainable” and “eco” even mean? You have no standards, measurements or definitions to judge by.
These problems are increasingly important when it comes to the greenwashing of investment products, such as pensions and investment funds. In recent years, there has been a sharp rise in consumer demand for funds that invest according to environmental, social and governance criteria, often referred to as ESG funds. According to the financial data provider Morningstar, the value of assets(资产) held in UK funds grew from £29bn at the beginning of 2017 to £71bn by the end of 2020.
With that much money at risk for high profits, misleading claims can effectively hamper the flow of money and resources into really green new plans and businesses, preventing global efforts from dealing with the climate emergency. “I describe it as the 'teenage years' of responsible investing, with a lot of experimentation, and a lot of people trying out new things.” says Ashley Hamilton Claxton.
1. Which of the following can be called greenwashing?A.A product that is claimed to benefit the climate. |
B.A product that can been washed in a green way. |
C.A product that is absolutely environmentally friendly. |
D.A product that is claimed to be green while not the case. |
A.The product's description is not clear. |
B.The language isn't grammatically right. |
C.There are no such words as “sustainable”. |
D.The company doesn't say it's “green” and “eco”. |
A.put | B.clarify | C.stop | D.divide |
A.Much money enables high profits |
B.Responsible investing is still at its early stage. |
C.More money is invested in real green businesses. |
D.A lot of people are unwilling to try out new things. |
【推荐3】If there was any doubt about whether the world has entered a new space race, the competition of lunar-bound launch this month could be the smoking gun. After NASA canceled two launch attempts in late August and early September-followed by delays(延期) caused by Hurricane Ian and Tropical Storm Nicole—the US space agency tried again to send up its first Artemis mission.
That period fits in with that of another mission less-known in the United States. A Japanese commercial company focusing on building moon landers launched on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket on Dec. 11, 2022 in the US.
“We recognize that a launch of NASA’s is scheduled during the same timeframe, and we believe this sends the message that a new age is opening for the cislunar economy(地月经济) with these two historic missions—one government and one commercial,” the company said in a statement.
NASA happens to be one of the company’s customers, hoping to receive moon dust samples from the private lander’s trip. However, the plan failed on Apr. 26, 2023. If the Tokyo-based company had succeeded, it would have been the first to land a Japanese spacecraft on the moon. What’s more, it could have been the first successful private delivery of cargo to the lunar surface ever.
Brad Jolliff, director of the McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis, believes the next five years will be full of commercial missions to perform landings, deliver more goods to the moon, and promote science experiments. In Brad’s opinion, the new age of lunar exploration and travel won’t be done entirely by NASA. It will be done with international partners and with commercial partners.
1. What made NASA put off its launch plan a third time?A.Natural disasters. | B.A lack of preparation. |
C.The high cost of technology. | D.Other important experiments. |
A.Its head office is in the US. |
B.It has ever sent goods for customers in space. |
C.Its launch time is roughly the same as a NASA’s launch. |
D.It’s a company successfully delivering goods to the moon. |
A.Satellite. | B.Spaceship. | C.Signal. | D.Goods. |
A.Hopeful. | B.Opposed. | C.Careless. | D.Doubtful. |