The age of adulthood is by definition arbitrary. If everyone matured at the same, fixed rate, it wouldn’t be a human process. Indeed, maturation happens at varying speeds across different categories within the same individual, so I’d say I was easily old enough to vote at 16, but nobody should have given me a credit card until I was 32, and I’ve got the county court judgment to prove it.
However, we broadly agree that there’s a difference between a child and an adult, even if we might argue about the transition point. So the political theorist David Runciman’s view that six-year-olds should be allowed to vote goes against any standard argument about the age of civic responsibility. Nobody would say that a six-year-old could be held criminally responsible, could be sent to war, could be capable of consent, could be given responsibility for anything. So allowing them the vote—along with, unavoidably, seven-year-olds who are even sillier, if anything—is quite an amusing proposal.
Runciman’s argument is that this is the only way to rebalance political life, which is currently twisted in favor of the old, who don’t (he added) ever need to demonstrate mental capacity, even long after they’ve lost it.
The first part of his case is self-evident: pensions are protected while children’s centers are closed, concepts such as sovereignty (最高权威) are prioritized over the far more urgent business of the future: climate change. Nostalgia (怀念) for a past the young wouldn’t even recognize plays a central role, which is completely unfair.
Most of the arguments against giving six-year-olds a vote are that children would end up voting for something damaging and chaotic, if someone made unrealistic promises to them, which could never be realized. Well, it’s not children’s fault.
Having said that, children do tend towards the progressive, having a natural sense of justice (which kicks in at the age of six months, psychologists have shown, by creating scenes of great unfairness to babies, and making them cry) and an underdeveloped sense of self-interest. My kid, when he was six, made quite a forceful case against private property, on the basis that, since everybody needed a house, they shouldn’t cost money, because nobody would want anyone else not to have one. Also, food should be free. It was a kind of pre-Marx communism, where you limit the coverage of the market to only those things that you wouldn’t mind someone else not having.
On that particular day, when we were registered as voters, my kid was quite far to the left of me, but in the normal run of things, we’re united, which brings us to the point of the problem: children obey you on almost nothing, but they do seem to believe in your politics until they’re adolescent. So giving kids the vote is really just a way of giving parents extra votes. And what can stop us having even more children, once there’s so much enfranchisement (选举权) in it for us?
Now, if parents could be trusted to use their influence wisely, and hammer into children the politics it will take to assure a better future, then I wouldn’t necessarily have a problem with that, apart from, obviously, that culture is already wildly twisted towards parents, and I can imagine a few non-parents boiling with fierce anger. But that’s not worth talking about anyway, because parents can’t be trusted, otherwise we’d all already vote Green(绿党).
In short: no, six-year-olds should not get the vote; but while we’re here, if any votes come up in the near future, which will have an impact on the next five decades of British political life, alongside EU migrants, 16-year-olds certainly should be enfranchised.
1. The author refers to his age of adulthood to prove that ________.A.certain rights are granted at different stages of life |
B.there’s a common standard for the age of adulthood |
C.people mature at different rates in various aspects |
D.a credit card is more difficult to get than the vote |
A.they believe children are far from mature in many ways |
B.they are uncertain whether children can assume responsibility |
C.they know the age to get the vote is not to be questioned |
D.they don’t think a child can grow into adulthood earlier |
A.Public ignorance of children’s abilities. | B.Inequalities of opportunity. |
C.A cultural preference for the old. | D.The imbalance in political life. |
A.children are in favor of a just society and tend to be idealistic |
B.children are innocent and don’t want to be involved in politics |
C.children are simple-minded and can fall for an adult’s trick |
D.children are good-natured and like to help people in need |
A.twisted culture | B.parents’ objections | C.misuse of rights | D.unusual maturation |
A.There is a difference between adults and children. |
B.Allowing children the vote is not altogether absurd. |
C.The definition of adulthood is quite controversial. |
D.Parents should introduce politics to their children. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Scientists have found evidence of a link between social and economic status and childhood attention deficit disorder(ADHD)(注意力缺陷多动障碍)in the UK. A team led by the University of Exeter Medical School analysed data from the Millennium Cohort Study, a database of more than 19, 500 UK children born between 2000 and 2002 .The study was published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Findings showed that more children with ADHD came from families below the poverty line than the UK population as a whole, with average family incomes for households whose study child was affected by ADHD at £324 per week, compared to £391 for those whose child was not. The study found the odds (机会)of parents in social housing having a child with ADHD was roughly three times greater than for those who owned their own homes.
The team also found that the odds of younger mothers having a child with ADHD were significantly higher than for other mothers. Mothers with no qualifications were more than twice as likely to have a child with ADHD than those with degrees, and lone (孤独的)parents were more likely to have a child with ADHD diagnosis than households with two live-in parents.
Information was gathered from surveys when the cohort children were nine months old, and at the ages of three, five, seven and eleven.
Dr Ginny, of the University of Exeter Medical School,who led the study, said, "There is a genetic element to ADHD,but this study provides strong evidence that ADHD is also associated with a disadvantaged social and economic background. Some people believe that ADHD in children causes disadvantage to the economic situation of their family, but we found no evidence to support that theory. It's important to discover more about the causes of this disorder so that we can look towards prevention, and so that we can target treatment and support effectively. "
1. We can infer from Paragraph 2 that _______.A.family incomes of £391 per week are below the poverty line in the UK |
B.children affected by ADHD consume family incomes of £324 per week |
C.parents who rent houses are likely to have a child with ADHD |
D.families who own their own houses are above the poverty line |
A.The households with two live-in parents. |
B.Middle-aged mothers having no diploma. |
C.Single younger mothers with no diploma. |
D.Younger mothers living with their husbands. |
A.He agrees with it. |
B.He ignores it. |
C.He hesitates to accept it. |
D.He argues against it. |
A.ADHD linked to social and economic disadvantage. |
B.The cure of ADHD has been found by the UK's scientists. |
C.New methods have been used to treat ADHD patients. |
D.Causes and effects of ADHD have been found out completely. |
【推荐2】Yelp, the San Francisco Internet company that makes reviews of restaurants and other businesses across a large part of America, is getting into the food delivery business.
Today, the company has announced that it has agreed to acquire Eat24, a food company that delivers food to homes on behalf of partner restaurants. Yelp is paying $134 million for the company—$75 million in cash and the rest in stock. Eat24 works with 20,000 restaurants in more than 1,500 cities all over the U.S.
On Yelp's reviews site, you can find new restaurants to suit your tastes, and now that the company is acquiring Eat24, the idea is that it will also let you take the next step: order food to your door.
“If you're looking at a restaurant, you want to be able to book that restaurant,” Yelp co-founder and CEO Jeremy said in a Tuesday interview. “If we can integrate(融入) that into the Yelp experience, it makes the site much better.”
The move is just one way that some of Internet's most recognizable names are branching into online food delivery to improve their existing business. Last August, payments company Square bought Caviar, a high-end quick food delivery service. And that same month, Uber tested a fast food delivery service called UberFRESH, which aimed to deliver meals from local restaurants to customers in less than 10 minutes.
In each case, food delivery can provide an added source of income, and it can also help these companies push the use of their existing services. The market for food delivery is hardly small, and mobile technologies can speed up the process, potentially expanding the business even further.
1. How does Yelp pay for the company Eat24?A.Totally by cheque. | B.Totally in cash. | C.Only in credit | D.Partly in stock. |
A.Finding the restaurants they like. | B.Booking a restaurant they like. |
C.Enjoying much cheaper food. | D.Ordering food to their door |
A.Purchase.. | B.Claim. | C.Request. | D.Bargain |
A.begin to set up their own food branches |
B.begin to attach importance to food delivery making |
C.make little money from their existing business |
D.give up the present business and turn to food making |
【推荐3】LIANG TAO.sold 80 pink Givenchy bags in 12 minutes.Becky Fang sold 100 Mini Cooper cars in just five.Both are wanghong,literally"red-hot on the web".Every day millions of Chinese search social media for wanghong posts or tune in to live-streams for wanghong's opinions on everything.The fans are helping this new Chinese Internet star to make money out of their popularity and to shake up the country's e-commerce industry in the process.
A few of wanghong have been hired by luxury brands.Jaeger-LeCoultre, a Swiss watchmaker,hired Papi Jiang for a video ad targeting young urbanites(都市人),including her 27m fans on Sina Weibo,a Twitter-like microblog. Zhang Yi of iiMedia Research,a consulting firm,estimates that up to 15%of sales on shopping sites like Taobao or social-media apps such as WeChat are influenced by wanghong's public support.The length of a dress might be decided by a survey of a wanghong's fans;its launch date might be based on the number of hits,shares or comments it collects,some of which can cause last-minute design changes.
This poses a new challenge for retailers(零售商),whose supply chains must respond even more quickly to wanghong's opinions.Whereas previously a company would look for a celebrity to match its image,wanghong and their admirers are shaping goods.
Another challenge comes directly from wanghong themselves.They increasingly make money not merely from online support or advice but by launching their own e-commerce stores.Sales of goods accounted for just under half of wanghong earnings of 53bn yuan($8bn)in 2016,estimates Analysis,a Chinese market-research firm(the rest came mostly from live-show tips and adverts).
Some wanghong are going a step further.In November Becky Fang launched her own clothing line.Part of her motivation,she says,was that the brands she supported did not always match the trends she was sharing with her followers.By creating her own brand,Becky's Fantasy,she has full control of the quality.She also gains a new income. For the time being only 3-5%of wanghong follow Becky Fang's example,iiMedia Research estimates.But it expects the model to become an industry in its own right, including entertainment and e-commerce,and driven by online data..
1. Why can wanghong use their popularity to make money?A.Because they are Internet stars. |
B.Because they use social media. |
C.Because their opinions influence fans.. |
D.Because they can shake the e-commerce industry. |
A.They are fans-based. |
B.They are social-media-based. |
C. They are design-shared. |
D. They are youth-targeted. |
A.Online support and advice. |
B.Increasing sales of goods online. |
C.Quick responses to the.market changes. |
D.Wanghong's opinions and e-commerce stores. |
A.Because they want.to attract more fans. |
B.Because they want to share with their followers. |
C.Because they want to set up a new industry model. |
D.Because the brands they speak for can't satisfy their fans. |
A.supportive | B.objective |
C.indifferent | D.worried |
【推荐1】Electronic book publishing has many of the same risks and opportunities as electronic music publishing. By delivering text directly to the reader's computer screen, the e-book could cut down costs, and allow creators to deal directly with their audience, bypassing traditional publishers and traders. But it also raises the possibility of mass piracy(盗版). Phil Rance, founder and managing director of Online Originals, a London-based e-book publisher, sums it up,“No one wants Napster to happen to books.”
Indeed, the most popular MP3 may have put the frighteners on an industry that generally operates some way behind the “bleeding edge”. The Meta Group, a leading US-based market researcher, says publishers are far too concerned about protecting their rights,“ We believe all the recent legal control over Napster is like putting a finger in a river that is already overflowing. Publishers need to deal with reality and come up with new ways to develop wide electronic distribution, asking the question, ‘How can we change the certainty of wide distribution to our advantage?’ ”
At the moment, most publishers would like to limit the use of e-books to the person who bought them, or to the computer used to download them. If that can be done, e-books become just an extra income stream in a publishing industry that would continue to operate the way it does today, according to Terry Robinson, business manager for the digital rights aspect, “you've cracked the market,” he says.
Robert Nichols, Books Director at BOL agrees, “Rights management is absolutely important. Publishers just say that, ‘until copyright is secure, we're not going to talk’.”
1. According to the text, what is the similarity of e-books to electronic music?A.They both result in piracy. |
B.They both lead to price reduction. |
C.They both bring in much money to creators. |
D.They both avoid industry management. |
A.wide use of e-books may increase the income. |
B.the publishing markets should be brought back to normal. |
C.publishers haven’t agreed on rights management up to now. |
D.most publishers prefer e-books for the extra income. |
A.copyrights management | B.price control |
C.market share | D.original works |
A.A Magic Book |
B.The Fight Against Mass Piracy |
C.Risks and Challenges Go Hand in Hand |
D.The E-book----a New and Big Challenge |
【推荐2】I have frequently taught Research Methods and Design to college students at several institutions. I love teaching this course. One reason, of course, is that I enjoy thinking about research methodology (方法学) and sharing it with others. The other reason, however, is the obvious impact that it has on students. Every term, one (if not more) student tells me how taking this course has affected him/her: “I used to just read articles and believe what they said, but now I find myself asking ‘Is this true? How do they know? Is this a well designed study?’ ” That is what I want the students to achieve in this course.
This brings to mind something written by Dorothy L. Sayers in 1948. One of her books, The Lost Tools of Learning speaks to Sayers’ thoughts on education. “By teaching our young men and women to read, we have left them at the mercy of the printed words. By the invention of the film and the radio, we have made certain that no dislike for reading shall protect them from the constant battery of words, words, words. They do not know what the words mean: they are victims to words in their emotions instead of being the masters of them in their intelligence.”
We are well past the 1940s, but her observation is still relevant. Sayers’ point is well taken. In the world of 24-hour news and social media that often resembles the Wild West, the ability to carry out evaluations has never been more important. In order to resist the distortions with which we are constantly bombed in the media, as well as be able to present a persuasive argument, we must be able to reason well, and think and give a judgement carefully.
When my students begin the Research Methods and Design course, they are generally not content to read all those research article I give. However, by the end of the course, they are excited about their newly obtained abilities.
1. What is the author’s course goal for her students?A.Reading more books. | B.Thinking critically. |
C.Designing studies well. | D.Questioning themselves. |
A.It was beneficial to learners’ development. |
B.It was conventional by teaching learners to read. |
C.It was satisfying with the invention of film and video. |
D.It was worrying because learners were subject to words. |
A.Popular news. | B.Various evaluations. |
C.Misleading information. | D.Persuasive arguments. |
A.To review a book. | B.To introduce a writer. |
C.To criticize social media. | D.To suggest a practical skill. |
【推荐3】Unlike Hillary Clinton, and most previous US presidents, who entered the election after years of being politicians, Trump, 70, the country’s 45th president, was a New York businessman. And he was not a presidential candidate who worked hard to keep a perfect public image(形象) of a man who was always caring, fair and intelligent. Instead, Trump has a reputation of being bad-tempered, self-important and hateful toward those who disagree with him. He also blames immigrants, both from Latin America and the Middle East, for many problems in the US. This has caused a dangerous division in the country —a country made up of many diverse races. Furthermore, he opposes globalization.
But to his supporters, the fact that Trump is not a typical politician is actually one of his advantages. His habit of never hiding his opinions is also considered by many to be a sign that he is not a pretender like many politicians are. “We have seen our country take a fall in the eyes of the world. We need to go in a different direction,” Binyom in Weisswasser, 39, a man from Chicago, told the Chicago Tribune. “Trump’s not a politician. I like that he is not always politically correct and speaks his mind. It gives me the feeling that what you see is what you get. You may not like it, but you know what it is.
But interestingly, many who voted for Trump actually followed the “lesser of two evils(两害相权取其轻)” principle—one that people use when faced with picking from two unpleasant options — simply because they didn't think Clinton was a better choice. “He’s the candidate I disagree less with,” Jack Stucky, 20, a student at Northwestern University, told the Chicago Tribune. “I don’t think I'd say Donald Trump is going to be the best president ever, but I did think he’d be better than Hillary Clinton.”
1. What can we learn from the text?A.Trump is more tolerant to immigrants. |
B.Trump minds more about keeping his public image perfect. |
C.Trump is thought to be more complex and flexible in politics. |
D.Trump is considered more straightforward and narrow-minded. |
A.Trump will do better than Hillary. |
B.Hillary is the least unpleasant candidate. |
C.Both Trump and Hillary are bad, but the former is better. |
D.Trump is going to be the worst president in the history of the USA. |
A.Trump’s shocking win. |
B.Trump’s new policy to the USA. |
C.Different congratulations on Trump’s win. |
D.The advantages Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. |
DAY 1: Arrive in Delhi
Today arrive in Delhi, the national capital of India. Upon arrival at the airport, our company representative will meet you and transfer you to the hotel for check-in.
Overnight at Delhi hotels
DAY 2: Delhi—Full-day tour(old& New Delhi tour)
Today morning have breakfast in the hotel. At 9:30, the tour guide will meet you at your hotel and later proceed for a full-day guided tour in Delhi starting with Old Delhi visiting Raj Gaht. Jama Masjid, driving past through the Red Fort. Later in New Delhi visit Humayun’s Tomb, India Gate, drive past through Parliament Street and President House and visit Qutub Minar.
Overnight at Delhi hotels
DAY 3: Delhi-Jaipur via Fitehpur Sikri(240 km/5 hours)
Today morning after breakfast. drive to Jaipur, the capita] city of Rajsthan state. Jaipur is also known as “Pink City”. En route visit Fatehpur Sikri, known as Ghost. Later continue the drive to Jaipur. Upon arrival, check in at the hotel. Evening: free at leisure for your own activities.
Optional: visits to Chokhi Dhani Village Resort(US $25 per person)
Overnight at Jaipur hotels
DAY 4:Delhi(256 km/5 hours)
Today morning after breakfast, drive back to Delhi airport. The total distance is 256 kms and you can cover it in 5 hours. Upon arrival in Delhi, board flight to onward journey.
NOTE: Price starts with US $ 215 with
●Daily breakfast and soft beverages(饮料) and packaged drinking water.
●Elephant rides at Amber Fort.
●Sunset or sunrise visits to Taj MahaL
●All entrance fees to the monuments and train tickets.
1. On which day can you visit Qutub Minar?A.DAY 1 | B.DAY 2 |
C.DAY 3 | D.DAY 4 |
A.The whole journey covers 496 km |
B.Travelers will stay in Delhi for two nights |
C.Travelers will fly to Delhi airport on DAY 4 |
D.Travelers will be made to buy things on DAY 3 |
A.a sunrise visit to Taj Mahal |
B.elephant riding at Amber Fort |
C.visits to Chokhi Dhani Village Resort |
D.breakfast and packaged drinking water |
【推荐2】It is rightly said that one can share any secret with a true friend. He may know your deepest fears and weaknesses and yet will never take advantage of you. However, keeping a friend’s secrets to yourself and not telling the world is what makes the bond grow strong and last forever. You need to develop trust and mutual understanding before you start sharing secrets with each other. With friends, secret talks never seem to end and it can get really amusing to know what has been going on in your friend’s mind.
There is a certain time in life especially from the teenage years when one starts having a personal periphery in life and parents are excluded from it. It is because there are certain things that they can’t understand and we can’t discuss with them. That is when friends become the best secret sharers. They are the ones to whom one reveals one’s feelings and best kept secrets.
It is a general belief that only girls share secrets. But boys have their own secrets that they discuss with only closest friends. The secret talks can range from relationships, talks about fights with parents, secret activities and anything that is not supposed to be known to others! If you think secrets are limited to only teenagers, get your facts right! Secrets can be shared at any age and there is no hard and fast rule that secrets are shared only among youngsters.
Sharing secrets with a friend is not just fun, but it also helps to develop a lasting trust in one another. Sometimes, sharing secrets will tell you more about the person. You will come to know whether your friend is reliable and trustworthy and whether it is worth sharing your secrets with them. You can call it a test of friendship.
1. What do you need to do before sharing secrets?A.To know about deepest fears and weaknesses. |
B.To develop trust and mutual understanding. |
C.To know what has been going on in people’s mind. |
D.To consider whether she or he is your best friend. |
A.friend | B.preference | C.limit | D.rule |
A.Boys often share secrets with friends. | B.Teenagers tell more secrets than adults. |
C.Secrets sharing can happen at any age. | D.Secrets sharing will follow strict rules. |
A.Sharing Secrets Is a Test of Friendship | B.How to Make Close Friends in One’s Life |
C.Whether It Is Worth Sharing Your Secrets | D.The Best People to Share Secrets With |
【推荐3】British historian Jacob Bronowski once wrote, “Man masters nature not by force, but by understanding.” This is especially for extreme climber Alex Honnold, who climbed California's El Capitan by himself, without any safety ropes(绳子), in 2017. The New York Times called it“one of the greatest athletic feats(功绩)of any kind, ever.”
Now you can watch him do it. The documentary Free Solo, which hit Chinese mainland cinemas on Sept 6, shows Honnold’s brave journey up the 914-meter high mountain. The film won the 2019 Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature in February. In it, Honnold gives us some useful advice:“You’ll always feel fear, but over time you’ll realize the only way to truly manage your fear is to broaden your comfort zone. It means that challenging yourself is important.”
In fact, free climbing requires perseverance, control, and concentration. “I’m not thinking about anything when I’m climbing,” Honnold said, “I’m focused on doing what’s in front of me.” This strong focus on the present is a sort of meditation (冥想) that we can use in our daily routines.
While the documentary seemingly praises extreme athletes for pushing the limits of human potential, some are concerned about Honnold risking his own life. “His deed puts great stress on his loved ones, even when he succeeds,” Climbing Magazine noted.
Free Solo seems to say that with enough courage and dedication, one can achieve any goal. However, the movie may also be viewed as the disturbing story of a climber who went against all better judgment and got away with it.
1. What do we know about Free Solo?A.It won an Academy Award in 2017. |
B.It was adapted from a book about mountain climbing. |
C.It introduces famous extreme climbers around the world. |
D.It shows how Honnold climbed El Capitan without any protection. |
A.He practices meditation regularly. |
B.He does different exercises to help him relax. |
C.He keeps taking on new challenges. |
D.He asks experienced climbers for advice. |
A.They believe he should value his own life. |
B.They think he will reach even greater achievements. |
C.They think he should have done more training. |
D.They see him as an idol. |
【推荐1】For as long as there have been gifts, we naturally make choices based on the recipient (接受者). But what if we have been wrong all along and that we could turn things around, which not only made gift buying easier, but the recipient happier?
In 2015, psychologists Lauren Human and Lara Aknin conducted an online survey, which suggested that when people buy gifts, they prefer to choose something based on the recipient’s personality and tastes. Most people also said that they preferred receiving gifts bought with them in mind: gifts for them.
But Human and Aknin wondered if this approach to giving failed to take advantage of the way we connect as people. So they sent 78 volunteers into a shopping centre before Mother’s Day. Half were told to buy a card that “reveals(揭示) your knowledge of the recipient” while the others set out to buy a card that “reveals your true self”. After the purchase, the givers who had thought partly of themselves reported feeling emotionally closer to their mothers.
To find out how that approach goes down with recipients, the psychologists did another test, asking more than 100 students to choose a song on iTunes to give to a friend, partner or family member. Each half of the group received the same instructions as the card buyers. Results revealed that recipients of songs that revealed something of the givers felt closer to them than those who received gifts bought only with them in mind.
Human and Aknin suggest it might apply to all gifts. “If building stronger social connections is the underlying (潜在的)goal” of a gift and surely it should be — then we “may well be advised to offer more self-reflective gifts”. In short, for a present to be meaningful, you need to give away a bit of yourself, even if there is a risk that the gift might not so closely suit the recipient’s practical needs or tastes as one acquired purely with that in mind.
Moreover, giving something of oneself can be a safer act, the psychologists added. Because it reduces the risk of revealing poor knowledge of a recipient by attempting to buy something that fits their character — and failing.
But a note of caution here: what the research does not examine is the potential risk in repeated, unsympathetic giver-centered giving, which, according to Human and Aknin “could signal self-obsession” — and nobody wants to reveal that about themselves.
1. From the Mother’s Day card test, we can conclude that .A.gifts chosen with the giver in mind work well on the giver |
B.most people choose gifts with the recipient in mind |
C.most people choose gifts based on their personal tastes |
D.gifts chosen with the giver in mind work well on the recipient |
A.Making the giver’s life happier. |
B.Showing one’s knowledge of the recipient. |
C.Establishing and strengthening social connections. |
D.Meeting the recipient’s practical needs. |
A.Choose gifts that reflect more of yourself. |
B.Just focus on your own tastes when choosing gifts. |
C.Buy something that fits the recipient’s character most. |
D.Be careful not to signal your true personality. |
A.The tradition of gift giving | B.The purpose of gift giving |
C.The effect of gift giving | D.The psychology of gift giving |
【推荐2】2019 World Conference on VR Industry was held in Nanchang, China, with the goal of further satisfying people's growing demand for a better life, accelerating the modernization of China's economic system and its transformation into an innovation -oriented country, and promoting breakthroughs in the economic and social development of Jiangxi Province. The theme of the conference is "VR Adorns (装扮)the World - VR + 5 G for a New Era of Perception (观念)” .The virtual reality industry in Nanchang, capital city of East China's Jiangxi province, is expecting a boom when China grows in a new era of 5G this year, experts and industry insiders said at the conference.
The Conference attracted experts, scholars and company leaders from more than 30 countries, including the US, Germany, Britain, Russia, India and Israel, discussing the development and application of VR, especially as 5G, the next generation technology for network on devices like cellphones, unlocks the potential of VR. With a focus on the new era of perception enabled by 5G, this yearns conference showed leading-edge VR technologies and the latest outcomes of the global VR industry.
Miao Wei, head of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, said in the opening address that with China officially getting 5 G commercial licenses on June 6th 2019, the co — development of VR and 5G promises a huge market in future. " China takes the lead in VR innovations. And the wide popularity of high-tech in our country guarantees the potential of this market, said Miao.
China is building its VR industry into one with the most dynamic environments for innovation and entrepreneurship, highest market acceptance, and the greatest growth potential in the world.
1. What is one of the aims of 2019 World Conference on VR Industry?A.To promote 5G technology. |
B.To make Chinese people more creative. |
C.To improve the economic development of Jiangxi. |
D.To change the world into a modern one. |
A.It is widely used in Nanchang. | B.It can be used in business now. |
C.It makes China a leading country. | D.It is the technology for computer system. |
A.5G can greatly help the development of VR. | B.VR's application would unlock 5G. |
C.5G makes VR a business. | D.VR is made up of 5G. |
A.Technology Revolution in Jiangxi | B.New Era Marked by 5G and VR |
C.VR, Technology for the Future | D.VR Conference in Nanchang |
【推荐3】There are two kinds of secrets: secrets of nature and secrets about people. Natural secrets exist all around us; to find them, one must study some undiscovered aspect of the physical world. Secrets about people are different: they are things that people don't know about themselves or things they hide because they don't want others to know. So when thinking about what kind of company to build, there are two distinct questions to ask: What secrets is nature not telling you? What secrets are people not telling you?
It's easy to assume that natural secrets are the most important: the people who look for them can sound authoritative (权威的).This is why physics PhDs are difficult to work with—because they know the most basic truths, they think they know all truths. But does understanding electronic theory automatically make you a great marriage counselor? Does a gravity theorist know more about your business than you do? At PayPal, I once interviewed a physics PhD for an engineering job. Halfway through my first question, he shouted, "Stop! I already know what you're going to ask!" But he was wrong. It was the easiest no-hire decision I've ever made. Secrets about people are relatively overlooked. Maybe that's because you don,t need a dozen years of higher education to ask the questions that uncover them: What are people not allowed to talk about? What is forbidden or taboo?
The best place to look for secrets is where no one else is looking. Most people think only in terms of what they've been taught; schooling itself aims to spread basic wisdom. So you might ask: are there any fields that matter but haven't been standardized? Physics, for example, is a real major at all major universities, and it's set in its ways. The opposite of physics might be astrology, but astrology doesn't matter. What about something like nutrition? Nutrition matters for everybody, but you can't major in it at Harvard. Most top scientists go into other fields. Most of the big studies were done 30 or 40 years ago, and most are seriously flawed (有缺陷的).The food pyramid that told us to eat low fat and large amounts of grains was probably produced by Big Food(美国著名食品公司)than real science; its chief impact has been to worsen our obesity(肥胖)problem. There’s plenty more to learn: we know more about the physics of far away stars than we know about human nutrition. It won't be easy, but it's not obviously impossible: exactly the kind of field that could produce secrets.
1. What can we learn about secrets in Paragraph 1?A.To establish a company, one should explore secrets of both nature and people. |
B.Trying to discover people themselves will help them to find the natural secrets. |
C.Secrets of nature are more important than secrets about people. |
D.We have to find the secrets that nature and people have told us. |
A.the physics PhD was not hired because he sounded authoritative |
B.higher education will ensure a better understanding of secrets |
C.it is necessary and important to appreciate secrets about people |
D.it is not easy for physics PhDs to find an engineering job |
A.The best place to find secrets is where many great scientists are studying. |
B.Eating low fat and large amounts of grains is certainly good for our health. |
C.There may be some hidden secrets for us to find in the field of human nutrition. |
D.Without physics, secrets in astrology and human nutrition would not have been found. |
A.Secrets of nature | B.Secrets about people |
C.How to build a secret company | D.How to find secrets |