组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 政治与经济 > 政治政策
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:323 题号:9190906

The age of adulthood is by definition arbitrary. If everyone matured at the same, fixed rate, it wouldn’t be a human process. Indeed, maturation happens at varying speeds across different categories within the same individual, so I’d say I was easily old enough to vote at 16, but nobody should have given me a credit card until I was 32, and I’ve got the county court judgment to prove it.

However, we broadly agree that there’s a difference between a child and an adult, even if we might argue about the transition point. So the political theorist David Runciman’s view that six-year-olds should be allowed to vote goes against any standard argument about the age of civic responsibility. Nobody would say that a six-year-old could be held criminally responsible, could be sent to war, could be capable of consent, could be given responsibility for anything. So allowing them the vote—along with, unavoidably, seven-year-olds who are even sillier, if anything—is quite an amusing proposal.

Runciman’s argument is that this is the only way to rebalance political life, which is currently twisted in favor of the old, who don’t (he added) ever need to demonstrate mental capacity, even long after they’ve lost it.

The first part of his case is self-evident: pensions are protected while children’s centers are closed, concepts such as sovereignty (最高权威) are prioritized over the far more urgent business of the future: climate change. Nostalgia (怀念) for a past the young wouldn’t even recognize plays a central role, which is completely unfair.

Most of the arguments against giving six-year-olds a vote are that children would end up voting for something damaging and chaotic, if someone made unrealistic promises to them, which could never be realized. Well, it’s not children’s fault.

Having said that, children do tend towards the progressive, having a natural sense of justice (which kicks in at the age of six months, psychologists have shown, by creating scenes of great unfairness to babies, and making them cry) and an underdeveloped sense of self-interest. My kid, when he was six, made quite a forceful case against private property, on the basis that, since everybody needed a house, they shouldn’t cost money, because nobody would want anyone else not to have one. Also, food should be free. It was a kind of pre-Marx communism, where you limit the coverage of the market to only those things that you wouldn’t mind someone else not having.

On that particular day, when we were registered as voters, my kid was quite far to the left of me, but in the normal run of things, we’re united, which brings us to the point of the problem: children obey you on almost nothing, but they do seem to believe in your politics until they’re adolescent. So giving kids the vote is really just a way of giving parents extra votes. And what can stop us having even more children, once there’s so much enfranchisement (选举权) in it for us?

Now, if parents could be trusted to use their influence wisely, and hammer into children the politics it will take to assure a better future, then I wouldn’t necessarily have a problem with that, apart from, obviously, that culture is already wildly twisted towards parents, and I can imagine a few non-parents boiling with fierce anger. But that’s not worth talking about anyway, because parents can’t be trusted, otherwise we’d all already vote Green(绿党).

In short: no, six-year-olds should not get the vote; but while we’re here, if any votes come up in the near future, which will have an impact on the next five decades of British political life, alongside EU migrants, 16-year-olds certainly should be enfranchised.

1. The author refers to his age of adulthood to prove that ________.
A.certain rights are granted at different stages of life
B.there’s a common standard for the age of adulthood
C.people mature at different rates in various aspects
D.a credit card is more difficult to get than the vote
2. People reject David Runciman’s proposal because ________.
A.they believe children are far from mature in many ways
B.they are uncertain whether children can assume responsibility
C.they know the age to get the vote is not to be questioned
D.they don’t think a child can grow into adulthood earlier
3. What is the base for David Runciman’s argument?
A.Public ignorance of children’s abilities.B.Inequalities of opportunity.
C.A cultural preference for the old.D.The imbalance in political life.
4. The author talks about his kid to indicate that ________.
A.children are in favor of a just society and tend to be idealistic
B.children are innocent and don’t want to be involved in politics
C.children are simple-minded and can fall for an adult’s trick
D.children are good-natured and like to help people in need
5. The author thinks allowing children the vote may lead to ________.
A.twisted cultureB.parents’ objectionsC.misuse of rightsD.unusual maturation
6. What is the main point of the passage?
A.There is a difference between adults and children.
B.Allowing children the vote is not altogether absurd.
C.The definition of adulthood is quite controversial.
D.Parents should introduce politics to their children.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐1】Scientists have found evidence of a link between social and economic status and childhood attention deficit disorder(ADHD)(注意力缺陷多动障碍)in the UK. A team led by the University of Exeter Medical School analysed data from the Millennium Cohort Study, a database of more than 19, 500 UK children born between 2000 and 2002 .The study was published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

Findings showed that more children with ADHD came from families below the poverty line than the UK population as a whole, with average family incomes for households whose study child was affected by ADHD at £324 per week, compared to £391 for those whose child was not. The study found the odds (机会)of parents in social housing having a child with ADHD was roughly three times greater than for those who owned their own homes.

The team also found that the odds of younger mothers having a child with ADHD were significantly higher than for other mothers. Mothers with no qualifications were more than twice as likely to have a child with ADHD than those with degrees, and lone (孤独的)parents were more likely to have a child with ADHD diagnosis than households with two live-in parents.

Information was gathered from surveys when the cohort children were nine months old, and at the ages of three, five, seven and eleven.

Dr Ginny, of the University of Exeter Medical School,who led the study, said, "There is a genetic element to ADHD,but this study provides strong evidence that ADHD is also associated with a disadvantaged social and economic background. Some people believe that ADHD in children causes disadvantage to the economic situation of their family, but we found no evidence to support that theory. It's important to discover more about the causes of this disorder so that we can look towards prevention, and so that we can target treatment and support effectively. "

1. We can infer from Paragraph 2 that _______.
A.family incomes of £391 per week are below the poverty line in the UK
B.children affected by ADHD consume family incomes of £324 per week
C.parents who rent houses are likely to have a child with ADHD
D.families who own their own houses are above the poverty line
2. Which of the following families are most likely to have a child with ADHD?
A.The households with two live-in parents.
B.Middle-aged mothers having no diploma.
C.Single younger mothers with no diploma.
D.Younger mothers living with their   husbands.
3. What is Dr Ginny's attitude to the belief that ADHD in children causes disadvantage to the economic situation of their family?
A.He agrees with it.
B.He ignores it.
C.He hesitates to accept it.
D.He argues against it.
4. What message does the author most want   to give us?
A.ADHD linked to social and economic disadvantage.
B.The cure of ADHD has been found by the UK's scientists.
C.New methods have been used to treat ADHD patients.
D.Causes and effects of ADHD have been found out completely.
2019-05-19更新 | 85次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约300词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐2】Yelp, the San Francisco Internet company that makes reviews of restaurants and other businesses across a large part of America, is getting into the food delivery business.

Today, the company has announced that it has agreed to acquire Eat24, a food company that delivers food to homes on behalf of partner restaurants. Yelp is paying $134 million for the company—$75 million in cash and the rest in stock. Eat24 works with 20,000 restaurants in more than 1,500 cities all over the U.S.

On Yelp's reviews site, you can find new restaurants to suit your tastes, and now that the company is acquiring Eat24, the idea is that it will also let you take the next step: order food to your door.

“If you're looking at a restaurant, you want to be able to book that restaurant,” Yelp co-founder and CEO Jeremy said in a Tuesday interview. “If we can integrate(融入) that into the Yelp experience, it makes the site much better.”

The move is just one way that some of Internet's most recognizable names are branching into online food delivery to improve their existing business. Last August, payments company Square bought Caviar, a high-end quick food delivery service. And that same month, Uber tested a fast food delivery service called UberFRESH, which aimed to deliver meals from local restaurants to customers in less than 10 minutes.

In each case, food delivery can provide an added source of income, and it can also help these companies push the use of their existing services. The market for food delivery is hardly small, and mobile technologies can speed up the process, potentially expanding the business even further.

1. How does Yelp pay for the company Eat24?
A.Totally by cheque.B.Totally in cash.C.Only in creditD.Partly in stock.
2. What can customers NOT do on the new Yelp's website?
A.Finding the restaurants they like.B.Booking a restaurant they like.
C.Enjoying much cheaper food.D.Ordering food to their door
3. What does the underlined word “acquire” in Paragraph 2 mean?
A.Purchase..B.Claim.C.Request.D.Bargain
4. From the passage, we can infer that many companies ________.
A.begin to set up their own food branches
B.begin to attach importance to food delivery making
C.make little money from their existing business
D.give up the present business and turn to food making
2018-03-09更新 | 91次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐3】LIANG TAO.sold 80 pink Givenchy bags in 12 minutes.Becky Fang sold 100 Mini Cooper cars in just five.Both are wanghong,literally"red-hot on the web".Every day millions of Chinese search social media for wanghong posts or tune in to live-streams for wanghong's opinions on everything.The fans are helping this new Chinese Internet star to make money out of their popularity and to shake up the country's e-commerce industry in the process.

A few of wanghong have been hired by luxury brands.Jaeger-LeCoultre, a Swiss watchmaker,hired Papi Jiang for a video ad targeting young urbanites(都市人),including her 27m fans on Sina Weibo,a Twitter-like microblog. Zhang Yi of iiMedia Research,a consulting firm,estimates that up to 15%of sales on shopping sites like Taobao or social-media apps such as WeChat are influenced by wanghong's public support.The length of a dress might be decided by a survey of a wanghong's fans;its launch date might be based on the number of hits,shares or comments it collects,some of which can cause last-minute design changes.

This poses a new challenge for retailers(零售商),whose supply chains must respond even more quickly to wanghong's opinions.Whereas previously a company would look for a celebrity to match its image,wanghong and their admirers are shaping goods.

Another challenge comes directly from wanghong themselves.They increasingly make money not merely from online support or advice but by launching their own e-commerce stores.Sales of goods accounted for just under half of wanghong earnings of 53bn yuan($8bn)in 2016,estimates Analysis,a Chinese market-research firm(the rest came mostly from live-show tips and adverts).

Some wanghong are going a step further.In November Becky Fang launched her own clothing line.Part of her motivation,she says,was that the brands she supported did not always match the trends she was sharing with her followers.By creating her own brand,Becky's Fantasy,she has full control of the quality.She also gains a new income. For the time being only 3-5%of wanghong follow Becky Fang's example,iiMedia Research estimates.But it expects the model to become an industry in its own right, including entertainment and e-commerce,and driven by online data..

1. Why can wanghong use their popularity to make money?
A.Because they are Internet stars.
B.Because they use social media.
C.Because their opinions influence fans..
D.Because they can shake the e-commerce industry.
2. What is the characteristic of the products supported by wanghong?
A.They are fans-based.
B.They are social-media-based.
C. They are design-shared.
D. They are youth-targeted.
3. What are the challenges for retailers?
A.Online support and advice.
B.Increasing sales of goods online.
C.Quick responses to the.market changes.
D.Wanghong's opinions and e-commerce stores.
4. Why do some wanghong create their own brands?
A.Because they want.to attract more fans.
B.Because they want to share with their followers.
C.Because they want to set up a new industry model.
D.Because the brands they speak for can't satisfy their fans.
5. What's the writer's attitude to wanghong?
A.supportiveB.objective
C.indifferentD.worried
2020-07-14更新 | 111次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般