组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 信息技术
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.15 引用次数:765 题号:9268142

A block chain is a data structure that stores time-ordered data in an ever-growing list, like an accounting ledger (分类账簿). The block chain data structure is maintained using a distributed, peer-to-peer network of computers with no central “master”. As with many new concepts, block chain technology generates much optimism and also a huge amount of interest and excitement. Just what is it good for?

In short, block chains may improve any process where people need to access, confirm, send or store information securely. This information could be a person’s identity, a product’s shipment history or digital property like money.

Typical databases, spreadsheets (电子数据表), and ledgers store information about objects, people, and the interactions between them. Much of the world’s information, from credit card transactions to medical and financial records, is stored in these types of systems.

These types of systems have considerable, well-documented weaknesses that arise from their being centralized. A centralized record is hard to understand and is exposed to unauthorized access or distribution. It is also, because it is a ‘master’ copy, exposed to permanent changing or deletion.

Block chains are also used to store information. Crucially, however, they differ in two ways.

First, information is parceled up into blocks and sealed. Bitcoin, for example, which is the most famous practical example of a production block chain, stores all transactions across the network every ten minutes or so in a single, newly formed block. Each block is then added to the previous one to form a chain.

Second, this “chain of blocks” is not stored centrally. Instead, each block is copied and distributed around an entire network of peers - be they individuals, public institutions, or businesses - using distributed ledger technology. (The terms “block chain” and “distributed ledger” are often used interchangeably; for the sake of clarity, block chain technologies tend to employ distributed ledger technology.)

Each time someone adds a new block to the chain, meanwhile it is added to everyone’s copy.

1. What is the biggest strength of a block chain?
A.It promotes people’s enthusiasm about new technology.
B.It strengthens the security of processing information.
C.It enables people to store more data in time order.
D.It stores a large part of world’s information.
2. The typical systems used to store information are weak in that ________.
A.they are difficult to operateB.they can be accessed easily
C.they have a central “master”D.they store considerable documents
3. The passage is developed mainly by ________.
A.making comparisonsB.giving examples
C.making a listD.showing the effect and causes
4. What’s the author’s purpose in writing the passage?
A.To analyze the weaknesses of typical systems.
B.To encourage the popularity of the block chain.
C.To introduce the new concept of the block chain.
D.To compare the two different data structures.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-任务型阅读(约630词) | 困难 (0.15)
名校
【推荐1】请认真阅读下面短文,并根据所读内容在文章后表格中的空格里填入一个最恰当的单词。

There’s a contradiction in the way many of us behave online: we know we’re being watched all the time, and disapprove of the monitor by Google and the government. But the bounds of what’s considered too personal to be uploaded or shared online seems to shrink by the day.

I complain about the lack of privacy, for example, and yet I willingly and routinely trade it for convenience. I no longer run the risk of unforeseen delays on public transport; Google Maps will inform me of the fastest route to my destination; I no longer need to remember my friends’ birthdays; Facebook will urge me, and invariably appeal to me to post an update to remind people I exist. All I have to do is make my location, habits and beliefs transparent to their parent companies whenever they choose to check in on me.

So what’s going on? “Visibility is a trap,” explained the French philosopher Michel Foucault in Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison (1975). Allowing oneself to be watched, and learning to watch others, is both attractive and dangerous. He took for example “Panopticon”, a prison where prisoners were observed from a tower manned by an invisible occupant. The prisoners would believe in the presence of the mysterious watchman, whether or not anyone was actually inside, and behave themselves.

According to Foucault, the dynamics of the Panopticon are similar to how generally people self-monitor in society. In the presence of ever-watching witness, people police themselves. They don’t know what the observers are looking for, or what the punishments are for disobedience (不顺从). But they willingly accept and follow this invisible discipline.

Foucault claimed that such monitoring is worrisome, not just because of what companies and states might do with our data, but because the act of watching is itself a terrible exercise of power, which may influence behavior without our fully realizing it.

But something’s not right here. Why does the self-display continue when we are sure that we are watched from everywhere and nowhere?

Social media provides a public space that often operates more like a private one, where many people hold the belief that there they won’t suffer the consequences of what they say online, as if protected by technology.

Plato would be alarmed by the lack of shame online. His point about moral knowledge is this: we already know the right way to live a just and fulfilling life, but are constantly distracted(转移) from that noble aim. For him, then, shame helps us be true to ourselves and to pay attention to the moral knowledge within. A man without shame, Plato says, is a slave to desire — for material goods, power, fame, respect. Such desire, by its nature, cannot be satisfied.

PhenomenonWhile people hate being monitored, the     1     of privacy is gradually becoming a more serious problem.
My experienceI complain about the lack of privacy but still exchange it for convenience.
convenience* I     2     on Google maps for the fastest route to avoid delays on public transport.
* Facebook will remind me of my friends’ birthdays, and appeal to
me to be updated.
costI must make my     3     information available to relevant companies.
Michel Foucault’s explanationsIdea: Visibility is a trap.
An analogy:
* In the Panopticon, prisoners behave themselves just because they believed they were watched by an     4     watchman.
* In real life, the way people self-monitor     5     the dynamics of the
Panopticon. They willingly follow the invisible discipline.
Worr ies: Our data may be     6     and monitoring may influence us to change our behavior     7    .
Reasons for contractionThough being watched, self-display continues because some netizens think that they don’t need to take     8     for what they say online.
Conclusion*Shame is essential in leading a just and fulfilling life.
*Shame helps us stay true to ourselves and focus on our     9    .
*Shame can     10     us being a slave to desires for fame and fortune.
2019-01-08更新 | 154次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约540词) | 困难 (0.15)
名校

【推荐2】In 1953, when visiting his daughter’s maths class, the Harvard psychologist B.F. Skinner found every pupil learning the same topic in the same way at the same speed. Later, he built his first “teaching machine”, which let children tackle questions at their own pace. Since then, education technology (edtech) has repeated the cycle of hype and flop (炒作和失败), even as computers have reshaped almost every other part of life.

Softwares to “personalize” learning can help hundreds of millions of children stuck in miserable classes—but only if edtech supporters can resist the temptation to revive harmful ideas about how children learn. Alternatives have so far failed to teach so many children as efficiently as the conventional model of schooling, where classrooms, hierarchical year-groups, standardized curriculums and fixed timetables are still the typical pattern for most of the world’s nearly 1.5 billion schoolchildren. Under this pattern, too many do not reach their potential. That condition remained almost unchanged over the past 15 years, though billions have been spent on IT in schools during that period.

What really matters then? The answer is how edtech is used. One way it can help is through tailor-made instruction. Reformers think edtech can put individual attention within reach of all pupils. The other way edtech can aid learning is by making schools more productive. In California schools, instead of textbooks, pupils have “playlists”, which they use to access online lessons and take tests. The software assesses children’s progress, lightening teachers’ marking load and allowing them to focus on other tasks. A study suggested that children in early adopters of this model score better in tests than their peers at other schools.

Such innovation is welcome. But making the best of edtech means getting several things right. First, “personalized learning” must follow the evidence on how children learn. It must not be an excuse to revive pseudoscientific ideas such as “learning styles”: the theory that each child has a particular way of taking in information. This theory gave rise to government-sponsored schemes like Brain Gym, which claimed that some pupils should stretch or bend while doing sums. A less consequential falsehood is that technology means children do not need to learn facts or learn from a teacher—instead they can just use Google. Some educationalists go further, arguing that facts get in the way of skills such as creativity. Actually, the opposite is true. According to studies, most effective ways of boosting learning nearly all relied on the craft of a teacher.

Second, edtech must narrow, rather than widen, inequalities in education. Here there are grounds for optimism. Some of the pioneering schools are private ones in Silicon Valley. But many more are run by charter-school groups teaching mostly poor pupils, where laggards (成绩落后者) make the most progress relative to their peers in normal classes. A similar pattern can be observed outside America.

Third, the potential for edtech will be realized only if teachers embrace it. They are right to ask for evidence that products work. But skepticism should not turn into irrational opposition. Given what edtech promises today, closed-mindedness has no place in the classroom.

1. According to the passage, education technology can ________.
A.decrease teachers’ working load
B.facilitate personalized learning
C.help standardize curriculums
D.be loved by schoolchildren
2. Which example best argues against the underlined sentence in Para. 4?
A.The students who are better at memorization tend to be less creative.
B.Schools with bans on phones have better results than high-tech ones.
C.Shakespeare was trained in grammar but he penned many great plays.
D.Lu Xun’s creativity was unlocked after he gave up studying medicine.
3. The author believes that edtech functions well only when it is ________.
A.at the service of teaching
B.limited in use among pupils
C.aimed at narrowing the wealth gap
D.in line with students’ learning styles
4. What is the main purpose of the passage?
A.To stress the importance of edtech.
B.To introduce the application of edtech.
C.To discuss how to get the best out of edtech.
D.To appeal for more open-mindedness to edtech.
2021-05-31更新 | 2309次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 困难 (0.15)

【推荐3】Teachers say the digital age has had a good influence and a not-so-good influence on this generation of American teenagers. More than 2,000 middle and high school teachers took an online survey. Researchers also spoke with teachers in focus groups.

Three-quarters of the teachers said the Internet and digital search tools have had a "mostly positive" effect on their students research habits and skills. But 87 percent agreed that these technologies are creating an "easily distracted generation with short attention spans (持续时间) " .And 64 percent said the technologies "do more to distract students than to help them academically(学业上) " . Many students think "doing research" now means just doing a quick search on Google.

The Pew Internet Project did the survey with the College Board and the. National Writing Project. Most of the teachers came from Advanced Placement classes, which provide college-level work for high school students.

Judy Buchanan is director of the National Writing Project and a co-author of the report. Ms. Buchanan says digital research tools are helping students learn more, and learn faster. Teachers really welcome these tools because they are ways to make some of learning exciting and engaging.Young people welcome these tools. And the goal is to really help them become creators of content,and meaningful content, and not just sort of consumers.

But one problem the survey found is that many students are lacking in digital literacy. In other words, they trust too much of the information they find on the Internet. Another problem the survey found is blamed on something that might not seem like a problem at all: being able toquickly find information online.

Teachers say the result is a reduction in the desire and ability of their students to work hard to find answers. They say students are depending too much on search engines and do not makeenough use of printed books or libraries. Many teachers are also concerned that the Internet makes it easy for students to copy work done by others instead of using their own abilities.

1. The purpose of the online survey is to____
A.convince teachers of the Internet good influence
B.spread knowledge about the Internet search tools
C.influence teachers viewpoints towards the digital age
D.get teachers opinions about the digital age influence on youngsters
2. What negative effect did the teachers think the Internet search has on students?
A.It results in students bad research habits and skills.
B.It brings too much negative information to the students.
C.It distracts students attention instead of helping them academically.
D.It develops their interest in doing research through the technologies.
3. What's Judy Buchanans attitude towards the use of the digital research tools?
A.Supportive.B.Negative.C.Critical.D.Doubtful.
4. What can be inferred from the passage?
A.The Internet is changing everybody's life.
B.Teachers welcome the digital age in general.
C.The Internet has more disadvantages than advantages.
D.Solutions to the lack of digital literacy should be found.
2019-02-17更新 | 313次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般