组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 语篇范围
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 68 道试题
完形填空(约430词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文为一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了我们语言的大多数不是重大的话题讨论和研究,而是闲言碎语,而Dunbar教授认为这些闲言碎语不是在浪费时间,而是对语言的发展很重要。

1 . Research has shown that two-thirds of human conversation is taken up not with discussion of the cultural or political problems of the day, not heated debates about films we’ve just watched or books we’ve just finished reading, but plain and simple _________.

Language is our greatest treasure as a species, and what do we _________ do with it? We gossip. About others’ behaviour and private lives, such as who’s doing what with whom, who’s in and who’s out—and why; how to deal with difficult _________ situations involving children, lovers, and colleagues.

So why are we keen on gossiping? Are we just natural _________, of both time and words? Or do we talk a lot about nothing in particular simply to avoid facing up to the really important issues of life? It’s not the case according to Professor Robin Dunbar. In fact, in his latest book, Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language, the psychologist says gossip is one of these really _________ issues.

Dunbar _________ the traditional view that language was developed by the men at the early stage of social development in order to organize their manly hunting activities more effectively, or even to promote the exchange of poetic stories about their origins and the supernatural. Instead he suggests that language evolved among women. We don’t spend two-thirds of our time gossiping just because we can talk, argues Dunbar—_________, he goes on to say, language evolved specifically to allow us to gossip.

Dunbar arrived at his cheery theory by studying the _________ of the higher primates(灵长类动物) like monkeys. By means of grooming—cleaning the fur by brushing it, monkeys form groups with other individuals on whom they can rely for support in the event of some kind of conflict within the group or _________ from outside it.

As we human beings evolve from a particular branch of the primate family, Dunbar __________ that at one time in our history we did much the same. Grouping together made sense because the bigger the group, the greater the __________ it provided; on the other hand, the bigger the group, the greater the stresses of living close to others. Grooming helped to __________ the pressure and calm everybody down.

But as the groups got bigger and bigger, the amount of time spent in grooming activities also had to be __________ to maintain its effectiveness. Clearly, a more __________ kind of grooming was needed, and thus language evolved as a kind of vocal grooming which allowed humans to develop relationship with ever-larger groups by exchanging information over a wider network of individuals than would be possible by one-to-one __________ contact.

1.
A.gestureB.gossipC.descriptionD.recognition
2.
A.occasionallyB.habituallyC.discreetlyD.originally
3.
A.historicalB.naturalC.socialD.cultural
4.
A.wastersB.usersC.mastersD.owners
5.
A.wittyB.vividC.vitalD.worthless
6.
A.supposesB.rejectsC.highlightsD.outlines
7.
A.on the contraryB.for instanceC.in additionD.as a result
8.
A.comprehensionB.appearanceC.motivationD.behaviour
9.
A.contactB.attackC.assistanceD.trick
10.
A.concludesB.recallsC.requiresD.confesses
11.
A.protectionB.prospectC.responsibilityD.promise
12.
A.echoB.blameC.easeD.preserve
13.
A.establishedB.extendedC.earnedD.consumed
14.
A.efficientB.scientificC.considerateD.common
15.
A.regularB.independentC.widespreadD.physical
2024-02-25更新 | 276次组卷 | 1卷引用:上海市上海中学2023-2024学年高二上学期期末考试英语试卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约460词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了科学研究实际上充满了不确定性和复杂性,科学发现的主张应被视为科学的早期形式,需要经过可信度的验证才能变为成熟的科学发现,这一验证的过程需要集体的努力,并且伴随着相应的两个问题。

2 . In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an unclear and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience. Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience. Opportunities for misinterpretation are everywhere.

Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as early forms of science and are full of potential. But it takes collective inspection and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.

Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works it through the community, the interaction and battle between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.

Two problems exist throughout this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of current knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies repetition and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not re-search. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or contradiction by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as “seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.” But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.

In the end, credibility “happens” to a discovery claim — a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. “We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”

1. According to the first paragraph, the process of discovery is characterized by its ________.
A.uncertainty and complexityB.misconception and falsehood
C.logicality and objectivityD.systematicness and regularity
2. It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 that credibility process requires ________.
A.strict inspectionB.shared effortsC.individual wisdomD.persistent innovation
3. Albert Szent-Gyorgyi would most likely agree that ________.
A.scientific claims will survive challengesB.discoveries today inspire future research
C.efforts to make discoveries are justifiedD.scientific work calls for a critical mind
4. Which of the following would be the best title of the test?
A.Novelty as an Engine of Scientific DiscoveryB.Collective Inspection in Scientific Discovery
C.Evolution of Credibility in Doing ScienceD.Challenge to Credibility at the Gate to Science
阅读理解-阅读单选(约450词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章讲述了古生物学远不止是新的化石发现,通过化石上表征的过去,古生物学家抽丝剥茧得出过去经验,预测危险,为未来如何避免犯过去同样的错误提供明灯,强调了古生物学研究的真正意义何在。

3 . Frozen in time, a 125-million-year-old mammal attacking a dinosaur. A 39-million-year-old whale, the heaviest animal that ever lived. The oldest known jellyfish, from 505 million years ago. Paleontology (古生物学) produces newsworthy discoveries.

Fossils (化石), moreover, provide direct evidence for the long history of life, allowing paleontologists to test hypotheses (假设) about evolution with data only they provide. They allow investigation of present and past life on Earth. Flows of biological diversity, appearances of new life forms and the extinctions of long existing ones, would go undiscovered without these efforts. But the headlines over exciting new fossils greatly underestimate the true importance of paleontology. Its real significance lies in how such discoveries brighten the grand history of life on Earth. From its beginnings, more than three billion years ago, to the present day, fossils record how life adapted or disappeared in the face of major environmental challenges.

Paleontologists provide us with a unique vantage on modern climate change. They play an essential role in interpreting ancient environments, in reconstructing ancient oceans, continents and climates. Fossils provide key limitation on the climate models that are essential for predicting future climate change. And the fossil record gives important insights into how life will respond to predicted future climate conditions, because these have occurred before in Earth’s history.

In addition, paleontology has provided a fundamental contribution to human thought: the reality of species extinction and thus of a world that has dramatically changed over time. In documenting the history of life, paleontologists recognized that many extinction episodes could occur suddenly, such as the event 66 million years ago that ended the dinosaurs. The search for the causes of past mass extinctions started pioneering studies from across the scientific spectrum (科学界), focusing on potential future threats to humanity.

Not only do paleontologists know what happens to life when things go bad, they also know how long it takes for ecosystems and biodiversity to recover from these disasters, which can take far longer than modern humans have existed.

Paleontologists thus provide a unique perspective on the nature and future long-term ecological impact of the current human-produced biodiversity crisis, the so-called Sixth Extinction, and therefore the importance of protecting modern biodiversity. The very concept of a Sixth Extinction would not exist without paleontologists documenting the first five.

Paleontologists know that understanding life’s past is critical to anticipating and adapting to life’s and humanity’s future. Paleontology is important because it brings its unique and critical perspective to current challenges in climate change, biodiversity loss and the environment. Paleontologists can predict the future because they know the past.

1. The first two paragraphs are written to _______.
A.describe an eventB.raise a question
C.present an opinionD.make a comparison
2. What does the underlined word “vantage” in Paragraph 3 mean?
A.A positive effect.B.A valuable suggestion.
C.A quick decision.D.A comprehensive view.
3. Which of the following would the author agree with?
A.Ecological recovery takes shorter than imagined.
B.Past lessons can help to predict the future threats.
C.Paleontologists can handle the biodiversity crisis.
D.Fossil studies focus on the causes of mass extinctions.
4. What’s the best title for the passage?
A.Paleontology: A Pioneering Study
B.Paleontology: A History Recorder
C.Paleontology Tells More About Nature Than Humans
D.Paleontology Is Far More Than New Fossil Discoveries
2024-01-21更新 | 238次组卷 | 6卷引用:北京市西城区2023-2024学年高二上学期期末考试英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文为一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了很多品牌推出了加码衣服,却只是为了迎合尺码包容这一趋势,而并非真正的满足客户的需要。品牌如果真的想要取得成功,就需要关心消费者的价值观。

4 . The needs of plus size consumers have long been the elephant in the room of the fashion industry until body positivity and fat acceptance movements promoted the slogan (口号) that large-bodied people are not those who are left behind. This size-inclusive (尺码包容) trend has become so popular that it is influencing mainstream culture. As a result, fashion brands have finally decided to extend their size ranges. In 2022, the plus-size market grew twice as fast as the standard size market in both North America and the UK.

Yet, many consumers say fashion brands broadening their ranges are not truly inclusive. “Inclusive sizing means that all bodies are included in fashion, not just the ones who fit in standard sizes,” says Marie Southard Ospina, a UK-based journalist who covers body-image issues. “However, what many designers do right now is pick a number that they think is big enough to include plus sizes and stop. This is even more disrespectful.”

Researchers also criticize that some brands are just taking advantage of the trend. “Brands that used to promote so-called perfect bodies in their advertisements are now trying to get in on the trend by adding a few sizes. It doesn’t feel like they really care about plus-size people,” says Tom Burgess, analyst in fashion industry. “If brands cared about large-bodied consumers, then it wouldn’t have taken until now to acknowledge that they exist,” he says. “It gives the impression that companies are just trying to gain a share of the market without a real commitment to the community.”

The fashion industry must go beyond merely producing clothing in a range of sizes if they hope to succeed with a body -diverse world. The whole industry has to connect on a personal level with consumers. That involves showing shoppers that they are seen, understood and important to brands. “Consumers care about values, and so they want to buy from brands that reflect the values they believe in. Everyone should enjoy the same range of fashion options,” says Ludovica Cesareo, professor of marketing at the College of Business in the US.

1. What do the underlined words “the elephant in the room” mean in the first paragraph?
A.The hot issue that is valued.
B.The obvious truth that is ignored.
C.The important principle that is recognized.
D.The common phenomenon that is criticized.
2. Why do consumers say fashion brands are not truly inclusive?
A.They pick sizes randomly.B.They offer limited plus sizes.
C.They treat designers disrespectfully.D.They haven’t broadened standard sizes.
3. For what do researchers mainly criticize some brands?
A.Their designs.B.Their quality.
C.Their motivations.D.Their advertisements.
4. What does the last paragraph imply?
A.Buyers may deserve fashion that fits their figure.
B.Consumers prefer brands with personalized values.
C.Brands should catch up with the size-inclusive trend.
D.A good brand image is critical in the fashion industry.
智能选题,一键自动生成优质试卷~
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 较难(0.4) |
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文。作者通过一个朋友的故事指出:与认可和欣赏有关的工作问题是很常见的离职原因,而作为管理者,最好在该向员工表示认可和欣赏的时候就表示一下。

5 . I recently had a conversation with a friend who was feeling very upset about work. Why? He thought his manager didn’t like him. He rarely heard much from his manager, and when his manager said something, it was about correcting some aspects of his work or giving him some constructive advice.

Not surprisingly, given my friend’s understandably anxious view of these workplace dynamics (动态), he was afraid of his annual performance evaluation. He was worried that his boss might even tell him that he wasn’t needed anymore. Accordingly, he considered looking around for another job — not because he really wanted to, as he liked the kind of work he was doing, but because he suffered from the kind of management.

The evaluation day came, and to his great surprise, rather than being harshly critical, his manager told him that he was doing a fine job and gave him a promotion.

The sad truth is, this kind of phenomenon is by no means unusual in the workplace. One recent survey showed that nearly half of the employees have considered leaving a job “due to lack of recognition”. Another similar study found 46 percent of the employees left a job “because they felt unappreciated”.

The good news is that, in this case, the damage was repaired before it was too late — before my friend was out the door and his company began the expensive and time-consuming process of hiring a new employee. But as the research noted above shows, workplace problems related to recognition and appreciation are as common as the office air we breathe.

This conforms with my personal experience; during my decades of corporate management, I saw similar appreciation issues all the time. When a job isn’t done well, nobody deserves anything, of course. But when a job is done well, if you’re an employee, it’s entirely natural to expect at least a bit of appreciation. So if you’re a manager, it’s a good idea to show some. It’s that simple.

1. What phenomenon does the author want to describe through his friend’s case?
A.Unclear rewards and punishments.B.Employee-management misunderstanding.
C.Unfair promotion in the workplace.D.Fierce competition among new employees.
2. What happened to the author’s friend in the end?
A.His company hired a new employee.
B.He continued to work for the company.
C.His company simplified the evaluation process.
D.He repaired the relationship with his colleagues.
3. What does the underlined phrase “conforms with” in the last paragraph mean?
A.Results from.B.Separates from.
C.Agrees with.D.Contrasts with.
4. What can be the best title for the text?
A.Defend employees’ rights.B.A friend’s unforgettable experience.
C.Acknowledge employees’ work.D.Misunderstanding between employees.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 较难(0.4) |
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,主要介绍了人工智能工具在美国的流行使用及社会各界对此现象的观点与看法。

6 . More American businesses are starting to use artificial intelligence(AI)tools to come up with new ideas and to deal with customers.

Mattel is known for making children’s toys. The company recently used an AI image generator (生成器) called DALL-E to come up with ideas for new Hot Wheels toy cars. The used vehicle seller CarMax is using ChatGPT to gather thousands of customer comments. The social media service Snapchat has added a chatbot (聊天机器人) to its messaging service. And Instacart, a delivery service, now uses ChatGPT to answer food questions. Even the Coca-Cola company plans to use AI to help create new marketing content. It has not said exactly how it plans to use the technology. But the move shows that businesses are under pressure to use the tools that many of their employees and customers are already trying on their own.

Some experts warn that businesses should carefully consider possible harms to customers, society, and their own companies before choosing to use AI tools in the workplace. Chaire Leibowicz works at The Partnership on AI, a nonprofit group. The group recently released recommendations for companies producing AI- generated images, audio and other media. “I want people to think deeply before deploying this technology” Leibowicz said. “They should play around. . . but we should also think, what purpose are these tools serving in the first place?”

While text generators like ChatGPT can make the process of writing emails and marketing documents faster and easier, they also appear to present misinformation as fact. And image generators like DALL-E are trained in copying widely available digital art and photography. This has raise copyright(版权)concerns from the creators of those works.

“It is safer to use AI tools as a ‘thought partner’ but still people as the creator of final products,” said Anna Gressel. She works at the law company Debevoise & Plimpton, which advises businesses on how to use AI.

1. Which company made creative products with Al tools’ help?
A.InstacartB.MatelC.CarMaxD.Snapchat
2. What can we infer from the second paragraph?
A.People rely too much on technology in their daily life.
B.AI tools are widely used to help businesses grow.
C.AI tools have an effect on improving business conditions.
D.Customers are more and more connected online.
3. What does the underlined word “deploying” in paragraph 3 mean?
A.presenting confidentlyB.promoting successfully
C.debating publiclyD.applying effectively
4. What can we learn from Anna Gressel’s words?
A.AI tools should just be humans’ assistants.
B.The use of AI tools should be forbidden.
C.A business should partner with a law company.
D.Copyright concerns are unnecessary
阅读理解-阅读单选(约410词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:这是一片说明文。文章主要介绍了与自己未来建立联系的好处,以及如何与未来的自己建立联系,并为未来做出有益的选择。

7 . Is future you? It might seem like a strange philosophical question. But the answer to how you think about your future self could make the difference between decisions you ultimately find satisfying and ones you might eventually regret.

The brain patterns that emerge on an MRI (核磁共振成像) when people think about their future selves most like the brain patterns that arise when they think about strangers. This finding suggests that, in the mind’s eye, our future selves look like other people. If you see future you as a different person, why should you save money, eat healthier or exercise more regularly to benefit that stranger?

However, if you see the interests of your distant self as more like those of your present self, you are considerably more likely to do things today that benefit you tomorrow. A paper in the journal PLoS One revealed that college students who experienced a greater sense of connection and similarity to their future selves were more likely to achieve academic success. Relationships with our future selves also matter for general psychological well-being. In a project led by Joseph Reiff, which includes 5, 000 adults aged 20 to 75, he found that those who perceived a great overlap (重叠) in qualities between their current and future selves ended up being more satisfied with their lives 10 years after filling out the initial survey.     

So how can we better befriend our future selves and feel more connected to their fates? The psychological mindset with what we call ”vividness interventions“ works. We have found, for instance, that showing people images of their older, grayer selves increases intentions to save for the long term. Besides, you might try writing a letter to-and then from-your future self. As demonstrated by Yuta Chishima and Anne Wilson in their 2020 study in the journal Self and Identity, when high-school students engaged in this type of ”send-and-reply“ exercise, they experienced elevated (升高的) levels of feelings of similarity with their future selves.

Letter-writing and visualization exercises are just a couple of ways we can connect with our future selves and beyond, but the larger lesson here is clear: If we can treat our distant selves as if they are people we love, care about and want to support, we can start making choices for them that improve our lives-both today and tomorrow.

1. What’s the function of paragraph 2?
A.Generating further discussion.B.Introducing a research result.
C.Showing the effect of the finding.D.Concluding various viewpoints.
2. How does the author prove his statements?
A.By offering relevant statistics.B.By using quotations.
C.By referring to previous findings.D.By making comparisons.
3. What is paragraph 4 mainly about?
A.Benefits of befriending our future selves.
B.Ways of connecting with our future selves.
C.Methods of changing psychological mindsets.
D.Possibilities of us becoming our future selves.
4. What does the article want to tell us?
A.Making future plans makes a difference.
B.Our future selves look like other people.
C.Getting to know your future self benefits.
D.Your choice affects the fates of strangers.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。本文主要介绍了心理学家的一项EC理论表明,我们不是只有大脑负责人类的认知,我们的身体也负责思考或者解决问题。更准确的说思想塑造身体,身体同等程度地塑造思想。

8 . Is it true that our brain alone is responsible for human cognition(认知)? What about our body? Is it possible for thought and behaviour to originate from somewhere other than our brain? Psychologists who study Embodied Cognition(EC)ask similar questions. The EC theory suggests our body is also responsible for thinking or problem-solving. More precisely, the mind shapes the body and the body shapes the mind in equal measure.

If you think about it for a moment, it makes total sense. When you smell something good or hear amusing sounds, certain emotions are awakened. Think about how newborns use their senses to understand the world around them. They don’t have emotions so much as needs – they don’t feel sad, they’re just hungry and need food. Even unborn babies can feel their mothers’ heartbeats, and this has a calming effect. In the real world, they cry when they’re cold and then get hugged. That way, they start to associate being warm with being loved.

Further studies have backed up the mind-body interaction. In one experiment, test subjects were asked to judge people after being handed a hot or a cold drink. They all made warm evaluations when their fingertips perceived warmth rather than coolness. And it works the other way too. In another study, subjects’ fingertip temperatures were measured after being “included” in or “rejected” from a group task. Those who were included felt physically warmer.

For further proof, we can look at the metaphors(比喻)that we use without even thinking. A kind and sympathetic person is frequently referred to as one with a soft heart and someone who is very strong and calm in difficult situations is often described as solid as a rock. And this kind of metaphorical use is common across languages.

Now that you have the knowledge of mind-body interaction, why not use it? If you’re having a bad day, a warm cup of tea will give you a flash of pleasure. If you know you’re physically cold, warm up before making any interpersonal decisions.

1. According to the author, what is the significance of EC?
A.It brings us closer to the truth in human cognition.
B.It offers a clearer picture of the shape of human brain.
C.It reveals the major role of the mind in human cognition.
D.It facilitates our understanding of the origin of psychology.
2. Where does the newborns’ understanding of their surroundings start from?
A.Their personal looks.B.Their mental needs.
C.Their inner emotions.D.Their physical feelings.
3. What does the author intend to prove by citing the metaphors in Paragraph 4?
A.Human speech is alive with metaphors.
B.Human senses have effects on thinking.
C.Human language is shaped by visual images.
D.Human emotions are often compared to natural materials.
4. What is the author’s purpose in writing the last paragraph?
A.To deepen the readers’ understanding of EC.
B.To encourage the reader to put EC into practice.
C.To guide the reader onto the path to career success.
D.To share with the reader ways to release their emotions.
2023-12-19更新 | 306次组卷 | 24卷引用:重庆市第八中学校2022-2023学年高二下学期7月期末英语试题(含听力)
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。主要介绍了研究表明跑步后人们会感觉很好,其真正的原因可能是内源性大麻素。

9 . Running is often tiring and a lot of hard work, but nothing beats the feeling you get after finishing a long workout around the track.

But while it’s long been believed that endorphins (内啡肽) —chemicals in the body that cause happiness—are behind the so-called “runner’s high”, a study suggested that there may be more to this phenomenon than we previously knew.

According to a recent study published by a group of scientists from several German universities, a group of chemicals called endocannabinoids (内源性大麻素) may actually be responsible for this familiar great feeling.

To test this theory, the scientists turned to mice. Both mice and humans release high levels of endorphins and endocannabinoids after exercise. After exercising on running wheels, the mice seemed happy and relaxed and displayed no signs of anxiety. But after being given a drug to block their endorphins, the mice’s behavior didn’t seem to change. However, when their endocannabinoids were blocked with a different drug, their runners’ high symptoms seemed to fade.

“The long-held notion of endorphins being responsible for the runner’s high is false. Endorphins are effective pain relievers, but only when it comes to the pain in your body and muscles you feel after working out,” Patrick Lucas Austin wrote on science blog Lifchacker.

Similar studies are yet to be carried out on humans, but it’s already known that exercise is a highly effective way to get rid of stress or anxiety. The UK’s National Health Service even prescribes (开药 方) exercise to patients who are suffering from depression. “Being depressed can leave you feeling low in energy, which might put you off being more active. Regular exercise can improve your mood if you have depression, and its especially useful for people with mild to moderate (中等的) depression,” it wrote on its website.

It seems like nothing can beat that feeling we get after a good workout, even if we don’t fully understand where it comes from. At least if we’re feeling down, we know that all we have to do is to put on our running shoes.

1. What did scientists from German universities recently discover?
A.Working out is a highly effective way to treat depression.
B.The runner’s high could be caused by endocannabinoids.
C.Endorphins may contribute to one’s high spirits after running.
D.The level of endorphins and endocannabinoids could affect one’s mood.
2. Why did the scientists give mice drugs in their experiment?
A.To find what reduces the runner’s high symptoms.
B.To see the specific symptoms of the runner’s high.
C.To identify what is responsible for the runner’s high.
D.To test what influences the level of endocannabinoids released.
3. What does the underlined word “notion” mean?
A.Effect.B.Goal.C.Opinion.D.Question
4. What can we know about regular workouts according to the UK’s National Health Service?
A.They can help ease depression symptoms.
B.They are the best way to treat depression.
C.They only work for those with serious depression.
D.They can help people completely recover from depression.
2023-12-09更新 | 347次组卷 | 18卷引用:黑龙江省哈尔滨市第四中学校2023-2024学年高二上学期期末考试英语试卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章讲述了午睡可以提高成年人的大脑容量,并有助于改善学习能力。许多企业已经开始提供员工午睡的设施,员工认为这很有帮助。然而,午睡仍然在集体观念中受到误解,被认为是弱点和懒散的表现。睡眠专家指出,午睡确实对健康有益,但还是要优先保证晚上足够的睡眠。

10 . According to a study published this week, habitual napping (打盹) appears to be associated with a large brain volume in adults although experts stressed that further research was needed. It reduces the cost caused from the lost time and the fatigue-related errors. The work followed previous studies that suggested a brief doze could improve people’s ability to learn.

Arianna Huffington, a co-founder of Huff Post and the founder and chief executive of Thrive Global, said, “Given the latest science on the effectiveness of napping and the clear link between employees feeling well rested and their productivity, it’s long past time that businesses embrace short naps at work.”

Some businesses, including Thrive Global, have already introduced facilities for employees to take naps. Google introduced sleep pods as far back as 2014 and companies like Nike and Ben & Jerry’s introduced nap rooms. The practice has even been adopted by the NHS, with a growing number of hospitals introducing sleep pods for staff in an effort to help them get more rest. Employees, it seems, are enthusiastic. Sean Greenwood, of Ben & Jerry’s, said, “If a quick nap gets employees more involved and creative, we’re happy to provide that for our team members.”

Unfortunately, the practice of napping still suffers from our collective concept that sleep equals weakness and laziness. However, the performance-enhancing benefits of naps have been no secret to many leaders throughout history. It also gives the higher-ups the chance to acknowledge the 24/7 culture and come up with top-down   solutions that encourage workers to take care of themselves in and out of work.

While sleep experts stressed that a daytime doze could be beneficial, they said it was crucial to get enough shut-eye at the end of a day. It is the late stage of sleep, sometimes missed by early risers, that strengthens the nerve circuits that make for learning and memory, allowing the brain to make and consolidate new neutral connections. Additionally, prioritizing sufficient sleep during the regular nightly sleep period is essential for overall well-being.

1. What is paragraph 1 mainly about?
A.Work stress.B.Learning abilities.
C.A research finding.D.The brain volume.
2. What is Arianna Huffington’s attitude toward napping?
A.Dismissive.B.Approving.
C.Unclear.D.Critical.
3. Why are so many companies mentioned in the passage?
A.To advocate enough rest.B.To praise creative employees.
C.To compare the differences.D.To present the current situation.
4. What will possibly be discussed in the paragraph that follows?
A.The approaches to shut-eye.B.The importance of napping.
C.The secrets to well-being.D.The benefits of memory.
共计 平均难度:一般