1 . On January 3, Preet Chandi made history by becoming the first woman to complete a solo expedition across Antarctica to the South Pole.
Chandi, who calls herself Summit Preet,
“I want my eight-year-old niece to grow up without
Chandi
Chandi now
A.went on with | B.came up with | C.set off on | D.got by on |
A.challenge | B.press | C.approach | D.inspire |
A.sufferings | B.regrets | C.limits | D.aims |
A.fixed | B.endless | C.slim | D.faraway |
A.preparing | B.calling | C.waiting | D.looking |
A.ran | B.shipped | C.transported | D.covered |
A.measuring | B.pulling | C.lifting | D.getting |
A.wrote | B.put | C.recorded | D.downloaded |
A.more than | B.rather than | C.less than | D.other than |
A.change | B.set | C.realize | D.push |
A.unexpected | B.unknown | C.unprotected | D.unrecognized |
A.nowhere | B.somewhere | C.thoroughly | D.passively |
A.doubtful | B.free | C.capable | D.fortunate |
A.rises | B.plans | C.fails | D.sticks |
A.original | B.visual | C.eventual | D.unique |
2 . Caring for plants is a fantastic skill for kids to have. There are so many benefits of gardening for kids, yet the importance of gardening in early childhood is often undervalued. Here are some reasons why to teach your kids to garden.
Gardening makes kids stronger.
Gardening is good for kids’ well-being. Studies find that kids who garden have reduced large amounts of anxiety, stress and tend to be in a better mood.
Gardening is beneficial for picky eaters.
Gardening strengthens connection. Through gardening activities, kids grow closer to their parents and make many new friends.
A.Gardening helps build teamwork skills. |
B.Gardening activates kids’ sensory skills. |
C.It is the perfect activity for growing bodies. |
D.Learning to garden can be very tiring for children. |
E.Spending time outdoors in nature can bring a sense of well-being. |
F.Kids are more likely to eat the vegetables and fruit they’ve helped grow. |
G.They also develop a connection to the earth and a need to care for our planet. |
3 . Like dogs, wolves can recognize and respond to the voices of familiar humans more than those of strangers, according to a recent study. The research challenges the belief that dogs ability to differentiate human voices is due to selective breeding (选择性繁殖).
Holly Root Gutteridge and colleagues carried out experiments across five zoos and wildlife parks in Spain, involving a total of 24 gray wolves. The team set up speakers and first played the animals the voice of a number of strangers. Then, they played the wolves the voice of their keeper who would say familiar things to them in Spanish, such as “Hey, what’s up, wolves?” The wolves raised their heads, pricked their ears up, and turned toward the speaker. To test that the effect wasn’t accidental, the researchers went back to playing the wolves recordings of strangers and found that they once more lost interest. Finally, to make sure that the wolves truly knew their keepers’ voices, the team mixed things up and had the keepers say a series of unfamiliar phrases. Once more, the results held up.
Root Gutteridge pointed out the significance of wolves being able to differentiate between humans, despite the fact that our species went our separate evolutionary (进化的) ways tens of millions of years ago.
Before this, there had been a limited number of studies on the topic of how animals differentiate between the vocalizations (发声) of other species. Research has shown that our close cousins, gorillas, listen to people, but that was expected.
Given the new finding, “chances are that lots of species are listening to us and getting to know us as individuals,” Root Gutteridge said. “And it’s not all about us. Dogs could be listening to the neighbors’ cats and understanding the difference between one meow or the other. If the abilities are that general, it means that animals might be having a lot more cross- species interactions than we had thought about before.”
1. What established viewpoint does the recent research call into question?A.Dogs are the only animals that can differentiate human voices. |
B.Wolves recognize the voices of humans better than dogs. |
C.Wolves cannot understand human languages. |
D.Selective breeding enables dogs to differentiate human voices. |
A.By letting the keepers say unfamiliar phrases in Spanish. |
B.By asking strangers to reproduce the keepers’ voices. |
C.By playing recordings of strangers speaking familiar phrases. |
D.By changing the playback speed of the keepers’ recordings. |
A.To stress their close relationship with humans. |
B.To offer additional evidence for the recent study. |
C.To point out another species that can differentiate voices. |
D.To explain how animals’ ability to differentiate humans’ voices developed. |
A.The focus of the future studies. |
B.The limitations of the research. |
C.The significance of the research. |
D.The uniqueness of the experiments. |
4 . Cackles was my favorite goose. I was proud of her. Few people I knew had geese. It was
I was most
I remember being scared of them before I learned to stand my ground. As they
One day, I came home to find that Cackles was being
My dad said Cackles had to
My dad
A.normal | B.important | C.unusual | D.unacceptable |
A.acquired | B.sold | C.found | D.kept |
A.nervous | B.proud | C.worried | D.thankful |
A.choices | B.memories | C.celebrations | D.impressions |
A.feed | B.train | C.catch | D.study |
A.surprised | B.scared | C.excited | D.curious |
A.reason | B.purpose | C.excuse | D.idea |
A.watched | B.called | C.attacked | D.chased |
A.face | B.comfort | C.direct | D.greet |
A.brought back | B.left behind | C.taken away | D.cared for |
A.afraid | B.anxious | C.disappointed | D.angry |
A.jump | B.run | C.hide | D.fall |
A.go | B.stay | C.wait | D.return |
A.satisfied | B.heartbroken | C.confused | D.touched |
A.reminded | B.advised | C.promised | D.taught |
5 . It might be strange to wear clothes made out of plastic bottles. But in fact some clothing companies are already making such clothes.
Fashion brand JUMA recently showed its newest collection at a workshop in Shanghai. Eighteen clothing items from the collection, including jump-suits, jackets, shirts and dresses, were made from recycled plastic bottles. “We realized that billions of water bottles were being thrown into landfills and oceans every year and that these bottles take hundreds of years to decompose (分解). We thought we should use them to create our clothes and help the environment,” said Alia Juma, the company’s design director.
Many other fashion companies are finding similar ways to save our planet these days. The process is rather simple. First, the plastic bottles are washed and cut into small pieces. Then they are melted and shaped into small balls. The balls are melted again to form thread. People can then use the thread to make different kinds of clothes.
According to Juma, it takes 67,000 bottles to create 1 ton of thread. This reduces carbon emissions by 4.2 tons and water use by 6.2 tons compared with the normal way of making thread. “4 bottles can make a pillowcase. 5 can make a shirt, 10 a dress and 20 a short coat,” Juma said.
Some people might have doubts about wearing something made out of plastic bottles. But according to Causeartist, a website that focuses on innovation, clothes made from plastic could be even better than nylon and polyester. Plastic thread can be made into different textures, such as cotton, silk or even wool. “The more we learn about recycled fabrics, the more we realize that they work just like other fabrics. You can get a heavier cotton feeling or a silky feeling by weaving the yarns into different textures and using different washing methods. There is actually a lot you can do with this fabric,” Juma said.
The price for the clothes in the new collection ranges from 500 to 3,000 yuan. However, Juma is optimistic that prices will fall when more companies follow the sustainability path taken by her business.
1. Why is fashion brand JUMA now making clothes from plastic bottles?A.Because too many bottles are being thrown away. |
B.Because the company has advanced technology. |
C.Because people are fond of wearing such clothes. |
D.Because recycling the bottles is good for the Earth. |
A.Creating 1 ton of thread in the normal way brings about 4.2 tons of carbon emissions. |
B.Making clothes from plastic bottles reduces carbon footprint and is worth the effort. |
C.A fashion company can make as many as 300 short coats using only 1 ton of thread. |
D.The new way of making thread from plastic bottles is not harmful to the environment. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Critical. | C.Supportive. | D.Disapproving. |
A.To advertise fashion brand JUMA. | B.To introduce a new type of clothes. |
C.To praise fashion companies’ creativity. | D.To express concern about the Earth. |
1. How was the weather early in the morning?
A.Sunny. | B.Cloudy. | C.Rainy. |
A.Disappointed. | B.Ambiguous. | C.Understanding. |
7 . Need to get rid of old clothes? You’re not alone: With fast fashion, it’s easier than ever to follow trends. But cheap clothes aren’t made to last, most of which often end up in a landfill (垃圾填埋场). Take US as an example: per person generates an average of 82 pounds of such waste every year, with 85 per cent of it going to landfills even though 95 per cent can be reused.
Donating is a popular alternative — but know that only about 10 to 20 per cent of donated clothing gets sold at thrift shops (廉价旧货店). While all but five per cent of donated clothes are resold for reuse or recycling, it’s impossible to know exactly how much ultimately becomes trash.
The best way to ensure good, usable clothing doesn’t become waste is to increase the chances it ends up with someone who wants it. First, don’t wait too long if you choose to donate clothing to an organization, big or small. The sooner you donate your unwanted items, the more demand there is for them. Wherever you donate, ensure clothes are clean and dry. If it’s damaged or stained, don’t send it to thrift shops. They don’t have the capacity to do repairs and it just creates a financial burden in addition to the eco-burden, and defeats the purpose of the charitable action.
Clothes that are stained or damaged beyond repair will likely never be re-worn but can still be diverted (使转向) from landfills. You can send your clothes directly to recycling companies, like through Retold Recycling or municipal programmes. Old clothes can be downcycled into other items like wipers for car washes, and even generated into new textiles (织品).
Recycling is better than landfilling. It might take time to do a little research to find the right organization that can actually use the items you’re looking to give away. But it’s more rewarding than throwing everything in a big garbage bag, dumping it into a bin, and hoping for the best.
1. What can be learnt about fast fashion?A.It has reduced the eco-burden. |
B.It has caused clothing waste. |
C.It has lost its appeal in the US. |
D.It has led to a rise in landfills. |
A.To show the seriousness of the clothing waste. |
B.To criticize the spending habits of Americans. |
C.To push for tougher laws against fast fashion. |
D.To offer practical advice on managing landfills. |
A.Make them into new textiles. |
B.Put as many into landfills as possible. |
C.Downcycle them into wipers. |
D.Donate them to where they are needed. |
A.Critical. | B.Indifferent. | C.Supportive. | D.Unclear. |
8 . Art may not be a uniquely human patent. Apes (猿), monkeys, elephants, dolphins and even rabbits can be encouraged to express themselves via pencil and paper.
New research on the artistic efforts of apes suggests that their work varies according to changes in the world around them. The new study, published in the journal Animals, focuses on hundreds of drawings produced by five female apes at Japan’s Tama Zoological Park, where keepers provided them with crayons and paper over many years as part of a behavioural enrichment programme.
One of the apes, named Molly, was especially productive. She only started drawing on her 54th birthday, but from that point on, until her death five years later, she produced about 1,300 pictures. She drew almost every day, creating more complex pictures than her companions. “I don’t know if we can describe her as a genius,” says Sueur, a biologist in the park. “Such differences are often observed between individuals of a species, with some smarter than others.” Sueur and his colleagues identified individual differences between the apes’ artistic styles, in terms of their preferred colors, the types of shapes they drew and the space they filled on the paper. Only Molly routinely filled most of the space available.
Molly’s style changed with the season too. In summer and winter, greens dominated her pictures, but she switched to pinks and purples in spring and autumn. Appealingly, she opted for red whenever another female in the group was giving birth, which may indicate that her paintings are something more than purely abstract.
“We’ve tried not to overinterpret,” says Sueur. “It could be earlier representational art.” The biologists suggest that apes may provide clues to the development of artistic skills in humans. Like children, and unlike other species known to put pen to paper, the apes needed no reward to participate in the task, suggesting that they enjoy it for its own interest.
1. What can we learn from the first two paragraphs?A.Female animals are talented at the creation of art. |
B.The artistic style of animals remains unchanged. |
C.Some animals can develop artistic skills like humans. |
D.Animals are capable of creating masterpieces through efforts. |
A.Talented. | B.Human-like. | C.Open-minded. | D.Competitive. |
A.Help people know better about apes. |
B.Gain a new perspective of the evolution of art. |
C.Better protect the friends of humans-animals. |
D.Appeal to humans to learn from apes. |
A.Work hard, play hard. | B.Well begun is half done. |
C.Look before you leap. | D.Interest is the best teacher. |
9 . In the animal kingdom, killer whales (虎鲸) are social stars: they travel in varied family groups, care for grandchildren, and even imitate human speech. Now, scientists are adding one more behavior to the list: forming fast friendships. A new study shows killer whales can rival animals such as chimpanzees and macaques (a kind of monkey), and even humans when it comes to the kind of “social touch” that indicates strong bonds.
Some ocean animals maintain social structures — including male dolphins that learn the “names” of their close allies (盟友). But there is little data about wild killer whales. That’s where drone (无人机) technology came in. Michael Weiss, a behavioral ecologist, teamed up with his colleagues to launch drones, flying them 30 to 120 meters above a group of killer whales. That was high enough not to trouble the whales, marking the first time drones have been used to study friendly physical contact in whales.
The researchers recorded over 800 instances of physical contact between individuals. Those included hugs, back-to-back and nose-to-nose touches between pairs of whales. Other whales playfully threw young whales into the air, letting them fall into the water. Besides, the drone images revealed clear preferences among individuals, usually for one “best friend” of the same sex and age. Take J49 and J51 — two distantly related young males aged 9 and 6 — for instance. “Every time you see a group of whales, those two are right there interacting with each other,” Weiss says.
The young led most of these interactions, rather than the older females or males. Older males in particular were less important. “The young individuals really seem to be the glue holding the groups together,” Weiss says. As individuals age, this gradual loss of “centrality” is known in many social mammals, including humans. That finding is “especially appealing” to Stacey Tecot, who wasn’t involved in the study. “Scientists have long observed this social aging trend in animals, but there are still many unanswered questions,” she says. That’s certainly on the researchers’ radar. “We’re already gathering new data, with more advanced equipment,” says Weiss.
1. What does the underlined word “rival” in Paragraph 1 probably mean?A.Benefit from. | B.Be equal to. | C.Depend on. | D.Be fond of. |
A.The research method. | B.The variety of species. |
C.The size of the research team. | D.The time spent on the research. |
A.They have a stable friendship. | B.Their interactions are more complicated. |
C.Their communicating ways change frequently. | D.They prefer playing with young female whales. |
A.More researchers will be involved in the study. |
B.Other scientists take a negative attitude to the research. |
C.Researchers will collect more data to study killer whales. |
D.Researchers will uncover the social aging trend in animals soon. |
10 . The world’s forests may hold more secrets than previously thought: a new global estimate of tree biodiversity suggests that there are about 9,200 tree species remaining undocumented. Most are likely in the tropics, according to the new research.
The new research drew on the efforts of hundreds of contributors, who have categorized trees in two huge data sets: One, the Global Forest Biodiversity Initiative, records every species found in extensively documented forest plots worldwide. The other, TREECHANGE, puts together sightings of individual species. Together they suggest there are approximately 64,100 recorded tree species on the planet — up from previous estimates of around 60,000.
The researchers reached their estimate of an additional 9,200 yet undocumented species on the basis of the number of rare ones already in the databases. Most unknown species are likely to be defined as rare, found in limited numbers in small geographical areas, says the quantitative forest ecologist Jingjing Liang. The team’s result is “a rather conservative estimate,” Liang says, “because scientists know less about the preponderance of uncommon trees in places such as the Amazon, where out-of-the-way spots could host pockets of unusual species found nowhere else.” “If we can focus the resources on those rain forests in the Amazon,” Liang adds, “then we would be able to estimate it with higher confidence.”
Silman, a conservation biologist, who was not involved in the new study agrees that the study result is likely an underestimate. His and his colleagues’ local surveys suggest there are at least 3,000 and possibly more than 6,000 unknown tree species in the Amazon basin alone. Tree species often get grouped together based on appearance, he notes, so new genetic analysis techniques will likely lead to the discovery of even more biodiversity. Sliman wonders how many species will go extinct before scientists describe them. “How many are already known to native peoples in the Amazon — or were known to peoples or cultures who have themselves been made extinct through colonization, disease, or absorption? How many “species” already have dried samples sitting in a cabinet?” he says.
Searching for the new species will inform not only conservation but the basic evolutionary science of how and why species diversify and die out, Silman says. “Just the fact that there are thousands of species of something as common as trees out there that are still left to be discovered,” he adds, “I find pretty inspirational.”
1. What is the finding of the new research?A.About nine thousand new tree species have been identified. |
B.Thousands of tree species remain unknown to science. |
C.Maintaining tree diversity has become a global challenge. |
D.Human activities have led to the reduced number of trees. |
A.The researchers adopted quality method to analyze data. |
B.The researchers did extensive field study in out-of-the-way spots. |
C.Inferring from the existing dada is the main research method. |
D.Doing surveys and interviews is the main research method. |
A.majority | B.evolution | C.cultivation | D.capability |
A.genetic analysis technique failed to produce accurate information |
B.trees of similar sizes in the Amazon basin are grouped together |
C.too many rare trees were made into dried samples before being documented |
D.the local peoples or the local cultures are not fully aware of the tree species. |