1 . Open data-sharers are still in the minority in many fields. Although many researchers broadly agree that public access to raw data would accelerate science, most are reluctant to post the results of their own labours online.
Some communities have agreed to share online - geneticists, for example, post DNA sequences at the GenBank repository (库), and astronomers are accustomed to accessing images of galaxies and stars from, say, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, a telescope that has observed some 500 million objects- but these remain the exception, not the rule. Historically, scientists have objected to sharing for many reasons: it is a lot of work; until recently, good databases did not exist; grant funders were not pushing for sharing; it has been difficult to agree on standards for formatting data and there is no agreed way to assign credit for data.
But the barriers are disappearing in part because journals and funding agencies worldwide are encouraging scientists to make their data public. Last year, the Roval Society in London said in its report Science as an Open Enterprise that scientists need to shift away from a research culture where data is viewed as private preserve. Funding agencies note that data paid for with public money should be public information, and the scientific community is recognizing that data can now be shared digitally in ways that were not possible before. To match the growing demand, services are springing up to make it easier to publish research products online and enable other researchers to discover and cite them.
Although calls to share data often concentrate on the moral advantages of sharing, the practice is not purely altruistic (利他主义的). Researchers who share get plenty of personal benefits, including more connections with colleagues, improved visibility and increased citations. I he most successful sharers-those whose data are downloaded and cited the most often-get noticed, and their work gets used. For example, one of the most popular data sets on multidisciplinary repository Dryad is about wood density around the world; it has been downloaded 5, 700 times. Co-author Amy Zanne thinks that users probably range from climate- change researchers wanting to estimate how much carbon is stored in biomass, to foresters looking for information on different grades of timber. “I would much prefer to have my data used by the maximum number of people to ask their own questions, ” she says. “It’s important to allow readers and reviewers to see exactly how you arrive at your results. Publishing data and code allows your science to be reproducible”
Even people whose data are less popular can benefit. By making the effort to organize and label files so others can understand them, scientists become more organized and better disciplined themselves, thus avoiding confusion later on.
1. What do many researchers generally accept?A.It is necessary to protect scientists’ patents. |
B.Repositories are essential to scientific research. |
C.Open data sharing promotes scientific advancement. |
D.Open data sharing is most important to medical science. |
A.The fear of massive copying. |
B.The belief that data is private intellectual property. |
C.The lack of a research culture. |
D.The concern that certain agencies may make a profit out of it. |
A.The ever-growing demand for big data. |
B.The changing attitude of journals and funders. |
C.The advantage of digital technology. |
D.The trend of social and economic development. |
A.is becoming increasingly popular | B.benefits shares and users alike |
C.makes researchers successful | D.saves both money and labor |
2 . Everyone knows that running is a good way to stay in shape. The simplicity of running appeals to many people. You don’t need a lot of complicated or expensive equipment; you just need a good pair of running shoes. Well, that idea is changing.
This is not a surprise to the Tarahumara Indians, who live in northwest Mexico. The rough terrain (地势) in their area makes it easier to travel on foot than by horse or by car. Traditionally, the Tarahumara were hunters. They follow their prey over long distances, sometimes, for days, until the animals became exhausted.
But here is the amazing part: Tarahumara runners don’t wear running shoes. Tarahumara shoes are very simple. The sole (鞋底) is a piece of rubber held to the foot with homemade belt. These rubber soles protect against sharp objects, but they don’t provide any support or cushioning.
How is it possible that some of the best runners in the world don’t wear running shoes? Scientific studies are beginning to point to something the Tarahumara have known for centuries: Human beings are built for running barefoot. In a recent study, researchers used a video camera to examine how athletes run when they are barefoot.
A.The study revealed that barefoot runners land on the middle of their foot. |
B.Some researchers suggest that perhaps you do not need shoes at all. |
C.As a result, for the Tarahumara, running very long distances became part of daily life. |
D.Many of these shoes have higher heels that are equipped with special materials. |
E.As the force of impact drives the foot toward the ground, the arch flattens and expands. |
F.In response to this research, shoe companies started to reconsider the design of running shoes. |
3 . Recent years have seen a small increase in unemployment rates due to slowing of the economy. The fact that many college graduates are finding it difficult to land a job has sparked online discussions on the cost of education and the returns on it, with many agreeing with the notion that “education is useless”.
Stories like a person with a doctorate’s degree from Zhejiang University is delivering food, and overseas-returned graduates are selling hot-pot ingredients have caused many to question the value of education. Moreover, the fact that about 36,000 fewer candidates have applied to take the postgraduate exam in 2024, the first decline in numbers in years, has also fueled the “education is useless theory.
Is education truly worthless? This question has resurfaced due to several factors.
The wide spread of higher education has significantly increased the number of college graduates, reducing the value of college degrees. As the job market becomes over-crowded with graduates, the scarcity of high-level talents has become apparent, particularly in fields such as the humanities. For example, more than 900 institutions in China offer English major, making it the most common degree program, yet there’s a shortage of top talents who are proficient in English and have a good knowledge about the differences in Chinese and foreign approach to fields such as international relations and journalism.
The declining returns on the investment in education have given rise to the “education is useless” theory. Given the challenging job market, many believe college education does not guarantee any sort of employment, let alone a suitable job. And with various economic opportunities available, the notion that one can become financially successful even without formal education is becoming increasingly acceptable.
In light of these developments, combined efforts need to be made to change the situation. For instance, universities must take measures to integrate education, research and industry, while enhancing cooperation with enterprises through tailored talent training programs. Additionally, the authorities need to pay greater attention to vocational education, an important part of China’s educational system. Students, parents and society, on their part, should abandon their bias against vocational training, because it integrates education with career prospects throughout the learning process, offering targeted, technical and practical training which allows students to master their skills which can get them well-paying jobs in the future.
Developing a correct view of employment and career choice is key to abandoning the notion of “education being useless”. People, especially students, must understand the current employment landscape, their positioning, and strengths and weaknesses. While realizing that a college degree is no longer a ticket to employment, college students should leverage education resources to enrich their professional knowledge and competitiveness. And youths should approach vocational education with an open mind in order to make the most of what the job market has to offer.
Education is not synonymous with earning money, nor does a college degree guarantee financial success. The value of education is knowledge, which we need to make informed decisions not only in our professional life but also in our social and other fields of life.
1. What are the main reasons for the recent rise in the belief that ”education is useless”?A.Economic slowdown and job scarcity. |
B.Sad stories about educated individuals. |
C.Decline in postgraduate exam applicants. |
D.Emphasis on practical skills over qualifications. |
A.By focusing solely on academic research. |
B.By integrating education, research, and industry. |
C.By ignoring cooperation with enterprises. |
D.By eliminating vocational education courses. |
A.limit | B.abandon | C.balance | D.maximize |
A.Negative and pessimistic | B.Positive and supportive |
C.Balanced and objective | D.Unclear and ambiguous |
4 . ChatGPT, as a large language model, learned to generate human-like text based on a given context. It can do most of the text-generation tasks that involve natural language for communication. Examples of these tasks are text completion (e.g. email and report writing), paraphrasing, text summarization, machine translation, and question-answering. In addition, it can also be used for conversational AI applications, such as chatbots and virtual assistants.
While the ChatGPT platform has a wide range of applications related to text generation, outputs should be evaluated critically and used with caution, as they may contain false, biased, or outdated information.
The use of homework aids in higher education is not new. For years, students have used sites like Quizlet to cut comers as they complete homework assignments or take online quizzes. In response, teachers have had to adapt to these challenges and design assessments that can avoid the use of these tools.
I view ChatGPT in the same light. Essentially, ChatGPT collects information readily available online to form a response to a given prompt (提示). The AI has no capacity for critical thinking and often misses the mark whenever a prompt requires any critical or abstract thinking If university teachers want to avoid the threat of ChatGPT, then perhaps the strictness of their assignments needs to be increased.
While there are many concerns that ChatGPT harms academic assessment, it and better versions may force us to shift our curriculum to higher levels of critical thinking. Beyond this, we may discover ways it can be used to enhance the learning process. If students focus on advanced aspects of their schoolwork, chatbots could assist with more menial (微不足道的) educational tasks. For example, some instructors are experimenting with new forms of student engagement, including project-based learning. Perhaps a chatbot could be used to brainstorm on these projects. Learning effectiveness could be enhanced by customizing the learning process at an individual level to better match a diversified student body.
1. What’s the common point between ChatGPT and Quizlet according to the passage?A.They should both be assessed objectively and used carefully. |
B.They are both widely used by teachers, instructors and faculty. |
C.They are both sites provided for students to take an online quiz. |
D.They can both help students take a shortcut when doing homework. |
A.It can only be used for traditional AI applications. |
B.It’s not accurate or unbiased enough when generating text. |
C.It cannot the level of critical thinking as high as that of humans. |
D.It cannot be widely used in higher education or diversified learning. |
A.They have to meet the diversified demands of students. |
B.They have to deal with the cheating problem of students. |
C.They have to design more strict and precise assignments. |
D.They have to make the class more effective through advanced techs. |
A.indifferent | B.critical | C.objective | D.supportive |
5 . Here’s the deal: you’re as hungry as a horse and you want a delicious meal from a fine restaurant, but you’re a little low on funds.
So what do you do? If you happen to live in Europe, the answer is as easy as pie: you pull out your smart phone or tablet, and tap Too Good To Go, Europe’s most popular app. Approximately 23,000 restaurants and food sellers post their leftover offerings on the app for half their usual cost.
Why all this incredible generosity? Unbelievably, one-third of the world’s food is thrown away, and nearly one billion people don’t have enough to eat. Besides, burning wasted food releases harmful carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere, which contributes to climate change. That’s why environment-minded companies around the world are creating apps for phones, tablets, and other smart devices that connect uneaten food with people who want or need it.
After a long day at work, Anne, a 34-year-old student, pulls out her smart phone and chooses a noodle dish —pasta with mushrooms. Then she heads to a restaurant on the banks of the Spree River, where the owner packs her dinner and also offers her a spoon of free icecream, which is a reward for bringing her own container.
Indeed, there are many programmes serving the same mission around the world. In America, people are using an app called Food for All. One hour before a restaurant closes, its staff can post leftover meals to the app for up to 80 percent off menu prices. The app also allows customers to donate leftover meals to others.
In the Netherlands, 77,000 people have downloaded an app called No Food Wasted. This programme allows grocery store workers to share products that are approaching their expiration dates with customers who might need them.
Some countries are taking their commitment to reducing food waste a step further. France and the Czech Republic, for example, have laws that prohibit restaurants and grocery stores from throwing away food. Instead, workers are required to donate that food to charity.
So think about if there might be a better use for your uneaten vegetables. The planet will thank you.
1. Why are such apps as Too Good To Go created?A.They are created to show the generosity of some eco-minded companies. |
B.They are created to offer delicious meals to those who live on a tight budget. |
C.They are created to call for people to not waste food and to reduce harmful emissions from burning wasted food. |
D.They are created as a publicity tool for restaurants and companies. |
A.Make laws and regulations to ban the waste of food. |
B.Share products approaching their expiration dates with those who might need them. |
C.Post leftover meals to the app for up to 80 percent discounts. |
D.Offer consumers a free meal as the reward for bringing their own container. |
A.Companies are designing environment-friendly apps for poor people. |
B.Restaurants enable their staff to sell leftover meals at a low price on apps. |
C.Apps are designed to provide leftover food for people in need to choose from. |
D.Apps are designed to appeal to the public to treasure food and donate food to people in need. |
A.more methods are needed to help solve the problem of leftover food |
B.more applications should be created to help restaurants sell food |
C.leftover food will pose a great danger to the environment |
D.the applications already designed cannot ensure a good use of leftover food |
6 . Human Being or Human Doing?
During my seemingly-endless career as a high school teacher, not even once have I woken up in the morning, realizing that it’s the beginning of a new week, joyfully posted a Wechat Moment and said “Thank God! It’s Monday again!”
Welcome to hustle culture (过劳文化). Now we all live in a society that encourages us to equate our work with our intrinsic value as human beings.
It is not hard to view hustle culture as a swindle (欺诈行为).
If we are doomed to overwork until we die, we may at least die with dignity. Stop pretending to love Mondays!
A.However, the gloomy employment prospect in recent years has significantly reduced the bargaining power of workers. |
B.Apparently, that makes me slightly different from people of my generation. |
C.After all, persuading a generation of workers to work their heads off is convenient for those at the top. |
D.Hustle culture can negatively affect people’s personal relationships as they favor the hustle over the connections with others. |
E.In this new work culture, enduring or even merely liking one’s job is no longer enough. |
F.Furthermore, all that nonstop work will lead to exhaustion and burnout, which can have lasting harmful consequences. |
7 . Tiredness May Lead to Snacking
Staying up late doing homework is always tiring. Perhaps when we are tired, we feel the need to eat unhealthy snack food. Recently scientists have been investigating tiredness and snack food.
According to a study in the Journal of Neuroscience, people are more likely to crave snacks when they don’t get enough sleep.
For the study, researchers from University of Cologne in Germany gave the same dinner to 32 healthy men aged between 19 and 33. Half of the men were then sent home to bed, and the other half were kept aware in the laboratory all night.
The next morning, the participants were asked to consider how much they would be willing to pay for snack food items shown to them in pictures.
According to the researchers, all were similarly hungry in the morning, and had similar levels of most hormones and blood sugar.
However, brain scans showed that when the sleep-deprived participants looked at the pictures of junk food, they released more of the “hunger hormone”. This is the hormone responsible for increasing the appetite, and making us consume more.
Asked about how much they would pay for snacks, “participants with sleep deprivation were more willing to overspend on food items than those with a good night’s sleep,” researchers said.
Researchers also observed that among the people who hadn’t slept, there was greater activity in the part of the brain where food rewards are processed.
Scientists think that sleep-deprived people experience changes to the hunger hormone and the brain’s reward system that leads to a stronger desire to eat snacks with high fat and calories.
“This brings us a little closer to understanding the mechanism behind how sleep deprivation changes food valuation,” Professor Jan Peters, a co-author of the study from the University of Cologne, told The Independent.
Kill the cravingListen to some soft music to relieve your tiredness.
Do some slight exercise for a short time when you’re tired.
Eat yogurt or fruits to replace snacks with high fat and calories.
Distance yourself from the craving.
1. People are more likely to crave snacks if they don’t get enough sleep because they ______.A.have high levels of most hormones and blood sugar |
B.release more of the “hunger hormone”, making them consumer more |
C.are extremely hungry in the morning |
D.are attracted by the snack food items in the pictures |
A.Hunger hormone can increase people’s appetite and let them eat more food. |
B.Participants without sleep deprivation may spend less on food items. |
C.The brain’s reward system will lead to craving snack food. |
D.Greater activity will appear in certain part of the brain among those who sleep well. |
A.Listening to Rock & Roll. | B.Walking out for while. |
C.Ordering a McDonald’s Big Mac. | D.Drinking black coffee. |
8 . ①We have a problem, and the strange thing is that we not only know about it but also celebrate it. Just today, someone boasted to me that she was so busy she’s averaged four hours of sleep a night for the last two weeks. She wasn’t complaining; she was proud of the fact. She is not alone.
②Why are typically rational (理智的) people so irrational in their behavior? The answer is that we’re in the midst of a bubble. I call it “The More Bubble.”
③The nature of bubbles is that something is absurdly overvalued until-eventually-the bubble bursts, and we’re left wondering why we were so irrationally animated in the first place. The thing we’re overvaluing now is the opinion of doing it all, having it all, achieving it all.
④This bubble is being enabled by a combination of three powerful trends: smart phones, social media, and extreme consumerism. The result is not just information overload, but opinion overload. We are more aware than at any time in history of what everyone else is doing and therefore, what we should be doing. In the process, we have been sold a bill of goods: that success means being supermen and superwomen who can get it all done. Of course we boasted about being busy—it’s code for being successful and important.
⑤And our answer to the problem of more is always more. We need more technology to help us create more technologies. We need to shift our workload to free up our own time to do yet even more.
⑥Luckily, there is a solution to the pursuit of more: the pursuit of less, but better. A growing number of people are making this change. I call these people Essentialists.
⑦These people are designing their lives around what is essential and removing everything else. These people arrange to have actual weekends (during which they are not working). They create technology-free zones in their homes. They trade time on Facebook with calling those few friends who really matter to them. Instead of running to different meetings, they put space on their calendars to get important work done.
⑧So we have two choices: we can be among the last people caught up in “The More Bubble” or we can join the growing community of Essentialists and get more of what matters in our one precious life.
1. When the woman said she only slept for four hours a night for two weeks, she “_________”.A.took pride in doing so | B.was asking for suggestions |
C.was unsatisfied with her lifestyle | D.knew few people were like her |
A.The solutions to “The More Bubble”. |
B.The advantages of “The More Bubble”. |
C.The cause and result of “The More Bubble”. |
D.The disadvantages of “The More Bubble”. |
A.are tired of information and opinions |
B.prefer not to rely on technology at their homes |
C.give up certain things for what matters in life |
D.are not interested in becoming successful and important |
A.Disapproval. | B.Indifferent. | C.Supportive. | D.Skeptical. |
9 . In Japan many workers for large corporations have a guarantee of lifetime employment. They will not be laid off during recessions or when the tasks they perform. are taken over by robots. To some observers, this is capitalism at its best, because workers are treated as people not things. Others see it as necessarily inefficient and believe it cannot continue if Japan is to remain competitive with foreign corporations more concerned about profits and less concerned about people.
Defenders of the system argue that those who call it inefficient do not understand how it really works. In the first place not every Japanese worker has the guarantee of a lifetime job. The lifetime employment system includes only “regular employees”. Many employees do not fall into this category, including all women. All businesses have many part-time and temporary employees. These workers are hired and laid off during the course of the business cycle just as employees in the United States are. These “irregular workers” make up about 10 percent of the nonagricultural work force. Additionally, Japanese firms maintain some flexibility through the extensive use of subcontractors. This practice is much more common in Japan than in the United States.
The use of both subcontractors and temporary workers has increased markedly in Japan since the 1974 — 1975 recession. All this leads some to argue that the Japanese system is not all that different from the American system. During recessions Japanese corporations lay off temporary workers and give less business to subcontractors. In the United States, corporations lay off those workers with the least seniority. The difference then is probably less than the term “lifetime employment” suggests, but there still is a difference. And this difference cannot be understood without looking at the values of Japanese society. The relationship between employer and employee cannot be explained in purely contractual terms. Firms hold on to the employees and employees stay with one firm. There are also practical reasons for not jumping from job to job. Most retirement benefits come from the employer. Changing jobs means losing these benefits. Also, teamwork is an essential part of Japanese production. Moving to a new firm means adapting to a different team and at least temporarily, lower productivity and lower pay.
1. according to the passage, a woman in Japan ________.A.cannot get a lifetime job | B.is impossible to get a part time job |
C.will be employed for life | D.is among the regular workers |
A.They don’t want to lose their retirement benefits. |
B.They are not adaptable people. |
C.Any change of jobs will make them less paid. |
D.They get used to the team work. |
A.Those who want to change jobs frequently in Japan should think twice. |
B.Those who are first laid off by American corporations are temporary workers. |
C.The use of subcontractors makes Japan films less flexible |
D.The Japanese system is totally different from the American system |
10 . “Sushi tastes amazing. A great steak is just amazing.” Those are not the words you expect to hear from a leader of the vegetarian movement. But that’s how Graham Hill, founder of the sustainability website Tree Hugger, feels about the fleshier components of his diet. He is a self-described “weekday vegetarian,” a compromise that came about after years of trying—and failing—to adhere to (坚持) a strictly vegetarian diet.
For the past year, Hill has preached (宣传,鼓吹) the cause of partial vegetarianism to help fight global warming. According to the U. N., the livestock industry produces 18%of the world’s greenhouse gases. Part-time vegetarians choose what to eat and when. The popular Meatless Monday movement, which began in 2003, has been backed by many celebrities, including Paul McCartney, who has taken the lead in his own Meat Free Monday campaign. Last year the Belgian city of Ghent picked Thursday as its Veggie day, calling for meat-free options to be served that day in schools and public institutions.
The drive to avoid eating meat on certain days is not new. Catholics have long been urged to restrain themselves on Fridays. But environmentalists have only recently caught on. “The surge is due to a sense of a plateau (达到平衡) . You’ve already reached out to the base of strict vegetarians, and it’s hard to get beyond those numbers,” says Peter Singer, a Princeton philosophy professor. “People should go further, but it’s progressed in the right direction.”
Although the American Dietetic (ADA) Association doesn’t track the number of part-times, the group says roughly 2.5% of Americans are strictly vegetarian, a diet that poses no health risks as long as practitioners get enough protein from beans and other nonmeat sources. “A partial-vegetarian plan is a little more user-friendly,” says Dawn Jackson Blatner, a flexitarian (弹性素食者(偶尔吃荤)) and ADA spokesperson.
The goal for many activists is simply to get more people to eat less meat. “Absolute purists should be living in a cave,” says Ingrid Newkirk, president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). “Anybody who witnesses the suffering of animals and has a glimmer of hope of reducing that suffering can’t take the position that it’s all or nothing. We have to be realistic. Screw the principle.”
1. The first quote of the passage intends to show that ________.A.sushi and steak are both of Hill’s favorite food | B.the vegetarian movements are popular |
C.Hill isn’t a qualified leader of the vegetarian movement | D.it’s difficult to be a strict vegetarian |
A.He doesn’t eat meat on weekends. | B.He doesn’t want to be a strict vegetarian. |
C.He is an environmentalist. | D.He failed to lose weight. |
A.Part-time vegetarians account for nearly 2.5% of Americans. |
B.A diet with all vegetables may have no bad effect on health. |
C.Partial vegetarian is better than strict vegetarian in terms of nutrition. |
D.Many celebrities are part-time vegetarians. |
A.people should adhere to a strictly vegetarian diet. |
B.everybody should act to fight global warming |
C.partial vegetarian plan works more sensibly |
D.people shouldn’t stop eating meat for it’s bad for health |