1 . The spending power of young people varies from person to person. Each, however, is faced with the same question: what to do with their money? Recent headlines have seen more and more teens maxing out their parents’ credit cards on games or other online activities.
However people intend to use their money, the importance attached to managing it seems to be unparalleled to younger generations. In this case, Jerry Witkovsky and his method of using four jars to teach teenagers how to spend their money wisely caught the public’s attention.
When Jerry’s grandchildren turned 13, his present to each of them was four jars: one for Spending, one for Saving, one for Giving, and another for Investing. It was from then on that his grandchildren started to be in control of what to do with the money they receive.
The value taught with the Spending jar is that you are responsible for your own happiness. Money gives you independence and the opportunity to buy something you like.
The Saving jar, giving you a vision for the future, could involve saving for university but it could also mean saving for that special something you’ve seen in the stores.
The Investing jar not only represents a vision for the future, but gives the opportunity to build for the future. Although this could likewise involve putting aside money for your university education, it also means investing in yourself.
The Giving jar is all about kindness and helping. Whether you want to help out a friend or give money to children in another country, it’s up to you.
The wider aim of the jars is to encourage teenagers to think more objectively about money and the things that it can do, so that they can grow up understanding the value of the valuable. In this way, they will be better equipped in their adult lives to make informed choices about how they use the money they have. Indeed, the small change inside their jars could mean a big change in how they manage their money.
1. Why did Jerry give his grandchildren jars as the birthday present?A.To increase their spending power. |
B.To teach them how to manage money. |
C.To prevent them from spending money. |
D.To share with them his attitude to money. |
A.Jerry aims to help his grandchildren learn life-long values. |
B.Teenagers can always learn how to spend money from their grandfather. |
C.The money in the Investing jar is intended to help children in need. |
D.The Spending jar is the only jar that represents a vision for the future. |
A.To give suggestions. | B.To draw a conclusion. |
C.To make a comparison. | D.To present an example. |
A.Wise. | B.Friendly. | C.Selfless. | D.Humble. |
2 . TikTok, a social media app dedicated to short-form videos, has emerged as a major firer of food trends—from mushroom coffee and pancake cereal to cloud bread and feta pasta. But another trend, the #whatieatinaday trend, is dominating TikTok, which is
Even though #whatieatinaday posts may be
The
Often the overly stylized meals do not
Younger audiences, especially girls and young women, internalize the message that they must eat like these creators to achieve and maintain not only health, but also social
Even if the #whatieatinaday posts are displaying a balanced day of eating, the
People making these videos are overwhelmingly thin, young, able-bodied and white. There is a complete lack of body
A.nearing | B.longing | C.ducking | D.driving |
A.emphasized | B.simplified | C.substituted | D.intended |
A.moral | B.scientific | C.potential | D.unfavorable |
A.modern | B.staged | C.educational | D.alternative |
A.prioritize | B.commercialize | C.recognize | D.civilize |
A.promoting | B.representing | C.spoiling | D.perfecting |
A.welfare | B.equality | C.desirability | D.justice |
A.individual | B.instinctive | C.restrictive | D.changeable |
A.attracting | B.seeking | C.slipping | D.offering |
A.suburban | B.subtle | C.subsequent | D.substantial |
A.reader | B.advertiser | C.campaigner | D.poster |
A.Therefore | B.Finally | C.Additionally | D.Meanwhile |
A.lose weight | B.share interests | C.assume burden | D.make contributions |
A.language | B.diversity | C.similarity | D.dynamic |
A.available | B.predictable | C.inadequate | D.unattainable |
3 . The personal grievance provisions of New Zealand’s Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA) prevent an employer from firing an employee without good cause. Instead, dismissals must be justified. Employers must both show cause and act in a procedurally fair way.
Personal grievance procedures were designed to guard the jobs of ordinary workers from “unjustified dismissals”. The premise was that the common law of contract lacked sufficient protection for workers against arbitrary conduct by management. Long gone are the days when a boss could simply give an employee contractual notice.
But these provisions create difficulties for businesses when applied to highly paid managers and executives. As countless boards and business owners will attest, constraining firms from firing poorly performing, high-earning managers is a handbrake on boosting productivity and overall performance. The difference between C-grade and A-grade managers may very well be the difference between business success or failure. Between preserving the jobs of ordinary workers or losing them. Yet mediocrity is no longer enough to justify a dismissal.
Consequently and paradoxically laws introduced to protect the jobs of ordinary workers may be placing those jobs at risk.
If not placing jobs at risk, to the extent employment protection laws constrain business owners from dismissing under-performing managers, those laws act as a constraint on firm productivity and therefore on workers’ wages. Indeed, in “An International Perspective on New Zealand’s Productivity Paradox” (2014), the Productivity Commission singled out the low quality of managerial capabilities as a cause of the country’s poor productivity growth record.
Nor are highly paid managers themselves immune from the harm caused by the ERA’s unjustified dismissal procedures. Because employment protection laws make it costlier to fire an employee, employers are more cautious about hiring new staff. This makes it harder for the marginal manager to gain employment. And firms pay staff less because firms carry the burden of the employment arrangement going wrong.
Society also suffers from excessive employment protections. Stringent job dismissal regulations adversely affect productivity growth and hamper both prosperity and overall well-being.
Across the Tasman Sea, Australia deals with the unjustified dismissal paradox by excluding employees earning above a specified “high-income threshold” from the protection of its unfair dismissal laws. In New Zealand, a 2016 private members’ Bill tried to permit firms and high-income employees to contract out of the unjustified dismissal regime. However, the mechanisms proposed were unwieldy and the Bill was voted down following the change in government later that year.
1. The personal grievance provisions of the ERA are intended to ________.A.discipline dubious corporate practices | B.promote traditional hiring procedures |
C.regulate the privileges of the employers | D.safeguard the rights of ordinary workers |
A.hinder business development | B.justify managers’ authority |
C.affect the public image of the firms | D.worsen labor-management relations |
A.ERA’s sensible approach corresponds with the international trend of democracy. |
B.The society will see a rise in well-being with the ERA’s procedures carried out. |
C.Non-proficient managerial capabilities make employees suffer from salary cuts. |
D.High-income threshold in Australia is relatively beneficial to business owners. |
A.Appreciative | B.Skeptical | C.Optimistic | D.Contradictory |
4 . Public distrust of scientists stems in part from the blurring of boundaries between science and technology, between discovery and manufacture. Most governments, perhaps all governments, justify public expenditure on scientific research in terms of the economic benefits the scientific enterprise has brought in the past and will bring in the future. Politicians remind their voters of the splendid machines “our scientists” have invented, the new drugs to relieve old disorders, and the new surgical equipment and techniques by which previously unmanageable conditions may now be treated and lives saved. At the same time, the politicians demand of scientists that they tailor their research to “economics needs”, and that they award a higher priority to research proposals that are “near the market” and can be translated into the greatest return on investment in the shortest time. Dependent, as they are, on politicians for much of their funding, scientists have little choice but to comply. Like the rest of us, they are members of a society that rates the creation of wealth as the greatest possible good. Many have reservations, but keep them to themselves in what they perceive as a climate hostile to the pursuit of understanding for its own sake and the idea of an inquiring, creative spirit.
In such circumstances no one should be too hard on people who are suspicious of conflicts of interest. When we learn that the distinguished professor assuring us of the safety of a particular product holds a consultancy with the company making it, we cannot be blamed for wondering whether his fee might conceivably cloud his professional judgment. Even if the professor holds no consultancy with any firm, some people may still distrust him because of his association with those who do, or at least wonder about the source of some of his research funding.
This attitude can have damaging effects. It questions the integrity of individuals working in a profession that prizes intellectual honesty as the supreme virtue, and plays into the hands of those who would like to discredit scientists by representing them as corruptible. This makes it easier to dismiss all scientific pronouncements, but especially those made by the scientists who present themselves as “experts”. The scientist most likely to understand the safety of a nuclear reactor, for example, is a nuclear engineer, and a nuclear engineer is most likely to be employed by the nuclear industry. If a nuclear engineer declares that a reactor is unsafe, we believe him, because clearly it is not to his advantage to lie about it. If he tells us it is safe, on the other hand, we distrust him, because he may well be protecting the employer who pays his salary.
1. What is the chief concern of most governments when it comes to scientific research?A.The decline of public expenditure. | B.Quick economic returns. |
C.The budget for a research project. | D.Support from the voters. |
A.They realize they work in an environment hostile to the free pursuit of knowledge. |
B.They know it takes incredible patience to win support from the public. |
C.They think compliance with government policy is in the interests of the public. |
D.They are accustomed to keeping their opinions secrets to themselves. |
A.some of them do not give priority to intellectual honesty |
B.sometimes they hide the source of their research funding |
C.they could be influenced by their association with the project concerned |
D.their pronouncements often turn out to be short-sighted and absurd |
A.Scientists themselves may doubt the value of their research findings. |
B.It may wear out the enthusiasm of scientists for independent research. |
C.It makes things more trivial for scientists to seek research funds. |
D.People will not believe scientists even when they tell the truth. |
5 . Women are still underrepresented in top academic positions. One of the possible explanations for this is the increasing importance of obtaining research funding. Women are often less successful in this than men. Psychology researchers Dr. Romy van der Lee and professor Naomi Ellemers investigated whether this difference also occurs at the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) and examined potential explanations.
The researchers were assigned by NWO to carry out this study as part of the broader evaluation of NWO’s procedures and its gender diversity policy. The aim was to gain more insight into the causes of the differences in awarding rates for male and female applicants for research funding. The analysis addressed an important “talent programme” of NWO, the Veni grant. “Whoever receives this grant has a greater chance of obtaining an important appointment at a university, ” says Naomi Ellemers.
Van der Lee and Ellemers investigated all the applications submitted by male and female researchers over a period of three years: a total of 2823 applications. Under the direction of NWO these applications were assessed by scientific committees consisting of men and women. The results demonstrate that the awarding rates for female applicants (14.9%) are systematically lower than those for male applicants (17.7%). “If we compare the proportion of women among the applicants with the proportion of women among those awarded funding, we see a loss of 4%,” said Ellemers.
The study reveals that women are less positively evaluated for their qualities as researcher than men are, “Interestingly the research proposals of women and men are evaluated equally positively. In other words, the reviewers see no difference in the quality of the proposals that men and women submit,” says Romy van der Lee.
In search for a possible cause for the differences in awarding rates and evaluations, the researchers also investigated the language use in the instructions and forms used to assess the quality of applications. This clearly revealed the occurrence of gendered language. The words that are used to indicate quality are frequently words that were established in previous research as referring mainly to the male gender stereotype (such as challenging and excellent). Romy van der Lee explains: “As a result, it appears that men more easily satisfy the assessment criteria, because these better fit the characteristics stereoty-pically associated with men.”
In response to the results of this research, NWO will devote more attention to the gender awareness of reviewers in its methods and procedures. It will also be investigated which changes to the assessment procedures and criteria can most strongly contribute to more equal chances for men and women to obtain research funding. This will include an examination of the language used by NWO. NWO chair Jos Engelens said, “The research has yielded valuable results and insights. Based on the recommendations made by the researchers we will therefore focus in the coming period on the development of evidence-based measures to reduce the difference in awarding rates.”
1. Van der Lee and Ellemers carried out the research to find out whether _________.A.women are less successful than men in top academic positions |
B.female applicants are at a disadvantage in getting research funding |
C.NOW’s procedures and gender diversity policy enhance fair play |
D.there are equal chances for men and women to be admitted to a university |
A.grant receivers were more likely to get appointments at universities |
B.men applicants for research funding outnumbered women applicants |
C.the research proposals of women are equally treated with those of men |
D.the reviewers have narrow, prejudiced conceptions of women candidates |
A.The words used in the instructions and forms. |
B.The reviewers’ preference to applications. |
C.The methods and procedures for evaluation. |
D.The vague and unclear assessment criteria. |
A.Eliminate possibilities for difference in awarding rates. |
B.Design a language examination for all the reviewers. |
C.Emphasize the importance of gender awareness. |
D.Improve the assessment procedures and criteria. |
6 . Deep in the British Library lie the priceless treasures for pop music lovers. Housed across the main building in St Pancras and the Library’s Boston Spa site are more than 350,000 CDs and 250,000LPs (密文唱片) ,as well as around a quarter of a million 78 RPM discs and countless cassette tapes.
Andy Linehan, the Library’s Curator (馆长) of Popular Music Collections, feels he and his team are not only preserving pop, but they’re also honoring history.“One of the British’s Library’s functions is to be the cultural memory of the nation. We do that with books, journals and newspapers and it’s absolutely right that we should also do it with music,“ he said.
The treasures in the British Library rely on donations from record labels, artists and members of the public. As Andy noted,“If you publish a book, newspaper or magazine in the UK, you’re legally obliged to send a copy to the British Library, but that law does not apply to sound recordings.”
Among the treasures are an early voice recording of Florence Nightingale and a cassette tape that was sold at gigs (现场演唱会) in the early1980s by a sixth-form band called On A Friday. There are also old blues, rare LPs from the 1950s and promotional copies of Beatles singles that only had a couple of hundred pressings.
When it comes to preservation, the team is tirelessly transferring music from media that’s vulnerable and digitising (数字化) it for generations to come.“If anyone can save anything from an old tape which is not in very good condition, it’s our engineers. Because they have equipment and know how to play back everything,“ Andy explained.
Private companies and specialists record labels are also trying their best to ensure music is safeguarded for generations to come. Iron Mountain Entertainment Service offers digital transfer and preservation services for music as well as other media. Cherry Red Records Chairman, Iain McNay, said,“It’s about looking after all that material and letting it see the light of day. We’re music fans who are also protectors.”
1. What can we learn about the treasures from paragraph 1?A.The number is incredibly large. |
B.They are all donations from people. |
C.They represent different times. |
D.They are not open to the public yet. |
A.It is technically demanding. |
B.It is significant in the long term. |
C.It is commercially beneficial. |
D.It can boost music composition. |
A.To emphasize the popularity of the band. |
B.To reflect the varieties of the collections. |
C.To indicate the great value of the treasures. |
D.To convey the urgency of music protection. |
A.It can arouse people’s interest in pop music. |
B.It can encourage more people to contribute. |
C.It will develop the music industry in Britain. |
D.It will be the cultural memory of generations. |
Water shortage is one of the
This is not just
8 . Adolescence is a crucial period when the subject experiences a process of growth, the development of his own personality, and the discovery of himself.
They are often upset when their children praise the homes of their friends and regard it as a slur on their own cooking, or cleaning, or furniture, and often are foolish enough to let the adolescents see they are annoyed.
Disillusionment(幻灭感) with the parents, however good and adequate they may be both as parents and as individuals, is to some degree inevitable. Most children have such a high ideal of their parents, unless the parents themselves have been unsatisfactory,
Victorian parents believed that they kept their dignity by retreating behind an unreasoning authoritarian(专制的) attitude; in fact they did nothing of the kind, but children were then too cowed to let them know how they really felt while
A.in contemporary societies we tend to go to the other extreme. |
B.They may even accuse them of disloyalty or make some spiteful remarks. |
C.which almost eliminated the disillusionment via sincere talks. |
D.But how do parents feel about their kids’ independence shown out? |
E.adolescents came to terms with their unreasoning demands. |
F.that it can hardly stand up to a realistic evaluation. |
G.the child was developing valuable powers of observation and judgment. |
It is widely acknowledged that wealthy people generate more pollution or carbon emissions(排放) than the less fortunate.
The richest 10 percent of humanity was responsible
Wealthy people are also more likely to invest in the stock market. By giving a company money,investors permit the company’s business practices,
Still, the blame for greenhouse gas emissions
Traffic deaths
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimated that 9,560 people died in motor vehicle
The auto-safety regulator said the numbers
A number of issues are causing
The regulator said the state with the biggest increase of deaths was Delaware,